Crura ultrastructural alterations in patients with hiatal hernia: a pilot study

Incidence and Impact of Preoperative Hiatal Hernia in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma Undergoing Curative Surgical Resection

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia (HH) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma. High positive margin rates and poor survival were described among HH patients undergoing esophagectomy. We sought to describe incidence and impact of HH on outcomes following esophagectomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy 2012-2019 for esophago-junctional carcinoma were included. CT studies were blindly reviewed by two radiologists. A third radiologist reviewed cases of disagreement. Hernias ≥ 3 cm were included in the HH group.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 patients (33%) had HH ≥ 3 cm. The no hernia group included 12 patients (6%) with < 3 cm HH and 106 (53%) without HH. Preoperative variables were comparable among groups. Location of anastomosis was similar among cohorts and predominantly cervical (n = 97, 82.2% vs 61, 92.4%, p = 0.113). Postoperatively, HH patients had higher incidence of atrial dysrhythmia (n = 11, 16.7% vs n = 6, 5.1% p = 0.015). Rates of R0 resections were similar (n = 62, 93.9%, vs n = 113, 95.8%, p = 0.724). HH patients had higher rates of signet ring cell histology (n = 14, 21.2% vs n = 9, 7.6% p = 0.025); this was confirmed on subgroup analysis including only adenocarcinoma patients (n = 14, 28.6% vs n = 8, 12.3%, p = 0.042). On Cox regression analysis, HH was not associated with disease-free or overall survival (HR 1.308, p = 0.274 and HR .905, p = 0.722).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with preoperative HH had higher rates of postoperative atrial dysrhythmias and signet ring cell features on pathology. In a population with predominant cervical anastomosis, positive margin rates were low and survival comparable among cohorts.

Patient-tailored algorithm for laparoscopic cruroplasty standardization: comparison with hiatal surface area and medium-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Different methods have been described for laparoscopic hiatoplasty and hiatus hernia (HH) repair. All techniques are not standardized and the choice to reinforce or not the hiatus with a mesh is left to the operating surgeon's preference. Hiatal surface area (HSA) has been described as an attempt at standardization; in case the area is > 4 cm², a mesh is used to reinforce the repair.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe a new patient-tailored algorithm (PTA), compare its performance in predicting crura mesh buttressing to HSA, and analyze outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center, descriptive study (September 2018-September 2021). Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic HH repair. Outcomes and quality of life measured with the disease-specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and reflux symptom index (RSI) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients that underwent laparoscopic hiatoplasty and Toupet fundoplication were included. The median age was 61 years (range 32-83) and the median BMI was 26.7 (range 17-36). According to the PTA, 27 patients (54%) underwent simple suture repair while crural mesh buttressing with Phasix-ST® was used in 23 (46%). According to the HSA, the median hiatus area was 4.7 cm² while 26 patients had an HSA greater than 4 cm². The overall concordance rate between PTA and HSA was 94% (47/50). The median hospital stay was 1.9 days (range 1-8) and the 90-day complication rate was 4%. The median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 1-35). Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in 6%. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in one patient (2%). The GERD-HRQL (p < 0.001) and RSI (p = 0.001) were significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of PTA for cruroplasty standardization in the setting of HH repair seems effective. While concordance with HSA is high, the PTA seems easier and promptly available in the operative theater with a potential increase in procedure standardization, reproducibility, and teaching.

Paraesophageal hernia: to fundoplicate or not?

The need for an antireflux procedure during repair of a paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has been the subject of a long-standing controversy. With most centers now performing routine fundoplication during PEH repair, high-quality data on whether crural repair alone or using a mesh may provide adequate anti-reflux effect is still scarce. We sought to answer to the question: "Is fundoplication routinely needed during PEH repair?". Our endpoints were (I) rates of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (either symptomatic or objectively assessed), (II) rates of recurrence, and (III) rates of postoperative dysphagia. We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases for papers published between 1995 and 2019, selecting comparative cohort studies and only including papers reporting the rationale for performing or not performing fundoplication. Overall, nine papers were included for review. While four of the included studies recommended selective or no fundoplication, most of these data come from earlier retrospective studies. Higher-quality data from recent prospective studies including two randomized controlled trials recommended routine fundoplication, mostly due to a significantly lower incidence of postoperative GERD. However, only a relatively short follow-up of 12 months was presented, which we recognize as an important limitation. Fundoplication did not seem to result in reduced recurrence rates when compared to primary repair alone.

