Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for biliary strictures: the experience of 10 patients

The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with increased operative time, hospital stay, complication rates, open conversion, treatment costs, and mortality. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive literature review on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted for articles published in English up to June 2024 using common databases including PubMed/MIDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Keywords included "safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy", "difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy", "acute cholecystitis", "prevention of bile duct injuries", "intraoperative cholangiography," "bailout procedure," and "subtotal cholecystectomy". Only clinical trials, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and review articles were included. Studies involving children, robotic cholecystectomy, single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, and cholecystectomy for indications other than gallstone disease were excluded.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is ideally performed within 72 h of symptom onset, with a maximum window of 7-10 days. Intraoperative cholangiography can help clarify unclear biliary anatomy and detect bile duct injuries. In the "impossible gallbladder", laparoscopic cholecystostomy or gallbladder aspiration may be considered. When dissection of Calot's triangle is deemed hazardous or impossible, the fundus-first approach allows for completion of the procedure with either total cholecystectomy or subtotal cholecystectomy. Subtotal cholecystectomy is effective in preventing bile duct injuries, can be performed laparoscopically, and is currently the best available bailout approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common clinical scenario that requires a judicious approach by experienced surgeons in appropriate settings. When difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy is encountered, various bailout strategies are available. Currently, subtotal cholecystectomy is likely the most effective bailout approach.

Laparoscopic repair of bile duct injuries: Feasibility and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Bile duct injuries (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy occurs in approximately 0.6% of the cases, often being more severe and complex. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) is considered the optimal therapeutic option, with success rates ranging from 75% to 98%. Several series have demonstrated the advancements of the laparoscopic approach for resolving this condition. The objective of this study is to describe our experience in the laparoscopic repair of BDI.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted, including patients who underwent laparoscopic repair after BDI. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and postoperative variables were analysed using descriptive statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Eight patients with BDI underwent laparoscopic repair (out of 81 surgically repaired patients). Women comprised 75% of the sample. A complete laparoscopic repair was achieved in 75% (6) of cases. The mean age was 40.8 ± 16.61 years (range 19-65). Injuries at or above the confluence (Strasberg-Bismuth ≥ E3) occurred in 25% of cases (2). Primary repair was performed in two cases. Half of the cases underwent a Hepp-Couinaud laterolateral RYHJ, while three patients received a terminolateral RYHJ, and one underwent a bi-terminolateral RYH. The mean operative time was 260 min (range 120-360). Overall morbidity was 37.5% (3 cases): two minor complications (bile leak grade A and drainage-related bleeding) and one major complication (bile leak grade C). No mortality was recorded. The maximum follow-up period reached 26 months (range 6-26).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of laparoscopic RYHJ in a selected group of patients, offering the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

Minimally invasive surgery for post cholecystectomy biliary stricture: current evidence and future perspectives

Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) remains a devastating iatrogenic complication that adversely impacts the quality of life with high healthcare costs. Despite a decrease in the incidence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related BDI, the absolute number remains high as cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure. Open Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with meticulous surgical technique remains the gold standard surgical procedure with excellent long-term results in most patients. As with many hepatobiliary disorders, a minimally invasive approach has been recently explored to minimize access-related complications and improve postoperative recovery. Since patients with gallstone disease are often admitted for a minimally invasive cholecystectomy, laparoscopic and robotic approaches for repairing postcholecystectomy biliary stricture are attractive. While recent series have shown the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive post-cholecystectomy biliary stricture management, most are retrospective analyses with small sample sizes. Also, long-term follow-up is available only in a limited number of studies. The principles and technique of minimally invasive repair resemble open repair except for the extent of adhesiolysis and the suturing technique with continuous sutures commonly used in minimally invasive approaches. The robotic approach overcomes key limitations of laparoscopic surgery and has the potential to become the preferred minimally invasive approach for the repair of postcholecystectomy biliary stricture. Despite increasing use, lack of prospective studies and selection bias with available evidence precludes definitive conclusions regarding minimally invasive surgery for managing postcholecystectomy biliary stricture. High-volume prospective studies are required to confirm the initial promising outcomes with minimally invasive surgery.

