Learning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty

Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) technique compared with the traditional three-port total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique for inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

This prospective, randomised study involved patients who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia at our hospital from December 2021 to July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to SIL-TEP or TEP groups based on a computer-generated random number table. Perioperative clinical indicators for the surgical approaches were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients eligible for study, 66 were randomised to the SIL-TEP group and 61 to the TEP group. The operation time for SIL-TEP was significantly longer than for TEP but the time to return to normal activities was significantly shorter and short-term pain score was significantly lower. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, pain relief time, hospitalization costs or cosmetic satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSION

While SIL-TEP is more challenging than TEP for hernia repair, we found that at our centre it is comparable with regard to overall safety and feasibility. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

Evaluating a Single Surgeon's Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia with Telescopic Dissection: A Cumulative Sum Control Chart Analysis

Background: Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR) reduces risk of injury to intraperitoneal structures. Balloon dissection is more costly and has theoretical risk of injury to the surrounding structures compared with telescopic dissection (TD). This study aims to evaluate the learning curve (LC) for TEP IHR with TD of a single surgeon. Methods: This is a 3-year retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to December 2022 on patients who underwent elective laparoscopic TEP unilateral IHR with TD. Exclusion criteria were recurrent inguinal hernia. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to evaluate the number of cases required to surmount the LC, that is, NLC for operating time (OT) and open conversion. One way analysis of variance was used to perform groupwise comparison. Results: There were 69 patients who underwent laparoscopic TEP unilateral IHR with TD. The median age was 58.0 years (range 24.0-80.0) and body mass index was 23.0 (range 18.6-30.0). Majority of the hernia was indirect (n = 48, 69.6%). The median OT was 70 minutes (range 35-210). Three cases (4.3%) had open conversion. One-year recurrence was 4.2% (n = 1/24). CUSUM analysis showed improvement in OT after the eighth case. However, this was followed by multiple inflection points with no apparent stabilization in OT. Pairwise comparison showed a decrease in OT between cases 18-36 and cases 37-54. There was no incidence of open conversion until the 56th case. Conclusion: Laparoscopic TEP IHR using TD is safe in the absence of a practor. A minimum of 36 cases is required to surmount the initial LC.

Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Totally Extraperitoneal and Lichtenstein Repair of Inguinal Hernia: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background: Surgical repair of inguinal hernia is among the most commonly performed surgical interventions in general surgery clinics, with minimal postoperative complications, less pain, and maximum cosmetic results. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent Lichtenstein repair (LR), which is currently the most commonly used open surgical procedure to repair inguinal hernias, and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair with regard to postoperative cosmesis, patient satisfaction, pain, and inflammatory response. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of male patients 18-65 years of age, who were operated for inguinal hernia with two different methods between February 2022 and January 2023 in the general surgery clinic of Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were observed to evaluate the inflammatory response in all patients. Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Rating Score systems were used to monitor the response to pain in the postoperative period. In addition, both groups were evaluated for patient satisfaction in cosmetic terms using the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Results: Postoperative pain sensation in the TEP group was found to be significantly lower compared to the LR group. In terms of inflammatory response, IL-6 and CRP levels were found to be significantly higher in the LR group on postoperative day 1 and 2. Satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the surgical scar was significantly higher in the TEP group. Conclusion: TEP, which is a laparoscopic hernia repair method, is a safe surgical technique that can be preferred, especially in patients with less postoperative pain and higher cosmetic expectations. In terms of inflammatory response, significant difference is also in favor of TEP repair.

Using the concept of preperitoneal membrane anatomy in total extraperitoneal prosthesis: a preliminary report

Purpose

Total extraperitoneal prosthesis (TEP) is one of the most commonly used laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair procedures. This work aims to report the application of membrane anatomy to TEP and its value in intraoperative space expansion.

Methods

The clinical data of 105 patients, from January 2018 to May 2020, with inguinal hernia who were treated with TEP (58 patients in the General Department of the Second Hospital of Sanming City, Fujian Province, and 47 patients in the General Department of the Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

All surgeries were successfully completed under the guidance of the concept of preperitoneal membrane anatomy. The operation time was 27.5 ± 9.0 min, blood loss was 5.2 ± 0.8 ml, and the peritoneum was damaged in six cases. The postoperative hospital stay was 1.5 ± 0.6 days, and five cases of postoperative seroma occurred, all self-absorbed. During the follow-up period of 7-59 months, there was no case of chronic pain and recurrence.

Conclusion

The membrane anatomy at the correct level is the premise of a bloodless operation to expand the space while protecting adjacent tissues and organs to avoid complications.

A novel laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair technique: single-port lateral non-abdominal pre-peritoneal approach

PURPOSE

Open and endoscopic techniques have been described for the treatment of inguinal hernia, but the gold standard treatment method is yet to be defined. Recurrence rates after inguinal hernia surgery vary between 10 and 15%, and chronic pain is seen in 10-12% of patients. This study aimed to introduce a new surgical technique called lateral non-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair for inguinal hernia surgery.

METHODS

We recorded the data of patients' age, gender, body mass index (BMI), prior hernia surgery, hernia side, type of hernia, postoperative complications, pain scores according to the numeric pain scale, and analgesic consumption. We performed a nearly 2 cm incision from approximately 2 cm medial and superior of the anterior superior iliac spine, then separated the peritoneum from the transverse abdominal muscle by blunt dissection, and perform the surgery by a single-port device.

RESULTS

Seventeen inguinal hernias were repaired with the new technique in 14 patients. Two of the patients were female. The median age was 59, and the mean BMI was 26.8 kg/m². The median hospital stays and time passed since the surgery was 1 day and 72 days, respectively. The mean operative time was 64 ± 29 min. The median tramadol consumption was 100 mg, and the mean paracetamol consumption was 1143 mg. The median pain score on POD 1 and current pain score was 4 and 0, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant complications occurred intraoperatively. We observed the pain scores were acceptable on POD 1, and excellent in postoperative follow-up. Low pain scores, low analgesic consumption, and the absence of recurrence in a newly developed procedure within the learning curve indicate that satisfactory results can be obtained.

Preoperative Subcutaneous Fat is an Useful Indicator for Learning Totally Extraperitoneal Repair

BACKGROUND

Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair is a recommended procedure for inguinal hernia repair in European hernia guidelines. However, technical challenges have limited its uptake in Japan, where transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair is more common. We evaluated the association of preoperative subcutaneous fat area (preSFA) with surgical outcomes and identified factors associated with the difficulty of TEP repair.

