1
|
Arutyunyan AS, Blagovestnov DA, Yartsev PA, Levitsky VD, Gulyaev AA, Kislukhina EV. [Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic approach for widespread appendicular peritonitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2022:24-32. [PMID: 35775842 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202207124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze treatment outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis complicated by widespread peritonitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 165 patients acute appendicitis complicated by widespread peritonitis. Inclusion criteria: acute appendicitis complicated by widespread peritonitis MIP grade 1-2 in reactive or toxic phase (grading system by Simonyan K.S.), abdominal cavity index ≤16. Exclusion criteria: MIP grade 3, terminal phase, abdominal cavity index ≥17. RESULTS Analysis of postoperative data revealed no correlation between surgical approach and incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses and infiltrates. In the main group, intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in 4.9% of patients (n=5), infiltrates - 12.8% (n=13). In the control group, these parameters were 4.6% (n=2) and 18.2% (n=8), respectively. We have developed and introduced into clinical practice a differentiated approach to surgical treatment of widespread appendicular peritonitis based on laparoscopic data. Abdominal cavity was intraoperatively assessed. The proposed method included 5 criteria with establishment of appropriate points (min 3, max 14). In case of total score 3-8, laparoscopic approach was preferred. Overall score 9-11 required laparoscopic surgery with subsequent elective repeated laparoscopy, ≥12 scores - intraoperative conversion and open surgery. Thus, subject to the rules of surgical intervention, the number of intra-abdominal complications between laparoscopic and open methods is equalized. CONCLUSION The developed differentiated surgical strategy for patients with appendicular peritonitis is effective and reduces the incidence of wound infection, extra-abdominal complications, and hospital-stay, as well as contributes to early rehabilitation of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Arutyunyan
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - D A Blagovestnov
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - P A Yartsev
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
- Penza Institute for Advanced Training of Doctors, Penza, Russia
| | - V D Levitsky
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
- Penza Institute for Advanced Training of Doctors, Penza, Russia
| | - A A Gulyaev
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
- Penza Institute for Advanced Training of Doctors, Penza, Russia
| | - E V Kislukhina
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laparoscopic Partial Cecal Resection With an Endoscopic Linear Stapler in Complicated Appendicitis: A Single Center Experiences. Int Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00027.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
It can be challenging to perform an appendectomy laparoscopically in patients with complicated appendicitis with severe inflammation or perforation of the appendix base. This study aimed to introduce a simple alternative surgical treatment that can be used safely in difficult appendectomy cases.
Case presentation
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 14 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial resection of the cecum with a linear stapler between January 2015 and December 2016 in our hospital. Fourteen patients were included in this study, and no surgical complications were observed. Enteral feeding was resumed on the third or fourth postoperative day, and the average length of hospital stay was 7.6 days (range, 5 to 12 days).
Conclusion
The results suggest that laparoscopic partial cecal resection with an endostapler is a safe, simple surgical procedure that can be a good alternative in patients with complicated appendicitis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernández-Moreno MC, Pérez Santiago L, Martí Fernández R, León Espinoza C, Ortega Serrano J. Is laparoscopic approach still a risk factor for postappendectomy intra-abdominal abscess? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90:163-169. [PMID: 33003018 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) on the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) remains controversial. We aimed to identify risk factors for postappendectomy IAA and assess the impact of appendectomy approach in postoperative morbidity. METHODS A retrospective single-center study including consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 2015 and 2018 was performed. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and perioperative variables were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to detect independent risk factors for IAA. Comparison of LA and open appendectomy was conducted, and propensity score model (PSM) was used to overcome differences between groups. Independent risk factors for IAA were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses in the PSM cohort. RESULTS A total of 532 appendectomies were included. The median age was 35 years. Three hundred two patients (56.7%) underwent LA. The most frequent operative finding was American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade 1 appendicitis in 303 patients (57%). Peritonitis was found in 109 patients (20.5%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 14.4% and 0%, respectively. Intra-abdominal abscess rate was 6.2%. An AAST grade of ≥2, a preoperative C-reactive protein level of >100 mg/dL, and diabetes mellitus were identified as independent risk factors for IAA in the multivariate analysis. Comparing LA and open appendectomy, there were no differences in IAA rates. After PSM, LA showed lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe approach and not related to a higher risk of IAA. Patients with an AAST grade of ≥2, a preoperative C-reactive protein level of >100, and diabetes mellitus have higher risk for postappendectomy IAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María-Carmen Fernández-Moreno
- From the Department of Surgery (M.-C.F.-M., L.P.S., R.M.F., C.L.E., J.O.S.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia; and Biomedical Research Institute (INCLIVA) (J.O.S.), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martínez-Pérez A, Payá-Llorente C, Santarrufina-Martínez S, Sebastián-Tomás JC, Martínez-López E, de'Angelis N. Predictors for prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis in adults. