A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Postoperative pain in transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair with staple fixation versus self-fixation mesh

Background

The mesh fixation method is one of the multiple factors associated with chronic postoperative pain in inguinal hernia surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative pain associated with the two available fixation strategies (staple fixation versus self-fixating mesh) used in our field.

Methods

We designed an observational study with retrospective cohorts to analyze postoperative pain in patients who underwent a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with a self-fixating mesh or staple fixation, which are the two available techniques in our field. A total of 296 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included between January 2014 and October 2021.

Results

The evaluated patients' median age was 66.0 (interquartile range (IQR): 20.75) years and were predominantly male (70.13 %). The proportion of participants with chronic pain was 3.20 % in the staple fixation group and 0 % in the self-fixating mesh group, with no statistically significant differences. On the other hand, recurrency in the staple fixation group was 2.28 % versus 3.90 % in the self-fixating mesh group, without statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

Self-fixating meshes have a trend towards smaller proportion of chronic pain and similar proportions of recurrence; therefore, they seem to be the best fixation method between the two mechanisms that are available in our field to prevent postoperative chronic pain.

Mesh Fixation Versus Nonfixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether mesh should be fixed during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair.

METHODS

A registration was listed with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration no. CRD42022350469). Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify RCTs comparing fixation with nonfixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain at 24 hours and recurrence. Secondary outcomes were mean operative time, urinary retention, and postoperative pain at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 18 trials, including 2617 patients with 2878 hernias, were included in this meta-analysis. In contrast to the fixation group, the nonfixation group was associated with lower postoperative pain scores at 24 hours and 6 months, a shorter mean operative time, and a lower incidence of urinary retention. There were no significant differences between the 2 types of procedures in terms of the rate of recurrence for patients with an inguinal hernia orifice smaller than 4 cm in size.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonfixation technique is an effective method to reduce urinary retention, mean operative time, and postoperative pain at 24 hours and at 6 months; however, the rate of recurrence was comparable to that of the fixation method.

Safety of unfixed mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Whether the effect of the unfixed mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair can lead to hernia recurrence remains controversial.

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched to retrieve clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nonfixation of mesh and fixation of mesh in TEP inguinal hernia repair, and we performed a metaanalysis with RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Fifteen RCTs were included in the metaanalysis, which showed that the operation time (P = 0.001) of the unfixed mesh group was shorter than that of the fixed mesh group; additionally, the postoperative 24-h pain score (P = 0.04) and incidence of urinary retention (P = 0.001) were lower in the unfixed mesh group. There was no significant difference between the unfixed mesh group and the fixed mesh group in terms of hospital stay (P = 0.47), time to resume normal activities (P = 0.51), incidence of haematoma (P = 0.96), incidence of chronic pain (P = 0.20), and recurrence rate (P = 0.09).

Conclusion

Unfixed mesh in TEP inguinal hernia repair shows no elevated recurrence rates compared to fixed mesh and is clinically safe.

Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized control trial

INTRODUCTION

Mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair, has been a controversial subject for many years. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated and compared fixation and non-fixation of mesh in Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

In this randomized control trial, 100 patients diagnosed with unilateral inguinal hernia were included. We divided the study population into two groups of fifty. For both groups, a 15 × 13 cm Prolene(polypropylene) mesh was used for repair. In the fixation group, mesh was fixed to the abdominal wall by endoscopic tacks, while in the non-fixation group, mesh was secured at the proper place without any fixation. Postoperative outcomes were complications, recurrence, and pain intensity after 1-, 3- and 6-months.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain intensity in the 1st month [Median of 2 and 0, (P < 0.001)], and 3rd month [Median of 0.5 and 0, (P < 0.001)], in the fixation group were significantly higher than the non-fixation group. However, 6 months after surgery, pain intensity was almost similar for both groups. In the 6th postoperative month, only one patient experienced recurrence who was in the fixation group. The rate of recurrence and urinary retention between the groups was not significant.

CONCLUSION

It was observed that until 6 months after surgery patients who received the non-fixating method of TAPP repair experienced lower levels of pain in comparison to the fixation group while other complications did not differ between the two groups. This trail was registered at www.irct.ir with Trial Registration Number of IRCT20210224050491N1.

The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study

PURPOSE

The development of chronic pain is one of the major post-surgery problems after inguinal hernia repair. Although the possibility of chronic pain formation decreases with laparoscopic methods, pain may develop due to the staples used. It is thought that absence of mesh fixation in total extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair does not increase the recurrence rate. This study aims to investigate the absence of mesh fixation in the TEP on the development of postoperative pain, mesh displacement, and recurrence rate.

METHODS

Between December 2019 and December 2020, 100 patients who underwent TEP repair due to unilateral inguinal hernia in the General Surgery Clinic of Hitit University were included in the study. Study was registered at http://Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05152654). Patients were divided into two groups as repairs in which the mesh was fixed with a tacker and no-fixation (NF) was used. The mesh is marked with radiopaque clips. Patients were compared in terms of postoperative pain, mobilization time, hospital stay, return to work, chronic pain, early-late mesh displacement, and recurrence.

RESULTS

While there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of mesh displacement and recurrence, it was observed that the NF group developed significantly less pain in the early and late postoperative period compared to the other group. The time-dependent reduction rate of postoperative pain was higher in NF group than in other group. In addition, operation time was shorter in the NF group.

CONCLUSION

While the absence of mesh fixation in TEP hernia repair does not increase the recurrence rate, it can be used safely, because it causes less acute and chronic pain.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials number: NCT05152654.

Mesh erosion into skin following laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair

With increasing utilisation of meshes in inguinal hernia repair, reports of mesh-related complications are emerging, particularly late visceral complications, with mesh migration and erosion into the small bowel, bladder and colon reported after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. We present a case of spontaneous mesh migration through the superficial inguinal ring with skin erosion following TEP inguinal hernia repair, the first published report in the literature to our knowledge. This case highlights the difficulty in diagnosis due to the long latent period of hernia repair and the onset of erosion. A high index of suspicion is required when diagnosing any patient who presents with an unexplained groin abscess following ipsilateral TEP repair. CT scan should be performed early for diagnosis and assessment. Removal of the migrated portion of the mesh, antibiotic therapy and secondary wound closure are strategies for the successful treatment of this complication.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair for primary unilateral femoral hernia: a retrospective cohort study of 132 case

BACKGROUND

Femoral hernia (FH) is traditionally treated by open surgery (OS). Laparoscopic treatment has also shown good results in treating FH. However, there have been few comparative studies of these two techniques. Therefore, our aim was to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgical FH treatment.

METHODS

Adult patients with primary unilateral FH undergoing OS or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair at our hospital from January 2013 to June 2018 were included in this study. Patients with history of abdominal surgery, contraindications to general anesthesia and those not wishing to receive general anesthesia received OS. Demographics, operation details and complications were compared retrospectively between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were recruited to the study, 62 and 70 of whom underwent OS and TAPP, respectively. Compared to OS group, the TAPP group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 2.0 days, respectively, P < 0.05) and a lower postoperative pain score (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.05), and took less time to return to normal activities (13.0 vs. 6.0 days, respectively, P < 0.05). The overall complication rates were equivalent between the groups (10 vs. 9.7%, OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.329-3.270).

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic and open surgery appear to be safe and effective in a cohort of patients with femoral hernia and laparoscopic surgery might offer some advantages in reducing length of hospital stay, lower postoperative pain score and quicker return to activities.