METHODS

Clinical data from 62 patients undergoing TEP repair were collected retrospectively. Using the median for the preoperative subcutaneous fat index (preSFI; 45.9 cm²/m²), we classified patients as having a high SFI (HSFI) (n=31) and low SFI (LSFI) (n=31). Surgical outcomes and perioperative complications were then compared between these groups. Additionally, TEP repair was divided into five phases (e.g., Phase 1: dissection of the caudal side of the preperitoneal space), and operative time was measured during each phase. Phase 1 was divided into two sub-phases (1A: insertion of the first port, 1B: reaching Cooper's ligament).

RESULTS

Operative time was longer (133 min vs 111 min, P = 0.028) and the peritoneal injury rate was higher (35.5% vs 9.7%, P = 0.015) for the HSFI patients. Furthermore, operative time for HSFI patients was significantly longer during Phase 1 (P = 0.014) and Phase 1A (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

preSFA was associated with a higher peritoneal injury rate and longer operative time in HSFI patients, suggesting that the presence of abundant subcutaneous fat increases the difficulty of TEP repair.

Differences in in-hospital outcomes and healthcare utilization for laparoscopic versus open approach for emergency inguinal hernia repair: a nationwide analysis

PURPOSE

There has been a growing debate of whether laparoscopic or open surgical techniques are superior for inguinal hernia repair. For incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias, the laparoscopic approach remains controversial. This study aims to be the first nationwide analysis to compare clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in an emergency setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample was performed. All patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) between October 2015 and December 2019 were included. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes include post-operative complications, ICU admission, length of stay (LOS), and total admission cost. Two approaches were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression.

RESULTS

Between the years 2015 and 2019, 17,205 patients were included. Among these, 213 patients underwent LIHR and 16,992 underwent OIHR. No difference was observed between laparoscopic and open repair for mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% CI [0.25, 2.61], p = 0.714). Additionally, there was no significant difference between groups for post-operative ICU admission (OR 1.11, 95% CI [0.74, 1.67], p = 0.614), post-operative complications (OR 1.09, 95% CI [0.76, 1.56], p = 0.647), LOS (mean difference [MD]: -0.02 days, 95% CI [- 0.56, 0.52], p = 0.934), or total admission cost (MD: $3,028.29, 95% CI [$- 110.94, $6167.53], p = 0.059).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is comparable to the open inguinal hernia repair with respect to low rates of morbidity, mortality as well as healthcare resource utilization.

Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a long learning curve. It can be a technically challenging procedure and initially presents an unfamiliar view of inguinal anatomy. The aim of this review was to evaluate published literature relating to the learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and identify the number of cases required for proficiency. The secondary aim was to compare outcomes between surgeons before and after this learning curve threshold had been attained.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies that evaluated the learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A meta-regression analysis was undertaken to identify the number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency, and a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between cases that were undertaken during a surgeon's learning phase and experienced phase of the curve.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included in this review, with 19 studies included in the meta-regression analysis, and 11 studies included in the meta-analysis. Mixed-effects Poisson regression demonstrated that there was a non-linear trend in the number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency, with a 2.7% year-on-year decrease. The predicted number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency in 2020 was 32.5 (p < 0.01). The meta-analysis determined that surgeons in their learning phase may experience a higher rate of conversions to open (OR 4.43, 95% CI 1.65, 11.88), postoperative complications (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07, 2.42), and recurrences (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.40, 4.30).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a well-defined learning curve. While learning surgeons demonstrated reasonable outcomes, supervision during this period may be appropriate given the increased risk of conversion to open surgery. These data may benefit learning surgeons in the skill development of minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs.

İnguinal Hernilerde Balonsuz ve Mesh Sabitleyicisiz Laparoskopik Total Ekstraperitoneal Onarımın Cerrahi Deneyim ile Korelasyonu

Giriş: Günümüzde laparoskopik herni onarımları altın standart olma yolunda ilerlemektedir. Fakat laparoskopik total ektraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal herni onarımlarında disseksiyon balonun ve mesh sabitleyicinin getirdiği maliyet bu ameliyatların yapılmasında engel teşkil etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı cerrahi deneyimle birlikte maliyetli malzemeler kullanmadan standart laparaskopik aletlerle bu ameliyatların yapılabilirliğini irdelemektir. Yöntemler: Mart 2019-Nisan 2021 tarihleri arasında disseksiyon balonu ve mesh sabitleyici kullanılmadan laparoskopik TEP inguinal herni onarımı yapılan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Yaş,cinsiyet, intraoperatif ve postoperatif görülen komplikasyonlar, ameliyat süresi, hospitalizasyon süresi, günlük aktiviteye dönüş süresi, nüks parametreleri değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışma 86’sı sağ,76’sı sol, 44’ü çift taraflı olmak üzere 220 fıtık hastasına uygulanan TEP onarımı sonuçları üzerinden yapılmıştır. Ortalama yaş 52.55±18.02 yıldır. 186’sı erkek, 34’ü kadındır. Günlük aktiviteye dönüş sürelerinin ortalaması 3.98±1.68 gün, ameliyat süresinin ortalaması 39.55±11.32 dakikadır. Hastanede kalış süresinin ortalaması 0.78±0.16 gündür. Olguların 23 ünde intraoperatif komplikasyon, %5’inde seroma görülmüştür. 6. ay kontrolünde 3 hastada nüks görülmüştür. Tartışma: Disseksiyon balonu ve mesh sabitleyici kullanılmadan yapılan laparoskopik TEP inguinal herni onarımı; literatürdeki diğer laporoskopik onarımlar ile kıyaslandığında komplikasyon oranlarının hastanede yatış ve günlük aktiviteye dönüş sürelerin benzer olması ve daha az maliyetli bir yöntem olmasından dolayı yaygın bir şekilde kullanılması önerilir.

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein tension-free open mesh inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgery. The ideal procedure for inguinal hernia repair remains controversial. Open Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair (LMR) is one of the most preferred open techniques with satisfactory outcomes. Laparoscopic approach in inguinal hernia surgery remains controversial, especially in comparison with open procedures. In this study, we have reported a comparison of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with LMR. Postoperative pain, operative time, complications like seroma, wound infection, chronic groin pain, and recurrence rate were parameters to evaluate the outcome. One hundred seventy-four patients were included in the study by consecutive randomized prospective sampling. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair, and group B, LMR. The procedures were performed by experienced surgeons. The primary outcomes were evaluated based on postoperative pain and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes considered for evaluation were operative time, complications like seroma, infection, and chronic groin pain. Severe pain was reported in group A (7.9%) compared to group B (15.1%), which was statistically significant (P < .001). Moderate pain was reported more in group B (70.9%) compared to group A (29.5%) (P < .001). The mean operative time in group A was 84.6 ± 32.2, which was significantly higher than that in group B, 59.2 ± 14.8. There was no major complication in both groups. The chronic pain postoperatively was significantly in higher number of patients in group B vs group A (22.09% vs 3.4%). The postoperative hospital stay period was significantly lesser for group A vs for group B (2.68 ± 1.52 vs 3.86 ± 6.16). Time duration taken to resume normal activities was significantly lower in group A (13.6 ± 6.8) vs (19.8 ± 4.6) in group B (P < .001). Although there is definite evidence of longer operative time and learning curve, laparoscopic TEP has added advantages like less postoperative pain, early resumption of normal activities, less chronic groin pain, and comparable recurrence rate compared to open Lichtenstein repair. Laparoscopic TEP can be performed with acceptable outcomes and less postoperative complications if performed by experienced hands.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in adults: A retrospective cohort study using a medical claims database

