1
|
Wang J, Ma D, Du G, An B, Xia T, Zhou T, Sun Q, Liu F, Wang Y, Sui D, Zhai X, Jin B. Laparoscopic vs. open anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Front Surg 2022; 9:1003948. [PMID: 36325045 PMCID: PMC9618796 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly malignant and invasive cancer originating from biliary epithelial cells. The current study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Methods After screening, 95 patients who underwent anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at our center were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the surgical approach; the baseline characteristics, pathological findings, surgical outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or pathological findings between the two groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, the intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay were more favorable in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group than the open anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). The two groups differed significantly in the extent of liver resection, with a lower lymph node dissection rate and lymph node yield in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The median postoperative follow-up times were 10.7 and 13.8 months in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy and open anatomical hepatectomy groups, respectively. Regarding the long-term follow-up results, OS and DFS were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors for OS were CA-199, CEA, HGB, tumor diameter, and T stage, and those for DFS were CA-199 (P < 0.05), and T stage (P < 0.05). Conclusion laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. Compared with open anatomical hepatectomy, laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy provides better short-term outcomes and a comparable long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianlei Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Delin Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Du
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Baokun An
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Tong Xia
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Tao Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Qingmei Sun
- Department of Anesthesia, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Fengyue Liu
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yadong Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Deling Sui
- Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Liaocheng, China
| | - Xiangyu Zhai
- Department of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Bin Jin
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China,Correspondence: Bin Jin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Is It Time to Consider Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? A Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:2244-2250. [PMID: 31621026 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04404-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The role of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains indefinite, though the utilization of this minimally invasive approach has been increasing for ICC. We herein performed a meta-analysis to investigate this issue. METHODS Six retrospective studies including 384 patients who had undergone LH and 2147 patients who had undergone open hepatectomy (OH) for ICC were included. The fixed-effects or random-effects models were utilized for data analysis. RESULTS Compared with patients who had undergone OH for ICC, patients who had undergone LH for ICC experienced more R0 resections (81.6 versus 73.8%, risk ratio (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.14; P = 0.008) but less major hepatectomies (37.7 versus 54.2%, RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79; P < 0.0001), less lymph node dissections (38.0 versus 61.5%, RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.70; P < 0.0001), and smaller tumor size resected (4.14 versus 4.94 cm, weighted mean difference = - 0.80 cm, 95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.22 cm; P = 0.007). No significant difference was observed in other perioperative results (all P > 0.05) or overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.38, 95% CI 0.63-3.02; P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS LH has comparable safety, feasibility, and oncological efficacy to that of OH for ICC and has superiority in R0 resection over OH. It may be time to consider LH for ICC only if a more thorough effort on lymph node dissection is undertaken in selective patients at experienced centers.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J. Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:725-735. [PMID: 32607841 PMCID: PMC7471173 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive techniques have increasingly found their way into liver surgery in recent years. A multitude of mostly retrospective analyses suggests several advantages of laparoscopic over open liver surgery. Due to the speed and variety of simultaneous technical and strategic developments, it is difficult to maintain an overview of the current status and perspectives in laparoscopic liver surgery. Purpose This review highlights up-to-date aspects in laparoscopic liver surgery. We discuss established indications with regard to their development over time as well as continuing limitations of applied techniques. We give an assessment based on the current literature and according to our own center experiences, not least with regard to a highly topical cost discussion. Conclusions While in the beginning mainly benign tumors were laparoscopically operated on, liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma are now among the most frequent indications. Technical limitations remain and should be evaluated with the overall aim not to endanger quality standards in open surgery. Financial aspects cannot be neglected with the necessity of cost-covering reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shiraiwa DK, Carvalho PFDC, Maeda CT, Silva LC, Forones NM, Lopes-Filho GJ, Linhares MM, Araujo RLC. The role of minimally invasive hepatectomy for hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:863-872. [PMID: 31902142 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite the fact laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) for cholangiocarcinoma is still limited, this systematic review addressed surgical and oncological outcomes of LLR to treat both perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Five comparative and 20 noncomparative studies were found. Regarding iCCA, LLR had lower blood loss and less need for Pringle maneuver. However, open liver resections (OLR) were performed more for major hepatectomies, with better lymphadenectomy rates and higher number of harvested lymph nodes. High heterogeneity and selection bias were suggested for iCCA studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Shiraiwa
