The Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire Correlates with Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Examination for Detecting Swallowing Deficits in MS

Assessment of dysphagia and its associations in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

In this cross-sectional study in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, we assessed complaint of dysphagia and evaluated their association with sex, age, disease duration, disability severity, and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The validated Persian version of Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis (DYMUS) questionnaire was used. A total of 66 patients were included. The median DYMUS score was 1.0 [interquartile range: 0.0-2.3] and 40 (60.6%) had positive DYMUS. Only DMT showed a significant association with DYMUS score, with patients receiving reituximab exhibiting higher scores (mean estimated difference: 0.96 (±0.39), p = 0.014). Grouping patients into positive and negative DYMUS scores, no significant associations were observed (p > 0.05).

Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: pathophysiology, assessment, and management-an overview

Dysphagia is a frequent and life-threatening complication of multiple sclerosis (MS). Swallowing disturbances may be present at all stages of MS, although their prevalence increases with age, with disease duration, and in progressive phenotypes. The pathophysiology of dysphagia in MS is likely due to a combination of factors, including the involvement of corticobulbar tracts, the cerebellum, and the brainstem. Accurate diagnosis and early management of swallowing disorders improve quality of life and may delay complications or invasive therapeutic interventions. Here we provide an overview of the pathophysiology, the assessment, and the management of MS dysphagia, also examining the possible role of novel therapeutic strategies. Although studies using imaging and neurophysiological techniques have contributed to better characterize swallowing alterations in MS, the treatment of dysphagia is still challenging. Rehabilitation represents the main therapeutic approach for swallowing disorders. Recently, some innovative neurophysiological approaches, such as pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have been proposed as a supplement to swallowing therapy in different neurological conditions. However, only few studies have explored the role of neuromodulation for MS dysphagia.

Screening for dysphagia in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

In multiple sclerosis (MS), dysphagia is an important and common clinical symptom. Although often overlooked and underdiagnosed, it can have a significant impact on a patient's life, including social integration, and it can lead to malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, and suffocation, i.e., life-threatening complications. Early detection of dysphagia is essential to prevent these risks. However, the optimal screening method and the inter-relationship between different methods used for dysphagia screening are not clear. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a simple question about swallowing problems, the DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis (DYMUS) swallowing questionnaire, and the Timed Water Swallowing Test (TWST) to detect dysphagia in people with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

METHODS

Patients with MS were asked about subjective swallowing difficulties and, regardless of their response, completed the DYMUS questionnaire and underwent the TWST at their routine follow-up visit. Patients with at least one positive screening method were offered an objective assessment of swallowing function using the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). The results were statistically analyzed and correlated with demographic and MS-related parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 304 people with RRMS enrolled in the study, 46 (15.1 %) reported having subjective difficulty swallowing when asked a simple question. The DYMUS questionnaire was positive in 59 (19.4 %) of the 304 patients; 51 (16.8 %) had an abnormality on the TWST. A clear correlation (r = 0.351, p < 0.01) was found between the DYMUS and TWST results, but a significant proportion of patients (about half) had an abnormality on only one of these tests. The positivity of at least one of the screening methods used (DYMUS or TWST) had a better chance of identifying a patient with dysphagia than a simple question (p < 0.001). Of the patients with a positive result for difficulty swallowing, 37 underwent FEES, which confirmed dysphagia in 94.6% of this subgroup. Patients with higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, female gender, and older age were at higher risk of developing dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

The DYMUS questionnaire and TWST had a confirmed potential to identify more patients with dysphagia than a simple question about swallowing problems. However, our study found only a partial overlap between DYMUS and TWST; a combination of these two methods was more sensitive in identifying patients with MS at risk of dysphagia. Furthermore, the screening showed excellent specificity: almost 95 % of the positively screened patients had dysphagia confirmed by objective methods. Age, female gender, and a higher EDSS score appear to be potential risk factors for dysphagia in patients with MS.

Validation of the swallowing disturbance questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The DYSPHAGIA IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (DYMUS) questionnaire is the only specific tool developed to screen for dysphagia in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). However, some limitations of DYMUS could potentially be addressed by the SWALLOWING DISTURBANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (SDQ), which has not yet been validated in pwMS. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the SDQ into the Italian language for use in pwMS to detect swallowing disturbances.

