Partially versus fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign and malignant esophageal conditions: a single center experience

Efficacy and safety of a novel multisegmented fully covered self-expanding metal stent for malignant esophageal obstruction: a prospective pilot study with historical control

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) are effective for symptom palliation in patients with esophageal obstruction. However, their placement can lead to adverse events such as stent migration and restenosis. A novel fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) with antimigration properties has been developed to address these issues. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this novel stent in treating malignant esophageal obstruction.

METHODS

This prospective pilot study enrolled patients with malignant esophageal obstruction treated with the novel stent at a tertiary referral center. Primary outcomes included technical and clinical efficacy, whereas secondary outcomes were adverse events. Treatment outcomes were compared between the novel stent and historical control groups.

RESULTS

137 patients were analyzed, comprising 32 in the novel stent group and 105 in the historical control group. In the novel stent group, technical success was achieved in 100% of patients and clinical success in 96.9%. No stent placement-related events, including bleeding or perforation, were observed. Though no significant differences in adverse events were found, the novel stent group had a lower migration rate than the historical control group (9.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.565). Median stent patency was similar between the groups (70.5 vs. 43.0 days, p = 0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel multisegmented FCSEMS demonstrated high technical and clinical efficacy with a low migration rate, presenting a promising treatment option for malignant esophageal obstruction. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.

Unusual presentation of esophageal tuberculosis: a case study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal ulcers can arise not only from malignant lesions but also from benign diseases, such as tuberculosis. These ulcers may mimic the radiological features of esophageal malignancy or tuberculosis on PET/CT, leading to diagnostic challenges.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 59-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with a month-long history of progressive painful swallowing, fatigue, and loss of appetite. Whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT revealed a lesion in the mid-esophagus and swollen mediastinal lymph nodes with high FDG uptake, showing a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 17.10 for the lymph nodes and 8.08 for the esophageal lesion. Esophageal cancer was initially suspected based on PET/CT findings. However, pathological examination of the esophageal lesion obtained via esophagoscopy showed only inflammation and granulation tissue, with no malignancy. A biopsy of the lymph nodes obtained through endoscopic ultrasonography revealed caseous necrosis but no atypical cells, and microbiological tests were positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A final diagnosis of esophageal tuberculosis was made.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal lesions can result from both malignant and benign conditions, including tuberculosis, and may mimic the radiological features of esophageal malignancy on PET/CT or other imaging studies. When esophageal lesions resemble malignancy, pseudotumoral esophagus and esophageal tuberculosis should be considered as differential diagnoses. Endoscopy, particularly endoscopic ultrasonography, is strongly recommended to accurately distinguish between benign and malignant esophageal lesions, helping to avoid unnecessary invasive treatments and reduce potential physical and psychological harm to patients.

Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Palliation of Dysphagia in Cancer Esophagus at a Tertiary Care Center of North-East India: A Prospective Study

Background and Aim: Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cancer in India with a incidence of around 4.5%. Dysphagia is the primary manifestation of advanced esophageal cancer in 80%-90% of patients. Dysphagia is one of the most distressing and debilitating symptom for the patients. The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) has revolutionized the treatment of dysphagia in esophageal cancer patients. This study aims to assess the role of SEMS in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Surgical Oncology at Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute in Guwahati, India, from April 2019 to March 2020. Patients were assessed after stent placement for improvements in dysphagia, pain relief, nutritional status, and associated complications. Results: One week after stent placement, 65.3% of patients were able to tolerate semisolid food and 6.1% could tolerate solids. Prior to stent insertion, 87.8% had Grade 4 dysphagia, but at 6 months post-SEMS placement, 90.2% had only Grade 1 dysphagia. This represented a statistically significant improvement in the dysphagia grade, with a p value less than 0.0001. Further analysis using ANOVA and paired t-tests showed significant improvements in weight, body mass index (BMI), and serum albumin at 1, 3, and 6 months after stent placement, with p values less than 0.001. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that the placement of SEMS is a safe and effective palliative intervention for management of dysphagia in carcinoma esophagus, leading to improvements in patient nutrition and quality of life, with relatively few associated complications.

Endoscopic management of complications after sleeve gastrectomy: a narrative review

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most widely performed bariatric procedure globally due to its technical simplicity and proven efficacy. However, complications following SG, including bleeding, leakage, fistulas, stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and hiatal hernia (HH), remain a significant concern. Endoscopic interventions have emerged as valuable minimally invasive alternatives to traditional surgical approaches for managing these complications. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the endoscopic management strategies available for addressing the various complications encountered after SG, emphasizing their critical role in optimizing patient outcomes.

Nonoperative Management Strategies for Anastomotic Leaks After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Literature Review

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) has gained widespread acceptance as an effective bariatric surgery due to its relative simplicity and favorable outcomes in weight loss and metabolic improvement. However, anastomotic leaks, though uncommon, present a significant complication with the potential for severe morbidity and mortality if not managed appropriately. This review examines the range of nonoperative strategies currently employed to manage anastomotic leaks and fistulae following OAGB. The focus is on endoscopic techniques, including the use of clips, stents, suturing systems, internal drainage, vacuum therapy, and tissue sealants, which have been successfully used in various gastrointestinal surgeries. Although a proportion of patients will require surgical treatments, these strategies offer less invasive alternatives to surgical intervention and can be tailored to the specific characteristics of the leak and patient condition. However, the application of these techniques specifically for OAGB-related leaks is not as well-documented. This review lists the available evidence on these nonoperative approaches, highlighting some of their potential benefits and limitations. While these methods show promise, there is a clear need for further research to establish standardized protocols and optimize their use in the context of OAGB-related leaks and fistulae.

