Tailored approach to Zenker's diverticula

Flexible endoscopic incisional therapy for Zenker's diverticulum (FEIT-Z) is an effective treatment for surgical failures or non-operative patients

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) occurs mostly in the elderly, who often have significant comorbidities, and poor neck hyperextension, putting them at high risk for surgical management while also increasing the potential of technical failure. Flexible endoscopic incisional therapy for Zenker's diverticulum (FEIT-Z) offers a safe approach to this problem with high technical and clinical success rates. There are limited data on its use following a failed surgical approach or in patients unfit for a surgical approach. The aim of this study was to assess clinical and technical outcomes of FEIT-Z in patients who were non-operative candidates or refused or failed surgical management.

METHODS

Patients who underwent FEIT-Z from January 2015 to February 2019 at a tertiary referral center were included. Patient demographics, prior ZD surgical history, procedural data, dysphagia scores, clinical success, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Univariable analysis was performed to assess differences between pre- and post-FEIT-Z dysphagia scores.

RESULTS

30 patients undergoing FEIT-Z were included. Seven had a prior failed ZD surgical approach, 6 refused surgical management, and 17 were deemed to be non-operative candidates based on medical comorbidities. Mean age was 78.4 (± 12.1) and 36.7% were male. Technical success of FEIT-Z was 96.7%. There was a significant improvement in dysphagia scores after FEIT-Z: 2.3 (± 0.64) vs. before, 0.4 (± 0.76) (p < 0.001). Long-term clinical success was achieved in 73.3% of patients. Adverse events were seen in 23.3% of patients; however, these were graded as mild in 85.7% of patients. One microperforation was managed with antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

FEIT-Z is a safe procedure with low adverse events and a high rate of technical and clinical success. FEIT-Z can be done in patients who fail previous surgical treatment, refuse a surgical approach, or are not surgical candidates due to medical comorbidity or other factors.

Epidemiology and Management of Zenker Diverticulum in a Low-Threshold Single-payer Health Care System

Importance

The incidence of Zenker diverticulum has been established; previous estimates have been extrapolated from small institutional cohorts.

Objective

To describe the population-wide incidence of Zenker diverticulum over a 20-year period and characterize management strategies across specialties and treatment settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective national cohort study was conducted from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2015, and reviewed patient records from the Care Register for Healthcare in Finland, from which patients with Zenker diverticulum were identified. The data were analyzed in October 2021.

Exposures

Zenker diverticulum.

Main Outcome and Measure

The incidence of Zenker diverticulum per 100 000 person-years.

Results

A total of 2736 patients (median [IQR] age at diagnosis 72.0 [19-106] years; 1278 women [46.7%]) were identified, making the annual incidence of Zenker diverticulum in Finland 2.9/100 000 person-years. Men had higher incidence (3.7/100 000 person-years) compared with women (2.3/100 000 person-years), with an incidence rate ratio of 1.61 (95% CI, 1.48-1.76; P < .001). Within the study population, 1044 patients (38.2%) underwent surgical treatment and 227 (8.3%) underwent 2 or more surgeries. The choice of initial operative approach depended on the medical specialty (Cramer V = 0.41) and on specific catchment area (Cramer V = 0.41). Overall, endoscopic approaches for initial operations were most popular.

Conclusions and Relevance

The cohort study results found that the incidence of Zenker diverticulum was 2.9/100 000 person-years. Most patients with Zenker diverticulum did not undergo definitive therapy. Some hospital districts and some medical specialties were more likely to opt for conservative treatment than others. The choice of operative approach depended more on physician-level factors rather than patient profiles.