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate and compare the surgical complications following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) with those following open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study based on nationwide claims data. We extracted the data of patients aged ≥20 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair (IHR) between 2009 and 2020. The primary outcome was postoperative complications of IHR, and the secondary outcomes were recurrence of hernia and length of hospital stay. Patient characteristics were adjusted with propensity score (PS) matching, the annual proportions of LIHR versus OIHR were summarized, and the surgical outcomes of each IHR were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 15 728 eligible patients, 6512 underwent LIHR. The proportion of LIHR increased from 14.7% to 52.8% annually during the study period. From the analysis of 6060 pairs created by PS matching, the risk of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.86; P = .0007), and acute postoperative pain (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.79; P < .0001), and chronic postoperative pain (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98; P = .0291) were significantly lower with LIHR than with OIHR. The recurrent rate was not significantly different between the LIHR and OIHR groups (OR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.45-1.01; P = .0558). Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the length of hospital stay between the LIHR and OIHR groups (2.91 ± 1.94 days vs 2.97 ± 2.61 days, difference ± SE: 0.06 ± 0.04, P = .1307).

CONCLUSION

LIHR might be superior to OIHR in terms of fewer surgical complications and might be preferred over OIHR in the future.

Learning curve of single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (SILTEP) for inguinal hernia

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) is a widely used treatment for inguinal hernia. Single-incision laparoscopic TEP (SILTEP) has attracted the attention of several surgeons, given its superior cosmetic results and patient satisfaction, as well as comparable outcomes to multiport surgery. Nonetheless, no relevant studies have evaluated the learning curve (LC) of SILTEP in terms of both operation time (OT) and surgical failure. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the LC of SILTEP for inguinal hernia.

METHODS

Medical records of 180 patients who underwent SILTEP performed by a single surgeon from a single institution between October 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The LC was analyzed using the moving average method and cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) for OT and surgical failure. Surgical failure was defined as the need for additional ports, open conversion, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa), and recurrence. Eight patients who underwent combined surgery or bilateral hernia repair were excluded from the OT analysis.

RESULTS

From CUSUM graphs, the study period was divided into three phases: OT-phases 1 (1st-32nd), 2 (33rd-83rd), and 3 (84th-172nd) for OT and failure-phases 1 (1st-29th), 2 (30th-58th), and 3 (59th-180th) for surgical failure. Mean OTs were statistically different in the three OT phases (64.6 vs. 50.8 vs. 35.2 min; p < 0.001). Open conversion (31.0% vs. 0% vs. 2.5%) and additional port insertion (6.9% vs. 24.1% vs. 2.5%) stabilized consecutively at failure-phases 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Surgical failure rates decreased to 5.7% by failure-phase 3 (37.9% vs. 24.1% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For an experienced laparoscopic surgeon, we estimated that approximately 60 cases are needed to overcome the LC for SILTEP in terms of both reducing OT and achieving a surgical failure rate < 10%. Further proficiency could be achieved after approximately 85 SILTEP procedures with a stable OT of approximately 35 min.

[Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of strangulated groin hernia]

OBJECTIVE

To study the possibility of totally extraperitoneal repair combined with diagnostic laparoscopy in the treatment of strangulated groin hernias (Laparoscopy-Assisted Totally Extraperitoneal Plasty, LATEP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the results of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. The trocar placement technique was modified. There were 38 patients with strangulated groin hernia. The sample included 26 patients with strangulated inguinal hernia, 9 ones with strangulated femoral hernia and 3 patients with recurrent strangulated inguinal hernia.

RESULTS

LATEP was attempted in 38 patients and successful in 37 (97.3%) cases. In 1 (2.6%) patient, correction of small bowel strangulation was failed and conversion to open surgery was required. In 29 patients (76.3%), correction of strangulation was performed after laparoscopy-assisted external manipulations and careful traction from abdominal cavity. In 8 (21%) cases, strangulation spontaneously regressed before laparoscopy. Laparoscopy confirmed viability of strangulated organs in 36 patients. One (2.6%) patient required bowel resection due to small intestine wall necrosis. Later, all patients underwent totally extraperitoneal repair. We were able to prevent the contact of hernia sac fluid with the implant in all cases. At the stage of preperitoneal repair, local damage to peritoneum occurred in 9 patients. Nevertheless, sealing was not required since hernia fluid was previously removed from abdominal cavity. There were no signs of implant infection and hernia recurrence within 6-14 months.

CONCLUSION

Totally extraperitoneal repair combined with diagnostic laparoscopy is possible for strangulated groin hernias.

Implementation and Validation of a Novel and Inexpensive Training Model for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a reproducible low-cost model useful for the development and acquisition of skills and competencies required for endoscopic hernia repairs. Methods: Ten general surgery residents (PGY3) were instructed to construct the model and perform the maneuvers necessary for the simulation of laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty by the trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) technique. They practiced for 4 weeks in the model, and the time required to perform simulated hernioplasty by the laparoscopic TAPP technique in the initial session was compared to the time required after 4 weeks of training. Results: The time required to perform the exercise was significantly lower than in the initial session (p < 0.01). The time required by residents to complete the exercise in the initial session was significantly longer than that used by expert surgeons in the same task (p < 0.01), and although a significant difference persisted, this difference was substantially reduced to 3.60 min after the residents completed 4-week training in the model (p < 0.01). An independent expert, blinded to the level of training of the person who performed the exercise, could recognize all residents as novices and all experienced surgeons as experts in the initial session of the exercise with the model, but after 4 weeks of training, they did not recognize 4 of the 10 residents as novices (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The routine implementation of training in this model could be very useful in the laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty teaching-learning process.

First experience of junior surgeon with laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: Comparison with experienced surgeon in single institution

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy is among the current leading inguinal hernia repair methods. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of a junior surgeon's first experience with laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed between January 2017 and December 2019 to analyze the medical records of patients with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy. The operative outcomes and complications of patients undergoing surgery by an experienced surgeon (group A, n = 100) were compared with those undergoing surgery by a junior surgeon (group B, n = 100).