Endoscopic Intervention for Anastomotic Leakage After Gastrectomy

Anastomotic leaks and fistulas are significant complications of gastric surgery that potentially lead to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Surgical intervention is reserved for cases with severe symptoms or hemodynamic instability; however, surgery carries a higher risk of complications. With advancements in endoscopic treatment options, endoscopic approaches have emerged as the primary choice for managing these complications. Endoscopic clipping is a traditional method comprising 2 main categories: through-the-scope clips and over-the-scope clips. Through-the-scope clips are user friendly and adaptable to various clinical scenarios, whereas over-the-scope clips can close larger defects. Another promising approach is endoscopic stent insertion, which has shown a high success rate for leak closure, although vigilant monitoring is required to monitor stent migration. Infection control is essential in post-surgical leakage cases, and endoscopic internal drainage provides a relatively safe and noninvasive means to manage fluids, contributing to infection control and wound healing promotion. Endoscopic suturing offers full-thickness wound closure, but requires additional training and endoscopic versatility. As a promising tool, endoscopic vacuum therapy potentially surpasses stent therapy by draining inflammatory materials and closing defects. Furthermore, the use of tissue sealants, such as fibrin glue and cyanoacrylate, has been reported to be effective in selected situations. The choice of endoscopic device should be tailored to individual cases and specific patient conditions, with careful consideration of the nature of the defect. Further extensive studies involving larger patient populations are required to provide more robust evidence on the efficacy of endoscopic approach in managing post-gastric anastomotic leaks.

Prevention of Migration of Esophageal Self-Expandable Metallic Stents Using Endoscopic Clips

Background and Objectives: Esophageal stenting with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS), for both benign and malignant reasons, has been widely practiced for decades, but migration still remains the most common complication of the procedure. In this report we aim to review our experience and results in stent fixation with clips. Materials and Methods: We present 18 patients who underwent esophageal stenting for both benign and malignant reasons. The SEMSs used were partially covered and were fixated with two to four through the scope hemostatic clips in the proximal end of the prothesis. The procedure was performed only on patients with a high risk of migration of the stent. Results: Migration occurred in only one of the above-mentioned patients and was treated with stent repositioning. The other adverse events that occurred were related to tumor growth in patients with malignant diseases. Conclusions: Clip fixation of an esophageal self-expandable metallic stent in cases considered high-risk for migration is a safe procedure. It reduces the migration rate significantly for both benign and malignant indications.

Efficacy of endoscopic over-the-scope clip fixation for preventing migration of self-expandable metal stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over-the-scope clips (OTSC), both conventional and Stentfix, are believed to anchor the self-expanding metal (SEMS) and prevent migration. We aimed to systematically study the efficacy of endoscopic OTSC fixation of SEMS in prevention of migration.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases from inception to November 11, 2022 to identify studies reporting outcomes of OTSC fixation of metal stents. The primary outcome was to calculate the pooled migration rates following OTSC anchorage of SEMS and to compare it with controls (SEMS without any fixation). The secondary outcomes include technical and clinical success of OTSC anchorage of SEMS. Random effect models were used to determine pooled rates of migration and technical as well as clinical success rates of OTSC anchorage of metal stents.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were included. The pooled rate of migration following OTSC anchorage of SEMS was 0.10 (95%CI, 0.04-0.20, I2 = 43%). The pooled rate of migration following OTSC anchorage of esophageal SEMS was 0.08 (95%CI, 0.04-0.15, I2 = 0%). The pooled risk ratio of SEMS migration following OTSC Stentfix was lower as compared to no fixation of SEMS [RR = 0.24 (95%CI,0.13- 0.43, I2 = 0)]. The pooled technical success rate of OTSC fixation following SEMS was 0.98 (95%CI, 0.81-1.00, I2 = 0%). The pooled clinical success rate of OTSC fixation following SEMS was 0.79 (95%CI, 0.64-0.88, I2 = 56%). All studies had valid and reliable methods to diagnose migration, technical and clinical success.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of OTSC clips (conventional or Stentfix) for anchorage had a lower risk of migration of metal stents than no fixation. Future studies should look into prospective multicenter studies on their use to prevent the migration of SEMS.

Reduction of esophageal stent migration rate with a novel over-the-scope fixation device (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is routinely performed in a variety of benign and malignant GI diseases. One of the most frequent adverse events after esophageal SEMS placement is stent migration. We evaluated a novel over-the-scope clip device (stentfix OTSC; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tuebingen, Germany) designed and approved for SEMS fixation.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective observational cohort study was performed to analyze stent migration rates before and after availability of the stentfix OTSC device. A cohort of patients who consecutively underwent SEMS fixation with the stentfix OTSC system (SF cohort) was compared with an historical cohort of patients who did not receive stentfix OTSC fixation or any other stent fixation method (NF cohort) before the stentfix OTSC system became available. Outcome variables including technical success, adverse events and clinical success were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients (SF cohort, 26; NF cohort, 51) underwent esophageal SEMS implantation for malignant (69%) and benign (31%) conditions. The technical success rate of stent fixation was 100%, and no procedure-related adverse events were observed. The stent migration rate was significantly lower in the SF cohort compared with the NF cohort (8.3% vs 35.4%, P < .001), indicating a relative risk reduction of 76.5% associated with stentfix OTSC application. Stent implantation across the gastroesophageal junction was identified as a predictor of stent migration.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with benign or malignant gastroesophageal diseases, there was a significantly lower stent migration rate in patients managed with the stentfix OTSC system compared with those without stent fixation. The application was technically successful in all cases, and no adverse events related to clip application or removal were observed.

Outcomes of patients with malignant esophagogastric junction obstruction receiving metallic stents: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Malignancies-related esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction is usually diagnosed in inoperable status with poor clinical outcomes. Metallic stent placement at EGJ could improve dysphagia for these patients. However, studies regarding the outcomes in these patients receiving metallic stents are still limited. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of metallic stent placement in malignant EGJ obstruction.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with inoperable malignant EGJ obstruction receiving metallic stent placement were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical outcomes between different stents and deployment techniques were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall technical success rate was 97.6% and clinical success rate was 92.1%. The median overall survival time was 77 (4-893) days, and the patency time was 71 (4-893) days, respectively. Poststent radiotherapy significantly prolonged survival and stent patency. Between patients receiving uncovered or partially covered metal stents, there was no difference in procedure-related complications, survival time, and stent patency time. Moreover, the clinical outcomes in patients receiving duodenal stents for malignant EGJ obstruction are not inferior to those receiving esophageal stents.