Mesh-fixation technique for inguinal hernia repair: umbrella review

Background

Mesh-based repair is the standard of surgical care for symptomatic inguinal hernias. Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) addressed various aspects of these procedures. This umbrella review aimed to report the evidence from all previous SRMAs for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

SRMAs were identified from MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, DARE, PROSPERO, CINAHL, JBISRIS, EPPI-Centre, Wiley Online Library and ScienceDirect database according to PRISMA guidelines. Data including mesh-fixation techniques and surgical approach were extracted from selected SRMAs. The corrected covered area was calculated to address study overlap across reviews, and an excess significance test was used to assess potential bias. The outcomes of interest were hernia recurrence, chronic groin pain, operating time, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, return to daily life activities, and postoperative complication.

Results

Thirty SRMAs were included between 2010 and 2019: 16 focused on open repair, and 14 focused on laparoscopic repair, with a high degree of overlap (open repairs, 41 per cent; laparoscopic repairs, 30–57 per cent). Sufficient evidence was available on hernia recurrence, chronic groin pain, and operative time. Effects of glue on hernia recurrence were inconclusive in open and laparoscopy approaches, P = 0.816 and 0.946 respectively. Glue was significantly associated with lower persistent groin pain, in open repair (versus suture) and in laparoscopic repair (versus tack). SRMAs suggested that self-gripping mesh was associated with shorter operating time in open surgery, although with only a few minutes of improvement (0.36–7.85 min, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In this umbrella review, chronic groin pain and operating time were the only outcomes for which there was sufficient evidence supporting the effectiveness respectively of glue and self-gripping mesh.

Adolescent inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature and recommendations for selective management

BACKGROUND

The choice of how to repair inguinal hernias in adolescents has historically been a matter of experience and differed between pediatric surgeons who traditionally performed a high ligation of the sac and general surgeons who typically perform a repair using mesh. This up-to-date review thoroughly examines the subject and discusses the suitability of both types of repairs in this unique age group.

METHODS

A 20-year Pub Med search was performed for the following terms: adolescent hernia repair including reports of mesh hernia repair in adolescents and postoperative complications including chronic inguinal pain and recurrences.

RESULTS

The evidence in the literature suggests that while there appears to be no difference between the two types of repairs with regards to recurrence and complications, changes in the pelvic floor physiology in adolescents suggest that a selective, individualized approach can be recommended depending on the size and nature of the presenting pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

A selective approach to the inguinal hernia in adolescent patients based on the size of the defect appears justified.

ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN CHRONIC PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR USING THE TRANSABDOMINAL TECHNIQUE COMPARING WITH FIXATION OF THE MESH WITH STAPLES, WITH GLUE OR WITHOUT FIXATION? A CLINICAL RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Regarding postoperative pain, it remains unclear whether non-fixation of the polypropylene prosthesis in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair produces the same outcomes as mesh fixation with glue or tackers. In addition, hernia recurrence is another aspect to be assessed in the comparison between non-fixation and mesh-fixation techniques (tackers and glue). AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, quality of pain, and recurrence in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (transabdominal preperitoneal) technique, comparing the fixation of the mesh with tackers versus with glue versus without fixation. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blind study in which 63 patients presenting with primary unilateral inguinal hernia underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and were randomized into three groups: no mesh fixation (n=21), mesh tacked (n=21), and mesh fixed with fibrin glue (n=21). Patients also responded to questionnaires in order to assess pain and pain quality and were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: Neither mesh-fixation nor non-fixation techniques were found to affect postoperative chronic pain (p=0.535), but patients undergoing tacker fixation reported more pain descriptors (p=0.0021) and a higher pain index (p=0.002) on the McGill scale in the first 15 postoperative days (T0 and T1). No hernia recurrences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both mesh-fixation techniques (tackers and glue) used with the transabdominal preperitoneal approach did not influence the onset of inguinodynia, but tacker fixation was more likely to increase patient sensitivity to pain. Mesh placement without fixation produced the same pain and recurrence outcomes as mesh-fixation techniques. Also, no recurrence was observed in patients without mesh fixation in this study. Consequently, it has become an alternative therapy deserving consideration for hernia repair.

Glue versus mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice for mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has not been well established. This review compared the effects of glue versus mechanical mesh fixation in LIHR on incidence of chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and other secondary outcomes, including acute pain, seroma, haematoma, hernia recurrence and other postoperative complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of English/non-English studies using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, OpenThesis and Web of Science, and searching bibliographies of included studies was completed. Search terms included laparoscopic, hernia, fibrin glue, Tisseel, Tissucol, cyanoacrylate, Glubran and Liquiband. Only RCTs comparing mechanical with glue-based fixation in adult patients (aged over 18 years) that examined CPIP were included. Two authors independently completed risk-of-bias assessment and data extraction against predefined data fields. All pooled analyses were computed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria; 2777 hernias among 2109 patients were assessed. The incidence of CPIP was reduced with use of glue-based fixation (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95 per cent c.i. 0.19 to 0.69; P = 0.002), with moderate heterogeneity that disappeared with sensitivity analysis (8 d.f.) for patient-blinded studies (RR 0.43, 0.27 to 0.86). Trial sequential analysis provided evidence for a relative risk reduction of at least 25 per cent. The incidence of haeamtoma was reduced by using glue-based fixation (RR 0.29, 0.10 to 0.82; P = 0.02) with no significant effects on seroma formation or hernia recurrence (RR 1.07, 0.46 to 2.47; P = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Glue-based mesh fixation appears to reduce the incidence of CPIP and haematoma after LIHR compared with mechanical fixation, with comparable recurrence rates.

Outcomes on mesh fixation vs non-fixation in laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedure, and laparoscopic approach gained popularity over the open approach. This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of TEP inguinal hernioplasty with or without mesh fixation. The primary outcome was acute post-operative pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective comparative study on a prospectively collected data was conducted in a large DGH in England between Janu- ary 2017 and December 2019 on 47 patients. The patients were divided into two groups. In group A, mesh fixation was performed with absorbable tackers and in group B no fixation was performed. Patients were followed up to 18 months postoperatively. Data was collected on post-operative pain, cost, recurrences and time taken to return to normal activities. Patients with lower midline scar and complicated inguinal hernias were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of the 47 patients 53% (n= 25) were in group A and 47% (n= 22) in group B. All the patients in both groups were male. The mean postopera- tive pain score at 72h in group A was 7.12 (SD 1.13) and 4.91 (SD 1.23) in group B (p <0.001). Group B patients have taken shorter time to return to normal activities in comparison to group A (p <0.001), while recurrence (2%) rate is higher in group B (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pain and time taken to return to normal work postoperatively were significantly less in the non-fixation group. The study recommends non-fixation over fixation as it is feasible, cost-effective, causes less post-operative pain and no differences in terms of recurrences.

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Tacks in Mesh Fixation for Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran 2) is a synthetic adhesive mesh fixation material. Its utility is being evaluated in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR). A multicentre randomized controlled trial was performed comparing Glubran 2 to standard of care absorbable tacks, particularly assessing chronic postoperative inguinal pain and its effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing elective TEP IHR at 2 centers from 2017 to 2019 were randomly assigned to Glubran 2 or absorbable tack mesh fixation, and followed for 6 months. All other aspects of surgery and aftercare remained the same. Surgeons documented operative and fixation time, and the placement of fixation on standardized diagrams. Via a questionnaire, aspects of inguinal pain were evaluated before surgery, and at various time-points postoperatively over 6 months. Postoperative clinical factors were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 106 operative sides were randomized to either glue (51) or tack (55) mesh fixation over a 14-month period. Similar median operative times between tack (83.0 min) and glue fixation (75.0 min) were observed. There were no significant surgical complications or observed hernia recurrences in either group. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at all time-points after analysis through mixed effects modeling. Temporal pain profiles over time were also similar. Totally, 55% of patients in the glue group had returned to work within 2 weeks of surgery. There was no increase in complications or pain scores despite regular lateral fixation of glue in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Adding to known data, we observed no significant difference in postoperative pain, demonstrating that cyanoacrylate glue is a viable and safe alternative fixation method to absorbable tacks in laparoscopic TEP IHR. As secondary outcomes, cyanoacrylate glue permits some patients to return to work early, and we observed regular lateral mesh glue fixation without increased pain or complications.

