Video. Laparoscopic dissection of Denonvilliers' fascia and implications for total mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer

Robot-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations with rectourethral and rectovesical fistula: feasibility and short-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Multiple structures in the anorectal area are closely related to defecation, voiding and sexual function. Although laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through is widely accepted as a minimally invasive surgical technique, controversy still exists for ARMs with rectourethral fistulas. Intraoperative injuries more or less involve the perirectal sphincters and neurovascular tissue.

METHODS

Seventeen selected infants with ARMs underwent robot-assisted anorectal pull-through (RAARP) between October 2016 and January 2018. The application of nerve- and sphincter-sparing technique in RAARP was detailed. The feasibility and early outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed without conversion. The robotic system facilitated clear dissections between different anatomical layers. Under direct vision, the fistula was easier to repair, and the rectal pouch was precisely placed in the center of the striated muscle complex. During the follow-up of 11.6 months, 13 patients resumed normal defecation. The other four children experienced mild constipation or fecal incontinence. Their continence and defecation functions showed favorable evolution.

CONCLUSION

RAARP is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of ARMs, which provides an advantage in further minimizing the injury to perirectal nerves and sphincters.

The Toldt fascia: A historic review and surgical implications in complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer

To clarify the anatomic concept of Toldt fascia, based on the literature review and the surgical anatomic dissection using laparoscopic or robotic approach. We undertook review of the historic literature and surgical videos from 250 patients with colorectal cancer operated on laparoscopically or robotically to discuss the surgical implications of Toldt fascia in complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer. Toldt fascia, sandwiched by the overlying mesothelial layer of the mesocolon and underlying mesothelial layer of the retroperitoneum, comprised loose fibrous tissues with minute vessels inside, and was contiguous from the ileocecal mesentery radix to the upper rectum. Surgical dissection plane is readily developed within the Toldt fascia; however, any attempt to dissect along the interface between Toldt fascia and the overlying mesocolon or underlying retroperitoneum failed. Within the anatomic territory of kidney, Toldt fascia fused with Gerota fascia, and then extended in all directions: upward to the dosal surface of the duodenum, liver and pancreas; medially to fuse with the adventitia layer of the abdominal aorta; laterally, it tapered at the area below the reflection of visceral and parietal peritoneum; and downward, it became a thin membranous structure covering the gonadal vessels, ureters and retroperitoneal structures and ended at the upper rectum, where it met the junction of endopelvic fascia and proper fascia of the rectum. The present study demonstrated that Toldt fascia is a natural embryonic dissection plane for the precise conduction of complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer.

Ponderings on low rectal surgery

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. As the development of modern medicine and the wide application of early cancer screening, rectal cancer has been found and treated timely nowadays. At present, sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer is getting more and more popular. Low rectal anastomotic fistula and pelvic autonomic nerve injuries are common complications. Improving the oncological clearance and reducing the complications have been the goals of surgeons. This article discusses several problems in low rectal surgery: (1) the selection of the cut-off location of the inferior mesenteric artery; (2) the protection of pelvic autonomic nerve plexus; (3) the anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia; (4) the surgical strategy for preventive stoma; and (5) the improvement of drainage in pelvic floor.

Rectal mobilization: the place of Denonvilliers' fascia and inconsistencies in the literature

Confusion remains as to what is meant by Denonvilliers' fascia. This review searched the literature on pelvic surgical anatomy to determine whether there is agreement with Denonvilliers' original description and its implication in defining the correct anterior plane of dissection when mobilizing the rectum. The original French description of the fascia was translated into English and then compared both with French and with English studies identified by searching PubMed, Medline and Scopus from 1836 to June 2015. Special emphasis was given to the years between 1980 and 2015 in order to capture the literature pertinent to, and following on from, the description of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The final literature search revealed 16 studies from the original 2150 citations. Much of the debate was concerned with the origin and development of the fascia, arising from either the 'fusion' or the 'condensation' of local primitive tissue into a mature 'multilayered' structure. Controversy regarding the correct plane of rectal mobilization occurs as a result of different interpretations by surgeons, anatomists and radiologists and bears little resemblance to Denonvilliers' original description. This may reflect wide anatomical variability in the adult pelvis or a form of dissection artefact. Further study is required to investigate this. Logically, for both men and women, the plane of rectal mobilization should be behind Denonvilliers' fascia and between it and the fascia propria of the rectum.

Effect of preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectal cancer on protection of male urinary and sexual functions

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia (DF) during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectal cancer on protection of male urogenital function. Whether preservation of DF during TME is effective for protection of urogenital function is largely elusive.Seventy-four cases of male mid-low rectal cancer were included. Radical laparoscopic proctectomy was performed, containing 38 cases of preservation of DF (P-group) and 36 cases of resection of DF (R-group) intraoperatively. Intraoperative electrical nerve stimulation (INS) on pelvic autonomic nerve was performed and intravesical pressure was measured manometrically. Urinary function was evaluated by residual urine volume (RUV), International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL). Sexual function was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scale and ejaculation function classification.Compared with performing INS on the surfaces of prostate and seminal vesicles in the R-group, INS on DF in the P-group exhibited higher increasing intravesical pressure (7.3 ± 1.5 vs 5.9 ± 2.4 cmH2O, P = 0.008). In addtion, the P-group exhibited lower RUV (34.3 ± 27.2 vs 57.1 ± 50.7 mL, P = 0.020), lower IPSS and QoL scores (7 days: 6.1 ± 2.4 vs 9.5 ± 5.9, P = 0.002 and 2.2 ± 1.1 vs 2.9 ± 1.1, P = 0.005; 1 month: 5.1 ± 2.4 vs 6.6 ± 2.2, P = 0.006 and 1.6 ± 0.7 vs 2.1 ± 0.6, P = 0.003, respectively), higher IIEF score (3 months: 10.7 ± 2.1 vs 8.9 ± 2.0, P = 0.000; 6 months: 14.8 ± 2.2 vs 12.9 ± 2.2, P = 0.001) and lower incidence of ejaculation dysfunction (3 months: 28.9% vs 52.8%, P = 0.037; 6 months: 18.4% vs 44.4%, P = 0.016) postoperatively.Preservation of DF during laparoscopic resection for selective male mid-low rectal cancer is effective for protection of urogenital function.