CONCLUSION

This study provides crucial information for endoscopists to establish individualized stenting strategies for malignant EGJ obstruction.

Performance and Predictors of Migration of Partially and Fully Covered Esophageal Self-Expanding Metal Stents for Malignant Dysphagia

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are routinely used to palliate malignant dysphagia. However esophageal SEMS can migrate or obstruct due to epithelial hyperplasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates and factors predicting migration and obstruction, and the nutritional outcomes in partially covered (pc) vs. fully covered (fc) SEMS vs. fcSEMS with antimigration fins (AF) placed for malignant dysphagia.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing SEMS placement for malignant dysphagia at three academic medical centers.

RESULTS

Among 357 patients, there were 55 (15.4%) stent migrations, 45 (12.6%) obstructions from epithelial hyperplasia, and 20 (5.6%) food impactions. Median overall survival was 79 days (IQR 41,199). The percent weight change/change in albumin at 30 and 60 days after SEMS placement were -2.24%/-0.544 g/dL and -2.98%/-0.55 g/dL, respectively. Stent migration occurred significantly more often with fcSEMS than pcSEMS (25.3% vs 10.9%; P < .003), but there was no difference when either group was compared to fcSEMS-AF (19.3%). The overall rate of epithelial hyperplasia resulting in stent obstruction was low (12.6%) and not different between stent types. Factors associated with increased risk of SEMS migration on multivariable logistic regression included stricture traversability with a diagnostic endoscope (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.29-4.35) and use of fcSEMS (OR, 2.56; 1.31-5.00) or fcSEMS-AF (OR, 2.30, 1.03-5.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Traversability of a malignant esophageal stenosis predicts SEMS migration. In these patients with a limited overall survival, pcSEMS are associated with lower rates of stent migration and similar rates of obstruction compared to fcSEMS.

A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.

New technique: removal of embedded esophageal partially covered stent by endoscopic sub-stent space dissection

Both fully (FCSEMS) and partially (PCSEMS) covered self-expandable metal stents are used for the endoscopic management of leaks, perforations, and fistulas. PCSEMS have lower migration rates as their uncovered flanges allow for anchorage into the surrounding tissue, but this consequently makes them difficult to be removed, with reported cases of esophageal perforation during the removal of the embedded PCSEMS. Stent-in-stent technique is mostly used, where a FCSEMS is placed co-axially into an existing PCSEMS causing pressure necrosis and facilitating subsequent removal of both stents. This technique, although effective, is expensive, requiring the use of a second stent. In this report, we describe a series of 3 patients with embedded PCSEMS removed by a new endoscopic technique, i.e., endoscopic sub-stent space dissection, without using a second stent.

Customized bariatric stents for sleeve gastrectomy leak: are they superior to conventional esophageal stents? A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Recently, there has been a burgeoning interest in the utilization of customized bariatric stents (CBS) for management of sleeve gastrectomy leak (SGL). We aimed to conduct a proportion meta-analysis to evaluate the cumulative efficacy and safety of these new stents and to compare them with the conventional esophageal stents (CES).

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases was conducted through May 1, 2020. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success and post-procedure adverse events of CBS and CES. Secondary outcomes were number of stents and endoscopic sessions per patient, and time to leak closure. A proportion meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using a random-effects model, and the weighted pooled rates (WPRs) or mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

The WPR with 95% CI of technical success, clinical success, and stent migration for CBS were 99% (93-100%) I2 = 34%, 82% (69-93%) I2 = 58%, and 32% (17-49%), I2 = 69%, respectively. For CES, the WPR (95% CI) for technical success, clinical success, and stent migration were 100% (97-100%) I2 = 19%, 93% (85-98%) I2 = 30%, and 15% (7-25%), I2 = 41%, respectively. Adverse events other than migration were very low with both types of stents. On proportionate difference, CBS had lower clinical success (11%) and higher migration rate (17%) in comparison to CES. In successfully treated patients, CBS was associated with lower mean number of stents and endoscopic sessions, and shorter time to leak closure compared to CES. The overall quality of evidence was very low.

CONCLUSIONS

In treatment of SGL, there is very low level evidence that CES are superior to CBS in terms of clinical success and migration rate, though may require more stent insertions and endoscopic procedures. The evidence however remains very uncertain. Perhaps relevant to some types of stents, CBS are promising; however design modification is strongly recommended to improve outcomes.

A finite element investigation on design parameters of bare and polymer-covered self-expanding wire braided stents

Self-expanding covered braided stents are routinely used across a diverse range of clinical applications, but few computational studies have attempted to replicate their complex behaviour. In this study, a computational framework was developed to predict the functional performance of bare and covered self-expanding wire braided stents, with a systematic evaluation on the effect of various braid and cover parameters presented. Simulated radial force and kink deformation tests show good agreement to experimental data for covered braided stents across a range of braid angles and cover thicknesses. Our results demonstrate that braid angle is a key governing parameter that dictates the radial and kink performance of both bare-metal and covered wire braided stents. It was also demonstrated that addition of a polymeric cover to a wire braided stent causes a stiffer radial response across all braid angles, particularly when thicker and/or stiffer covering systems were considered. This study represents the first experimentally-validated computational model for covered wire braided stent systems and has excellent potential to be used in future design of these devices for a range of applications.