RESULTS

The mean operative time for group B was significantly longer than that for group A (52.0 ± 15.1 min vs 60.1 ± 17.4 min; P = 0.03). A statistical difference was also found in the mean postoperative stay (1.1 ± 0.3 d vs 1.4 ± 0.7 d; P = 0.02) between the two groups. There were 2 and 3 cases of recurrence in these two groups respectively (P = 0.72). Considering the operating time as a variable of learning curve, significant stabilization can be achieved after 30 cases (67.3 ± 17.8 min vs 53.1 ± 11.1 min; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical outcomes of laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy performed by a well-trained junior surgeon were similar to the outcomes of an experience surgeon.

Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

To examine the updated evidence on safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and to explore the timely tendency variations favoring one treatment over another.

Methods

Systematic review and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were consulted. Risk Ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures.

Results

Fifteen RCTs were included (1359 patients). Of these, 702 (51.6%) underwent TAPP and 657 (48.4%) TEP repair. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 92 years and 87.9% were males. The estimated pooled RR for hernia recurrence (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.35–1.96) and chronic pain (RR = 1.51; 95% CI 0.54–4.22) were similar for TEP vs. TAPP. The TSA shows a cumulative z-curve without crossing the monitoring boundaries line (Z = 1.96), thus supporting true negative results while the information size was calculated as adequate for both outcomes. No significant differences were found in term of early postoperative pain, operative time, wound-related complications, hospital length of stay, return to work/daily activities, and costs.

Conclusions

TEP and TAPP repair seems comparable in terms of postoperative hernia recurrence and chronic pain. The cumulative evidence and information size are sufficient to provide a conclusive evidence on recurrence and chronic pain. Similar trials or meta-analyses seem unlikely to show diverse results and should be discouraged.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02407-7.

Treatment of Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review and Updated Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Despite the advent of innovative surgical platforms and operative techniques, a definitive indication of the best surgical option for the treatment of unilateral primary inguinal hernia remains unsettled. Purpose was to perform an updated and comprehensive evaluation within the major approaches to inguinal hernia.

METHODS

Systematic review and network meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) compare Lichtenstein tension-free repair, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair, and totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Risk Ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures while 95% Credible Intervals (CrI) were used to assess relative inference.

RESULTS

Thirty-five RCTs (7,777 patients) were included. Overall, 3,496 (44.9%) underwent Lichtenstein, 1,269 (16.3%) TAPP, and 3,012 (38.8%) TEP repair. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was significantly lower for minimally invasive repair at <12-hour, 24 hours, and 48 hours. Postoperative chronic pain [TAPP vs. Lichtenstein (RR = 0.36; 95% CrI 0.15-0.81) and TEP vs. Lichtenstein (RR = 0.36; 95% CrI 0.21-0.54)] and return to work/activities [TAPP vs. Lichtenstein (WMD = -3.3; 95% CrI -4.9; -1.8) and TEP vs. Lichtenstein (WMD = -3.6; 95% CrI -4.9; -2.4)] were significantly reduced for minimally invasive approaches. Wound hematoma and infection were significantly reduced for minimally invasive approaches while no differences were found for seroma, hernia recurrence, and hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive TAPP and TEP repair seem associated with significantly reduced early postoperative pain, return to work/activities, chronic pain, hematoma, and wound infection compared to the Lichtenstein tension-free repair. Hernia recurrence, seroma, and hospital length of stay seem similar across treatments.

The learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of three inexperienced surgeons

Introduction

Studies with inexperienced surgeons in terms of the learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair are limited.

Aim

To compare three inexperienced surgeons in terms of the learning curve without supervision.

Material and methods

Patients’ data, which were from consecutive laparoscopic TEP hernioplasties between December 2017 and February 2020, were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was to compare the learning curve of three surgeons (Surgeon A, B, and C) in terms of complications, conversion, and duration of surgery. Secondary outcomes were recurrence rates.

Results

A total of 299 patients were included in the study. Conversion and intraoperative complication rates decreased after the first 60 cases (from 10% to 2.5%, p = 0.013 and from 9% to 2.5%, p = 0.027, respectively). The mean operative time reached a plateau of less than 40 min after 51–81 cases (Surgeon A 51, B 71, and C 81 cases). Ageing was a risk factor for intraoperative complications and recurrence (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, respectively), and higher body mass index (BMI) was a risk factor for conversion (p = 0.004). Age ≥ 60 years compared to age < 60 years increased intraoperative complications five-fold and recurrence six-fold (p = 0.001). On the other hand, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² increased the possibility of conversion to open surgery nine-fold (p < 0.001). In addition, a positive correlation was found between the operative time and the BMI and VAS score (p = 0.004, p = 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions

In order to reach the plateau in the operative time during the TEP learning curve period, more than 50 cases should be experienced, whereas more than 60 cases are needed for conversion, intraoperative complications, and recurrence.

A prospective randomised control trial to compare the perioperative outcomes and ergonomic challenges between triangular versus midline port placement in total extra-peritoneal repair of uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

Routine TEP technique requires three skin incisions for placement of three trocars in the midline. Otherwise, this can be done by three-port triangular technique or two-hand technique. This study reports a randomised trial of perioperative outcomes and ergonomics characteristics of this procedure using two different techniques of port insertion.

METHODS

N = 28 patients were randomised into two groups for triangular three-port (TTEP) versus midline three-port TEP (MTEP) hernioplasty after informed written consent in Department of Surgery, King George's Medical University UP between September 2016 and September 2017 after institutional ethical approval. Patient-related outcomes in terms of quality of life (QOL) and ergonomic evaluation of the technique were compared in double-blinded fashion.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain score at 24 h post surgery (5.1 ± 0.6; 95% CI 4.9-5.3 vs. 4.8 ± 0.4; 95% CI 4.6-4.9) differed, while hospital stay, time to return to routine work, tolerance to oral feeds and intraoperative complications occurrence (OR 2.1; 95% CI 0.2-24.3) were comparable in both groups. Time to return to office work (5.5 ± 0.5; 95% CI 5.4-5.7 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8; 95% CI 3.7-4.3) and immediate postoperative sensation of mesh and pain score were significantly higher in MTEP compared to TTEP. Ergonomic parameters including visualization of landmark score, spreading of mesh score and total surgeon satisfaction score (TTEP 8.4 ± 0.7; 95% CI 8.1-8.6 vs. MTEP 7.0 ± 0.8; 95% CI 6.7-7.3), mental effort quotient (SMEQ score: TTEP 50.6 ± 12.7; 95% CI 45.9-55.3 vs. MTEP 70.8 ± 12.6: 95% CI 66.1-75.4) and physical effort quotient (LEDQ scores in wrist, hand, arm and shoulders) were also superior in triangular technique of port placement.