METHODS

We translated the SDQ into Italian and adapted it for use in Italian pwMS. PwMS aged > 18 years, assessed for disability using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), completed the SDQ and DYMUS questionnaires and performed the 3-OUNCE WATER SWALLOW TEST (WST). Clinical and demographic data were collected for each patient. The Italian version of the SDQ was retested after 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 84 pwMS were recruited for the study, consisting of 73.8 % women and 48.8 % with a relapsing-remitting form of MS. The mean age of participants was 44.5 years (SD: ±12.46), with a mean disease duration of 17 years (SD: ±10.27), and a median EDSS of 4 (range 1.5-7.5). The Cronbach's alpha for SDQ (to assess internal consistency) was 0.902, which increased to 0.908 after the elimination of item 15, resulting in the SDQ composed of 14 items. ROC analysis demonstrated good accuracy of the 14-item SDQ in pwMS (AUC: 0.811). By dividing the 14-item SDQ score into quartiles, three risk levels for dysphagia were identified: low (score 1-3), intermediate (score 4-8), and high (score ≥9). 14-item SDQ scores significantly correlated with DYMUS (r = 0.820; p<0.0001) and with EDSS (r = 0.541; p<0.0001). PwMS who reported dysphagia had a significantly higher mean 14-item SDQ score (8.27 ± SD 8.15) compared to those without swallowing problems (2.77 ± SD 4.25; p = 0.003). Additionally, pwMS with a positive WST had a significantly higher mean 14-item SDQ score (10.17 ± SD 8.96) than those with a negative WST (2.96 ± SD 3.93; p = 0.02). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for the retest, calculated on 48 pwMS in a stable phase of the disease, was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.84-0.95).

CONCLUSION

The 14-item SDQ has demonstrated high internal consistency, good accuracy, and reliability in pwMS, making it a readily applicable tool for investigating dysphagia in MS.

DYMUS-Hr self-assessment questionnaire (Croatian version) for dysphagia in multiple sclerosis-validity, reliability, and cross-cultural adaptation

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of dysphagia in the early phases of multiple sclerosis is 30-40%, with an estimated of 30% of cases going undiagnosed cases. Such complications can lead to malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia and have a great impact on the quality of life and psychosocial status of a person with MS. The aim of this study was the validation of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis self-assessment questionnaire (DYMUS) in the Croatian language.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

The cross-cultural adaptation process included a back-forward translation technique of the English language version of DYMUS to the Croatian language, with pilot testing on 30 participants. The validity and reliability of the Croatian version of DYMUS (DYMUS-Hr) was applied to 106 MS patients, with comparison to the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT10), the Water Swallowing Test (WST), and a dichotomous self-assessment question. In the assessment of test-retest reliability, 99 MS patients were included.

RESULTS

Internal consistency of DYMUS-Hr was very good (Cronbach's alpha-0.837); Cronbach's alpha was 0.819 for the "dysphagia for solids", and 0.562 for "dysphagia for liquids" subscale. A significant correlation (p < 0.001) was found between DYMUS-Hr and EAT10 (Spearman's rho-0.787), and WST (Spearman's rho-0.483). Construct validity was assessed with the self-assessment question and interpreted with the Mann-Whitney U test. Test-retest reliability showed moderate to substantial Cohen's Kappa reliability for each item.

CONCLUSION

DYMUS-Hr is a valid and reliable screening assessment tool for patients with MS. There is a general lack of awareness about dysphagia symptoms among patients with MS; consequently, this disorder receives inadequate attention and often goes untreated.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Conjunction with Conventional Swallowing Therapy in the Treatment of Dysphagia Caused by Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Case Experimental Design

INTRODUCTION

Dysphagia as a consequence of multiple sclerosis (MS) puts individuals at higher risk of dehydration, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia. This study intended to investigate the effects of a combined program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy to improve swallow safety and efficiency, oral intake, and physical, emotional, and functional impacts of dysphagia in people with dysphagia and MS.

METHODS

In this single-case experimental study with ABA design, two participants with dysphagia caused by MS underwent 12 sessions therapy during 6 weeks following a baseline of 4 evaluation sessions. They were evaluated 4 more times in the follow-up phase after therapy sessions. Scores of Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis (DYMUS), and timed test of swallowing capacity were obtained at baseline, during treatment, and in the follow-up phases. The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) based on videofluoroscopic swallow studies, Persian-Dysphagia Handicap Index (Persian-DHI), and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were also completed before and after treatment. Visual analysis and percentage of nonoverlapping data were calculated.