Self-expanding metal stent in esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option for esophageal perforation and leaks. The aim of our study was to assess the role of SEMS for the management of benign esophageal diseases such as perforations and anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

All patients (n = 26) who underwent SEMS placement for esophageal perforation and anastomotic leaks between May 2012 and February 2019 were included. Data were analyzed in relation to the indications, type of stent used, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Indications for stent placement included anastomotic leaks 65% (n = 17) and perforations 35% (n = 9). Fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) was placed in 25 patients, and in 1, partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS) was placed. Stent placement was successful in all the patients (n = 26). Four patients did not report for follow-up after stenting. Among the patients on follow-up, 91% (20/22) had healing of the mucosal defect. Stent-related complications were seen in 5 (23%) patients and included stent migration [3], reactive hyperplasia [1] and stricture [1].

CONCLUSION

Covered stent placement for a duration of 8 weeks is technically safe and clinically effective as a first-line procedure for bridging and healing benign esophageal perforation and leaks.

Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement - Update 2020

1:  ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforations, including the definition of procedures that carry a higher risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 : ESGE recommends that in the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, the endoscopist reports its size and location, with an image, and statement of the endoscopic treatment that has been applied. 3:  ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be rapidly and carefully evaluated and documented with a computed tomography (CT) scan. 4 : ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of the iatrogenic perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. Switch to carbon dioxide (CO2) endoscopic insufflation, diversion of digestive luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or pneumothorax should also be performed. 5 : ESGE recommends that after endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended.

Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae: What option do we have?

Gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae are serious, potentially life threatening conditions that may occur with a wide variety of clinical presentations. Leaks are mostly related to post-operative anastomotic defects and are responsible for an important share of surgical morbidity and mortality. Chronic leaks and long standing post-operative collections may evolve in a fistula between two epithelialized structures. Endoscopy has earned a pivotal role in the management of gastrointestinal defects both as first line and as rescue treatment. Endotherapy is a minimally invasive, effective approach with lower morbidity and mortality compared to revisional surgery. Clips and luminal stents are the pioneer of gastrointestinal (GI) defect endotherapy, whereas innovative endoscopic closure devices and techniques, such as endoscopic internal drainage, suturing system and vacuum therapy, has broadened the indications of endoscopy for the management of GI wall defect. Although several endoscopic options are currently used, a standardized evidence-based algorithm for management of GI defect is not available. Successful management of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae requires a tailored and multidisciplinary approach based on clinical presentation, defect features (size, location and onset time), local expertise and the availability of devices. In this review, we analyze different endoscopic approaches, which we selected on the basis of the available literature and our own experience. Then, we evaluate the overall efficacy and procedural-specific strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Comparison of fully-covered vs partially covered self-expanding metallic stents for palliative treatment of inoperable esophageal malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following placement of fully covered self-expanding metallic stents (FCSEMS) vs partially covered self-expanding metallic stents (PCSEMS) for palliative treatment of inoperable esophageal cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases from inception up to 10th July 2019. Studies comparing clinical outcomes with FCSEMS vs PCSEMS in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer requiring palliative treatment for dysphagia were included.

Results

Five studies were included in the review. Two hundred twenty-nine patients received FCSEMS while 313 patients received PCSEMS in the five studies. There was no difference in the rates of stent migration between FCSEMS and PCSEMS (Odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95%CI 0.37–1.08, P = 0.09; I² = 0%). Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in technical success between the two groups (OR 1.32, 95%CI 0.30–5.03, P = 0.78; I² = 12%). Improvement in dysphagia was reported with both FCSEMS and PCSEMS in the included studies. There was no difference between the two stents for obstruction due to tissue growth (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.47–1.39, P = 0.44; I² = 2%) or by food (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.10–1.62, P = 0.20; I² = 29%). Incidence of bleeding (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.21–1.58, P = 0.28; I² = 0%) and chest pain (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.44–2.57, P = 0.89; I² = 0%) was similar in the two groups. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs produced similar results. The overall quality of studies was not high.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that there is no difference in stent migration, and stent obstruction, with FCSEMS or PCSEMS when used for palliative treatment of esophageal malignancy.

A New Fully Covered Irradiation Stent Versus a Partially Covered Irradiation Stent for Unresectable Malignant Dysphagia: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a newly developed fully covered irradiation stent (FCIS) compared with a partially covered irradiation stent (PCIS) in patients with unresectable malignant dysphagia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 195 patients [158 (81.0%) males, median age of 75 years (range 49-89 years)] who underwent FCIS or PCIS placement for unresectable malignant dysphagia from January 2012 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time was 181 days (range 4-547 days). Outcomes were measured in terms of recurrent dysphagia (primary), technical success, clinical success, overall survival, and adverse events. Recurrent dysphagia was analyzed by Fine-Gray regression model.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 97.8% (87/89) in the FCIS group and 99.1% (105/106) in the PCIS group (P = 0.59). The clinical success rate was 100.0% in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrent dysphagia rate between the FCIS and PCIS groups (21.8% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.12). Compared with PCISs, FCISs were associated with a decrease in tissue/tumor growth rate (11.5% vs. 21.9%; P = 0.01), while stent migration rates were statistically comparable (11.5% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.23). The median overall survivals were comparable between the FCIS and PCIS groups (164 days vs. 162 days; P = 0.70). A dysphagia score of 4 and metastasis were risk factors for survival. No significant differences were observed in the rates of adverse events, including chest pain, fistula formation, hemorrhage, and aspiration pneumonia (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients with unresectable malignant dysphagia, this newly developed FCIS can provide efficacy and safety comparable to those of a PCIS. Compared with PCIS, this FCIS is more successful in preventing tissue/tumor growth, with a comparable stent migration rate.

Feasibility and safety of duodenal covered self-expandable metallic stent fixation: an experimental study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Migration of duodenal covered self-expandable metallic stents (C-SEMS) is the main cause of stent dysfunction in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. However, the ideal method to prevent migration has not been clarified. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of duodenal C-SEMS fixation in this experimental study.

METHODS

We used the over-the-scope clip (OTSC), suture, and clip methods to fix duodenal C-SEMS and evaluated the gripping force of each device and invasion depth based on pathological findings.