Traction on the septum during transoral septotomy for Zenker diverticulum improves the final outcome

OBJECTIVE

Transoral diverticulostomy/septotomy has become a popular treatment for patients with Zenker diverticulum (ZD). To improve the results of transoral stapler-assisted septotomy, a modification of the technique has been introduced. In this study, we aimed to compare the final outcome of such a modified transoral septotomy (MTS) with the results of traditional transoral septotomy (TTS) in patients with ZD.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients with ZD underwent transoral stapler-assisted septotomy between 2010 and 2018. Symptoms were recorded and scored using a detailed questionnaire. Barium swallow, endoscopy, and manometry were performed before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients forming the study population (male:female = 35:17), 25 had TTS and 27 had MTS. The patients' demographic and clinical parameters were similar in the two groups. No intraoperative mucosal lesions were detected, and the mortality was nil. The median time taken to complete the procedure was 25 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 22-35) for TTS, and 30 minutes (IQR: 25-36) for MTS (P < 0.07). The median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 46-95) in the TTS group and 30 months (IQR: 25-35) in the MTS group. All patients in both groups had an improvement in their symptom score after the procedure, but the failure rates were 32% (8 of 25) after TTS and 3.7% (1 of 27) after MTS (P < 0.02). At univariate and multivariate analyses, the procedure was the only predictor of a positive final outcome.

CONCLUSION

Albeit with the intrinsic limitations of the study (retrospective, different time window, and different follow-up), traction on the septum during transoral septotomy improves the final outcome of this treatment in patients with ZD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:637-640, 2020.

Same-day discharge in benign esophageal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Day-case esophageal surgery has been demonstrated to be safe in small prospective cohorts and only for laparoscopic fundoplication. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility and safety of a large series of esophageal day-case surgeries, including laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), Zenker diverticulectomy (ZD), and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and to compare the outcomes among three procedures.This was a prospective, observational study of selected patients who underwent day-case LNF, ZD, and LHM between 2003 and 2013. Postoperative outcomes, the patients' satisfaction, and functional results were evaluated with dedicated scores and compared.Of the 427 patients who underwent surgery for those indications during the study period, 168 (39.3%) eligible patients underwent day-case procedures (134 LNF, 14 LHM, and 20 ZD). The overnight unplanned admission rate was 16.2% and was similar among the groups (P = 0.681). Ten patients were readmitted during the first postoperative week because of dysphagia (n = 6, all in the LNF group), flu-like syndrome (n = 1), and secondary perforation (n = 3, all in the LHM group). The unplanned seven-day readmission rate was significantly higher in the LHM group than in the ZD and LNF groups (P = 0.042). The 30-day rates of unplanned readmission and consultation were 8.9% (P = 0.300) and 4.8%, respectively. At follow-up, 87.5% of the patients were satisfied with day-case treatment, and the functional results were good for 81.4% of the patients.Day-case esophageal surgery is feasible for LNF and seems to be feasible for ZD. Safety criteria have not yet been met for LHM, requiring further adaptations.

Prognostic variables for the clinical success of flexible endoscopic septotomy of Zenker's diverticulum

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Flexible endoscopy septotomy for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is an alternative to endostapling; however, long-term data are sparse and studies are heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical success of flexible endoscopy diverticuloscope-assisted septotomy according to all ZD-related symptoms and to identify potential prognostic variables.

METHODS

A prospective database of all patients with ZD undergoing septotomy and followed up for 24 months or longer was analyzed. Septotomy was conducted by using a diverticuloscope-assisted technique. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptoms (during the day and at night) were scored by their weekly frequency from 0 to 3 when on a solid food diet. Clinical success (asymptomatic state) was defined as a maximum of 2 symptoms with a score of 1 (once per week). Prognostic variables of clinical success included age, sex, pretreatment total symptom score, pre- and posttreatment ZD size, and septotomy length. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate the crude and adjusted hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

Septotomy was attempted and achieved in a single session in 89 patients. Clinical success at the intention-to-treat analysis was 69%, 64%, and 46% at 6, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 3 patients: perforation in 2 (2%) and postprocedural bleeding in 1 (1%). Independent variables for failure at 6 months were a septotomy length ≤25 mm (HR 6.34) and pretreatment ZD size ≥50 mm (HR 11.08), whereas at 48 months, they were septotomy length ≤25 (HR 2.20) and posttreatment ZD size ≥10 mm (HR 2.03). Success rates for ZD ranging in size from 30 mm to 49 mm with a septotomy >25 mm were 100% and 71% at 6 months and 48 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Flexible endoscopic septotomy for ZD is feasible and safe. Treatment success correlates with the length of the septotomy and the size of ZD, which should ultimately determine the appropriate approach.

