1
|
Siau K, Pelitari S, Green S, McKaig B, Rajendran A, Feeney M, Thoufeeq M, Anderson J, Ravindran V, Hagan P, Cripps N, Beales ILP, Church K, Church NI, Ratcliffe E, Din S, Pullan RD, Powell S, Regan C, Ngu WS, Wood E, Mills S, Hawkes N, Dunckley P, Iacucci M, Thomas-Gibson S, Wells C, Murugananthan A. JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2023; 14:201-221. [PMID: 37056319 PMCID: PMC10086724 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the UK, endoscopy certification is awarded when trainees attain minimum competency standards for independent practice. A national evidence-based review was undertaken to update and develop standards and recommendations for colonoscopy training and certification. METHODS Under the oversight of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), a modified Delphi process was conducted between 2019 and 2020 with multisociety expert representation. Following literature review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations appraisal, recommendation statements on colonoscopy training and certification were formulated and subjected to anonymous voting to obtain consensus. Accepted statements were peer reviewed by JAG and relevant stakeholders for incorporation into the updated colonoscopy certification pathway. RESULTS In total, 45 recommendation statements were generated under the domains of: definition of competence (13), acquisition of competence (20), assessment of competence (8) and postcertification support (4). The consensus process led to revised criteria for colonoscopy certification, comprising: (1) achieving key performance indicators defined within British Society of Gastroenterology standards (ie, unassisted caecal intubation rate >90%, rectal retroversion >90%, polyp detection rate >15%+, polyp retrieval rate >90%, patient comfort <10% with moderate-severe discomfort); (2) minimum procedure count 280+; (3) performing 15+ procedures over the preceding 3 months; (4) attendance of the JAG Basic Skills in Colonoscopy course; (5) terminal ileal intubation rates of 60%+ in inflammatory bowel disease; (6) satisfying requirements for formative direct observation of procedure skills (DOPS) and direct observation of polypectomy skills (Size, Morphology, Site, Access (SMSA) level 2); (7) evidence of reflective practice as documented on the JAG Endoscopy Training System reflection tool; (8) successful performance in summative DOPS. CONCLUSION The UK standards for training and certification in colonoscopy have been updated, culminating in a single-stage certification process with emphasis on polypectomy competency (SMSA Level 2+). These standards are intended to support training, improve standards of colonoscopy and polypectomy, and provide support to the newly independent practitioner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, UK
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stavroula Pelitari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Susi Green
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
| | - Brian McKaig
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Arun Rajendran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, Greater London, UK
| | - Mark Feeney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, Torbay, UK
| | - Mo Thoufeeq
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Anderson
- Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Vathsan Ravindran
- Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Paul Hagan
- Endoscopy, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Neil Cripps
- Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
| | - Ian L P Beales
- Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | | | - Nicholas I Church
- Department of Gastroenterology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ratcliffe
- Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, Wigan, UK
| | - Said Din
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Rupert D Pullan
- Colorectal Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, Torbay, UK
| | - Sharon Powell
- Endoscopy, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Catherine Regan
- Endoscopy, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Wee Sing Ngu
- Colorectal Surgery, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Eleanor Wood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Mills
- Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Neil Hawkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | - Paul Dunckley
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Christopher Wells
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hartlepool, Hartlepool, UK
| | - Aravinth Murugananthan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
- Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan X, Yang W, Wichmann D, Huang C, Mothes B, Grund KE, Chen Z, Chen Z. Magnetic endoscopic imaging as a rational investment for specific colonoscopies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 15:447-458. [PMID: 33267703 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1842192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic endoscopic imaging (MEI) was regarded as an adjuvant device to improve procedural efficacy and patients' comfort during colonoscopy. METHODS Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. Based on the heterogeneity of included studies, random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR), risk difference (RD) or mean difference (MD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Twenty-one randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for meta-analysis, with a total of 7,060 patients. Although there is a slightly lower risk of cecal intubation failure with the adjuvant of MEI (RD 3%; P < 0.00001) compared to the control group, the updated studies show no significant benefits. Similarly, the cecal intubation time, pain scores, and loop formation with the adjuvant of MEI did not show any advantages. However, considerable significant benefits were found in the subgroup of technically difficult colonoscopy and inexperienced colonoscopists. Moreover, MEI was associated with lower loop intubation time, lower abdominal compression times, and better lesion localization. CONCLUSION The clinical benefits of MEI could be exaggerated. However, MEI has considerable advantages in technically difficult colonoscopies, the assistance for inexperienced colonoscopists, loop resolving, and lesion localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangzhou Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Weimin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Department of General Surgery, Huaihua Hospital Affiliated to University of South China, Huaihua, Hunan Province, China
| | - Doerte Wichmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Changhao Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Benedikt Mothes
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - K E Grund