RESULTS

The OTSC and suturing systems had a significantly higher mean gripping force compared with the clipping system (OTSC vs. clip: 13.2 vs. 1.0 Newtons [N], P < 0.001; suture vs. clip: 8.5 vs. 1.0 N, P < 0.001). OTSC compression was stronger compared with suturing (OTSC vs. suture: 13.2 vs. 8.5 N, P = 0.006). The submucosal layer, but not the muscle layer, was compressed more widely and deeply by OTSC compared with clips based on pathological findings by hematoxylin and eosin staining.

CONCLUSION

Both OTSC and suturing methods used for duodenal C-SEMS fixation were feasible compared with the clipping method. The pathological evaluation of invasion depth indicated that OTSC may be safe even for preventive use. This study suggested that these methods can be applied clinically for duodenal C-SEMS fixation.

Endoscopic Closure of Gastrointestinal Fistulae and Leaks

The development of new endoscopic techniques, such as gastrointestinal (GI) stenting, full-thickness suturing, clip application, and use of tissue adhesives, has had a significant impact on management of GI fistulae. These techniques have shown promising results, but further study is needed to optimize the efficacy of long-term closure. The advancement of endoscopic techniques, including the use of the lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS), has allowed for the deliberate creation of fistula tracts to apply endoscopic therapy that previously could not be achieved. This article examines the rapidly evolving area of endoscopic fistula closure and its relationship to LAMS.

Fully-covered metal stents with endoscopic suturing vs. partially-covered metal stents for benign upper gastrointestinal diseases: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been increasingly used in benign conditions (e. g. strictures, fistulas, leaks, and perforations). Fully covered SEMS (FSEMS) were introduced to avoid undesirable consequences of partially covered SEMS (PSEMS), but come with higher risk of stent migration. Endoscopic suturing (ES) for stent fixation has been shown to reduce migration of FSEMS. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of FSEMS with ES (FS/ES) versus PSEMS in patients with benign upper gastrointestinal conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent stent placement for benign gastrointestinal conditions at seven US tertiary-care centers. Patients were divided into two groups: FSEMS with ES (FS/ES group) and PSEMS (PSEMS group). Clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 74 (FS/ES 46, PSEMS 28) patients were included. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in rate of stent migration between FS/ES (43 %) and PSEMS (15 %) (adjusted odds ratio 0.56; 95 % CI 0.15 - 2.00). Clinical success was similar [68 % vs. 64 %; P  = 0.81]. Rate of adverse events (AEs) was higher in PSEMS group [13 (46 %) vs. 10 (21 %); P  = 0.03). Difficult stent removal was higher in the PSEMS group (n = 5;17 %) vs. 0 % in the FS/ES group; P  = 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of stent migration of FS/ES and PSEMS are similar. Rates of other stent-related AEs were higher in the PSEMS group. PSEMS was associated with tissue ingrowth or overgrowth leading to difficult stent removal, and secondary stricture formation. Thus, FSEMS with ES for stent fixation may be the preferred modality over PSEMS for the treatment of benign upper gastrointestinal conditions.

Role of Percutaneous Glue Treatment After Persisting Leak After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Over the years, many treatment modes have been attempted for gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Minimally invasive techniques for GCF treatment include stent placement and radiological percutaneous glue treatment (GT).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Ten patients underwent a radiological acrylate mixed with contrast medium GT combined or not with other treatment strategies such as relaparoscopy, ultrasound, or computerized tomography scan (CT scan)-guided drain and endoscopic stent placement.

RESULTS

Ten patients (mean age 47.1 years, range 64-29) were treated by percutaneous injection of glue after LSG leak. Body mass index (BMI) was 42.2 kg/m(2) ± 6.7 at the time of LSG surgery. Mean time between LSG and leak diagnosis was 12 days (range 4-31 days). GT was only effective when performed after endoscopic stent placement (80 % resolution). With this regimen, five patients required a laparoscopic Roux limb placement. All fistulas eventually healed a mean of 75 days (range 29-293 days) after GCF diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous glue treatment alone does not seem to provide adequate results. Stenting previous to the glue treatment allows for better results.

Endoscopic suturing of esophageal fully covered self-expanding metal stents reduces rates of stent migration

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic suturing of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FC-SEMSs) may prevent migration. The aim of this study was to compare rates of migration between sutured FC-SEMSs (S-FCSEMSs), unsecured FC-SEMSs, and partially covered SEMSs (PC-SEMSs) placed for benign esophageal leaks and strictures.

METHODS

In a retrospective, single-center, cohort study, rates of migration for S-FCSEMSs, FC-SEMSs, and PC-SEMSs were assessed in patients with at least 1 month of follow-up or experiencing clinically significant stent migration (CSSM) any time after placement. CSSM was defined as proximal or distal displacement of the stent by ≥2 cm or passage into the stomach plus the recurrence of pre-SEMS symptoms or signs. A multivariable analysis was done to identify additional risk factors for stent migration.

RESULTS

A total of 184 SEMSs were placed in 101 patients, including 32 S-FCSEMSs in 25 patients, 114 FC-SEMSs in 59 patients, and 38 PC-SEMSs in 30 patients. CSSM occurred with 56 of 184 stents (30.4%) in 36 of 101 patients (35.6%), including 3 of 32 (9.4%) S-FCSEMSs, 45 of 114 (39.5%) FC-SEMSs, and 8 of 38 (21.1%) PC-SEMSs (P = .005). Migration was less likely for S-FCSEMSs than for FC-SEMSs (9.4% vs 39.5%; P = .01) but not between S-FCSEMSs and PC-SEMSs (9.4% vs 21.1%; P = .07) or between FC-SEMSs and PC-SEMSs (39.5% vs 21.1%; P = .38). Previous stent migration (odds ratio [OR], 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-8.19; P = .01) and previous esophageal surgery (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.67; P = .002) were associated with increased and decreased risk of CSSM, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic suturing of FC-SEMSs for benign esophageal disease reduces CSSM compared with unsecured FC-SEMSs but not PC-SEMSs. Patients with previous stent migration may benefit from prophylactic suturing of FC-SEMSs.

Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for the Palliation of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal stents have been used to palliate patients with dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer. Early rigid plastic prostheses have been associated with a high risk of complications. However, with the development of self-expanding stents, it has developed into a widely accepted method for treating malignant esophageal strictures and esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs). The present review covers various aspects of self-expanding metallic stent placement for palliating esophageal cancer, including its types, placement procedures, indications, contraindications, complications, and some of innovations that will become available in the future.

Endoscopic stent suture fixation for prevention of esophageal stent migration during prolonged dilatation for achalasia treatment

The aim of this study is to compare endoscopic stent suture fixation with endoscopic clip attachment or the use of partially covered stents (PCS) regarding their capability to prevent stent migration during prolonged dilatation in achalasia. Large-diameter self-expanding metal stents (30 mm × 80 mm) were placed across the gastroesophageal junction in 11 patients with achalasia. Stent removal was scheduled after 4 to 7 days. To prevent stent dislocation, endoscopic clip attachment, endoscopic stent suture fixation, or PCS were used. The Eckardt score was evaluated before and 6 months after prolonged dilatation. After endoscopic stent suture fixation, no (0/4) sutured stent migrated. When endoscopic clips were used, 80% (4/5) clipped stents migrated (p = 0.02). Of two PCS (n = 2), one migrated and one became embedded leading to difficult stent removal. Technical adverse events were not seen in endoscopic stent suture fixation but were significantly correlated with the use of clips or PCS (r = 0.828, p = 0.02). Overall, 72% of patients were in remission regarding their achalasia symptoms 6 months after prolonged dilatation. Endoscopic suture fixation of esophageal stents but not clip attachment appears to be the best method of preventing early migration of esophageal stents placed at difficult locations such as at the naive gastroesophageal junction.

Clinical outcomes following self-expanding metal stent placement for esophageal salvage

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for esophageal salvage in patients who would otherwise require esophageal/conduit resection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who had SEMS placed from January 2010 to December 2015. Patient demographics, esophageal stent characteristics, and outcomes were assessed in our patient cohort.

RESULTS

Our study included a total of 83 patients. A total of 148 SEMS were placed, with 121 partially covered SEMS (pcSEMS) and 27 fully covered SEMS (cSEMS). A stent was placed more than once in 42.2% of the patients. Median duration of stent placement was 23 days. Indications for SEMS placement included esophageal leak after esophageal resection (45.8%), spontaneous esophageal perforation (22.9%), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (20.5%), and esophageal obstruction (9.6%). Complications from SEMS placement included 6 stent migrations and 1 esophageal perforation. Of the 6 stents that migrated, 2 were pcSEMS and 4 were cSEMS. In a patient who underwent stent placement for a stricture refractory to dilation, a perforation at the distal end was discovered 2 days after stent removal. The perforation healed after the second SEMS placement. Ultimately, 15 patients (18.1%) had to undergo a subsequent esophagectomy or takedown of their conduit with an overall 81.9% salvage of native esophagus or conduits.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the successful use of SEMS in patients with anastomotic leaks, perforations, and recalcitrant strictures.

Outcome and risk factors assessment for adverse events in advanced esophageal cancer patients after self-expanding metal stents placement

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the treatment of choice for advanced esophageal cancers. Literature is scarce on risk factors predictors for adverse events after SEMS placement. Assess risk factors for adverse events after SEMS placement in advanced esophageal cancer and evaluate survival after SEMS placement. Cross-sectional study of patients with advanced esophageal cancer referred for SEMS placement, during a period of 3 years. Ninety-seven patients with advanced esophageal cancer placed SEMS. Adverse events were more common when tumors were located at the level of the distal esophagus/cardia (47% vs 23%, P = 0.011, OR 3.1), with statistical significance being kept in the multivariate analysis (OR 3.1, P = 0.018). Time until adverse events was lower in the tumors located at the level of the distal esophagus/cardia (P = 0.036). Survival was higher in patients who placed SEMS with curative intent (327 days [126-528] vs. 119 days [91-147], P = 0.002) and in patients submitted subsequently to surgery compared with those who did just chemo/radiotherapy or who did not do further treatment (563 days [378-748] vs. 154 days [133-175] vs. 46 days [20-72], P < 0.001). Subsequent treatment kept statistical significance in the multivariate analysis (HR 3.4, P < 0.001). SEMS allow palliation of dysphagia in advanced esophageal cancer and are associated with an increased out-of-hospital survival, as long as there are conditions for further treatments. Tumors located at the level of the distal esophagus/cardia are associated with a greater number of adverse events, which also occur earlier.

Stent-in-stent technique for removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents

BACKGROUND

Removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents (PCSEMS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared with removal of fully covered self-expanding stents (FCSES) due to tissue ingrowth. Successful removal of embedded PCSEMS has been described by the stent-in-stent (SIS) technique.

AIMS

To report the first US experience from three high-volume quaternary care centers on the safety and efficacy of the SIS technique for removal of embedded PCSEMS.

METHODS

Retrospective study of outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent the SIS for removal of embedded PCSEMS over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven embedded PCSEMS were successfully removed using the SIS technique (100 %) from 25 patients (11 males), median age 65 (range 37-80). All stents were successfully removed in one endoscopic session (no repeat SIS procedures were required for persistently embedded stents). The embedded PCSEMS had been in situ for a median of 76 days (range 26-501). Median SIS dwell time (FCSES in situ of PCSEMS) was 13 days (interquartile range 8-16 days; range 4-212 days). One adverse event (self-limited bleeding) occurred during a median follow-up period of 3 months (range 1-32). No patients died, required surgery, or had long-term disability due to adverse events attributed to the SIS technique. Twelve patients required additional interventions following SIS procedure for persistence or recurrence of the underlying pathology.