Assessment of the Results of Surgical Treatment of Zenker'S Diverticulum in Own Material

Zenker diverticulum (ZD) is the most common type of diverticula of the esophagus. Most often refers to men with a peak incidence in the seventh and eighth decade of life. In the majority diverticula remains asymptomatic and in patients with symptomatic course of the disease symptoms are often nonspecific. Aim of the study was to present the authors' own experience in surgical treatment of Zenker diverticulum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this paper we present an analysis of 31 patients with confirmed ZD treated surgically at the Clinic in 2004-2014. Patients were analyzed in terms of age, gender, clinical symptoms, diverticulum size, type of surgery, the time to return to the oral intake, hospital stay and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

22 men and 9 women were enrolled it this study. The mean age of the patients was 64.8 (SD, 10.7; in the range of 28 to 82 years). 29 patients (93.5%) underwent resection of the diverticulum, while diverticulopexy was performed in two patients. In 25 (80.6%) cases stapler device was used, while in 4 (12.9%) resection was performed manually. The average size of resected diverticulum was 4.9 cm (SD, 1.5). Following the surgery in four patients (12.9%) complications were present. The average operating time was 118.7 minutes (SD, 42.2, in the range of 50 to 240 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay was 9.3 (SD, 3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of ZD is associated with high effectiveness and low recurrence rate. Despite the advantages of endoscopic techniques, surgical treatment is characterized by one- stage procedure. The use of mechanical suture (stapler) significantly improves the operation, although on the basis of our own analysis there was no superiority revealed over hand sewn. Unquestionable adventage of classical technique is the opportunity to histopathological evaluation of resected diverticulum what is impossible to achieve in endoscopic techniques.

Esophageal strictures and diverticula

Esophageal disease and dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manifesting as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) particularly, is the most common of all gastrointestinal conditions impacting patients on a day-to-day basis. LES dysfunction can lead to anatomic changes to the distal esophagus, with GERD-mediated changes being benign stricture or progression of GERD to Barrett's esophagus and even esophageal cancer, and LES hypertension impairing esophageal emptying with subsequent development of pulsion esophageal diverticulum. This article details the causes, clinical presentation, workup, and treatment of esophageal stricture and epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum. Other types of esophageal diverticula (Zenker's and midesophageal) are also covered.

Incidence and predictive features of pharyngeal pouch in a dysphagic population

Pharyngeal pouch patients often present with dysphagia and risk perforation when undergoing gastroscopy. Knowledge of pharyngeal pouch incidence and predictive demographic features in patients referred for dysphagia would help determine those patients who should have barium swallow as an initial investigation. The prospectively collected data of 2,797 consecutive referrals were analysed. Logistic regression determined significant variables for predicting pharyngeal pouches. Of the 2,430 patients investigated [mean age = 67.7 years, range 17-103; 48.2 % male], 49 (2.0 %) had a pharyngeal pouch [mean age = 79.8 years (range 58-93); 53.1 % male]. Significant predictors of pharyngeal pouch were pharyngeal level dysphagia (odds ratio [OR] 3.8-19.2), age over 65 years (OR 2.2-14.1), symptom duration over 12 weeks (OR 1.1-3.9), and no weight loss (OR 1.1-5.5). Only 18 patients (36.7 %) underwent surgery for their pouch. Midsternal dysphagia alone occurred in 16 % of all patients with pouches. From our results we conclude that pharyngeal pouches in a dysphagic population are more common than previously recognised. Patients aged over 65 years with pharyngeal level dysphagia for more than 12 weeks should have a barium swallow as their initial investigation.

Complementary and integrative treatments: swallowing disorders

Swallowing disorders are associated with many disease processes and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This article provides information regarding the various causes of swallowing disorders as well as medical, surgical, and integrative approaches to their management.