Management of complicated choledochal cyst in children: ultrasound-guided percutaneous external drainage and subsequent definitive operation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of the combination of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous external drainage and subsequent definitive operation to manage complicated choledochal cyst in children.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 6 children with choledochal cyst who underwent initial US-guided percutaneous external drainage and subsequent cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy between January 2021 and September 2022. Patient characteristics, laboratory findings, imaging data, treatment details, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age at presentation was 2.7 ± 2.2 (0.5-6.2) years, and 2 patients (2/6) were boys. Four patients (4/6) had a giant choledochal cyst with the widest diameter of ≥ 10 cm and underwent US-guided percutaneous biliary drainage on admission or after conservative treatments. The other 2 patients (2/6) underwent US-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangio-drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage due to coagulopathy, respectively. Five patients (5/6) recovered well after US-guided percutaneous external drainage and underwent the definitive operation, whereas 1 patient (1/6) had liver fibrosis confirmed by Fibroscan and ultimately underwent liver transplantation 2 months after external drainage. The mean time from US-guided percutaneous external drainage to the definitive operation was 12 ± 9 (3-21) days. The average length of hospital stay was 24 ± 9 (16-31) days. No related complications of US-guided percutaneous external drainage occurred during hospitalization. At 10.2 ± 6.8 (1.0-18.0) months follow-up, all patients had a normal liver function and US examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our detailed analysis of this small cohort suggests that US-guided percutaneous external drainage is technically feasible for choledochal cyst with giant cysts or coagulopathy in children, which may provide suitable conditions for subsequent definitive operation with a good prognosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Minimally invasive biliary anastomosis after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a systematic review

Major bile duct injuries (BDIs) may require complex surgical repairs that are usually performed with a conventional open approach. This study aims to analyze current evidence concerning the safety and the outcomes of the minimally invasive (MI) approach for biliary anastomosis in post-cholecystectomy BDIs. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web-Of-Science indexed studies involving MI (laparoscopic or robotic) biliary anastomosis in patients with iatrogenic BDIs was performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. A total of 13 studies involving 198 patients were included. One hundred and twenty-five patients (63.1%) underwent a laparoscopic biliary anastomosis, while 73 (36.1%) received an analogue robotic procedure. All the included BDIs were types D and E (E1-E5). The mean OT varied between 190 and 330 (mean = 227) minutes. Ten studies reported the mean intraoperative blood loss that ranged between 50 and 252 (mean = 135.9) mL. No conversions occurred in the robotic series, while four patients required conversion to open surgery among the laparoscopic ones. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 6.3 days. The reported overall morbidity was similar among the robotic and laparoscopic series. During the follow-up period, no surgery-related mortality occurred. A growing number of referral centers are showing the safety and feasibility of the MI approach for biliary anastomosis in patients with major BDIs. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

[Laparoscopic reconstructive Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy]

Intraoperative damage to the bile ducts following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still one of the urgent problems of modern minimally invasive surgery. In some cases, these complications lead to patient disability, deterioration in their quality of life and need for redo surgery including technically difficult procedures. Modern endoscopic technologies are essential in the treatment of postoperative benign strictures of the common bile duct. These approaches can heal some patients after intraoperative bile duct trauma. Nevertheless, endoscopic treatment is ineffective or impossible in some clinical situations. Reconstructive Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy through laparotomy is a preferable procedure in these patients for many years. However, we report successful laparoscopic reconstructive Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in a patient with postoperative stricture of the common bile duct Halperin type 0.

Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for benign biliary stricture: A case series of 16 patients at a tertiary care centre in India

Background:

Gallstone disease is common in India, and since primary management involves surgery, it is one of the most commonly performed surgeries by a general surgeon either laparoscopically or open. There are various factors which are responsible for intra- and post-operative complications. These factors result in significant injuries which cause serious post-operative complications. Amongst them, benign biliary stricture is one such significant complication which is primarily managed by open surgery, but since advent of laparoscopy, there has been an increased interest in doing this repair laparoscopically.

