Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis

Is Contemporary Open Pancreatic Necrosectomy Still Useful In The Minimally Invasive Era?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that open pancreatic necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis was associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, these results were mostly concluded from historical cohorts with traditional early necrosectomy in the absence of a minimally invasive step-up approach.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of contemporary open pancreatic necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis in the minimally invasive era.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was performed in a prospective maintained database of 320 patients with infected pancreatic necrosis from January 2011 to December 2022 at a large Chinese tertiary hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients with infected pancreatic necrosis received either a minimally invasive step-up approach (245, 76.6%) or open pancreatic necrosectomy (75, 23.4%), which included upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy (32, 10.0%) and salvage open pancreatic necrosectomy (43, 13.4%). Upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy was associated with similar morbidity and mortality rates but fewer surgical interventions compared with a minimally invasive step-up approach. However, salvage open pancreatic necrosectomy was associated with significantly higher mortality (48.8% vs 18.8%, P = .007), gastrointestinal fistula (44.2% vs 18.8%, P = .021), hemorrhage (48.8% vs 15.6%, P = .003), and intensive care unit stay (25 vs 7 days, P = .040) compared with upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy. Multivariate analysis suggested that multiple organ failure (hazard ratio = 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-18.2, P = .013) and synchronous critical acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio = 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.6, P = .040) were 2 independent risk factors of death for patients who received open pancreatic necrosectomy.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy received fewer surgical interventions with comparable efficacy compared to the minimally invasive step-up approach. Salvage open pancreatic necrosectomy was potentially lifesaving, though it carried high morbidity and mortality. Multiple organ failure and synchronous critical acute pancreatitis were 2 independent risk factors of death for patients who received open pancreatic necrosectomy.

Prognostic factors of critical acute pancreatitis: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with critical acute pancreatitis (CAP) have the highest risk of mortality. However, there have been no studies specifically designed to evaluate the prognostic factors of CAP.

AIMS & METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study involving patients with CAP. Three aspects including organ failure, (peri)pancreatic necrotic fluid cultures and surgical interventions were analyzed specifically to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of the 102 consecutive patients with CAP, 83 patients (81.4%) received step-up surgical treatment, the mortality of the step-up group was 25.3% (21/83). 19 patients (18.6%) underwent step-down surgical treatment, the mortality of the step-down group was 57.9% (11/19). Overall mortality in the whole cohort was 31.4% (32/102). Multivariate analysis of death predictors indicated that multiple organ failure (MOF) (OR = 5.3; 95% CI, 1.5-18.2; p = 0.008), long duration (≥5 days) of organ failure (OR = 6.4; 95% CI, 1.2-54.3; p = 0.029), multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) infection (OR = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.3-15.8; p = 0.013), OPN (OR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-8.8; p = 0.004) and step-down surgical treatment (OR = 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.1; p = 0.019) were significant factors.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with CAP, MOF, long duration (≥5 days) of organ failure, MDROs infection, OPN and step-down surgical treatment were identified as the predictors of mortality.

Percutaneous catheter drainage combined with peritoneal dialysis for treating acute severe pancreatitis: a single-center prospective study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and its underlying mechanism.

METHODS

Totally 64 SAP patients were included in our study and randomly assigned into PCD+PD group (the combination group, N.=32) and convention group (N.=32). SAP patients in the combination group were treated with percutaneous catheter drainage combined with peritoneal dialysis, while those in the convention group were treated with conventional method. The treatment efficacy of both methods were evaluated by comparing levels of plasma inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and leukocyte count), relative indexes of important organs (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine and urea nitrogen) and other clinical data (amelioration time of abdominal pain and abdominal distension, Balthazar CT scores, acute physiology and chronic health enquiry II score, length of hospital stay, complications and prognosis).

RESULTS

The expression levels of inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased in the combination group in a time-dependent manner in comparison with those of the convention group. In addition, the amelioration time of abdominal pain and abdominal distension, length of hospital stay, Balthazar CT scores and the acute physiology and chronic health care II scores in the combination group were also significantly decreased in comparison with those of the convention group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination treatment of PCD and PD effectively relieves the clinical symptoms of SAP by clearing plasma inflammatory cytokines.