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Zhikang Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Zihua Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, Cleary K, Peters TM, Maier-Hein L. Electromagnetic tracking in medicine--a review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2014; 33:1702-1725. [PMID: 24816547 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2014.2321777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Object tracking is a key enabling technology in the context of computer-assisted medical interventions. Allowing the continuous localization of medical instruments and patient anatomy, it is a prerequisite for providing instrument guidance to subsurface anatomical structures. The only widely used technique that enables real-time tracking of small objects without line-of-sight restrictions is electromagnetic (EM) tracking. While EM tracking has been the subject of many research efforts, clinical applications have been slow to emerge. The aim of this review paper is therefore to provide insight into the future potential and limitations of EM tracking for medical use. We describe the basic working principles of EM tracking systems, list the main sources of error, and summarize the published studies on tracking accuracy, precision and robustness along with the corresponding validation protocols proposed. State-of-the-art approaches to error compensation are also reviewed in depth. Finally, an overview of the clinical applications addressed with EM tracking is given. Throughout the paper, we report not only on scientific progress, but also provide a review on commercial systems. Given the continuous debate on the applicability of EM tracking in medicine, this paper provides a timely overview of the state-of-the-art in the field.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bell CS, Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Image partitioning and illumination in image-based pose detection for teleoperated flexible endoscopes. Artif Intell Med 2013; 59:185-96. [PMID: 24188575 DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2012] [Revised: 09/20/2013] [Accepted: 09/23/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world, although it can be effectively treated if detected early. Teleoperated flexible endoscopes are an emerging technology to ease patient apprehension about the procedure, and subsequently increase compliance. Essential to teleoperation is robust feedback reflecting the change in pose (i.e., position and orientation) of the tip of the endoscope. The goal of this study is to first describe a novel image-based tracking system for teleoperated flexible endoscopes, and subsequently determine its viability in a clinical setting. The proposed approach leverages artificial neural networks (ANNs) to learn the mapping that links the optical flow between two sequential images to the change in the pose of the camera. Secondly, the study investigates for the first time how narrow band illumination (NBI) - today available in commercial gastrointestinal endoscopes - can be applied to enhance feature extraction, and quantify the effect of NBI and white light illumination (WLI), as well as their color information, on the strength of features extracted from the endoscopic camera stream. METHODS AND MATERIALS In order to provide the best features for the neural networks to learn the change in pose based on the image stream, we investigated two different imaging modalities - WLI and NBI - and we applied two different spatial partitions - lumen-centered and grid-based - to create descriptors used as input to the ANNs. An experiment was performed to compare the error of these four variations, measured in root mean square error (RMSE) from ground truth given by a robotic arm, to that of a commercial state-of-the-art magnetic tracker. The viability of this technique for a clinical setting was then tested using the four ANN variations, a magnetic tracker, and a commercial colonoscope. The trial was performed by an expert endoscopist (>2000 lifetime procedures) on a colonoscopy training model with porcine blood, and the RMSE of the ANN output was calculated with respect to the magnetic tracker readings. Using the image stream obtained from the commercial endoscope, the strength of features extracted was evaluated. RESULTS In the first experiment, the best ANNs resulted from grid-based partitioning under WLI (2.42mm RMSE) for position, and from lumen-centered partitioning under NBI (1.69° RMSE) for rotation. By comparison, the performance of the tracker was 2.49mm RMSE in position and 0.89° RMSE in rotation. The trial with the commercial endoscope indicated that lumen-centered partitioning was the best overall, while NBI outperformed WLI in terms of illumination modality. The performance of lumen-centered partitioning with NBI was 1.03±0.8mm RMSE in positional degrees of freedom (DOF), and 1.26±0.98° RMSE in rotational DOF, while with WLI, the performance was 1.56±1.15mm RMSE in positional DOF and 2.45±1.90° RMSE in rotational DOF. Finally, the features extracted under NBI were found to be twice as strong as those extracted under WLI, but no significance in feature strengths was observed between a grayscale version of the image, and the red, blue, and green color channels. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates that both WLI and NBI, combined with feature partitioning based on the anatomy of the colon, provide valid mechanisms for endoscopic camera pose estimation via image stream. Illumination provided by WLI and NBI produce ANNs with similar performance which are comparable to that of a state-of-the-art magnetic tracker. However, NBI produces features that are stronger than WLI, which enables more robust feature tracking, and better performance of the ANN in terms of accuracy. Thus, NBI with lumen-centered partitioning resulted the best approach among the different variations tested for vision-based pose estimation. The proposed approach takes advantage of components already available in commercial gastrointestinal endoscopes to provide accurate feedback about the motion of the tip of the endoscope. This solution may serve as an enabling technology for closed-loop control of teleoperated flexible endoscopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charreau S Bell
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, PMB 351826, Nashville, TN 37235-1826, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:431-9. [PMID: 23382621 PMCID: PMC3558566 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Revised: 08/23/2012] [Accepted: 08/26/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Diagnosing colorectal has been increasingly successful due to advances in technology. Flexible endoscopy is considered to be an effective method for early diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer, making it a popular choice for screening programs. However, millions of people who may benefit from endoscopic colorectal cancer screening fail to have the procedure performed. Main reasons include psychological barriers due to the indignity of the procedure, fear of procedure related pain, bowel preparation discomfort, and potential need for sedation. Therefore, an urgent need for new technologies addressing these issues clearly exists. In this review, we discuss a set of advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening that are either already available or close to clinical trial. In particular, we focus on visual-inspection-only advanced flexible colonoscopes, interventional colonoscopes with alternative propulsion mechanisms, wireless capsule colonoscopy, and technologies for intraprocedural bowel cleansing. Many of these devices have the potential to reduce exam related patient discomfort, obviate the need for sedation, increase diagnostic yield, reduce learning curves, improve access to screening, and possibly avert the need for a bowel preparation.
Collapse
|