Changing the innate consensus about mesh fixation in trans-abdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty in adults: Short and long term outcome. Randomized controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernioplasty is the standard treatment for inguinal hernia in adults. Mesh fixation was used to keep mesh in place for which various mesh fixation techniques have been used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in adults, but their effectiveness has remained inconclusive.

AIM OF THE WORK

to evaluate non fixation method of mesh laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty as safe and effective as regard short and long term outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over the period from July 2013 to July 2018, 798 patients with oblique inguinal hernias undergoing Trans abdominal preperitoneal technique (TAPP) were randomized into 3 groups: Group A; mesh non fixation 266 patients. Group B; tacker mesh fixation 266 patients Group C: Cyanoacrylic tissue glues (Histoacryl) mesh fixation 266 patients. Clinical effects were assessed by the following variables: intraoperative data, postoperative outcome as regard recurrence rate, postoperative pain [on visual analogue score (VAS)], analgesic consumption, operation time, hospital stay, and patient costs. Follow up was 18 months.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between groups (A) and Group (C) regarding operative time, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay and risk of chronic groin pain, postoperative pain score. In Group (B): the postoperative pain and complications were higher. There were 5 cases of hernia recurrence in all groups, but no significant differences among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Tacker Mesh fixation increased the risk of chronic groin pain. Pain score was higher with tacker mesh fixation. Laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair without tacker mesh fixation was safe and feasible with no significant increase in recurrence rates. Furthermore, mesh fixation with tacker procedure increased the risk of postoperative complications and patient costs. All ethical approval was given by our Faculty of Medicine medical ethical committee.

A study of the "Swiss-roll" folding method for placement of self-gripping mesh in TAPP

BACKGROUND

Using self-gripping mesh eliminates the need for additional mechanical fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair when surgeons plan to fix it. However, the mesh's 'self-gripping' characteristic makes it much more difficult to unfold and place. Here, the novel "Swiss-roll" placement method of folding self-gripping mesh is introduced and compared to the common folding placement method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The cohort of this prospective randomized controlled study included 100 patients who underwent transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) groin hernia repair in the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of Shanghai East Hospital between January and December 2018. The patients were randomly assigned to the "Swiss-roll" folding group or the common folding group. The time required for mesh placement, total surgical duration, and the incidences of postoperative pain and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The times required for mesh placement in the "Swiss-roll" and common folding groups were 155.10 ± 48.66 and 202.80 ± 61.05 sec, respectively. The "Swiss-roll" folding method significantly shortened the time required for mesh placement (p = 0.000). There were no significant differences in total surgical duration and the incidences of postoperative pain and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The "Swiss-roll" folding method facilitates self-gripping mesh placement without increasing the incidence of complications and recurrences in TAPP.

Fixation versus no fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of primary inguinal hernia-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The necessity of mesh fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of mesh fixation versus no fixation in laparoscopic TEP repair for primary inguinal hernia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles from January 1992 until May 2020. All trials that compared fixation versus no fixation in TEP repairs for inguinal herniae were included. Recurrent and femoral herniae were excluded from the current analysis. The primary outcome measure was recurrence while secondary outcomes included postoperative pain at 24 h, mean operative time, urinary retention, and seroma rates. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials were included capturing 557 patients and 715 inguinal herniae. On random effects analysis, there were no significant differences between fixation and no fixation with respect to recurrence (RD 0.00, 95% CI = - 0.01 to 0.01, p = 1.00), operative time (MD 1.58 min, 95% CI = - 0.22 to 3.37, p = 0.09), seroma (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.28 to 1.74, p = 0.44), or urinary retention (RD 0.09, 95% CI = - 0.18 to 0.36, p = 0.53). However, fixation was associated with more pain at 24 h (MD 0.93, 95% CI = 0.20 to 1.66, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh fixation in laparoscopic TEP repair for primary inguinal herniae is associated with increased postoperative pain at 24 h but similar recurrence, seroma, and urinary retention. Therefore, it may be omitted.

Comparing 30-day outcomes between different mesh fixation techniques in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

The association of postoperative patient-reported outcomes and type of mesh fixation during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair has not been well characterized. We aimed to compare the 30-day quality of life outcomes between various mesh fixation techniques utilizing the AHSQC prospective registry.

METHODS

All minimally invasive inguinal hernias with completed 30-day follow-up were abstracted from the AHSQC, excluding patients with primary indication for surgery being chronic groin pain. Mesh fixation was categorized as (1) atraumatic fixation (AF) (2) traumatic non-suture (TNS), (3) traumatic suture (TS). Our outcomes of interest were pain at site at 30-day and EuraHS quality of life assessment.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 864 patients had surgical site pain and quality of life outcomes reported; 253 (AF), 451 (TNS), and 160 (TS). After adjusting for identified confounders, there was no statistically significant difference between any fixation method when evaluating pain as a binary variable (Yes/No). However, when looking at the EuraHS evaluation for pain and quality of life outcomes, AF was associated with better scores than both TNS and TS fixation in the cosmetic, restrictions, and overall EuraHS domains. AF was only better than TS fixation in the pain domain.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that AF had a significantly improved hernia-specific quality of life in all domains at 30-days postoperatively. We also identified that pain as a binary variable is inadequate for its states purpose. Thus, the overall well-being and morbidity should be taken into account when evaluating hernia patients postoperatively.

Mesh fixation technique for inguinal hernia repair: protocol for an umbrella review with integrated and updated network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia mesh repair is the standard care for symptomatic inguinal hernia. Mesh fixation is used to keep mesh in place for which various mesh fixation techniques have been used in open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, but their effectiveness has remained inconclusive. Therefore, we developed a protocol for an umbrella review in order to summarise the evidences with integrate and update data of different mesh fixation techniques in both open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be identified from Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Databases, EMBASE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PROSPERO Register, CINAHL, JBISRIS, EPPI-Centre, Wiley Online Library and Science Direct database. Two reviewers will independently determine studies for eligibility. Disagreement will be solved by consensus and arbitrated by the third reviewer. Data extraction will also be performed by two independent reviewers. For umbrella review, a descriptive analysis will be applied to describe evidence of mesh fixation effectiveness. Overlapping studies and excess significance test will be performed to assess whether previous evidences are bias. In addition, individual studies from meta-analysis and additional published studies will be pooled using network meta-analyses. We will use I² statistic and Cochran's Q test to assess heterogeneity. Risk of bias and publication bias, if appropriate, will be evaluated, as well as overall strength of the evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO and approved with Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand (COA 167/2018). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018111773.

