The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis

Prevalence of Persistent Common Bile Duct Stones in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Remains Stable Within the First Week of Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is often associated with persistent common bile duct (CBD) stones. The best strategy in terms of timing of surgery is still controversial. The aim of the current study is to describe the prevalence of persistent common bile duct (CBD) stones in ABP during the first week of symptoms at a high-volume referral center.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Patients with diagnosis of ABP who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between January 2009 and December 2019 were extracted.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one patients were included. Cholecystectomy was performed laparoscopically in 230 (99.57%) patients. Intraoperative cholangiogram was performed in all patients. Two hundred nine (90%) patients had surgery within the first 7 days. Global prevalence of persistent CBD stones during IOC was 19.91% (95% CI 14.96-25.65). No significant association between timing to surgery and presence of CBD stones was found for the first week since the initial attack (p=0.28). Prevalence of CBD stones was significantly higher after day 7 (p=0.007 and 0.005). Positive findings in preoperative MRCP are significantly related to intraoperative CBD stones (p=0.0001). Mild postoperative complications (CD I/II) were present in 21 patients (9.09%). No difference was found in morbidity between CBD stones group and non-CBD stones group (p=0.48). We observed no severe complications nor mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis, the prevalence of persistent CBD stones does not change within the first 7 days since the onset of symptoms. This fact may have major clinical relevance when deciding the optimal therapeutic strategy in this population.

Timing of Cholecystectomy in Children With Biliary Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Biliary pancreatitis (BP) is common in adults and children. Current standard of care is to perform a cholecystectomy (CCE) to decrease the recurrence risk of pancreatitis. Controversy exists as to the timing of surgery, early versus delayed surgical intervention. Adult literature suggests a greater benefit of early CCE. Comparatively, there is limited pediatric literature as to the optimal timing of a CCE in children. We report a retrospective case series of children with BP who underwent early versus late CCE.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of children with BP for a period of 45 months. Reviewed information included patient demographics, timing of CCE, and the occurrence of adverse events preceding or following surgical intervention. Early CCE was defined as surgery during the index admission; late CCE was defined as surgery during a subsequent admission.

RESULTS

Nineteen children and adolescents (17 girls) were identified to have had BP with a subsequent CCE. Cholecystectomy was performed early in 9 patients with no adverse events. Ten patients had delayed surgery with 4 occurrences of adverse clinical events (recurrence of pancreatitis or biliary colic abdominal pain) while awaiting their CCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse biliary-related events occur at a higher rate in children with mild BP who undergo a delayed CCE when compared to early CCE performance. Early CCE is safe to perform in children with mild BP.

The impact of intraoperative cholangiography on recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications in patients with gallstone pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Although gallstone pancreatitis is initiated by the presence of stones in the common bile duct, the benefit associated with routine intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy in these patients is unclear. The purpose of this study, using population-based data, was to determine the impact of cholangiography on clinical outcomes after cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis.

METHODS

All patients who were admitted to hospital from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2001 in Nova Scotia, Canada with pancreatitis who underwent cholecystectomy during the same admission were identified. The rates of recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications after surgery were compared between patients who underwent cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography ± common bile duct exploration and those who underwent cholecystectomy alone, using three linked administrative databases.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-two patients were identified, 119 had cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy and 213 did not. After a median follow-up of after 3.8 years, there was no difference in the rate of recurrent pancreatitis or biliary complications between those who had cholangiography ± common bile duct exploration at the time of surgery and those who did not; 13.4 versus 10.8 %, respectively (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that intraoperative cholangiography does not improve outcomes after cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis.

Cholecystectomy for Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Early Vs Delayed Approach

Background and Aims:

The management of gallstone pancreatitis, in particular timing of cholecystectomy, has evolved substantially over the last decade. The trend has been toward earlier cholecystectomy. We review current literature regarding the timing of cholecystectomy in the context of gallstone pancreatitis.

Materials and Methods:

The authors performed a literature search in PubMed for relevant articles in the English language with greatest weight given to prospective trials compared to observational studies and previous reviews.

Results:

The literature search yielded 59 articles discussing cholecystectomy in the context of gallstone pancreatitis. Most were retrospective studies or reviews, but there were nine prospective observational studies and two randomized control trials. For mild gallstone pancreatitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 48 hours of presentation (without normalization of pancreatic enzymes or absence of abdominal pain) has been shown to shorten hospital stay without increased morbidity or mortality. Routine preoperative ERCP is unnecessary for patients with mild disease. For more severe disease, timing of cholecystectomy is governed by clinical status. Interval cholecystectomy (>2 weeks after index admission) can be safely done with low risk of recurrence if the patient has had ERCP and sphincterotomy at index admission.

Conclusion:

Patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis should have cholecystectomy during index admission within 48 hours of arrival, but patients with more severe disease will require cholecystectomy at a later time, depending on the clinical circumstances. Sphincterotomy should be done as soon as possible if cholecystectomy is not feasible early in course.

Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent attacks of acute biliary pancreatitis (RABP) are prevented by (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy. Since the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), several series have described a similar reduction of RABP after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). This report discusses the different treatment options for preventing RABP including conservative treatment, cholecystectomy, ES, and combinations of these options as well as their respective timing.

METHODS

A search in PubMed for observational studies and clinical (comparative) trials published in the English language was performed on the subject of recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis and other gallstone complications after an initial attack of acute pancreatitis.

RESULT

Cholecystectomy and ES both are superior to conservative treatment in reducing the incidence of RABP. Cholecystectomy provides additional protection for gallstone-related complications and mortality. Observational studies indicate that cholecystectomy combined with ES is the most effective treatment for reducing the incidence of RABP attacks.

CONCLUSION

From the literature data it can be concluded that ES is as effective in reducing RABP as cholecystectomy but inferior in reducing mortality and overall morbidity. The combination of ES and cholecystectomy seems superior to either of the treatment methods alone. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing ES plus cholecystectomy with cholecystectomy alone is needed.