CONCLUSION

When performed by experienced endoscopists, safe and effective removal of embedded PCSEMS can be achieved via the SIS technique.

Predictors of Successful Endoscopic Closure of Gastrointestinal Defects: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic closure is technically feasible in the majority of gastrointestinal defects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes, and identify variables predicting successful outcomes in patients with attempted closure.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal defects between December 2007 and May 2013 at a single tertiary care center. Technical success (TS) was defined as successful closure of the defect at the time of endoscopy. Clinical improvement (CI) was defined as improvement in symptoms. Clinical resolution (CR) was defined as documented radiographic closure of defect or clinical resolution of symptoms. Acute defects were diagnosed within 6 weeks, while chronic defects were those that persisted for >6 weeks, prior to index therapeutic endoscopy.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent 77 endoscopies for leaks (n = 23), fistulas (n = 22), and perforations (n = 5). TS occurred in 46/50 (92%). Overall, 34/50 (68%) patients had CR. CR was significantly higher for acute defects as compared to chronic defects (89.7 vs. 38.1%, OR 14.1, CI 3.19-62.1, p < 0.001). Of 24 patients who required repeat attempts at endoscopic closure, 14 (58%) achieved CR. Acute defects (p = 0.04) and those with initial CI (p = 0.001) were statistically more likely to achieve CR after a repeat attempt.

CONCLUSION

TS and CR are achieved in majority of patients. Acute defects are more likely to achieve CR. In cases where a defect persists, a repeat attempt at endoscopic closure should be attempted.

Preliminary Results of Temporary Placement of Retrievable Expandable Metallic Stents during Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Resectable Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of temporary placement of a retrievable expandable metallic stent (REMS) during preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

REMSs were placed in 25 patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant CRT for resectable esophageal cancer. Stent removal was scheduled between 4 and 6 weeks after starting neoadjuvant CRT. Clinical effectiveness was assessed using the following variables: technical and clinical success, dysphagia score before and after stent placement and removal, and complications and their management.

RESULTS

REMS placement was technically successful in all patients, with 24 of 25 patients (96%) showing symptomatic improvement. Stents were removed electively 32 days (range, 27-42 d) after starting neoadjuvant CRT (n = 20; 80%) or after stent migration and exit through the anus with no evidence of symptom recurrence (n = 5; 20%). The dysphagia score (before stent, 3.1 ± 0.5) improved by 3 days after stent placement (1.3 ± 0.4; P < .001) and was maintained up to 1 month after stent removal (1.2 ± 0.7; P < .001). The median survival was 18.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable esophageal cancer, temporary placement of a REMS during preoperative neoadjuvant CRT showed clinical efficacy in the bridge to surgery. Stent removal between 4 and 6 weeks after starting neoadjuvant CRT seems to be a feasible time frame with symptom improvement.

Gastrointestinal stenting: Current status and imaging features

The use of stents in the gastrointestinal tract has been subjected to major changes. Initially, the use of stents was restricted to malignant strictures in patients with metastatic disease. But thanks to reduction of the morbidity and mortality rates, they are now used with curative intention and in patients with benign diseases after careful selection. However, for patients presenting with colon obstruction due to an advanced colon carcinoma, the mortality and morbidity are still high. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of indications, techniques and further developments of the stents in the gastrointestinal tract and to highlight the predominant role of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of potential complications.

Migration of retrievable expandable metallic stents inserted for malignant esophageal strictures: incidence, management, and prognostic factors in 332 patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, prognostic factors, and secondary management of stent migration in patients with malignant esophageal strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in a single tertiary referral university hospital to identify the incidence, management, and prognostic factors for stent migration in 332 consecutive patients with placement of a retrievable expandable metallic stent. Stent migration was classified into four patterns as locations of a migrated stent: pattern I, partially migrated in the proximal direction; pattern II, partially migrated in the distal direction; pattern III, completely migrated into the stomach; and pattern IV, completely migrated into the bowel.

RESULTS

Stent migration occurred in 42 (12.6%) of 332 patients. Migration was partial (n = 21) or complete (n = 21), and nine (21%), 12 (29%), 11 (26%), and 10 (24%) patients had patterns I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the following prognostic factors: esophagogastric junction strictures caused by cancer of the gastric cardia (odds ratio 1.330; p = 0.004), patients who underwent anticancer treatment after stent placement (17.514; p < 0.001), and patients with a longer survival time (1.994; p < 0.001). Secondary management was needed for 33 of 42 patients. The strictures in the remaining nine patients improved throughout follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Stent migration occurs most commonly in patients with cancer of the gastric cardia, patients with longer survival time, and those who underwent anticancer treatment after stent placement. Stent migration is successfully managed by further intervention. Accurate knowledge of the pattern of stent migration is important for successful management.

Oesophageal stenting for benign and malignant strictures: a systematic approach

Oesophageal stenting is now standard treatment for managing both benign and malignant stenosis of the oesophagus. There is a wide choice in oesophageal stents currently available on the market, with variations in the stent material, size and design. Most oesophageal stents are made from metal alloy compounds for use in malignant strictures, although there are stents made of durable polymers, and now of biodegradable (BD) material, for use in both benign and malignant strictures. With the development of self-expanding plastic stents, self-expanding metal stents and BD stents, stent placement for oesophageal pathologies can be safe and cost-effective. Oesophageal stenting has several challenges for a therapeutic endoscopist which is determined by the location of stricture or tumour, the anatomy of the stenosis and the nature of stent selected. Strictures that have narrow or tortuous lumens can be particularly difficult to stent as the luminal diameter must allow access of at least a 0.035 inch guide wire. This review covers the indications and outcomes of different stents in clinical situations to help rational decision-making.