CONCLUSION

Triangular three-port TEP hernioplasty is ergonomically feasible and enables a surgeon to perform surgery safely using basic principles of laparoscopy.

Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

The learning curve for totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) is longer and steeper than that for transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) due to the preperitoneal view to which the surgeon is not accustomed and the limited working space. The aim of this study was to clarify the learning curve for SILS-TEP.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 80 consecutive patients with unilateral inguinal hernia was performed. All patients underwent elective SILS-TEP performed by a single learning surgeon with a teaching assistant between July 2016 and March 2018 at Kinki Central Hospital.

RESULTS

The operative time decreased gradually after 20 cases and stabilized after 40 cases. The first 40 cases were categorized as the learning period group, and the remaining 40 cases were categorized as the experienced period group. More patients received antithrombotic therapy in the experienced period than in the learning period (P < 0.05). The median operative time was 107 and 60 min in the learning period and the experienced period, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood loss peritoneal injury, conversion to a different procedure, postoperative hospital stay, complications, and recurrence between the two groups. No major complications or hernia recurrence were noted during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve for SILS-TEP might take 40 cases to reduce the operative time. SILS-TEP can be performed safely by a learning surgeon with a teaching assistant.

Efficacy of Single-incision Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair for Overweight or Obese Patients

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal repair in overweight or obese patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For outcome analyses, patients were subdivided by body mass index (BMI) as normal-weight (18.5≤BMI<25 kg/m), overweight (25≤BMI<30 kg/m) or obese (≥30 kg/m) and compared.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients were divided into a normal-weight group (n=152) and an overweight/obese group (n=49). Median operative time for unilateral hernia was 72 minutes in the normal-weight group and 95 minutes in the overweight/obese group (P<0.05). No significant differences in operative time for bilateral hernia, bleeding volume, peritoneal injury, conversion to a different procedure, postoperative hospital stay, follow-up duration, complications, or recurrence were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal repair, which offers good cosmetic outcomes, seems feasible and safe for overweight or obese patients, although the operation takes longer.

What Is the Influence of Simulation-Based Training Courses, the Learning Curve, Supervision, and Surgeon Volume on the Outcome in Hernia Repair?-A Systematic Review

Introduction: In hernia surgery, too, the influence of the surgeon on the outcome can be demonstrated. Therefore the role of the learning curve, supervised procedures by surgeons in training, simulation-based training courses and surgeon volume on patient outcome must be identified. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the available literature was carried out in June 2018 using Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. For the present analysis 81 publications were identified as relevant. Results: Well-structured simulation-based training courses was found to be associated with a reduced perioperative complication rate for patients operated on by trainees. Open as well as, in particular, laparo-endoscopic hernia surgery procedures have a long learning curve. Its negative impact on the patient can be virtually eliminated through consistent supervision by experienced hernia surgeons. However, this presupposes availability of an adequate trainee caseload and of well-trained hernia surgeons and calls for a certain degree of centralization in hernia surgery. Conclusion: Training courses, learning curve, supervision, and surgeon volume are important aspects in training and outcomes in hernia surgery.

Defining the characteristics of certified hernia centers in Italy: The Italian society of hernia and abdominal wall surgery workgroup consensus on systematic reviews of the best available evidences

BACKGROUND

The terms "Hernia Center" (HC) and Hernia Surgeon" (HS) have gained more and more popularity in recent years. Nevertheless, there is lack of protocols and methods for certification of their activities and results. The Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery proposes a method for different levels of certification.

METHODS

The national board created a commission, with the task to define principles and structure of an accreditation program. The discussion of each topic was preceded by a Systematic Review, according to PRISMA Guidelines and Methodology. In case of lack or inadequate data from literature, the parameter was fixed trough a Commission discussion.

RESULTS

The Commission defined a certification process including: "FLC - First level Certification": restricted to single surgeon, it is given under request and proof of a formal completion of the learning curve process for the basic procedures and an adequate year volume of operations. "Second level certification": Referral Center for Abdominal Wall Surgery. It is a public or private structure run by at least two already certified and confirmed FLC surgeons. "Third level certification": High Specialization Center for Abdominal Wall Surgery. It is a public or private structure, already confirmed as Referral Centers, run by at least three surgeons (two certified and confirmed with FLC and one research fellow in abdominal wall surgery). Both levels of certification have to meet the Surgical Requirements and facilities criteria fixed by the Commission.

CONCLUSION

The creation of different types of Hernia Centers is directed to create two different entities offering the same surgical quality with separate mission: the Referral Center being more dedicated to clinical and surgical activity and High Specialization Centers being more directed to scientific tasks.

International guidelines for groin hernia management

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, more than 20 million patients undergo groin hernia repair annually. The many different approaches, treatment indications and a significant array of techniques for groin hernia repair warrant guidelines to standardize care, minimize complications, and improve results. The main goal of these guidelines is to improve patient outcomes, specifically to decrease recurrence rates and reduce chronic pain, the most frequent problems following groin hernia repair. They have been endorsed by all five continental hernia societies, the International Endo Hernia Society and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