Comparison of short- to mid-term efficacy of nonfixation and permanent tack fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed the literature and pooled data for a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of mesh fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed® and a Cochrane review for all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and complications of mesh fixation versus nonfixation in TEP hernia repair. The evaluated outcomes included perioperative (operative time and conversion rate) and postoperative parameters (pain scores, duration of hospital stay, surgical complications including seroma, delayed return of bladder function, chronic pain, and recurrence). Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager Software (RevMan®, version 5.2.6) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in a pooled analysis. In total, 1099 patients (1467 hernias) had received TEP hernia repair (748 and 719 hernia defects in the nonfixation and fixation groups, respectively). The nonfixation group required shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -2.36 min, P = 0.0006) and had less pain on postoperative day 1 (WMD = -0.44, P = 0.04) than the fixation group. No significant differences were observed between groups with regard to conversion rate, hospital stay, recurrence rate, or complication rate. However, the incidence of postoperative urine retention was higher in the fixation group (odds ratio = 0.26, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

For patients with a nonrecurrent uncomplicated hernia defect with the size <3 cm, nonfixation yielded comparable efficacy with mesh fixation, but less short-term postoperative pain, and a lower risk of urine retention. In addition, the nonfixation method involved a shorter operative time and lower costs. However, no difference in the incidence of chronic pain was observed.

Mesh fixation technique in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair - A network meta-analysis

Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair is the standard option for inguinal hernia treatment. However, there are various types of mesh fixation and their relative uses are still controversial. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank the different fixations available for TEP. Medline and Scopus databases were search until February 1, 2017 and using randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes between different mesh fixation techniques were included. The results demonstrated that fifteen RCTs (n = 1783) were eligible for pooling. Five types of mesh fixation were used; metallic tack, no-fixation, absorbable tack, suture, and glue. Network meta-analysis that use metallic tack as the reference, indicated that suture and glue both carried a lower risk of recurrence with pooled risk ratios (RR) of 0.29 (95% CI 0.00, 18.81) and 0.29 (0.07, 1.30), respectively. For overall complications, absorbable tack had lower risk (0.63, 95% CI: 0.02, 16.13). However, none of these estimates reached statistical significance. So, this network meta-analysis suggests that glue and absorbable tack might be best in lowering recurrence risk and complications. However, a large scale RCT is still needed to confirm these results.

Comparison between single-incision and multiple-incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Introduction: We compared the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and multiple-incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.Material and methods: This retrospective study included 134 consecutive patients undergoing single-incision or multiple-incision laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia between January 2012 and December 2016 at our hospital.Results: In total, 62 patients undergoing SILS-TEP and 72 receiving multiple-incision laparoscopic surgery were included in this study. No significant differences in patients' characteristics between the two groups were noted. No patient required conversion to open surgery in either group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in operative time, bleeding volume, post-operative hospital stay, and analgesics used. Postoperative complications were observed in 5.7% (4 of 62) of patients in the SILS group and 3.2% (2 of 72) of patients in the control group. Among the few patients who experienced complications, most had hematomas. No major complications or hernia recurrences were observed during the follow-up period in either group.Conclusions: SILS-TEP produced good cosmetic outcomes for patients regardless of previous surgery, and it could be safely performed with acceptable morbidity. It also does not increase the possibility of conversion to open surgery.

[Endoscopic surgery and laparoscopy are new insights of evolution of inguinal hernia repair (in Russian only)]

This article is devoted to general and particular problems of inguinal hernia repair through the analysis of statistical data and comparison of advantages and disadvantages of various methods of inguinal hernia repair. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of current options of mesh implant fixing during endoscopic hernia repair: TAPP, TER, e-TER. Long-term outcomes are essential to determine surgical technique. The authors consider that careful adherence to the basic principles of minimally invasive surgery can reduce the incidence of complications, recurrences and chronic pain syndrome after inguinal hernia repair. The main advantages of current surgical technologies are accelerated rehabilitation, earlier restoration of social activity, improvement of the quality of life.

TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?

INTRODUCTION

Based on the new international guidelines for groin hernia management, there is no one surgical technique that is suited to all patient characteristics and diagnostic findings. Therefore, a tailored approach should be used. Here, a distinction must be made between primary unilateral inguinal hernia in men and in women, bilateral inguinal hernia, scrotal inguinal hernia, inguinal hernia following pelvic and lower abdominal procedures, patients with severe cardiopulmonary complications, recurrent inguinal hernias and incarcerated inguinal and femoral hernias. This paper now explores the relevant studies on TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia in men, which constitutes the most common indication for repair.

MATERIAL

A systematic search of the available literature was performed in February 2019 using Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link and the Cochrane Library. Only meta-analyses, systematic reviews, RCTs and comparative registry studies were considered. 117 publications were identified as relevant.

RESULTS

RCTs and comparative registry analyses demonstrated the advantages of TEP with regard to postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations, and postoperative and chronic pain compared with Lichtenstein repair for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men. No relevant differences were found compared with TAPP. Mesh fixation is not needed in TEP, but heavyweight meshes result in a lower recurrence rate. Extraperitoneal bupivacaine analgesia vs placebo does not demonstrate any advantages, but drainage is advantageous for seroma prophylaxis. The risk of chronic pain is negatively influenced by small defects, younger patient age, preoperative pain, higher BMI, postoperative complications, higher ASA score and risk factors.

CONCLUSION

For the subgroup of elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia in men, accounting for a proportion of less than 50% of the total collective, advantages were identified for TEP compared with open Lichtenstein repair but not versus TAPP.

Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with or without fixation leads to similar results. Outcome of randomized prospective trial

Introduction

The use of implants in inguinal hernia repair has reduced its recurrence rate. However, postoperative groin pain still remains an unresolved problem. There are suggestions that in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) two of the likely factors responsible for pain are use of fixation and the type of fixation used.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of mesh fixation on the incidence of postoperative pain, restriction of physical activities, hernia recurrence risk, return to normal activities and demand for analgesics in patients after unilateral TEP-IHR.

Material and methods

Unilateral TEP-IHR was performed in 139 male patients randomized to three groups: self-gripping mesh (SG), lightweight mesh (L) and lightweight mesh with fixation (LF). Full study-inclusion criteria were met by 110 patients; 43, 18 and 49 in groups SG, L and LF respectively. Follow-up occurred on the 1^st, 2^nd, and 7^th day and 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively. The numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess pain and the EuraHS-QoL (European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Score) questionnaire to compare quality of life (QoL) prior to surgery and one year later.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed between study groups with regard to the incidence rate and intensity of acute post-operative pain, chronic pain, analgesic demand, return to normal activity, hernia recurrence rate and post-operative QoL.

Conclusions

Lack of fixation in TEP-IHR does not increase the risk of hernia recurrence, and its presence does not significantly worsen the treatment results; especially it does not increase the incidence of chronic pain.

How I do it: the horizontal-bilateral unfolding method for self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh placement in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The use of the self-gripping mesh (Progrip™) during laparoscopic inguinal hernia has been proved to be effective and eliminates the need of additional fixation. However, the deployment of the self-gripping mesh is challenging due to its adhesive property. The purpose of this study was to introduce and describe an easy self-gripping mesh deployment method in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The self-gripping mesh was folded bilaterally towards the center of the mesh and placed vertically to align with the inferior epigastric artery, centered on the internal defect, then unfolded in a horizontal-bilateral unfolding method, first laterally, then medially.

RESULTS

A total of 63 inguinal hernias were repaired laparoscopicly: 40 patients by TAPP or TEP technique with self-gripping mesh, and there were no perioperative complications. The average time of mesh placement was 186 s (45-250 s). The patients only feel minimal pain (less than VAS 3) the second postoperative morning, and most of the patients were discharged the next day postoperatively; the average postoperative hospital duration was 1 day (1-2 days).