Materials and Methods:

This is a retrospective study of 16 patients having obstructive jaundice due to benign biliary stricture on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography who were operated consecutively over the past 10 years laparoscopically and underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Results:

All patients underwent laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy. The mean surgical time was 280 min, and the mean blood loss was 176 ml. In the post-operative period, most of the patients were started orally after 48 h; four had atelectasis, eight had surgical site infection, none had seroma and two had bile leak. All post-operative complications responded to conservative management.

Conclusion:

The study demonstrates that laparoscopic surgery for benign biliary strictures is safe and feasible with acceptable results.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the management of post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Surgical management by a bilioenteric anastomosis is the standard for the repair of post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures (BBS). This is traditionally done as an open operation. There are a few reports describing the procedure by a laparoscopic technique. The aim of the present study was to describe our experience of laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis [Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (LRYHJ)/laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy (LHD)] in the management of post-cholecystectomy BBS and compare the outcomes with our patients operated by the open approach.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospective data of post-cholecystectomy BBS patients treated by laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis. The outcomes were compared with patients who underwent an open repair.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and February 2019, 63 patients underwent surgery for post-cholecystectomy BBS. Twenty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis (LRYHJ-13, LHD-16) were compared with 34 patients who underwent an open repair. The median age (40 vs 39) years, type of index surgery [laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 vs 15), laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy (10 vs 16), and open cholecystectomy (6 vs 3)], type of injury low stricture (7 vs 5) and high stricture (22 vs 29), preoperative biliary fistula (23 vs 30), and time from injury to repair (6 vs 7 months) were similar in the 2 groups. The median duration of surgery was also similar (210 vs 200 min, p = 0.937); however, the median intraoperative blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, p = 0.001), time to resume oral diet (2 vs 4 days p = 0.023),** and median duration of postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.001) were significantly less in the laparoscopy group. Overall morbidity rate (within 30 days post-surgery) was significantly higher in the open repair group (38% vs 20%). In a subgroup analysis of the laparoscopic repair group, the operative time in patients who underwent an LHD was significantly less than LRYHJ (190 vs 230 min, p = 0.034). The other parameters like the mean intraoperative blood loss, time to initiate oral diet, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative bile leak were similar. Patients undergoing open repair had a median follow-up of 26 months with two developing anastomotic stenosis and those undergoing laparoscopic repair had a median follow-up for 9 months with one developing anastomotic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery for post-cholecystectomy BBS with an LRYHJ or LHD is feasible and safe and compares favourably with the open approach.

Minimally invasive surgery for the management of major bile duct injury due to cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

In recent years there has been a growing interest in the application of minimally invasive surgery in the management of cholecystectomy-related injury to the biliary tract. The aim of this analysis was to identify and combine the available evidence on the argument, with particular reference to major injuries to the main bile duct requiring biliodigestive anastomosis.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried through May 2019. Inclusion criteria considered all studies reporting detailed data about patients with bile duct injury following cholecystectomy receiving minimally invasive (both laparoscopic and robotic) surgical repair. Clinical outcomes data were pooled and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies reporting on the outcomes of 218 patients were eventually included in the analysis, whereby 148 patients with type D or E injury. Of these, there were 31 patients (21%) receiving direct bile duct repair and 117 patients (79%) undergoing bilioenteric reconstruction. Among patients with major bile duct injury, postoperative morbidity was 24%, being 12% the incidence of major complications and 6% the rate of patients requiring subsequent, further surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of high-level evidences precludes the possibility to draw definitive conclusions. However, the available data derived from a growing number of centers demonstrate that minimally invasive surgery may offer its well-known advantages on postoperative outcomes also in the setting of severe iatrogenic injury to the bile ducts.