Flexible endoscopic and surgical management of Zenker's diverticulum

Zenker's diverticulum is an outpouching of the mucosa through the Killian's triangle. The etiology of Zenker's diverticulum is not well understood. It is thought to be due to the incoordination or incomplete relaxation of the cricopharyngeal muscle. Most patients are men who present with symptoms of dysphagia between the seventh and eighth decades of life. The diagnosis is made with a dynamic contrast swallowing study. Treatment options include open surgical diverticulectomy and diverticulopexy with myotomy or myotomy alone using flexible or rigid endoscopes. Rigid endoscopic treatment is currently the preferred initial choice for Zenker's diverticulum of any size. The flexible endoscopic technique is used when there is a high risk of general anesthesia, or neck extension is contraindicated. Some centers use flexible endoscopy as the initial treatment option. Due to a lack of prospective studies, the treatment choice should be tailored to the individual patient and local expertise.

Transoral treatment of Zenker diverticulum: flexible endoscopy versus endoscopic stapling. A retrospective comparison of outcomes

Transoral stapled diverticulo-esophagostomy (TSDE) has gained increased popularity in surgical treatment of Zenker diverticulum (ZD). One of the advantages of this approach is early rehabilitation with significant decrease in patient morbidity and time to resumption of oral intake as compared with open treatment. The section of the septum between the diverticulum and the esophagus with a flexible endoscopic (ES) approach has also been proposed since mid-90s as an alternative for treatment of ZD. Both these approaches are a minimally invasive approach to treat ZD. We compared the TSDE management of ZD versus the ES treatment in a retrospective consecutive series of patients who were referred to either the ES or surgical unit of our Institute. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent treatment for ZD either by TSDE or ES. The two techniques were evaluated for length of hospital stay, diverticulum size, resumption of oral intake, resolution of dysphagia, and complications. Clinical outcome was evaluated throughout a symptom score from 0 to 3, calculated before and after the procedure. The two groups were compared on the various parameters using a Mann--Whitney test. Twenty-eight patients underwent ES and 30 TSDE for ZD. In both groups, a significant decrease in postoperative versus preoperative dysphagia was reported. The average length of hospital stay wasn't significantly different in the two groups (3.38 days for TSDE vs. 2.42 days for ES). The overall complication rate was similar in the two groups. There were two cases in the ES group and three cases in the TDSE group that required an ES revision to take down a residual diverticular wall that produced a mild but persistent dysphagia. Minimally invasive treatment of ZD both with ES and with TSDE is a valuable option for this disease: both techniques are safe and effective, with similar outcome in terms of hospital stay, symptom reduction, and complication rate. Long-term results have to be evaluated.

Endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of motility disorders

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal illness may result from either an underlying structural abnormality (e.g. neoplastic obstruction), or a functional disorder (e.g. motor diarrhea), or both (e.g. achalasia with squamous esophageal cancer).

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to highlight the potential value and role of endoscopy in the recognition and management of patients with functional and motility disorders.

METHODS

We performed a literature review in PubMed.

RESULTS

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy may be under-used by motility-oriented gastroenterologists; in contrast, motility and other functional studies may be under-used by endoscopists. Yet, many areas of cross-exchange exist.

CONCLUSIONS

This review aims to guide the appropriate indications for the use of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating functional GI and motility disorders and serve as a bridge and a forum of exchange between endoscopists and motility specialists.

Surgical experience of the national institution in the treatment of Zenker's diverticula

AIM

To review the 8-year experience of the Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, First Surgical University Hospital in Belgrade in the surgical management of Zenker's diverticula (ZD).

METHODS

Between January 2000 and January 2009, 52 patients underwent surgical procedure for the treatment of ZD. Complete preoperative workup including the symptom evaluation and large variety of structural and functional diagnostic procedures were conducted before the surgery. After the operative treatment patients underwent detailed follow-up in regular intervals up to 3 years.

RESULTS

Preoperative evaluation marked higher incidence of hiatal hernia and pathologic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) among the patients with ZD then in normal population. According to the preoperative evaluation and size of diverticula, as well as due to the intraopertive findings, a variety of surgical procedures were performed, including myotomy alone (n = 2), diverticulopexy and myotomy (n = 36) and diverticulectomy and myotomy (n = 14). Regardless of the operative treatment no salivary cervical fistulas were observed. Late and early postoperative results revealed low incidence in postoperative transitory dysphagia or regurgitation.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that the open surgical procedures are safe and effective in the treatment of ZD. Cricopharyngeal myotomy remains the essential focus of treatment, while the choice of resecting or suspending the diverticulum is brought upon its size. Complete preoperative investigation must be conducted in ZD patients, and the role of pathologic GER must be taken into account when we discuss the origin of this disorder.