CONCLUSION

The present "horizontal-bilateral unfolding" mesh deployment method is a relative easy method to implant the self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Long-term follow-up of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal direct inguinal hernia repair using the Endoloop technique

INTRODUCTION

The pre-tied suture Endoloop™ technique for plication of the weakened transversalis fascia is efficient in post-operative seroma prevention, after laparoscopic/endoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair. No studies have evaluated long-term tolerability of this new technique in regards to chronic pain and hernia recurrence.

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal evaluation study of consecutive patients treated with Endoloop™ for M2 or M3 direct defects, during endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach. Meshes were secured with fibrin sealant only. All patients had a minimum 2.8 years (median 5.9 years) follow-up. First outcome was chronic groin/testicular pain; secondary outcome parameters included hernia recurrence and Quality of Life (QoL). Patients were assessed by phone interview using the validated Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), questioned regarding recurrence and asked to present for clinical review as needed.

RESULTS

112 patients (median age 57 years) with 141 direct hernia defects were included during the study period of 2008-2014. An Endoloop™ was used on 127 occasions-79 M2 and 48 M3 direct hernias. One patient had an early recurrence requiring an open repair and was therefore excluded. Thirty-three of the remaining one hundred and eleven patients (29.7%) were lost to long-term follow-up. According to their CCS range, 70 patients (88.6%) were very satisfied with their results, 8 (10.1%) were satisfied, and only one patient (1.3%) who reported chronic groin pain was unsatisfied. There was no reported long-term hernia recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The PDS Endoloop™ technique for closure of direct inguinal hernia defects is well tolerated with low risk of hernia recurrence, chronic pain, and excellent QoL. This reliability persists to long-term follow-up.

The volume threshold of 300 versus 100 ml/day for chest tube removal after pulmonary lobectomy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In this meta-analysis, we conducted a pooled analysis of clinical studies comparing the efficacy of a volume threshold of 300 ml/day before removing a chest tube (CT) versus 100 ml/day after a lobectomy.

METHODS

According to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration, we established a rigorous study protocol. We performed a systematic electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, CNKI, the Wanfang database, CBMdisc and Google Scholar to identify articles to include in our meta-analysis. A literature search was performed using relevant keywords. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan© software.

RESULTS

Five studies, published between 2014 and 2015, including 615 patients (314 patients who had the CT removed when daily drainage was <300 ml and 301 patients who had the CT removed when daily drainage was <100 ml) met the selection criteria. From the available data, the patients using the volume threshold of 300 ml/day had a significantly decreased duration of drainage [MD = -44.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) -64.45 to -23.68; P < 0.0001] and hospital stay after operation (MD = -2.25; 95% CI -3.52 to -0.97; P = 0.0006) compared with patients using a volume threshold of 100 ml/day after a pulmonary lobectomy. However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, such as pleural fluid reaccumulation [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.73; 95% CI = 0.74-4.07; P = 0.21] and atelectasis (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.52-1.81; P = 0.93). Thoracentesis rates after removing the CT also showed no significant difference (OR = 1.53; 95% CI 0.55-4.22; P = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that a higher volume threshold, up to 300 ml/day, is effective in reducing hospitalization times and duration of drainage in patients who undergo a lobectomy. Moreover, the volume threshold of 300 ml/day does not increase the occurrence of postoperative atelectasis, pleural fluid reaccumulation and thoracentesis rates. However, this review is limited by the methodological quality of the included trials, and additional studies according to the recommendations of Cochrane Library are appreciated.

Outcome of the "Manchester Groin Repair" (Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approach With Fibrin Sealant Mesh Fixation) in 434 Consecutive Inguinal Hernia Repairs

Introduction: This study looks at the outcome of 352 patients that underwent the "Manchester groin repair" in the period from 2007 to 2016. The effect of laterality on chronic groin pain and the reduction of pain scores post-surgery are evaluated as well as the rate of hernia recurrence for the inguinal hernia repairs. Methods: The "Manchester groin repair" is a modification of a laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal approach with fibrin sealant mesh fixation. Data were collected prospectively. In addition to demographic data and the European Hernia Society classification grading of each hernia, pain scores were assessed prior to surgery and at 4-6 weeks post-operatively using a ten-point visual analog pain scale. Data were collected on a bespoke database and differences between time-points analyzed by non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank tests with Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test for three-group comparisons. Significance was at the P < 0.05 level. The study was undertaken as an institutional audit. Results: Three hundred and fifty two patients underwent TEP repair as per the "Manchester Groin Repair" modification during the period of interest with a median follow-up period of 109.5 (IQR 57.0-318.5) weeks. Of these 274 (77.8%) were for the repair of true hernias and 78 (22.2%) were for inguinal disruptions. All inguinal hernia repairs patients were evaluated (254 m, 20 f); median [interquartile range] age 50 (39-65) years. There were 75 right inguinal hernias (27.4%), 39 Left inguinal hernias (14.2%), and 160 bilateral inguinal hernias (58.4%), giving a total of 434 hernia repairs. During follow-up there were 6 recurrences (1.4%).Of the 274 patients evaluated, 145 (52.9%) had both pre and post-operative pain scores available. Median pre-operative pain score was 5 [IQR 4-7]. Median post-operative pain score was 1 [IQR 1-2]. This difference was significant (P < 0.001). Pre-operative pain scores were higher for those with a bilateral hernia (median 6 vs. 5 and 4, respectively; P = 0.005), but there was no difference in post-operative scores (P = 0.347). One patient (0.3%) presented with chronic groin pain (pain after 3 months). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the "Manchester groin repair" provides an excellent repair with a low rate of recurrence and low incidence of chronic pain. Longer-term evaluation and larger patient series will add to the understanding of the role of this procedure in groin hernia repair.

Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

Recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is poorly understood. Reports suggest that up to 13% of all inguinal herniorrhaphies worldwide, irrespective of the approach, are repaired for recurrence. We aim to review the risk factors responsible for these recurrences in laparoscopic mesh techniques.

METHODS

A search of the Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents and PubMed databases identified English language, peer reviewed articles on the causes of recurrence following laparoscopic mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy published between 1990 and 2018. The search terms included 'Laparoscopic methods', 'Inguinal hernia; Mesh repair', 'Recurrence', 'Causes', 'Humans'.

RESULTS

The literature revealed several contributing risk factors that were responsible for recurrence following laparoscopic mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. These included modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors related to patient and surgical techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence can occur at any stage following inguinal hernia surgery. Patients' risk factors such as higher BMI, smoking, diabetes and postoperative surgical site infections increase the risk of recurrence and can be modified. Amongst the surgical factors, surgeon's experience, larger mesh with better tissue overlap and careful surgical techniques to reduce the incidence of seroma or hematoma help reduce the recurrence rate. Other factors including type of mesh and fixation of mesh have not shown any difference in the incidence of recurrence. It is hoped that future randomized controlled trials will address some of these issues and initiate preoperative management strategies to modify some of these risk factors to lower the risk of recurrence following laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Mesh Displacement After Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair With No Fixation

Background and Objectives:

About 20% of patients with inguinal hernia present bilateral hernias in the diagnosis. In these cases, laparoscopic procedure is considered gold standard approach. Mesh fixation is considered important step toward avoiding recurrence. However, because of cost and risk of pain, real need for mesh fixation has been debated. For bilateral inguinal hernias, there are few specific data about non fixation and mesh displacement. We assessed mesh movement in patients who had undergone laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation and compared the results with those obtained in patients with unilateral hernia.