METHODS

An expert group of international surgeons (the HerniaSurge Group) and one anesthesiologist pain expert was formed. The group consisted of members from all continents with specific experience in hernia-related research. Care was taken to include surgeons who perform different types of repair and had preferably performed research on groin hernia surgery. During the Group's first meeting, evidence-based medicine (EBM) training occurred and 166 key questions (KQ) were formulated. EBM rules were followed in complete literature searches (including a complete search by The Dutch Cochrane database) to January 1, 2015 and to July 1, 2015 for level 1 publications. The articles were scored by teams of two or three according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. During five 2-day meetings, results were discussed with the working group members leading to 136 statements and 88 recommendations. Recommendations were graded as "strong" (recommendations) or "weak" (suggestions) and by consensus in some cases upgraded. In the Results and summary section below, the term "should" refers to a recommendation. The AGREE II instrument was used to validate the guidelines. An external review was performed by three international experts. They recommended the guidelines with high scores. The risk factors for inguinal hernia (IH) include: family history, previous contra-lateral hernia, male gender, age, abnormal collagen metabolism, prostatectomy, and low body mass index. Peri-operative risk factors for recurrence include poor surgical techniques, low surgical volumes, surgical inexperience and local anesthesia. These should be considered when treating IH patients. IH diagnosis can be confirmed by physical examination alone in the vast majority of patients with appropriate signs and symptoms. Rarely, ultrasound is necessary. Less commonly still, a dynamic MRI or CT scan or herniography may be needed. The EHS classification system is suggested to stratify IH patients for tailored treatment, research and audit. Symptomatic groin hernias should be treated surgically. Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic male IH patients may be managed with "watchful waiting" since their risk of hernia-related emergencies is low. The majority of these individuals will eventually require surgery; therefore, surgical risks and the watchful waiting strategy should be discussed with patients. Surgical treatment should be tailored to the surgeon's expertise, patient- and hernia-related characteristics and local/national resources. Furthermore, patient health-related, life style and social factors should all influence the shared decision-making process leading up to hernia management. Mesh repair is recommended as first choice, either by an open procedure or a laparo-endoscopic repair technique. One standard repair technique for all groin hernias does not exist. It is recommended that surgeons/surgical services provide both anterior and posterior approach options. Lichtenstein and laparo-endoscopic repair are best evaluated. Many other techniques need further evaluation. Provided that resources and expertise are available, laparo-endoscopic techniques have faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective. There is discussion concerning laparo-endoscopic management of potential bilateral hernias (occult hernia issue). After patient consent, during TAPP, the contra-lateral side should be inspected. This is not suggested during unilateral TEP repair. After appropriate discussions with patients concerning results tissue repair (first choice is the Shouldice technique) can be offered. Day surgery is recommended for the majority of groin hernia repair provided aftercare is organized. Surgeons should be aware of the intrinsic characteristics of the meshes they use. Use of so-called low-weight mesh may have slight short-term benefits like reduced postoperative pain and shorter convalescence, but are not associated with better longer-term outcomes like recurrence and chronic pain. Mesh selection on weight alone is not recommended. The incidence of erosion seems higher with plug versus flat mesh. It is suggested not to use plug repair techniques. The use of other implants to replace the standard flat mesh in the Lichtenstein technique is currently not recommended. In almost all cases, mesh fixation in TEP is unnecessary. In both TEP and TAPP it is recommended to fix mesh in M3 hernias (large medial) to reduce recurrence risk. Antibiotic prophylaxis in average-risk patients in low-risk environments is not recommended in open surgery. In laparo-endoscopic repair it is never recommended. Local anesthesia in open repair has many advantages, and its use is recommended provided the surgeon is experienced in this technique. General anesthesia is suggested over regional in patients aged 65 and older as it might be associated with fewer complications like myocardial infarction, pneumonia and thromboembolism. Perioperative field blocks and/or subfascial/subcutaneous infiltrations are recommended in all cases of open repair. Patients are recommended to resume normal activities without restrictions as soon as they feel comfortable. Provided expertise is available, it is suggested that women with groin hernias undergo laparo-endoscopic repair in order to decrease the risk of chronic pain and avoid missing a femoral hernia. Watchful waiting is suggested in pregnant women as groin swelling most often consists of self-limited round ligament varicosities. Timely mesh repair by a laparo-endoscopic approach is suggested for femoral hernias provided expertise is available. All complications of groin hernia management are discussed in an extensive chapter on the topic. Overall, the incidence of clinically significant chronic pain is in the 10-12% range, decreasing over time. Debilitating chronic pain affecting normal daily activities or work ranges from 0.5 to 6%. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is defined as bothersome moderate pain impacting daily activities lasting at least 3 months postoperatively and decreasing over time. CPIP risk factors include: young age, female gender, high preoperative pain, early high postoperative pain, recurrent hernia and open repair. For CPIP the focus should be on nerve recognition in open surgery and, in selected cases, prophylactic pragmatic nerve resection (planned resection is not suggested). It is suggested that CPIP management be performed by multi-disciplinary teams. It is also suggested that CPIP be managed by a combination of pharmacological and interventional measures and, if this is unsuccessful, followed by, in selected cases (triple) neurectomy and (in selected cases) mesh removal. For recurrent hernia after anterior repair, posterior repair is recommended. If recurrence occurs after a posterior repair, an anterior repair is recommended. After a failed anterior and posterior approach, management by a specialist hernia surgeon is recommended. Risk factors for hernia incarceration/strangulation include: female gender, femoral hernia and a history of hospitalization related to groin hernia. It is suggested that treatment of emergencies be tailored according to patient- and hernia-related factors, local expertise and resources. Learning curves vary between different techniques. Probably about 100 supervised laparo-endoscopic repairs are needed to achieve the same results as open mesh surgery like Lichtenstein. It is suggested that case load per surgeon is more important than center volume. It is recommended that minimum requirements be developed to certify individuals as expert hernia surgeon. The same is true for the designation "Hernia Center". From a cost-effectiveness perspective, day-case laparoscopic IH repair with minimal use of disposables is recommended. The development and implementation of national groin hernia registries in every country (or region, in the case of small country populations) is suggested. They should include patient follow-up data and account for local healthcare structures. A dissemination and implementation plan of the guidelines will be developed by global (HerniaSurge), regional (international societies) and local (national chapters) initiatives through internet websites, social media and smartphone apps. An overarching plan to improve access to safe IH surgery in low-resource settings (LRSs) is needed. It is suggested that this plan contains simple guidelines and a sustainability strategy, independent of international aid. It is suggested that in LRSs the focus be on performing high-volume Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia using low-cost mesh. Three chapters discuss future research, guidelines for general practitioners and guidelines for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The HerniaSurge Group has developed these extensive and inclusive guidelines for the management of adult groin hernia patients. It is hoped that they will lead to better outcomes for groin hernia patients wherever they live. More knowledge, better training, national audit and specialization in groin hernia management will standardize care for these patients, lead to more effective and efficient healthcare and provide direction for future research.

Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a self-expanding nitinol framed hernia repair device: A prospective case series

BACKGROUND

The use of a self-expanding nitinol framed prosthesis (ReboundHRD^®) for totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) could solve issues of mesh shrinkage and associated pain. We prospectively evaluated the use of the ReboundHRD^® mesh for TEP-IHR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent a TEP-IHR using the ReboundHRD^® Large mesh from April 2014 till May 2015, were included. No mesh fixation was performed. Follow-up assessments were performed at the day of surgery, 1, 2, and 7 days, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcome measures include post-operative pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), operative details, complications, and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

In total, 69 TEP-IHR procedures were performed in 54 patients (15 bilateral hernias). No perioperative and 5 (9%) postoperative complications occurred, all graded Clavien-Dindo I-II. The median length of stay was 1 day (range 0-3), with 78% of the operations performed in an ambulatory setting. Median VAS score decreased from 3 (range 0-4) on the day of surgery to 1 (range 0-2) on day 7. Patients were completely pain-free at a median time of 5 (range 1-60) days. The majority (80.4%, 37/46) of the active patients went back to work within 2 weeks (maximum 6 weeks). At a median follow-up of 19 months (range 16-26 months), no recurrences occurred.