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal diseases: A pooled analysis of the literature

AIM

To analyze the outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal strictures and benign esophageal leaks in the literature.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 2000 and July 2014. Eight prospective studies were identified that analyzed the outcomes of stent placement for refractory benign esophageal strictures. The outcomes of stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforations and fistulae were extracted from 20 retrospective studies that were published after the inclusion period of a recent systematic review. Data were pooled and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC SEMS) (n = 85), biodegradable (BD) stents (n = 77) and self-expandable plastic stents (SEPS) (n = 70) were inserted in 232 patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures. The overall clinical success rate was 24.2% and according to stent type 14.1% for FC SEMS, 32.9% for BD stents and 27.1% for SEPS. Stent migration occurred in 24.6% of cases. The overall complication rate was 31.0%, including major (17.7%) and minor (13.4%) complications. A total of 643 patients were treated with self-expandable stents mainly for postsurgical leaks (64.5%), iatrogenic perforations (19.6%), Boerhaave's syndrome (7.8%) and fistulae (3.7%). FC SEMS and partially covered SEMS were used in the majority of patients. Successful closure of the defect was achieved in 76.8% of patients and according to etiology in 81.4% for postsurgical leaks, 86.0% for perforations and 64.7% for fistulae. The pooled stent migration rate was 16.5%. Stent-related complications occurred in 13.4% of patients, including major (7.8%) and minor (5.5%) complications.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of stent placement for refractory benign esophageal strictures were poor. However, randomized trials are needed to put this into perspective. The evidence on successful stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforations and fistulae is promising.

Management of inoperable malignant oesophageal strictures with fully covered WallFlex(®) stent: a multicentre prospective study

BACKGROUND

The majority of currently available oesophageal metal stents are partially covered to reduce migration risk. Preliminary experiences with fully covered stents seem to indicate an increased risk of migration in patients treated for malignant dysphagia. The aim of our study was to determine, in this setting, the safety and efficacy of a new, recently introduced stent with anti-migration proprieties.

METHODS

We designed a prospective, multicentre, non-randomized, follow-up study in nine tertiary referral centres. Eighty-two patients with dysphagia due to inoperable or metastatic oesophageal cancer were included. In all of them the fully covered WallFlex(®) stent was placed. Main outcome measurements included functional outcome, recurrent dysphagia, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

Dysphagia score improved from a median of 3, before stenting, to 1 at 4 weeks after stent placement (P<0.001). Perforation occurred in 1 patient after 39 days, while bleeding was reported in 3. In total, 19 patients (23.1%) developed recurrent dysphagia because of stent migration (N=10, 12.2%), tissue overgrowth (N=7; 8.5%), and food impaction (N=2; 2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of the fully covered WallFlex(®) stent resulted in safe and effective palliation of malignant dysphagia, with migration and tissue overgrowth rates comparable to previously reported data on partially covered stents.

Endoscopic suture fixation of self-expanding metallic stents with and without submucosal injection

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are useful for treating leaks after bariatric procedures but stent migration (12 to 40 %) remains a problem. Suture fixation has been used to minimize migration but has attendant risks of transmural penetration. We hypothesized that submucosal injection would decrease the risk of full thickness suture penetration while still providing greater pullout forces than endoscopic clipping.

METHODS

Porcine explant models and 155 mm SEMS were used with a force meter to measure the pullout forces required to dislodge the stent. Stents were first deployed without fixation and this pullout force acted as a control. The explants were then randomized to receive fixation with clips, endoscopic suturing with submucosal elevation, or endoscopic suturing without submucosal elevation. The pullout force was again measured and the ratio of the experimental to control pullout forces was used as a measure of the efficacy of the fixation.

RESULTS

Endoscopic suture fixation after submucosal injection resulted in statistically significant increased pullout force compared to clip fixation (n = 5; mean force ratio 462 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 281-643 %; p < 0.01). Endoscopic suturing fixation without submucosal injection also resulted in statistically significant increased pullout force (n = 5; mean force ratio 765 %; 95 % CI 258-632 %; p < 0.01). Fixation with clips did not result in significantly increased pullout force compared to no fixation (n = 5; mean force ratio 108 %; 95 % CI 56-159 %; p < 0.01). Submucosal injection also eliminated full thickness suture penetration (0/10 submucosal injection; 7/10 no injection).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic suture fixation of SEMS resulted in a statistically significant increase in pullout force necessary to displace the stents. Submucosal injection prior to suture fixation preserves the increased pullout force while minimizing the risk of transmural penetration with the potential for less risk of injury to mediastinal structures.

Treatment of esophageal leaks, fistulae, and perforations with temporary stents: evaluation of efficacy, adverse events, and factors associated with successful outcomes

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with successful endoscopic therapy with temporary stents for esophageal leaks, fistulae, and perforations (L/F/P) are not well known.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of esophageal stenting in these patients and identify factors associated with successful closure.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients with attempted stent placement for esophageal L/F/P between January 2003 and May 2012.

INTERVENTION

Esophageal stent placement and removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Factors predictive of therapeutic success defined as complete closure after index stent removal (primary closure) or after further endoscopic stenting (secondary closure).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with 132 attempted stents for esophageal L/F/P were considered; 13 patients were excluded. Among the remaining 54 patients, 117 stents were placed for leaks (29 patients; 64 stents), fistulae (15 patients; 36 stents), and perforations (10 patients; 17 stents). Procedural technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Primary closure was successful in 40 patients (74%) and secondary closure in an additional 5 (83% overall). On short-term (<3 months) follow-up, 27 patients (50%) were asymptomatic, whereas 22 (41%) had technical adverse events, including stent migration in 15 patients (28%). Factors associated with successful primary closure include a shorter time between diagnosis of esophageal L/F/P and initial stent insertion (9.03 vs 22.54 days; P = .003), and a smaller luminal opening size (P = .002).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary stents are safe and effective in treating esophageal L/F/P. Defect opening size and time from diagnosis to stent placement appear to be candidate predictors for successful closure.