Methods:

From January 2012 through May 2014, 20 consecutive patients with bilateral inguinal hernia underwent TEP repair with no mesh fixation. Results were compared with 50 consecutive patients with unilateral inguinal hernia surgically repaired with similar technique. Mesh was marked with 3 clips. Mesh movements were measured by comparing initial radiography performed at the end of surgery, with a second radiographic scan performed 30 days later.

Results:

Mean movements of all 3 clips in bilateral nonfixation (NF) group were 0.15–0.4 cm compared with 0.1–0.3 cm in unilateral NF group. Overall displacement of bilateral and unilateral NF groups did not show significant difference. Mean overall displacement was 1.9 cm versus 1.8 cm in the bilateral and unilateral NF groups, respectively (P = .78).

Conclusions:

TEP with no mesh fixation is safe in bilateral inguinal repairs. Early mesh displacement is minimal. This technique can be safely used in most patients with inguinal hernia.

Non-fixation Versus Fixation of Mesh in Totally Extraperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia: a Comparative Study

Two major issues with laparoscopic inguinal hernia (IH) repair are recurrences and chronic groin pain (CGP). The procedure involves fixing the mesh with the tackers which is believed to increase the rate of CGP due to nerve injuries. Thus, non-fixation of mesh is being proposed but concerns remain regarding increased recurrences. We sought to look at our outcomes after we switched over to non-fixation of mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of 171 repairs was done on 122 patients (fixation 59 and non-fixation 112) during a period of 4 years with an endeavor to complete a minimum of 1 year of clinical follow-up. The primary objective was to assess the recurrence rates and CGP and the secondary objective was to assess operative times, immediate post-op pain, incidence of urinary retention, duration of hospital stay, days taken to return to activity, and cost. The mean operative times for unilateral IH for the fixation and non-fixation groups were 41.8 ± 11.4 and 35.9 ± 9.7 min, respectively (p = 0.021), whereas for bilateral were 66.2 ± 15.6 and 55.3 ± 14.2 min, respectively (p = 0.018). The mean pain score was 3.44 ± 1.2 versus 3.01 ± 1.0; (p = 0.037) in the two groups, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 33.2 ± 17.0 and 18.7 ± 6.2 months, the incidence of CGP was 02 (3.4%) and 3 (2.7%) (p = 1.000) and recurrences were 02 (3.4%) in the two groups, respectively (p = 0.118). Non-fixation of mesh in TEP does not lead to increased recurrence though it does not decrease the incidence of chronic groin pain. Collateral advantage would be decreased operative times, lesser post-operative pain, and decreased costs.

International guidelines for groin hernia management

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, more than 20 million patients undergo groin hernia repair annually. The many different approaches, treatment indications and a significant array of techniques for groin hernia repair warrant guidelines to standardize care, minimize complications, and improve results. The main goal of these guidelines is to improve patient outcomes, specifically to decrease recurrence rates and reduce chronic pain, the most frequent problems following groin hernia repair. They have been endorsed by all five continental hernia societies, the International Endo Hernia Society and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

METHODS

An expert group of international surgeons (the HerniaSurge Group) and one anesthesiologist pain expert was formed. The group consisted of members from all continents with specific experience in hernia-related research. Care was taken to include surgeons who perform different types of repair and had preferably performed research on groin hernia surgery. During the Group's first meeting, evidence-based medicine (EBM) training occurred and 166 key questions (KQ) were formulated. EBM rules were followed in complete literature searches (including a complete search by The Dutch Cochrane database) to January 1, 2015 and to July 1, 2015 for level 1 publications. The articles were scored by teams of two or three according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. During five 2-day meetings, results were discussed with the working group members leading to 136 statements and 88 recommendations. Recommendations were graded as "strong" (recommendations) or "weak" (suggestions) and by consensus in some cases upgraded. In the Results and summary section below, the term "should" refers to a recommendation. The AGREE II instrument was used to validate the guidelines. An external review was performed by three international experts. They recommended the guidelines with high scores. The risk factors for inguinal hernia (IH) include: family history, previous contra-lateral hernia, male gender, age, abnormal collagen metabolism, prostatectomy, and low body mass index. Peri-operative risk factors for recurrence include poor surgical techniques, low surgical volumes, surgical inexperience and local anesthesia. These should be considered when treating IH patients. IH diagnosis can be confirmed by physical examination alone in the vast majority of patients with appropriate signs and symptoms. Rarely, ultrasound is necessary. Less commonly still, a dynamic MRI or CT scan or herniography may be needed. The EHS classification system is suggested to stratify IH patients for tailored treatment, research and audit. Symptomatic groin hernias should be treated surgically. Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic male IH patients may be managed with "watchful waiting" since their risk of hernia-related emergencies is low. The majority of these individuals will eventually require surgery; therefore, surgical risks and the watchful waiting strategy should be discussed with patients. Surgical treatment should be tailored to the surgeon's expertise, patient- and hernia-related characteristics and local/national resources. Furthermore, patient health-related, life style and social factors should all influence the shared decision-making process leading up to hernia management. Mesh repair is recommended as first choice, either by an open procedure or a laparo-endoscopic repair technique. One standard repair technique for all groin hernias does not exist. It is recommended that surgeons/surgical services provide both anterior and posterior approach options. Lichtenstein and laparo-endoscopic repair are best evaluated. Many other techniques need further evaluation. Provided that resources and expertise are available, laparo-endoscopic techniques have faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective. There is discussion concerning laparo-endoscopic management of potential bilateral hernias (occult hernia issue). After patient consent, during TAPP, the contra-lateral side should be inspected. This is not suggested during unilateral TEP repair. After appropriate discussions with patients concerning results tissue repair (first choice is the Shouldice technique) can be offered. Day surgery is recommended for the majority of groin hernia repair provided aftercare is organized. Surgeons should be aware of the intrinsic characteristics of the meshes they use. Use of so-called low-weight mesh may have slight short-term benefits like reduced postoperative pain and shorter convalescence, but are not associated with better longer-term outcomes like recurrence and chronic pain. Mesh selection on weight alone is not recommended. The incidence of erosion seems higher with plug versus flat mesh. It is suggested not to use plug repair techniques. The use of other implants to replace the standard flat mesh in the Lichtenstein technique is currently not recommended. In almost all cases, mesh fixation in TEP is unnecessary. In both TEP and TAPP it is recommended to fix mesh in M3 hernias (large medial) to reduce recurrence risk. Antibiotic prophylaxis in average-risk patients in low-risk environments is not recommended in open surgery. In laparo-endoscopic repair it is never recommended. Local anesthesia in open repair has many advantages, and its use is recommended provided the surgeon is experienced in this technique. General anesthesia is suggested over regional in patients aged 65 and older as it might be associated with fewer complications like myocardial infarction, pneumonia and thromboembolism. Perioperative field blocks and/or subfascial/subcutaneous infiltrations are recommended in all cases of open repair. Patients are recommended to resume normal activities without restrictions as soon as they feel comfortable. Provided expertise is available, it is suggested that women with groin hernias undergo laparo-endoscopic repair in order to decrease the risk of chronic pain and avoid missing a femoral hernia. Watchful waiting is suggested in pregnant women as groin swelling most often consists of self-limited round ligament varicosities. Timely mesh repair by a laparo-endoscopic approach is suggested for femoral hernias provided expertise is available. All complications of groin hernia management are discussed in an extensive chapter on the topic. Overall, the incidence of clinically significant chronic pain is in the 10-12% range, decreasing over time. Debilitating chronic pain affecting normal daily activities or work ranges from 0.5 to 6%. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is defined as bothersome moderate pain impacting daily activities lasting at least 3 months postoperatively and decreasing over time. CPIP risk factors include: young age, female gender, high preoperative pain, early high postoperative pain, recurrent hernia and open repair. For CPIP the focus should be on nerve recognition in open surgery and, in selected cases, prophylactic pragmatic nerve resection (planned resection is not suggested). It is suggested that CPIP management be performed by multi-disciplinary teams. It is also suggested that CPIP be managed by a combination of pharmacological and interventional measures and, if this is unsuccessful, followed by, in selected cases (triple) neurectomy and (in selected cases) mesh removal. For recurrent hernia after anterior repair, posterior repair is recommended. If recurrence occurs after a posterior repair, an anterior repair is recommended. After a failed anterior and posterior approach, management by a specialist hernia surgeon is recommended. Risk factors for hernia incarceration/strangulation include: female gender, femoral hernia and a history of hospitalization related to groin hernia. It is suggested that treatment of emergencies be tailored according to patient- and hernia-related factors, local expertise and resources. Learning curves vary between different techniques. Probably about 100 supervised laparo-endoscopic repairs are needed to achieve the same results as open mesh surgery like Lichtenstein. It is suggested that case load per surgeon is more important than center volume. It is recommended that minimum requirements be developed to certify individuals as expert hernia surgeon. The same is true for the designation "Hernia Center". From a cost-effectiveness perspective, day-case laparoscopic IH repair with minimal use of disposables is recommended. The development and implementation of national groin hernia registries in every country (or region, in the case of small country populations) is suggested. They should include patient follow-up data and account for local healthcare structures. A dissemination and implementation plan of the guidelines will be developed by global (HerniaSurge), regional (international societies) and local (national chapters) initiatives through internet websites, social media and smartphone apps. An overarching plan to improve access to safe IH surgery in low-resource settings (LRSs) is needed. It is suggested that this plan contains simple guidelines and a sustainability strategy, independent of international aid. It is suggested that in LRSs the focus be on performing high-volume Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia using low-cost mesh. Three chapters discuss future research, guidelines for general practitioners and guidelines for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The HerniaSurge Group has developed these extensive and inclusive guidelines for the management of adult groin hernia patients. It is hoped that they will lead to better outcomes for groin hernia patients wherever they live. More knowledge, better training, national audit and specialization in groin hernia management will standardize care for these patients, lead to more effective and efficient healthcare and provide direction for future research.

