Optimized 1,3-propanediol production from crude glycerol using mixed cultures in batch and continuous reactors

Potato waste as feedstock to produce biohydrogen and organic acids: A comparison of acid and alkaline pretreatments using response surface methodology

The effects of physicochemical pre-treatment were evaluated on hydrogen (H₂) production and organic acids from hydrolyzed potato peel. Central composite design (CCD) and response surface methodology (RSM) were used to evaluate the effects of different substrate concentrations on a wet basis (38.8-81.2 g.L^-1) and hydrolyser ratios (6M NaOH and 30% HCl: 1.6-4.4% v.v^-1; and H₂SO₄: 2.2-7.8% v.v^-1). The experiments were conducted in batch reactors at 37 °C, using a heat-treated microbial consortium. The maximum H₂ production potential (P), lag phase (λ), and maximum H₂ production rate (R_m) were evaluated for untreated and pre-treated potato peel waste. H₂ production was positively influenced under hydrolyzed substrate concentrations ≥75 g.L^-1 in the three CCDs performed. Only the increase in the H₂SO₄ proportions (≥5% v.v^-1) had a negative influence on H₂ production. Increasing the 30% HCl and 6M NaOH proportions did not significantly influence the cumulative H₂ production. The highest hydrogen production was obtained after alkaline pre-treatment by dark fermentation (P: 762.09 mL H₂.L^-1; λ: 14.56 h; R_m: 38.39 mL H₂.L^-1.h^-1). Based on the CCD and RSM, the highest H₂ production (1060.10 mL H₂.L^-1) was observed with 81.2 g.L^-1 hydrolyzed potato peel with 3.0% v.v^-1 of 6M NaOH. The highest yield liquid metabolites were acetic (513.70 mg. g^-1 COD) and butyric acids (491.90 mg. g^-1 COD).

One waste and two products: choosing the best operational temperature and hydraulic retention time to recover hydrogen or 1,3-propanediol from glycerol fermentation

This study aimed to compare the production of hydrogen and 1,3-propanediol from crude glycerol (10 g/L) in mesophilic (30 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, namely AFBR_30 °C and AFBR_55 °C, respectively, at hydraulic retention times (HRT) reduced from 8 to 1 h. In AFBR_30 °C, the absence or low hydrogen yields can be attributed to the production of 1,3-propanediol (maximum of 651 mmol/mol glycerol), and the formation of caproic acid (maximum of 1097 mg/L) at HRTs between 8 and 2 h. In AFBR_55 °C, the hydrogen yield of 1.20 mol H₂/mol glycerol consumed was observed at the HRT of 1 h. The maximum yield of 1,3-propanediol in AFBR_55 °C was equal to 804 mmol/mol glycerol at the HRT of 6 h and was concomitant with the production of hydrogen (0.87 mol H₂/mol glycerol consumed) and butyric acid (1447 mg/L).

Anaerobic Biodegradation of Biodiesel Industry Wastewater in Mesophilic and Thermophilic Fluidized Bed Reactors: Enhancing Treatment and Methane Recovery

In the past few years, the extraction of value-added compounds from the anaerobic digestion of glycerol has been an option to add value to this waste because biodiesel production is increasing worldwide. The evolution of research on glycerol valorization by anaerobic digestion has reached the use of high-rate reactors. However, no study has evaluated glycerol digestion in an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor (AFBR), a configuration with potential advantages in methane production. Still, the best operating temperature for high-rate glycerol digestion remains unclear. To clarify these gaps, the present study aimed to compare glycerol digestion in mesophilic AFBR (30 °C) and thermophilic AFBR (55 °C). In both reactors, glycerol concentration was increased from 1.0 to 7.0 g L^-1 at a fixed hydraulic retention time of 24 h, resulting in an increase at the organic loading rate from 1.2 to 7.6 kg COD m^-3 day^-1. Thermophilic digestion of glycerol achieved superior removals of organic matter (67.7-94.2%) and methane yield (330.8 mL CH₄ g^-1 COD) than the mesophilic digestion (48.6-93.0% and 266.6 mL CH₄ g^-1 COD). Additionally, the application of the kinetic model of substrate utilization (modified Stover-Kincannon model) indicated a higher substrate utilization coefficient in the thermophilic AFBR (23.09 g L^-1 day^-1) than the mesophilic AFBR (7.14 g L^-1 day^-1). Therefore, the application of glycerol concentrations higher than 7.0 g L^-1 in thermophilic AFBR should be further investigated. Also, given only operational results, the application of the AFBR in the two-stage anaerobic digestion of glycerol is recommended.