Techniques and pitfalls of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in severe kyphoscoliosis patients

Background:

Increasing evidence suggests that kyphoscoliosis may play a role in the pathophysiology of paraesophageal hernia development. The presence of severe kyphoscoliosis not only increases the incidence of paraesophageal hernia but also increases the risk of hiatal hernia (HH) repair. Moreover, the technical skills and the pitfalls of laparoscopic repair of HH in this special condition have yet been described.

Methods:

The technical skills, experience and pitfalls of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in severe kyphoscoliosis patients were described. These include perioperative care of patients’ pulmonary function, patients’ operating position and trocar placement, and the key steps and risks of laparoscopic HH repair in this special condition.

Results:

Paraesophageal HHs were successfully laparoscopically repaired, and prolonged hospital stay was due to post-operative pulmonary complications.

Conclusion:

These techniques are essential to minimise the perioperative complications in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in severe kyphoscoliosis patients, and great pulmonary care is required in these patients.

Outcome of medical and surgical therapy of GERD: predictive role of quality of life scores and instrumental evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Aim of this study is to determine whether quality of life (QoL) assessment in association with instrumental evaluation can help to identify factors predictive of outcome both in surgically and medically treated GERD patients.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and June 2010, 301 patients affected with GERD were included in the study. QoL was evaluated by means of GERD-HRQL and SF-36 questionnaires administered before treatment, at 6 months, at 1 year follow-up and at the end of the study. The multivariate analysis was used to detect if variables such as sex, age, heartburn, acid regurgitation, dysphagia, presence of esophagitis, percentage of total time at pH < 4, symptom index score (SI), the SF-36 and HRQL scores before treatment, at 6 months and 1 year could affect the QoL questionnaires scores at the end of the study.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven patients were included in the surgical group and 154 in the medical group. No differences with regard to gender, age, mean SF-36 and HRQL scores before treatment were documented. At the end of the study, quality of life was significantly improved for SF-36 and HRQL scores, either for surgical or medical group. The multivariate analysis showed no factors individually affected the SF-36 and the HRQL scores, but symptom index score (SI) and QoL questionnaires scores at 6 months and 1 year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of pHmetry with evaluation of SI and QoL questionnaires can predict the outcome of GERD patients managed either by medical or surgical therapy.

Hiatal hernia and disorders of the spine: a historical perspective

Our understanding of esophageal disease and the foregut has evolved over the past 100 years, especially in recent times. Modern diagnostic technologies and new management paradigms have provided progressive insights into the anatomy, physiology, and normal and abnormal function of the esophagus, as well as improving patient care. Yet, the relationship between the esophagus and its close neighbor, the spine, is rarely discussed and likely underappreciated. Anatomic proximity and intertwined pathophysiology led early investigators to postulate relationships between esophageal disease and spinal abnormalities. More recent studies have illustrated a link between spinal disease and hiatal hernias. Objective radiographic measurements of kyphoscoliosis have correlated with increased hiatal hernia formation. Spinal abnormalities and disease of the esophageal hiatus are becoming more common in our aging population, with each carrying significant risk of morbidity and decreased quality of life. Operative planning and subsequent hiatal hernia repair must be undertaken in the context of these spinal abnormalities. A historical review of past publications related to the subject forms the basis for this publication, thus revealing insight and improving our understanding of the association between spinal abnormalities and hiatal hernias.

Hiatal hernias: a review of the pathophysiologic theories and implication for research

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of hiatal hernias is incompletely understood. This study systematically reviewed the literature of hiatal hernias to provide an evidence-based explanation of the pathogenetic theories and to identify any risk factors at the molecular and cellular levels.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Medline and Pubmed databases on the pathophysiology of hiatal hernias was performed to identify English-language citations from the database inception to December 2010.