What are the influencing factors for chronic pain following TAPP inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of 20,004 patients from the Herniamed Registry

BACKGROUND

In inguinal hernia repair, chronic pain must be expected in 10-12% of cases. Around one-quarter of patients (2-4%) experience severe pain requiring treatment. The risk factors for chronic pain reported in the literature include young age, female gender, perioperative pain, postoperative pain, recurrent hernia, open hernia repair, perioperative complications, and penetrating mesh fixation. This present analysis of data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry now investigates the influencing factors for chronic pain in male patients after primary, unilateral inguinal hernia repair in TAPP technique.

METHODS

In total, 20,004 patients from the Herniamed Hernia Registry were included in uni- and multivariable analyses. For all patients, 1-year follow-up data were available.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis revealed that onset of pain at rest, on exertion, and requiring treatment was highly significantly influenced, in each case, by younger age (p < 0.001), preoperative pain (p < 0.001), smaller hernia defect (p < 0.001), and higher BMI (p < 0.001). Other influencing factors were postoperative complications (pain at rest p = 0.004 and pain on exertion p = 0.023) and penetrating compared with glue mesh fixation techniques (pain on exertion p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

The indication for inguinal hernia surgery should be very carefully considered in a young patient with a small hernia and preoperative pain.

Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures

Background

The reported range of seroma formation in the literature after TEP repair is between 0.5 and 12.2% and for TAPP between 3.0 and 8.0%. Significant clinical factors associated with seroma formation include old age, a large hernia defect, an extension of the hernia sac into the scrotum, as well as the presence of a residual indirect sac. Seroma formation is a frequent complication of laparoendoscopic mesh repair of moderate to large-size direct (medial) inguinal hernia defects. This present analysis of data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry now explores the influencing factors for seroma formation in male patients after TAPP repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Methods

In total, 20,004 male patients with TAPP repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia were included in uni- and multivariable analysis.

Results

Univariable analysis revealed the highly significant impact of the fixation technique on the seroma rate (non-fixation 0.7% vs. tacks 2.1% vs. glue 3.9%; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that glue compared to tacks (OR 2.077 [1.650; 2.613]; p < 0.001) and non-fixation (OR 5.448 [4.056; 7.317]; p < 0.001) led to an increased seroma rate. A large hernia defect (III vs. I: OR 2.868 [1.815; 4.531]; p < 0.001; II vs. I: OR 2.157 [1.410; 3.300]; p < 0.001) presented a significantly higher risk of seroma formation. Likewise, medial compared to lateral inguinal hernias had a higher seroma rate (OR 1.272 [1.020; 1.585]; p = 0.032).

Conclusions

Mesh fixation with tacks or glue, a larger hernia defect, and medial defect localization present a higher risk for seroma development in TAPP inguinal hernia repair.

Impact of Mesh Fixation on Chronic Pain in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TEP): A Nationwide Register-based Study

BACKGROUND

Mesh fixation is used to prevent recurrence at the potential risk for chronic pain in TEP. The aim was to compare the impact of permanent fixation (PF) with no fixation (NF)/nonpermanent fixation (NPF) of mesh on chronic pain after TEP repair for primary inguinal hernia.

METHODS

Men, 30 to 75 years old, consecutively registered in the Swedish Hernia Register for a TEP primary repair in 2005 to 2009, were included in a mail survey using SF-36 and the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ). Primary endpoint was IPQ question "Did you have pain during past week that could not be ignored." Risk factors for chronic pain and recurrent operations were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1110 patients were included (325 PF, 785 NF/NPF) with 7.7% reporting pain at median 33 months follow-up. No difference regarding primary endpoint pain (P < 0.462), IPQ and SF-36 subscales were seen. Recurrent operation was carried out in 1.4% during 7.5 years follow-up with no difference between PF- and NF-groups including subgroups of medial hernias. All SF-36 subscale-scores were equal to or better than the Swedish norm. A postoperative complication was a risk factor for chronic pain (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.23-5.25, P < 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The TEP procedure for primary inguinal hernia repair in men is associated with a low frequency of chronic pain and recurrent operations, with no difference between permanent fixation and no/nonpermanent fixation of mesh in a nationwide population-based study. TEP without fixation reduces costs and is safe for all patients.

Lightweight Titanium-coated Mesh Versus Standard-Weight Polypropylene Mesh in Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TEP): A Cohort Analysis

PURPOSE

The study objective is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic to tally extraperitoneal repair using the standard-weight polypropylene mesh or a lightweight titanium-coated mesh.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 138 adult patients with unilateral inguinal hernias, who underwent totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2010 and 2013 using either a standard-weight polypropylene mesh (Prolene mesh, 80 g/m) or a lightweight titanium-coated mesh (Ti Mesh light, 35 g/m).

RESULTS

There was no difference in reported pain at 24 hours postoperatively. The difference in reported pain at follow-up (mean: 21 mo) was insignificant [PP vs. Ti: 7.8% (n=5) vs. 8.3% (n=3), P=0.92], the differences regarding chronic inguinal pain was also insignificant [PP vs. Ti: 14% (n=9) vs. 5.5% (n=2), P=0.191], and there was no difference in the development of hernia recurrence [PP vs. Ti: 1.5% (n=1) vs. 0, P=0.42].

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences of the overall postoperative outcome were observed between the 2 mesh types.

