Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a highly demanding procedure. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3241-3243. [PMID: 20372934 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1025-y]

Analysis of the impact on sexual function in early-onset overweight male patients with rectal cancer following robotic surgery

The effect of radical resection of male rectal cancer on sexual function has been the focus of attention. Despite this, there remains a dearth of robust evidence regarding the influence of robotic radical resection of rectal cancer on postoperative sexual function, particularly in men diagnosed at an early age. This study aims to explore the implications of robotic radical resection of rectal cancer on sexual function in early-onset overweight male patients diagnosed with this disease. A retrospective analysis was performed on male patients under 50 years old and over 20 years old who were diagnosed with rectal cancer (cT1-3N0M0) and underwent surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2015 to August 2020. Sexual function was evaluated by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) test and scored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The sexual function of traditional laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (L-RE) and robotic radical resection of rectal cancer (R-RE) were compared. According to body mass index, L-RE and R-RE groups were further divided into normal body weight groups (LN-RE and RN-RE) and overweight groups (LO-RE and RO-RE), and the sexual function of each group was compared successively. Neither L-RE nor R-RE patients had significant differences in number of lymph nodes removed, tumour size, pathological TNM stage, or first exhaust time or time to eat liquids. The OS and DFS of the L-RE and R-RE groups, as well as the LO-RE and RO-RE groups, did not differ statistically after the logarithmic rank test (P > 0.05). IIEF scores in both the L-RE and R-RE groups declined sharply 1 month after surgery and then steadily increased. The R-RE group's IIEF scores significantly recovered in 6 months, compared to 12 months in the L-RE group. In comparison of subgroups, the results of sexual function in the LN-RE and RN-RE groups were similar to those in the L-RE and R-RE groups. Conversely, the RO-RE group showed slightly improved sexual function recovery than the LO-RE group 3 and 6 months post-surgery. 12 months after surgery, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. With similar long-term oncology outcomes, the robot-assisted surgical approach provided better protection of sexual function for men with early-onset rectal cancer, especially for those with a higher body mass index (BMI).

Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Urological and sexual dysfunction are recognised risks of rectal cancer surgery; however, there is limited evidence regarding urogenital function comparing robotic to laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the urogenital functional outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Urological and sexual functions were assessed using gender-specific validated standardised questionnaires. Questionnaires were sent a minimum of 6 months after surgery, and patients were asked to report their urogenital function pre- and post-operatively, allowing changes in urogenital function to be identified. Questionnaires were sent to 158 patients (89 laparoscopy, 69 robotic) of whom 126 (80 %) responded. Seventy-eight (49 male, 29 female) of the responders underwent laparoscopic and 48 (35 male, 13 female) robotic surgery.

RESULTS

Male patients in the robotic group deteriorated less across all components of sexual function and in five components of urological function. Composite male urological and sexual function score changes from baseline were better in the robotic cohort (p < 0.001). In females, there was no difference between the two groups in any of the components of urological or sexual function. However, composite female urological function score change from baseline was better in the robotic group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Robotic rectal cancer surgery might offer better post-operative urological and sexual outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery in male patients and better urological outcomes in females. Larger scale, prospective randomised control studies including urodynamic assessment of urogenital function are required to validate these results.

Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery

AIM

To analyses the current literature regarding the urogenital functional outcomes of patients receiving robotic rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of electronic databases was performed in October 2015. The following search terms were applied: “rectal cancer” or “colorectal cancer” and robot* or “da Vinci” and sexual or urolog* or urinary or erect* or ejaculat* or impot* or incontinence. All original studies examining the urological and/or sexual outcomes of male and/or female patients receiving robotic rectal cancer surgery were included. Reference lists of all retrieved articles were manually searched for further relevant articles. Abstracts were independently searched by two authors.

RESULTS

Fifteen original studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 1338 patients were included; 818 received robotic, 498 laparoscopic and 22 open rectal cancer surgery. Only 726 (54%) patients had their urogenital function assessed via means of validated functional questionnaires. From the included studies, three found that robotic rectal cancer surgery leads to quicker recovery of male urological function and five of male sexual function as compared to laparoscopic surgery. It is unclear whether robotic surgery offers favourable urogenital outcomes in the long run for males. In female patients only two studies assessed urological and three sexual function independently to that of males. In these studies there was no difference identified between patients receiving robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, in females the presented evidence was very limited making it impossible to draw any substantial conclusions.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be a trend towards earlier recovery of male urogenital function following robotic surgery. To evaluate this further, larger well designed studies are required.

Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite the several series in which the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery were investigated, data concerning the long-term outcomes are still scarce.

METHODS

The prospectively collected records of 65 consecutive patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer who underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) were compared with those of 109 consecutive patients treated with open surgery (OTME). Patient characteristics, pathological findings, local and systemic recurrence rates and 5-year survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, reoperation and 30-day mortality. There were significant differences comparing groups: number of lymph nodes harvested (RTME: 20.1 vs. OTME: 14.1, P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (RTME: 0 vs. OTME: 150 ml, P = 0.003), operation time (RTME: 299.0 vs. OTME: 207.5 min, P < 0.001) and length of postoperative stay (RTME: 6 vs. OTME: 9 days, P < 0.001). The rate of circumferential resection margin involvement and distal resection margin were not statistically different between groups. There were no statistically significant differences at the 5-year follow-up: overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival. The cumulative local recurrence rate was statistically lower in the robotic group (RTME: 3.4% vs. OTME: 16.1%, P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

RTME showed a significant reduction in local recurrence rate and a higher, although not statistically significant, long-term cancer-specific survival with respect to OTME. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm or deny significantly better local control rates with robotic surgery.