Laparoscopic left lobe liver resection in a porcine model: a study of the efficacy and safety of different surgical techniques

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with right lateral hepatic lobectomy in pigs: surgical approach and comparative study of the inflammatory response versus open surgery

This study describes a left hemihepatectomy combined with a right lateral hepatic lobectomy. It compares the inflammatory response associated with laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH group, n = 7) with conventional open hepatectomy (OH group, n = 7). Blood was collected before surgery as well as 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days after surgery to determine the white blood cell count and levels of serum cortisol (COR), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The left hemi-hepatectomy combined with a right lateral hepatic lobectomy was completed in miniature pigs. The average operative time was 139.00 ± 9.07 min, which was longer than that in the OH group (121.67 ± 3.02 min). The length of surgical incision associated with the OH group was 17.93 ± 1.09 cm, significantly longer than that related to the LH group (5.10 ± 0.17 cm). The estimated mean blood loss in the LH group was 136.43 ± 63.24 mL, which was significantly lower than that in the OH group. No severe complications (e.g., massive bleeding, bile leakage, and air embolism) were reported. The CRP levels, COR, and IL-6, increased significantly in the OH group and then slowly returned to their preoperative levels. A postoperative laparoscopic exploration revealed that the incised portion of the liver adhered to the omentum, but no additional abnormalities were observed. These findings indicate that a 4-trocar method for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with a right lateral hepatic lobectomy is safe and feasible. The inflammatory response for those receiving LH are lower than that for those receiving OH. This porcine model can be used as a research analog for liver disease and regeneration.

Laparoscopic Liver Resection Using a Silicone Band Retraction Method (With Video)

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The success of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) depends on stable and full exposure of the parenchymal transection plane. We evaluated the efficacy of LLR using a silicone band retraction method for lesions in the anterolateral and posterosuperior segments.

Laparoscopic left hepatectomy in swine: a safe and feasible technique

A purely laparoscopic four-port approach was created for left hepatectomy in pigs. A polyethylene loop was placed on the left two hepatic lobes for traction and lift. Next, penetrating ligation of the lobes using of a double row of silk sutures was performed to control bleeding. A direct hepatic transection was completed using a monopolar hook electrode without meticulous dissection of the left hepatic vein. The raw surface of the liver was coagulated and sealed with fibrin glue. Lobes were retrieved through an enlarged portal. Laparoscopic hepatic lobectomy was completed in all pigs without the use of specialized instruments and with a mean operative time of 179 ± 9 min. No significant perioperative complications were observed. The average weight of each resected lobe was 180 ± 51 g. Complete blood count as well as serum organics and enzyme levels normalized after about 2 weeks. During necropsy, adhesion of the hepatic raw surface to the gastric wall and omentum were observed. No other abnormalities were identified. This minimally invasive left hepatectomy technique in swine could serve as a useful model for investigating liver diseases and regeneration, and offer preclinical information to improve hepatobiliary surgical procedures.

Usefulness of vessel-sealing devices combined with crush clamping method for hepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Blood loss during resection of the hepatic parenchyma in hepatectomy can be minimized using vessel-sealing (VS) devices. Some sealing devices were retrospectively compared to evaluate the efficacy of each device for controlling blood loss, transection time and postoperative complications in hepatectomy as a cohort study.

METHODS

Between 2005 and September 2012, hepatectomy was underwent in 150 patients using one of three types of LigaSure™ (Dolphin Tip Laparoscopic Instrument, Precise or Small Jaw) or the Harmonic Focus or Ace ultrasonic dissecting sealer. Results were compared to crush-clamping alone as the control method by the historical study (n = 81).

RESULTS

Irrespective of the vessel-sealing device used for underlying chronic hepatitis, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, operating time and transection time were significantly reduced in the VS group compared with controls (p < 0.05). Rates of postoperative bile leakage and intra-abdominal abscess formation were significantly lower in the VS group than in controls (p < 0.05). Comparing devices, LigaSure Small Jaw and Harmonic Focus showed lower blood loss, shorter transection time and reduced rates of post-hepatectomy complications, in turn resulting in shorter hospital stays (p < 0.05). Tendencies toward uncontrolled ascites and bile leakage were only concern with the use of Harmonic Focus. Satisfactory surgical results were achieved using the sealing device for laparoscopic hepatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of energy sealing devices improves surgical results and avoids hepatectomy-related complications. Adequate use of vessel sealers is necessary for safe and rapid completion of hepatic resection.

Usefulness of the combination procedure of crash clamping and vessel sealing for hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

Minimization of blood loss during resection of the hepatic parenchyma in hepatectomy remains a major problem. The usefulness of the LigaSure sealing system has been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of combination procedure of LigaSure and forceps clamping for control blood loss and transection time in hepatectomy.

METHODS

Here, we report our experience with the combination technique of LigaSure Precise, a clamp forceps type, and crush clamping method for hepatic transection in 33 patients who underwent hepatectomy.

RESULTS

The combination technique allows fast and bloodless transection even along the major intrahepatic vessels. Blood loss and transection time were significantly reduced in the group of LigaSure use (P < 0.05). Efficient hemostasis could be achieved also in patients with extensive liver injury such as cirrhosis. The rates of postoperative intraabdominal abscess formation in the combination technique of LigaSure and crush clamping were lower compared with the conventional crush clamping method (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of LigaSure Precise and crush clamping technique is safe and allows rapid completion of hepatic resection.

Total laparoscopic liver resection in 78 patients

AIM: To summarize the clinical experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy at a single center.

METHODS: Between November 2003 and March 2009, 78 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 39), metastatic liver carcinoma (n = 10), and benign liver neoplasms (n = 29) underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy in our unit. A retrospective analysis was done on the clinical outcomes of the 78 patients.

RESULTS: The lesions were located in segments I (n = 3), II (n = 16), III (n = 24), IV (n = 11), V (n = 11), VI (n = 9), and VIII (n = 4). The lesion sizes ranged from 0.8 to 15 cm. The number of lesions was three (n = 4), two (n = 8) and one (n = 66) in the study cohort. The surgical procedures included left hemi-hepatectomy (n = 7), left lateral lobectomy (n = 14), segmentectomy (n = 11), local resection (n = 39), and resection of metastatic liver lesions during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer (n = 7). Laparoscopic liver resection was successful in all patients, with no conversion to open procedures. Only four patients received blood transfusion (400-800 mL). There were no perioperative complications, such as bleeding and biliary leakage. The liver function of all patients recovered within 1 wk, and no liver failure occurred.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible operation with minimal surgical trauma. It should be performed by a surgeon with sufficient experience in open hepatic resection and who is proficient in laparoscopy.