[Suspension diverticulopexy for Zenker's diverticulum]

INTRODUCTION

Zenker's diverticulum is an unusual condition. Its treatment requires surgery but there is no consensus regarding the various operative techniques. Through an open cervical approach, the diverticulum can be either resected or suspended with or without a concurrent myotomy of the cricopharyngeus muscle. An innovative option is endoscopic trans-oral stapled esophago-diverticulostomy.

PATIENTS

and method: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 36 patients operated on between 1988 and 2006. Median age was 77.5 years and M/F sex ratio was 1.4. Through an open neck approach, diverticulectomy without cricopharyngeal myotomy was performed in 7 patients, diverticulectomy with myotomy in 11, and diverticulopexy with myotomy in 18.

RESULTS

Morbidity rate was 13.8%. One fistula and one recurrence occurred in both diverticulectomy groups with and without myotomy. There was no morbidity after suspension diverticulopexy which also allowed earlier oral feeding (1 vs. 6 days) and shortened hospitalization (6 vs. 13.5 days).

CONCLUSION

Diverticulopexy with cricopharyngeus myotomy is an effective, reliable, and reproducible technique for the correction of Zenker's diverticula smaller than 5 cm. Diverticulectomy should be reserved for larger diverticula. Technical improvements of transoral stapled diverticulostomy are still required before it can be promoted as an alternative therapy.

Zenker's diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size

BACKGROUND

Zenker's diverticula (ZD) can be treated by transoral diverticulostomy or open surgery (upper esophageal sphincter myotomy and diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a minimally invasive (group A) versus a traditional open surgical approach (group B) in the treatment of ZD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1993 and September 2007, 128 ZD patients underwent transoral diverticulostomy (n = 51) or cricopharyngeal myotomy and diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy (n = 77). All patients were evaluated for symptoms using a detailed questionnaire. Manometry recorded upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, relaxations, and intrabolus pharyngeal pressure. The size of the pouch was measured on the barium swallow. The choice of treatment was based on the size of the diverticulum and the patients' preference. Long-term follow-up data were available for 121/128 (94.5%) patients with a median follow-up of 40 months (interquartile range, 17-83).

RESULTS

Mortality was nil. Three patients in group A (5.8%) and ten in group B (13%) had postoperative complications (p = n.s.). Hospital stays were markedly shorter for patients after diverticulostomy (p < 0.01). Postoperative manometry showed a reduction in UES pressure, improved UES relaxation, and lower intrabolus pressure in both groups (p < 0.05). Four patients in the open surgery group (5.2%) complained of severe dysphagia after surgery (three of them required endoscopic dilations). In the transoral diverticulostomy group, 11 patients (21.5%) required additional septal reduction (n = 8) or a surgical myotomy (n = 3) for persistent symptoms (p < 0.01); nine of these 11 patients had a ZD < or = 3 cm in size. After primary and complementary treatments, symptoms disappeared or improved significantly at long-term follow-up in 93.5% of patients in group A and 96% of those in group B.

CONCLUSION

Diverticulostomy is safe, quick, and effective for most patients with medium-sized ZD, but open surgery offers better long-term results as a primary treatment and should be recommended for younger, healthy patients, especially those with small diverticula. Small ZD may represent a formal contraindication to the transoral approach because an excessively short septum prevents a complete division of the sphincter fibers.

Flexible endoscopic clip-assisted Zenker's diverticulotomy: the first case series (with videos)

BACKGROUND

In treating Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), there are potential risks associated with performing flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy without suturing or stapling. We recently introduced flexible endoscopic clip-assisted diverticulotomy (ECD) in treating ZD by securing the septum prior to dissection.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of ECD for complete septum dissection.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series at an academic center. Seven consecutive patients (mean age 71 y; range 48-91 y) with symptomatic ZD of various craniocaudal sizes based on radiographic measurements (mean 2.6 cm; range 0.8 cm-4.5 cm) were included. The mean depth of the septum was 1.73 cm (range 0.3 cm-3.1 cm). The mean duration of symptoms was 4.8 years (range 0.5-10 y).