CONCLUSION

TEP-IHR using a self-expanding nitinol framed hernia repair device is a safe technique in longterm follow-up. The technique is associated with a low incidence of postoperative pain, a short hospital stay and quick return to normal activities.

The learning curve for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a newly qualified surgeon perspective

BACKGROUND

The number of cases required to overcome the learning curve (LC) for laparoscopic extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) varies widely in the literature. Less is known about the LC for inexperienced surgeons performing this procedure early in their career. The present study describes the technical challenges of TEP repair and the LC from the perspective of a recently qualified general surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a single-surgeon experience of TEP repairs performed during the first 2 y of practice from 2011-2013. Patient demographics, hernia details, operative details, and postoperative outcome were all assessed. The CUSUM method was used to analyze the LC for operative time.

RESULTS

There were 149 consecutive patients (mean age, 56 ± 17, 146 males, 24 bilateral, BMI 26 ± 4) followed for a median of 15 (4-26) mo. Direct herniae accounted for 61% of the cohort, and 16% were recurrent open presentations. The major complication and recurrence rate were <2%, and minor complications including urinary retention (15%) were reported. Re-admission rate was 6%. CUSUM analysis suggested an inflection point at 18 cases after which operative times were stabilized.

CONCLUSIONS

For less experienced surgeons, standard surgical training provides for TEP hernia repair with satisfactory major complication, conversion, and recurrence rates. Minor complication rates can still be reduced further with further training and supervision from experienced peers.

Initial experience with application of single layer modified Kugel mesh for inguinal hernia repair: Case series of 72 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

This is an initial review of the safety and efficacy of anterior preperitoneal modified Kugel (MK) mesh herniorrhaphy application without using optional onlay mesh.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent herniorrhaphy by a single surgeon from July 1^st, 2009 to December 31^st, 2010. During these 18 months, a total of 72 patients underwent single-layer MK mesh herniorrhaphy. Anterior preperitoneal approach was used to place the mesh. If the patient's inguinal hernia defect did not exceed the memory ring of MK mesh, the onlay mesh was omitted. Postoperative results (wound infection, recurrence, and chronic pain/discomfort) were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients underwent anterior preperitoneal single layer MK mesh herniorrhaphy. One patient had recurrent hernia after 1 year and was treated with a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal operation. The most common postoperative complaint was mild soreness which was self-resolving after 1 month. Mean total operative time (skin to skin) was 73 minutes. The average hospital stay was 2 days. Most of the postoperative complications including soreness (14%), pain for > 3 months (1.4%), and scrotal hematoma (1.4%) were self-resolving. One patient experienced wound infection, which was treated with oral antibiotics. One patient had recurrence 1 year after the operation.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative complication and recurrence rates of single-layer MK mesh herniorrhaphy was comparable with previously reported tension-free repair. Single-layer application is safe and feasible. A longer follow-up period and larger study group with a control group are needed to verify our method.

The Surgical Treatment of Inguinal Hernia Using the Laparoscopic Totally Extra-Peritoneal (TEP) Technique

The surgical repair of inguinal hernia represents one of the most frequent procedures used in general surgery. The new surgical techniques are simpler, with a lower morbidity and recurrence of less than 2%. The laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) technique is contraindicated in complicated hernias (occlusion, incarceration) and in voluminous inguino-scrotal hernias.

PURPOSE

The evaluation of the TEP technique, of the risk factors and of the postoperative results on the group of patients who have undergone surgery in the Surgical Clinic 2 Cluj Napoca.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The study is prospective, on a group of 40 patients operated with the TEP technique in the Surgical Clinic 2 during the period May 2013 - July 2014. The following have been assessed: the demographic data, the risk factors, the immediate complications, the recurrence of the hernias.

RESULTS

The average duration of hospitalization was 6.79 days. The intraoperative incidents were: 7 minimal peritoneal lesions with pneumoperitoneum and a hemorrhagic lesion of the epigastric vessels repaired endoscopically by the clipping of the lesion. There were 2 recurrences, 24 hours and 1 year after surgery, solved by the Lichtenstein technique. After 30 interventions, the average duration of the surgery was of 64 minutes, being longer in the case of bilateral hernias and being influenced by the team's learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The TEP technique is a safe option followed by a low rate of complications, a low recurrence rate and low intensity postoperative pain.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Armed Forces: A 5-year single centre study

BACKGROUND

Surgery for inguinal hernia continues to evolve. The most recent development in the field of surgery for inguinal hernia is the emergence of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery (LIHS) which is challenging the gold standard Lichtenstein's tension free mesh repair. Our centre has the largest series of LIHS from any Armed Forces hospital. The aim of this study was to analyze the short and long term outcomes at our center since its inception.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively maintained data base of 501 LIHS done in 434 patients by a single surgeon between April 2008 and October 2013. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up data was analyzed with emphasis on the recurrence rates and the incidence of inguinodynia.

RESULTS

402 (92.6%) patients had primary hernias and 367 (84.6%) patients had unilateral hernias. Of the 501 repairs, 453 (90.4 %) were done totally extraperitoneal approach and 48 (9.6 %) were done by the transabdominal preperitoneal approach. The mean operative time for unilateral and bilateral repairs was 40.9 ± 11.2 and 76.2 ± 15.0 minutes, respectively. The conversion rate to open surgery was 0.6%. The intraoperative, and early and late postoperative complication rates were 1.7%, 6.2% and 3%, respectively. The incidence of chronic groin pain was 0.7% and the recurrence rate was 1.6%. The median hospital stay was 1 day (1-5 days).

CONCLUSION

We, in this series of over 500 repairs have demonstrated that feasibility as well as safety of LIHS at our centre with good short and long term outcomes.

Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre

One of the major reasons for laparoscopy not having gained popularity for repair of groin hernia is the perceived steep learning curve. This study was conducted to assess the learning curve and to predict the number of cases required for a surgeon to become proficient in laparoscopic groin hernia repair, by comparing two laparoscopic surgeons. The learning curve evaluation parameters included operative time, conversions, intraoperative complications and postoperative complications, and these were compared between the senior and the junior surgeon. One hundred thirty-eight cases were performed by the senior surgeon, and 63 cases by the junior surgeon. Both were comparable in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Using the moving average method, minimum of 13 laparoscopic hernia repairs are required to reach at par the operating time of an experienced surgeon. For total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, the number of cases was 14; and for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair, this number was 13.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: defining the learning curve

Between 2004 and June 2011, 181 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Three main surgeons, all experienced in laparoscopic procedures, performed all the cases. After analyzing the operative time (OT) for 3 main surgeons, within the first 20 cases the overall performance plateaued. Data from 60 patients (50F, 10M), with a mean age of 42.3 years (range, 26 to 88 y) and a mean hernia defect size of 6.5 cm (range, 4 to 18 y), were evaluated. No significant differences were recorded among the 3 surgeons in OT and intraoperative or postoperative complications. But 3 (5%, P<0.03) patients had complications, and the recurrence rate was 6.6% with a mean follow-up of 54 months (range, 42 to 70 mo). One had prolonged postoperative ileus, the second had bowel serosal tear, and the last had port-site incarcerated hernia. Our results showed that the OT of 98.9 minutes (range, 48 to 205 min) stabilized in 12 cases.