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Carlos T Maeda
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciana C Silva
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nora M Forones
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gaspar J Lopes-Filho
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo M Linhares
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Raphael L C Araujo
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uy BJ, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY. Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2015; 25:272-7. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Billy James Uy
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gumbs AA, Jarufe N, Gayet B. Minimally invasive approaches to extrapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2012; 27:406-14. [PMID: 22926892 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2489-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2012] [Accepted: 06/27/2012] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the perceived difficulty in dissecting gallbladder cancers and extrapancreatic cholangiocarcinomas off of the portal structures and in performing complex biliary reconstructions, very few centers have used minimally invasive techniques to remove these tumors. Furthermore, due to the relative rarity of these tumors when compared to hepatocellular carcinoma, only a few reports have focused on short- and long-term results. METHODS We performed a review by combining the experience of three international centers with expertise in complex minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery. Patients were entered into a database prospectively. All patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma were analyzed; patients with distal cholangiocarcinomas who underwent laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies were excluded. Patients were divided according to if they had gallbladder cancer, hilar cholangiocarcinoma, or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. RESULTS A total of 15 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for gallbladder cancer and 10 for preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer, and 5 underwent laparoscopic completion procedures. An average of four lymph nodes (range = 1-11) were retrieved and all patients had an R0 resection. One patient (7 %) required conversion to an open procedure. No patients developed a biliary fistula, required percutaneous drainage, or had endoscopic stent placement. One patient had a recurrence at 3 months despite a negative final pathological margin, and a second patient had a distant recurrence at 20 months with a mean follow-up of 23 months. Nine patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. All anastomoses were completed laparoscopically. Biliary fistula was seen in two patients, one of which died after a transhepatic percutaneous biliary drain resulted in uncontrollable intra-abdominal hemorrhage despite reoperation. A third patient developed a pulmonary embolism. Thus, the morbidity and mortality rates were 33 and 11 %, respectively. One patient was converted to open and six patients (66 %) are alive with a median follow-up of 22 months. Five patients underwent minimally invasive resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma; of these, two also required laparoscopic major hepatectomy. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 240 mL (range = 0-400 mL) and the median length of stay (LOS) was 15 days (range = 11-21 days). All patients are alive with a median follow-up of 11 months (range = 3-18 months). None of the 29 patients developed port site recurrences. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive approaches to gallbladder cancer and intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma seem feasible and safe in the short term. Larger series with longer follow-up are needed to see if there are any long-term disadvantages or advantages to laparoscopic resection of extrapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Gumbs
- Minimally Invasive HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Summit Medical Group, 1 Diamond Hill Rd., Bensley Pavilion, 4th Floor, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The field of laparoscopic liver resection surgery has rapidly evolved, with more than 1000 cases now reported. Laparoscopic hepatic resection was initially described for small, peripheral, benign lesions. Experienced teams are now performing laparoscopic anatomic resections for cancer. Operative times improved with experience. When compared with open cases, blood loss was less in most laparoscopic series, but was the main indication for conversion to an open procedure. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection had shorter length of hospital stay and quicker recovery. Perioperative complications were comparable between the two approaches. Importantly, basic oncologic principles were maintained in the laparoscopic liver resections. The purpose of this review is to summarize the data available on outcomes for laparoscopic hepatic resection for cancer. This includes primary hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. The evidence to date suggests that laparoscopic results are comparable with the open approach in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Tri Nguyen
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - T Clark Gamblin
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - David A Geller
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Starzl Transplant Institute, 3459 Fifth Avenue, UPMC Montefiore, 7 South, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–2582, USA
| |
Collapse
|