Negotiating the Curve of Laparoscopic Hepatopancreaticobiliary Procedures (Basic to Advanced) at a Tertiary Rural Teaching Institute

Background:

We present here our experience of laparoscopic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgeries at our rural institute and the hurdles we faced overcoming the various challenges.

Aims and Objectives:

The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, successful completion, operative time, conversions/requirement of assistance, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications on the HPB procedures performed laparoscopically in our surgical unit; and to help young surgeons for smooth navigation through their laparoscopic career.

Materials and Methods:

All the patients admitted under our unit over the past 9 years for elective HPB surgeries operated by a single surgeon were included in this study.

Results:

Total 1304 basic laparoscopic biliary procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. After getting well versed with the standard procedure, we switched over to difficult cases involving densely adhered gallbladder, frozen Calot's, Mirizzi's syndrome, use of intraoperative cholangiogram, and take down of cholecystoduodenal fistulas. Next step in evolution was doing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and biliary procedures with decreased number of ports. Five hundred and sixty-eight procedures were advanced HPB surgeries. With time, we also started performing a variety of complex advanced laparoscopic procedures such as cystogastrostomy, hepaticojejunostomy, choledochoduodenostomy, and pancreaticojejunostomy. All these procedures have been discussed with respect to operative duration, conversion rates, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rates in the initial and later parts of the learning curves and further compared with previous standard large case studies on specific surgeries.

Conclusion:

Several hurdles are met in a new institute, that too, a rural one. The present discussion will help the budding surgeons to identify their deficiencies and chart a way forward in a systematic scientific manner.

Prevention and acute management of biliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Expert consensus statement

Gallstone disease is very common and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures all over the world. Parallel to the increase in the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies, bile duct injuries also increased. The reported incidence of bile duct injuries ranges from 0.3% to 1.4%. Many of the bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are not due to inexperience, but are the result of basic technical failures and misinterpretations. A working group of expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons, an endoscopist, and a specialist of forensic medicine study searched and analyzed the publications on safe cholecystectomy and biliary injuries complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the organization of Turkish Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Association. After a series of e-mail communications and two conferences, the expert panel developed consensus statements for safe cholecystectomy, management of biliary injuries and medicolegal issues. The panel concluded that iatrogenic biliary injury is an overwhelming complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an important issue in malpractice claims. Misidentification of the biliary system is the major cause of biliary injuries. To avoid this, the "critical view of safety" technique should be employed in all the cases. If biliary injury is identified intraoperatively, reconstruction should only be performed by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons. In the postoperative period, any deviation from the expected clinical course of recovery should alert the surgeon about the possibility of biliary injury.

Early experience of laparoscopic complete en bloc excision for choledochal cysts in adults

BACKGROUND

For choledochal cyst, the treatment of choice is total excision of the cyst because there is a risk of biliary cancer including the gallbladder. The current report describes the authors' early experiences using their technique of laparoscopic en bloc excision of choledochal cysts with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction.

METHODS

Between September 2009 and July 2011, laparoscopic excision for choledochal cyst was attempted for 20 patients at the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center. Clinical, radiologic, and surgical data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 37.8 ± 11.1 years (range, 18-65 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 1:4.0 (4:16). According to Todani's classification, there were four type 1a cases, seven type 1c cases, and nine type 4a cases. The mean operation time was 395.8 ± 58.7 min. No perioperative transfusions were required. The average body mass index was 23.5 ± 4.04 kg/m(2). Conversion to laparotomy was required for seven patients (35 %) due to bleeding (n = 1), Roux loop venous congestion (n = 1), abdominal obesity (n = 2), and severe fibrosis and inflammation around the cyst (n = 3). No malignancies were identified. Of the 13 patients who underwent laparoscopy, the jejunojejunostomy was created extracorporeally for the first 2 patients and intracorporeally for the subsequent 11 patients. All hepaticojejunostomies were performed intracorporeally. Oral feeding was resumed on postoperative day 3. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.3 days (range, 8-36 days). No major complications or mortalities occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidity and mortality rates for the authors' method are comparable with previously reported results. Although the conversion rate, mean operation time, and hospital stay were greater than reported in some studies, this probably reflected the authors' learning curve for this technically challenging procedure. They believe laparoscopic approaches will eventually become an advantageous treatment option for laparotomy offered to selected choledochal cyst patients.