A New Proposal for Learning Curve of TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair: Ability to Complete Operation Endoscopically as a First Phase of Learning Curve

Background. The exact nature of learning curve of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia and the number required to master this technique remain controversial. Patients and Methods. We present a retrospective review of a single surgeon experience on patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Results. There were 42 hernias (22 left- and 20 right-sided) in 39 patients with a mean age of 48.8 ± 15.1 years. Indirect, direct, and combined hernias were present in 18, 12, and 12 cases, respectively. The mean operative time was 55.1 ± 22.8 minutes. Peritoneal injury occurred in 9 cases (21.4%). Conversion to open surgery was necessitated in 7 cases (16.7%). After grouping of all patients into two groups as cases between 1–21 and 22–42, it was seen that the majority of peritoneal injuries (7 out of 9, 77.8%, P = 0.130) and all conversions (P = 0.001) occurred in the first 21 cases. Conclusions. Learning curve of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair can be divided into two consequent steps: immediate and late. At least 20 operations are required for gaining anatomical knowledge and surgical pitfalls based on the ability to perform this operation without conversion during immediate phase.

Two surgeons, one patient: the impact of surgeon-surgeon familiarity on patient outcomes following mastectomy with immediate reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy with immediate reconstruction requires the coordination and expertise of two distinct surgeons. This often results in several different combinations of mastectomy and reconstructive surgeons, but with an unknown impact on patient outcomes. We evaluate the effect of different surgical teams on complication rates following mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive patients that underwent mastectomy with immediate prosthetic reconstruction from 4/1998 to 10/2008 at one institution was performed. Patients of the three highest-volume mastectomy and reconstructive surgeons were stratified by their individual combination of surgeons, resulting in nine different surgical teams. Complications were categorized by end-outcome. Appropriate statistics, including multiple linear regression, were performed.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were similar among patients (n = 511 patients, 699 breasts) with the same mastectomy surgeon but different reconstructive surgeon. Mean follow-up was 38.4 ± 25.7 months. For each mastectomy surgeon, the choice of reconstructive surgeon did not affect complication rates. Furthermore, the combined complication rates of the three highest-volume teams (n = 384 breasts) were similar to the remaining lower-volume teams (n = 315 breasts). Patient factors, but not the individual surgeon or surgical team, were independent risk factors for complications.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that among high-volume surgeons, complication rates following mastectomy with immediate reconstruction are not affected by the surgeon-surgeon familiarity. The individual surgeon's expertise, and patient risk factors, may have a greater impact on outcomes than the team's experience with each other. These results validate the efficacy and safety of the surgeon distribution model currently used by many breast surgery practices.

Totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: techniques and pitfalls of a challenging procedure

Inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure performed worldwide in general surgery. Since the turn of the 21st century, the minimally invasive approach and in particular totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair has gained in popularity. The concept of the TEP approach combines the advantages of anterior tension-free mesh repair (Lichtenstein repair) and the open preperitoneal approach championed by Stoppa. TEP repair uses a prosthetic mesh significantly bigger than in open herniorrhaphy, offering a complete overlap of the myopectineal orifice. TEP repair is a challenging technique with unfamiliar anatomy, a limited operative field, and long learning curve. This article provides an experienced opinion on the practical aspects of the TEP approach. Some of these steps have already been discussed in the surgical literature, while others are the fruit of a personal expertise grasped over the years with more than 1,000 TEP repairs performed.

Single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery (SPES) for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia: a critical appraisal of the chopstick repair

PURPOSE

Developments in minimal access surgery brought a new concept: single-port endolaparoscopic surgery (SPES). The aim of our study is to verify the safety and feasibility of SPES TEP hernia repair and report our initial clinical outcome.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent SPES TEP repair from May 2009 to December 2010. Data regarding patient demographics, type, size and location of hernia, port devices used, type of mesh and fixation, operative time, complications, length of stay and cosmetic results were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (36 M, 11 F) underwent 70 SPES TEP hernia repairs; median age was 53 years (range 22-80). 60 % had indirect hernia, 27.5 % direct, 8.5 % pantaloon, 2 % femoral and 2 % recurrent hernias. Mean hernia size was 1.91 ± 0.67 cm. Port devices used include 33 Triport, 12 SILS and 2 SSL. We used anatomical mesh in 20; flat polypropylene in 10 and titanium-coated polypropylene mesh in 17 patients. Fixation of mesh was achieved in 18 patients with absorbable tacks, 8 with titanium tacks, 1 with fibrin glue, and no tack in 20 with anatomical mesh. No conversions occurred and small seroma was reported in 3 (6.3 %) patients. Mean operative time was 96.48 min (range: 50-150). Average hospital stay was 11.8 h (range: 9-26). Median follow-up was 11 months (range 6-18), and no recurrence was noted. 82.6 % patients were very satisfied, and 17.4 % were satisfied with the procedure.

CONCLUSION

SPES TEP repair is a safe and feasible technique with good patient satisfaction.

Learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair has been accepted as a popular procedure for inguinal hernia repair, but surgeons still encounter technical difficulties owing to unfamiliar pelvic anatomy and limited working space. We sought to estimate the learning curve for laparoscopic TEP repair without supervision.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients scheduled for laparoscopic TEP repair of an inguinal hernia from December 2000 to October 2007.

RESULTS

We reviewed medical records for 700 patients. The cases were divided into 8 groups: 20 patients each in groups I-V and 200 patients each in groups VI-VIII. No significant difference in demographic characteristics was identified among the groups. The mean duration of surgery significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in relation to experience; it reached a plateau of less than 30 minutes (mean 28 min) after 60 cases. The mean length of stay in hospital was 0.97 days, reaching a plateau after 20 cases. Six patients were converted to other techniques: 1 patient each in groups III and VIII and 4 patients in group VII. Three recurrences were detected; however, 2 were excluded because the patient had bilateral inguinal hernias.

CONCLUSION

We estimate the learning curve for laparoscopic TEP repair is 60 cases for a beginner surgeon. The presence of an experienced supervisor during the first 60 cases can help prevent unnecessary complications and shorten the duration of surgery.