RESULTS

Although few studies have examined the relationship of molecular and cellular changes of the diaphragm to the pathogenesis of hiatal hernias, there appear to be three dominant pathogenic theories: (1) increased intraabdominal pressure forces the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) into the thorax; (2) esophageal shortening due to fibrosis or excessive vagal nerve stimulation displaces the GEJ into the thorax; and (3) GEJ migrates into the chest secondary to a widening of the diaphragmatic hiatus in response to congenital or acquired molecular and cellular changes, such as the abnormalities of collagen type 3 alpha 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathogenesis of hiatal hernias at the molecular and cellular levels is poorly described. To date, no single theory has proved to be the definitive explanation for hiatal hernia formation, and its pathogenesis appears to be multifactorial.

Association of kyphosis and spinal skeletal abnormalities with intrathoracic stomach: a link toward understanding its pathogenesis

BACKGROUND

Modern-day concepts about the pathogenesis of an intrathoracic stomach include crural diaphragm muscular deterioration, loss of phrenoesophageal ligament integrity, and presence of abdominothoracic pressure gradients. The role of spinal abnormalities has received little attention. Based on clinical observation, we hypothesized that kyphosis and other spinal diseases are components of the pathophysiology of an intrathoracic stomach.

STUDY DESIGN

The study population consisted of 98 patients (men, n = 22; women, n = 76; mean age 69.4 years) undergoing operations for type III or IV hiatal hernia with an intrathoracic stomach. Twenty-four age- and gender-matched control patients without hiatal hernia undergoing pulmonary or pleural procedures were used for comparison. Chest radiographs were assessed for spinal abnormalities, including degree of kyphosis, measured from superior T4 to inferior T12 (modified Cobb method), spinal fractures, osteoporosis, and scoliosis. Statistical analyses included two-sample t-test and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Patients with intrathoracic stomach had a greater degree of kyphosis than control patients (Cobb angle, 50.2 degrees versus 39.7 degrees; p < 0.001). This difference was most pronounced in women (Cobb angle, 51.7 degrees versus 40.4 degrees; p < 0.001), although the difference in men was not significant (Cobb angle, 45.0 degrees versus 38.1 degrees; p = 0.25). Patients with an intrathoracic stomach had significantly more vertebral fractures (37 of 98 [38%] versus 3 of 24 [13%]; p < 0.05). There was no difference in prevalence of degenerative changes (51 of 98 [52%], versus 13 of 24 [54%]), osteopenia (30 of 98 [31%] versus 6 of 24 [25%]), and scoliosis (27 of 98 [28%] versus 6 of 24 [25%]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an intrathoracic stomach have a higher degree of kyphosis and more vertebral fractures than age- and gender-matched controls. These data suggest that change in spinal curvature can be important in the pathogenesis of the intrathoracic stomach, a growing problem of our aging population.

Hiatal hernia recurrence: surgical complication or disease? Electron microscope findings of the diaphragmatic pillars

INTRODUCTION

Although laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has been recognized as the standard of care for hiatal hernia (HH) repair, HH recurrence due to breakdown of the hiatoplasty have been reported as a common mechanism of failure after primary repair. Different surgical techniques for diaphragmatic pillars closure have been proposed, but the problem remains unsolved. The authors hypothesized that ultrastructural illness may be implicated in this recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of changes at esophageal hiatal area in patients with and without HH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-two laparoscopic samples from phrenoesophageal membrane and diaphragmatic crura were collected from 33 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and HH (HH group) and 60 samples from 15 patients without HH enrolled as the control group (NHH group). All specimens were processed and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Muscular and connective samples from the NHH group showed no ultrastructural alterations; similar results were found in phrenoesophageal ligament samples from the HH group. In contrast, 94% of the muscular samples obtained from the crura of the HH group have documented four main types of alterations. In 75% of HH patients, the pillar lesions were severe.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hiatal hernia have ultrastructural abnormalities at the muscular tissue of the crura that are not present in patients with a normal gastroesophageal junction. There is no difference in the microscopic damage at the connective tissue of the phrenoesophageal membrane surrounding the esophagus of the two groups of patients. The outcome of antireflux surgery could depend not only on the adopted surgical technique but also on the underlying status of the diaphragmatic crura.