Laparoscopic complete cyst excision and hepaticoduodenostomy for choledochal cyst: early results in 74 cases

OBJECTIVE

To report the technical details and early outcomes of complete laparoscopic cyst excision and hepaticoduodenostomy for choledochal cyst.

METHODS

The operation was performed using four ports. The cystic duct was identified and divided. The liver was elevated by two stay sutures: one on the round ligament, and the other on the distal cystic duct. The choledochalcyst was isolated and removed completely and the duodenum was mobilized. Hepaticoduodenostomy was constructed 2 cm distal to the pylorus using two running sutures with 5-0 polydioxane sutures.

RESULTS

From January to December 2007, 74 patients were operated. There were 59 girls and 15 boys. Ages ranged from 2.5 months to 16 years old. The diameter of the cyst ranged from 10 mm to 184 mm. The operating time ranged from 90 minutes to 340 minutes (mean: 186 minutes). Conversion to open surgery was required in one patient. Blood transfusion was required in four patients. Postoperative anastomotic leakage occurred in three patients, resolving spontaneously in two patients and requiring a second operation in the third.Postoperative hospital stay ranged from 4 days to 21 days (average: 6.6 days). Follow-up from 3 months to 12 months was obtained in 56 patients (75.5%). Of these patients, cholangitis occurred in three patients (5.3%) and gastritis due to bilious reflux in eight patients (14.3%).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic complete cyst excision and hepaticoduodenostomy is a safe and physiologic procedure for choledochal cyst.

Laparoscopic Resection of Type I Choledochal Cyst in an Adult and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Choledochal cysts are rare cystic dilatations of the extrahepatic biliary tree, the intrahepatic bile ducts, or both and carry a substantial risk of malignant transformation. Type I choledochal cysts, which involve the entire common hepatic and common bile ducts, represent 80% to 90% of these lesions. We report laparoscopic excision of symptomatic type I choledochal cyst in a 37-year-old woman, and review the literature. Laparoscopic excision of the extrahepatic biliary tree from the hepatic confluence to the anomalous pancreatobiliary junction with en bloc cholecystectomy and reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was accomplished. Postoperative recovery was uneventful with a hospital stay of 3 days. She remains well and asymptomatic at 6 months of follow-up. Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cysts may be safely accomplished with a prompt recovery. Further experience with this approach in larger number of patients is justified and long-term follow-up data are needed.

Totally laparoscopic management of choledochal cysts using a four-hole method

BACKGROUND

Choledochal cyst is a rare benign disease of the biliary tract. However, once diagnosed, it must be excised with the gallbladder because of the risk for cancer developing in the biliary tree, including the gallbladder. This report introduces a new surgical technique for totally laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst and hepaticojejunostomy using a four-hole method.

METHODS

Between October 2003 and May 2005, the authors performed totally laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision for 12 patients. All the patients except one were women, and the mean age was 37.3 years (range, 17-62 years). According to the Todani classification, there were five type Ia cases, four type Ic cases, and three type IV cases. Choledochal cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were performed laparoscopically using the four-port technique.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 228 min (range, 150-330 min). No operative or postoperative transfusion was required. An oral diet was started on postoperative day 3. The average length of hospital stay was 5.8 days. There was no major complication associated with anastomosis leakage or obstruction. No patient had an adverse response, as determined by clinical or laboratory evaluation during a 2- to 19-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that choledochal cyst is common among young women, who are especially interested in cosmetic results in addition to complete resolution of medical problems, the laparoscopic management of choledochal cyst may be an attractive treatment option.