METHODS

After endoclips were placed on either side of the cricopharyngeal bar, the septum was dissected between these two clips down to the inferior end of the diverticulum with a needle-knife. Procedures including "one-step ECD" (n = 1), "stepwise ECD" (n = 3), and "bottom ECD" (n = 2) were performed based on the septum depth of the ZD during endoscopy. ECD was not performed on one patient due to severe mucosal fragility of the esophageal inlet. Iatrogenic blunt dissection of the septum by the endoscopic hood occurred secondary to patient retching during the procedure. Main outcome measurements were symptom resolution and complications.

RESULTS

All patients (n = 6) who underwent ECD had complete resolution of esophageal symptoms at a minimum 6-month follow-up. There were no procedural complications. The patient who did not undergo ECD developed an esophageal perforation. She was managed conservatively without surgical intervention. On follow-up, her dysphagia was completely resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

ECD is feasible, safe, and effective for complete septum dissection. ECD and endoscopic stapler-assisted diverticulotomy are complimentary rather than competing strategies in approaching ZD. Study limitations include the case series design and limited follow-up period.

Flexible endoscopic clip-assisted Zenker's diverticulotomy (with videos)

BACKGROUND

In treating Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), there are potential risks associated with flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy without suturing or stapling. Rigid endoscopic stapler-assisted diverticulotomy has limitations. The septum is usually not completely dissected with either technique.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility of flexible endoscopic clip-assisted diverticulotomy (ECD) for complete septum dissection.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Academic center.

PATIENT

An elderly male with symptomatic residual ZD.

INTERVENTIONS

After 1 endoclip (InScope multiclip applier, Ethicon Endo-Surgery) was placed on each side of the cricopharyngeal bar, the septum was easily and completely dissected between these 2 clips down to the bottom of the diverticulum into the esophageal mucosa with a needle-knife.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Symptom resolution and complications.

RESULTS

Complete esophageal symptom resolution without complications.

LIMITATION

Case report.

CONCLUSIONS

ECD is feasible, easy, safe, and effective for complete septum dissection. This is the first reported case of ECD. ECD provides another option in managing ZD with flexible endoscopy.

Cricopharyngeal Myotomy Normalizes the Opening Size of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter in Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

The development of a cricopharyngeal dysfunction is associated with a hypertonic cricopharyngeus (CP) muscle. Therefore, CP myotomy has been advocated by some authors to be an essential part of repair of this condition. However, little objective data exists to show that there is improvement in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) after CP myotomy. This study assesses the impact of CP myotomy on UES opening.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated at a university tertiary care center for cricopharyngeal dysfunction between 1998 and 2003 were identified. All patients underwent CP myotomy with or without Zenker's diverticulectomy. These patients had videofluoroscopic swallow studies before and after repair. The values of UES opening for 3 mL boluses from pre- and postrepair studies were compared with each other as well as with normal controls. Sixty percent (12/20) of the patients had a Zenker's diverticulum. Of these 12 patients, 5 had undergone previous attempts at surgical correction. Cricopharyngeal myotomy by way of an external approach, with or without Zenker's diverticulectomy, was performed in all patients by the senior author.

RESULTS

Before Zenker's diverticulectomy and CP myotomy, the mean UES opening (n = 20) for a 3 mL bolus was 0.30 cm +/- 0.17, which was 57% of the mean of 60 normal controls (0.52 cm +/- 0.15) (P < .001). After repair, the mean UES opening for the same bolus size improved to 0.51 cm +/- 0.16 (P < .0001). The UES opening size in patients who have undergone repair is comparable with that of the normal controls (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

UES opening size in patients with cricopharyngeal dysfunction is 57% of the size in normal controls. CP myotomy helps to normalize the UES opening in cricopharyngeal dysfunction repair.