RESULTS

MASA, DYMUS, FOIS, and DHI scores indicated significant improvement in both participants. Although the scores of the timed test of swallowing capacity in participant 1 (B.N.) and DOSS in participant 2 (M.A.) showed no changes, considerable improvements including reducing the amount of residue and the number of swallows required to clear bolus were seen in the posttreatment videofluoroscopic records of both participants.

CONCLUSION

NMES in conjunction with conventional dysphagia therapy based on motor learning principles could improve the swallowing function and decrease disabling effects of dysphagia on different aspects of life in participants with dysphagia caused by MS.

Validation of the Spanish version of DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis questionnaire (DYMUS)

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis that can occur even early in the disease course and can lead to serious complications. Early recognition and treatment can promote comfort, safety and optimal nutritional status. Few dysphagia rating scales are available in Spanish. The aim of this study was to translate the Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (DYMUS) into Spanish and to validate it.

METHODS

Forward and backward translation method was used to translate the original English version of DYMUS into Spanish. A pilot-study with 10 PwMS was carried on in order to improve the intelligibility of the instrument, comprehensibility and content validity of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was filled out by 100 PwMS who were asked a dichotomous question on their swallowing ("Do you have swallowing troubles?"). Descriptive data are presented as median and quartiles for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical ones. Internal consistency reliability was estimated by Cronbach's alfa. Test-retest reliability was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity with a speech and language therapy assessment (SLT-A) was measured with the weighted kappa statistic for the concordance for both dysphagia type and degree categories. Confirmatory factor analysis by means of structural equation models was used to verify the two-factor (solids and liquids) structure of the DYMUS questionnaire. As the goodness of fit evaluation was poor, an additional exploratory factor analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was high. The globus sensation question and the weight loss questions (item 3 and 10) are the least specific with dysphagia symptomatology so they are worst correlated with the sum of the others (item-rest correlation, 0.243 and 0.248, respectively). The test-retest reliability of the DYMUS among 40 patients using ICC was 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 - 0.86). Concurrent validity with SLT-A was poor (weighted kappa 0.37 for dysphagia type and 0.38 for dysphagia degree). The DYMUS questionnaire detected three times more dysphagia (53% versus 17%) than the dichotomous question. Confirmatory factors analysis failed to confirm the bidimensional structure (solid and liquid items) often reported in other validation studies. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis also identified two factors, but with poor interpretability.

CONCLUSION

DYMUS-SP scale is not a sufficiently useful scale to detect dysphagia in PwMS due to the poor concurrent validity and the probable overdiagnosis of the condition; however, it can be helpful as a screening tool when combined with other measures.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Dysphagia in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Dysphagia is one of the most common symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. It can reduce the quality of life and increase the risk of mortality by developing complications such as aspiration pneumonia. The present study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of dysphagia in MS patients and investigate the associations between dysphagia and disease characteristics. The Persian version of the DYMUS questionnaire was used to assess dysphagia in 865 patients with MS, including 738 (85.3%) relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 106 (12.3%) secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and 21 (2.4%) primary progressive MS (PPMS). Also, demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, smoking status, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, disease duration, disease-modifying therapies exposure, initial symptoms of MS, were recorded. The mean (SD) age was 37.95(9.25) years, and 83.1% of the participants were female. The prevalence of dysphagia was estimated to be 25.4% among all patients. According to the DYMUS questionnaire results, the prevalence of dysphagia in RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS patients was 22.2%, 44.3%, and 42.9%, respectively. After multivariate analysis the current EDSS score (OR = 1.197, CI: 1.062, 1.350, p = 0.003), cerebellar impairment (OR = 1.335, CI: 1.450, 4.716, p = 0.004) and motor dysfunction (OR = 1.651, CI: 1.004, 2.715, p = 0.048) emerged as the risk factors for dysphagia. Since dysphagia, as previously mentioned, is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis, particularly in SPMS and PPMS courses, active screening for this condition is recommended in all patients, particularly those with identified risk factors.