Anatomical basis and clinical research of pelvic autonomic nerve preservation with laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer

The clinical effect of laparoscopic rectal cancer curative excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP) was investigated. This study evaluated the frequency of urinary and sexual dysfunction of 149 male patients with middle and low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic or open total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP) from March 2011 to March 2013. Eighty-four patients were subjected to laparoscopic surgery, and 65 to open surgery respectively. The patients were followed up for 12 months, interviewed, and administered a standardized questionnaire about postoperative functional outcomes and quality of life. In the laparoscopic group, 13 patients (18.37%) presented transitory postoperative urinary dysfunction, and were medically treated. So did 12 patients (21.82%) in open group. Sexual desire was maintained by 52.86%, un-ability to engage in intercourse by 47.15%, and un-ability to achieve orgasm and ejaculation by 34.29% of the patients in the laparoscopic group. Sexual desire was maintained by 56.36%, un-ability to engage in intercourse by 43.63%, and un-ability to achieve orgasm and ejaculation by 33.73% of the patients in the open group. No significant differences in urinary and sexual dysfunction between the laparoscopic and open rectal resection groups were observed (P>0.05). It was concluded that laparoscopic rectal cancer radical excision with PANP did not aggravate or improve sexual and urinary dysfunction.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy performed by following the perigastric fascias and the intrafascial space for advanced upper-third gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPL) is required in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer. However, it is considerably difficult and risk in clinical practice. Thus, we explore the application of LSPL performed by following the perigastric fascias and the intrafascial space in D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced upper-third gastric cancer.

METHODS

From July 2010 to December 2012, 109 patients with T2-3 upper-third gastric cancer underwent LSPL. Of these patients, 55 underwent classic LSPL (classic group), and the remaining 54 patients underwent LSPL performed by following the fascias and intrafascial space (fascia group). Clinicopathologic characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). All of the operations were successful without conversion to laparotomy. The operation time, mean splenic hilar lymph node (LN) dissection time, mean total blood loss and mean blood loss from splenic hilar LN dissection were significantly lower in the fascia group than in the classic group (P<0.05), whereas the times to first flatus, fluid diet and soft diet and the duration of hospital stay were similar in both groups. The mean number of harvested LNs (No. 10 and No. 11d) was slightly higher in the fascia group, but the difference was not significant. No significant difference in morbidity was found between the fascia group and the classic group (9.3% vs.10.9%, P>0.05). At a median follow-up of 12 months(range 5 to 35 months), none of the patients had died or experienced recurrent or metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

LSPL performed by following the fascias and intrafascial space is an optimal and safe technique based on anatomical logic, and it reduces the difficulties associated with LSPL, making it easier to master and allowing its widespread adoption.

Comparison of tumor recurrence between laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation and laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

By traditional open surgery, the tumor recurrence rate of total mesorectal excision with sphincter-preserving procedure was lower than that of abdominoperineal resection (APR) for the treatment of low rectal cancer. The present study aimed to rescrutinize whether the same conclusion can be drawn when both surgical procedures are performed laparoscopically.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively recorded clinicopathologic data of 344 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer, in which 170 patients underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME), whereas 174 patients underwent laparoscopic TME directly without chemoradiotherapy. Such patients were further stratified according to the pathologic tumor, node, metastasis stage (stage II or III disease) and surgical strategy (APR or sphincter-preserving operation [SPO]). The surgical procedures are presented in supplemental videos. The disease-free survival, recurrence patterns, and functional recovery of patient groups stratified as appropriate were compared.

RESULTS

In patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the estimated recurrence rate were similar between laparoscopic TME with SPO and laparoscopic APR with 10.6%, 7 of 66, versus 18.5%, 5 of 27, in stage II disease (p = 0.811, log-rank test); and 19.3%, 11 of 57, versus 20%, 4 of 20, in stage III disease (p = 0.980). In patients without preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in laparoscopic APR than in the laparoscopic TME with SPO group of patients with stage III disease (45%, 9 of 20, vs. 19.3%, 16 of 83, p = 0.025), whereas the recurrence rate of the two procedures was similar (21.4%, 3 of 14, vs. 17.5%, 10 of 57, p = 0.702) in stage II disease.

CONCLUSIONS

When low rectal cancer was operated on by laparoscopic approach, the poorer prognosis of APR compared to SPO was only observed in stage III patients without preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Interactions in the aetiology, presentation and management of synchronous and metachronous adenocarcinoma of the prostate and rectum

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate and rectum are common male pelvic cancers and may present synchronously or metachronously and, due to their anatomic proximity. The treatment of rectal or prostate cancer (in particular surgery and/or radiotherapy) may alter the presentation, incidence and management should a metachronous tumour develop. This review focuses on the interaction between prostatic and rectal cancer diagnosis and management. We have restricted the scope of this large topic to general considerations, management of rectal cancer after prostate cancer treatment and vice versa, management of synchronous disease and cancer follow-up issues.