Tratamiento endoscópico del divertículo de Zenker

INTRODUCTION

We report our experience in the endoscopic (flexible) treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Three patients with medium-sized Zenker's diverticula were treated by endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy with a modified needle-knife sphincterotome through a therapeutic gastroscope. The procedure was performed in the digestive endoscopy unit under conscious sedation without anesthetic support.

RESULT

Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy was completed in a single session without immediate or late complications. In all three patients dysphagia disappeared and all were discharged at 48 hours with a solid diet. After 12, 18 and 17 months of follow-up there has been no recurrence of dysphagia or other symptoms attributable to Zenker's diverticulum.

CONCLUSION

Flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy is a simple, effective and safe treatment of Zenker's diverticulum that avoids the need for open cervical surgery and general anesthesia.

Surgical interventions for pharyngeal pouch

BACKGROUND

A pharyngeal pouch is an out-pouching or pocket that develops from the posterior wall of the pharynx just above the entrance to the oesophagus (gullet). Pouches may give rise to difficulty in swallowing, sensation of a lump in the throat or of food sticking in the throat and may lead to troublesome regurgitation of food. Food may enter the pouch rather than passing down the oesophagus and this and regurgitation may result in weight loss, hoarseness of voice and/or recurrent chest infections. The management of patients with a pharyngeal pouch may be either conservative or surgical. The surgical management can be further divided into two broad categories: endoscopic and open procedures. In the first half of the twentieth century an open surgical approach to the pouch was most frequently used, and remains common in some parts of the world. In recent decades endoscopic procedures (where the approach is made through the mouth) have become popular. The superiority of one approach over another has yet to be clearly demonstrated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of open and endoscopic surgical procedures for the management of a pharyngeal pouch.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004, MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) and EMBASE (1974 to 2004). Reference lists of all identified trials and previous reviews were searched for additional trials. Further electronic searches for key authors identified were made. There were no language restrictions. The date of the last search was September 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more interventions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion in the review, based on pre-determined criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No trials were identified which fulfilled the criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from high quality randomised controlled trials to demonstrate the effectiveness of endoscopic compared with open procedures for pharyngeal pouch. There is no good evidence to establish whether one endoscopic procedure is superior to another.

Evolution of surgical treatment for pharyngeal pouch

BACKGROUND

The development of endoscopic techniques, particularly endoscopic stapling, has led to a re-evaluation of the treatment of pharyngeal pouch. The pathophysiology and treatment of the condition is reviewed.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was undertaken on the pathophysiology, history and surgery of pharyngeal pouch (Zenker's diverticulum). These last two terms were used to the search the Cochrane, Medline and Embase databases (from 1966 to date) and the bibliographies of extracted articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

With recognition of the central role of the cricopharyngeus muscle in the pathogenesis of pouch formation, the emphasis on treatment has shifted from diverticulectomy to cricopharyngeal myotomy. Minimally invasive techniques have become established since the advent of endoscopic stapling devices. Although randomized controlled data are lacking, the endoscopic approach appears to offer advantages in terms of a shorter duration of anaesthesia, more rapid resumption of oral intake, shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery. It is associated with excellent success rates and minimal morbidity.

Oesophageal diverticula

Oesophageal diverticula are rare. They are most commonly seen at the pharyngo-oesophageal junction (Zenker's diverticula) or at the distal oesophagus (epiphrenic diverticula). In both cases they are caused by altered motility which results in abnormal intraluminal pressure and the pushing of the oesophageal mucosa through focal weaknesses of the muscular wall (pulsion diverticula). The established surgical treatment for these diverticula therefore consists of eliminating the functional obstruction causing the disease (myotomy), associated with resection of the diverticulum (diverticulectomy) or its suspension (diverticulopexy). Recently, the spread of minimally invasive surgery has also led the application of such techniques to the treatment of oesophageal diverticula. Endoscopic diverticulostomy with stapler, laser or coagulation, through a rigid or flexible endoscope, has been demonstrated to be a valid treatment for Zenker's diverticula-as an alternative to surgery-especially in high-risk patients. On the other hand, laparoscopic treatment of epiphrenic diverticula has recently been introduced with encouraging results. However, because the disease is rare, more experience is required in order to allow definitive conclusions.