Mesh fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: evaluation of methodology based on a systematic review of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The issue of mesh fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair is frequently debated and still no conclusive data exist on differences between methods regarding long-term outcome and postoperative complications. The quantity of trials and the simultaneous lack of high-quality evidence raise the question how future trials should be planned.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched, using the filters "randomised clinical trials" and "humans". Trials that compared one method of mesh fixation with another fixation method or with non-fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair were eligible. To be included, the trial was required to have assessed at least one of the following primary outcome parameters: recurrence; surgical site infection; chronic pain; or quality-of-life.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials assessing 2161 patients and 2562 hernia repairs were included. Only two trials were rated as low risk for bias. Eight trials evaluated recurrence or surgical site infection; none of these could show significant differences between methods of fixation. Two of 11 trials assessing chronic pain described significant differences between methods of fixation. One of two trials evaluating quality-of-life showed significant differences between fixation methods in certain functions.

CONCLUSION

High-quality evidence for differences between the assessed mesh fixation techniques is still lacking. From a socioeconomic and ethical point of view, it is necessary that future trials will be properly designed. As small- and medium-sized single-centre trials have proven unable to find answers, register studies or multi-centre studies with an evident focus on methodology and study design are needed in order to answer questions about mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair.

Surgical risk factors for recurrence in inguinal hernia repair - a review of the literature

Despite all the progress made in inguinal hernia surgery driven by the development of meshes and laparoendoscopic operative techniques, the proportion of recurrent inguinal hernias is still from 12% to 13%. Recurrences can present very soon after primary inguinal hernia repair generally because of technical failure. However, they can also develop much later after the primary operation probably due to patient-specific factors. Supported by evidence-based data, this review presents the surgical risk factors for recurrent inguinal hernia after the primary operation. The following factors are implicated here: choice of operative technique and mesh, mesh fixation technique, mesh size, management of medial and lateral hernia sac, sliding hernia, lipoma in the inguinal canal, operating time, type of anesthesia, participation in a register database, femoral hernia, postoperative complications, as well as the center and surgeon volume. If these surgical risk factors are taken into account when performing primary inguinal hernia repair, a good outcome can be expected for the patient. Therefore, they should definitely be observed.

Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair procedures with or without mesh fixation for non-recurrent inguinal hernia.

METHODS

100 male patients with non-recurrent inguinal hernia (62 unilateral and 38 bilateral) were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to either the mesh fixation group (n = 50) or the mesh non-fixation group (n = 50). The operative and follow-up data of the two groups were analyzed and compared in terms of recurrence rates, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative changes in testicular arterial blood flow.

RESULTS

Pain scores were significantly higher in the mesh fixation group prior to discharge and at the 1st postoperative month (p = 0.034 and 0.001, respectively). Necessity to use narcotic analgesics was higher in the fixation group prior to discharge (p = 0.025). Urinary retention was significantly more frequent in the fixation group than in the non-fixation group. (p = 0.007). The mean operative time and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of testicular arterial blood flow showed a substantial but not statistically significant difference for the frequency of impairment (14.2% in the fixation group and 5.8% in the non-fixation group) (p = 0.176). At long-term follow-up, no recurrence and no nerve injury were determined.

CONCLUSION

Fixation of the mesh to the abdominal wall has been associated with various postoperative complications for no additional benefit in lowering recurrence rates. For non-recurrent inguinal hernia, non-fixation of the mesh is safe and reliable. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary for subgroup analyses.

Evidence-Based Hernia Treatment in Adults

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is the most common general surgical procedure in industrialized countries, with a frequency of about 200 operations per 100 000 persons per year. Suture- and mesh-based techniques can be used, and the procedure can be either open or minimally invasive.

METHODS

This review is based on a selective search of the literature, with interpretation of the published findings according to the principles of evidence-based medicine.

RESULTS

Inguinal hernia is diagnosed by physical examination. Surgery is not necessarily indicated for a primary, asymptomatic inguinal hernia in a male patient, but all inguinal hernias in women should be operated on. For hernias in women, and for all bilateral hernias, a laparoscopic or endoscopic procedure is preferable to an open procedure. Primary unilateral hernias in men can be treated either by open surgery or by laparoscopy/endoscopy. Patients treated by laparoscopy/endoscopy develop chronic pain less often than those treated by open surgery. A mesh-based repair is generally recommended; this seems reasonable in view of the pathogenesis of the condition, which involves an abnormality of the extracellular matrix.

CONCLUSION

The choice of procedure has been addressed by international guidelines based on high-level evidence. Surgeons should deviate from their recommendations only in exceptional cases and for special reasons. Guideline conformity implies that hernia surgeons must master both open and endoscopic/laparoscopic techniques.

Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: A prospective study based on Herniamed Register

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide in general surgery. The transabdominal laparoscopic (TAPP) approach in the therapy of inguinal hernia seems to be a suitable alternative to classical open inguinal hernia repair mainly in the hands of an experienced surgeon. TAPP repair offers the possibility of gentle dissection with implantation of the mesh and the possibility of non-invasive fixation of the implanted mesh.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data analysis encompassed all patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery at our Surgical Department within the period from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2014 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The standard surgical technique was used. Data were entered and subsequently analysed on the Herniamed platform. Herniamed is an Internet-based register in German and English, and includes all data of outpatient and hospitalised patients who underwent surgery for some type of hernia. All relevant patient data are collected via Internet.

RESULTS

There were 241 patients enrolled in the group and there were 396 inguinal hernias repaired in total. Standard long-term follow-up after 12 months was evaluated in 205 patients (85.06%), and in the rest of the patients during the closing of the study, but at least 6 months after operation. The mean follow-up was at 19.69 months. At the 1-year assessment, mild discomfort was reported in the groin in 10 patients (4.88%) [1-3 on the visual analogue scale (VAS)]. Post-operative pain lasting over 12 months in the groin of moderate degree (4-6 VAS) was reported in two cases (0.97%). There was no recurrence and no chronic post-operative pain of severe degree reported.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the TAPP technique with the implantation of a self-fixation mesh is fast, effective, reliable and economically advantageous method in experienced hands and, according to our results, reduces the occurrence of post-herniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) and has a low recurrence rate.

Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review

AIM: To review current applications of the laparoscopic surgery while highlighting the standard procedures across different fields.

METHODS: A comprehensive search was undertaken using the PubMed Advanced Search Builder. A total of 321 articles were found in this search. The following criteria had to be met for the publication to be selected: Review article, randomized controlled trials, or meta-analyses discussing the subject of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, publications were hand-searched in the Cochrane database and the high-impact journals. A total of 82 of the findings were included according to matching the inclusion criteria. Overall, 403 full-text articles were reviewed. Of these, 218 were excluded due to not matching the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS: A total of 185 relevant articles were identified matching the search criteria for an overview of the current literature on the laparoscopic surgery. Articles covered the period from the first laparoscopic application through its tremendous advancement over the last several years. Overall, the biggest advantage of the procedure has been minimizing trauma to the abdominal wall compared with open surgery. In the case of cholecystectomy, fundoplication, and adrenalectomy, the procedure has become the gold standard without being proven as a superior technique over the open surgery in randomized controlled trials. Faster recovery, reduced hospital stay, and a quicker return to normal activities are the most evident advantages of the laparoscopic surgery. Positive outcomes, efficiency, a lower rate of wound infections, and reduction in the perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive procedures have been shown in most indications.

CONCLUSION: Improvements in surgical training and developments in instruments, imaging, and surgical techniques have greatly increased safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic surgical procedures.