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3628-3635. [PMID: 32767147 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07841-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendicitis-related hospitalizations linked with peritonitis or postoperative complications result in longer lengths of stay and higher costs. The aim of the present study was to assess the independent association between potential predictors and prolonged hospitalization after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for complicated acute appendicitis (CAA). METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with CAA in which LA was attempted. The primary outcome was a prolonged length of stay (LOS) after surgery, defined as hospitalizations longer than or equal to the 75th percentile for LOS, including the day of discharge. Hierarchical regression models were run to elucidate the independent predictors for the variable of interest. RESULTS The present study involved 160 patients with a mean age of 50.71 years. The conversion rate was 1.9%, and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 23.8%. The median length of stay (LOS) was 5 days (75th percentile: 7 days). Multivariate analyses included nine variables that are statistically and/or clinically relevant to assess its relationship with a prolonged LOS: three preoperative (age, sex, and comorbidity), four intraoperative (appendix gangrene, perforation, degree of peritonitis, and drain placement), and two postoperative (immediate ICU admission and complications). The development of postoperative complications (OR 6.162, 95% CI 2.451-15.493; p = 0.000) and the placement of an abdominal drain (OR 3.438, 95% CI 1.107-10.683; p = 0.033) were found to be independent predictors for prolonged LOS. For patients not presenting postoperative complications, drain placement was the only independent predictor for the outcome (OR 7.853, 95% CI 1.520-40.558; p = 0.014). Sensitivity analyses showed confirmatory results. CONCLUSION The intraoperative process of care has a clear impact on LOS after LA for CAA in adults; therefore, the decision of whether to drain in these situations should be made more restrictively yet with judicious caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Avenida Gaspar Aguilar 90, 46017, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Carmen Payá-Llorente
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Avenida Gaspar Aguilar 90, 46017, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Juan Carlos Sebastián-Tomás
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Avenida Gaspar Aguilar 90, 46017, Valencia, Spain
| | - Elías Martínez-López
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Avenida Gaspar Aguilar 90, 46017, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri-Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est - UPEC, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ivakhov GB, Sazhin AV, Ermakov IV, Titkova SM, Anurov MV, Nechaj TV. [Laparoscopic surgery for advanced appendicular peritonitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2020:20-26. [PMID: 32500685 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202005120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of laparoscopic treatment of patients with advanced appendicular peritonitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 271 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by peritonitis. The main group consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy after diagnostic laparoscopy (n=231), the control group - diagnostic laparoscopy followed by conversion to median laparotomy (n=36). Four extremely ill patients were operated through laparotomy and excluded from the further analysis. RESULTS Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 267 patients with advanced appendicular peritonitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy, debridement and abdominal drainage were performed in 231 (85.2%) patients. Mean age of patients was 44±18.5 years, duration of disease - 36.2±20.3 hours. Diffuse peritonitis was diagnosed in 219 (82%) patients, advanced peritonitis - in 48 (16.5%) cases. Incidence of conversion was 13.5%. Mortality was absent in both groups. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the conversion group (72.2% vs. 29.4%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic interventions for common appendicular peritonitis are feasible, effective and reduce postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B Ivakhov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Sazhin
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Ermakov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - S M Titkova
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Anurov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - T V Nechaj
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diaconescu B, Uranues S, Fingerhut A, Vartic M, Zago M, Kurihara H, Latifi R, Popa D, Leppäniemi A, Tilsed J, Bratu M, Beuran M. The Bucharest ESTES consensus statement on peritonitis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 46:1005-1023. [PMID: 32303796 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01338-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritonitis is still an important health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with peritonitis may be an important factor to reduce the risks for patients and improve efficiency, outcome, and the cost of care. METHODS Expert panel discussion on Peritonitis was held in Bucharest on May 2017, during the 17th ECTES Congress, involving surgeons, infectious disease specialists, radiologists and intensivists with the goal of defining recommendations for the optimal management of peritonitis. CONCLUSION This document is an updated presentation of management of peritonitis and represents the summary of the final recommendations approved by a panel of experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Diaconescu
- Anatomy Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Phamacy, Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Selman Uranues
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China
| | - Mihaela Vartic
- Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Clinic Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mauro Zago
- General and Emergency Surgery Division, Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital Head, Milan, Italy
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Dorin Popa
- Surgery Department, University Hospital Linkoping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jonathan Tilsed
- Honorary Senior Lecturer Hull York Medical School, Chairman UEMS Division of Emergency Surgery, Heslington, UK
| | - Matei Bratu
- Anatomy Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Phamacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mircea Beuran
- Surgery Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Phamacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takami T, Yamaguchi T, Yoshitake H, Hatano K, Kataoka N, Tomita M, Makimoto S. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 46:847-851. [PMID: 30710176 PMCID: PMC7429533 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Appendectomy is one of the most common operations. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is considered first-line treatment, but the use of LA for treatment of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with LA and those who underwent open appendectomy (OA). Methods Data for 179 patients who underwent an operation for the treatment of complicated appendicitis at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The selection included 89 patients who underwent a conventional appendectomy and 90 patients who were treated laparoscopically. Outcome measures such as mean operative time, blood loss, time until oral intake duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the concurrent effects of the examined factors on the rate of postoperative complications. Results The mean ages of patients in the OA and LA groups were 50.17 ± 22.77 and 50.13 ± 25.84 year. Mean operative times were longer in the LA group than OA (10.2.56 ± 44.4 versus 85.4 ± 43.11 min; p = 0.009). The duration of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (9.61 ± 5.57 versus 12.19 ± 8.4; p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in return to consumption of oral intake between the LA and OA groups (2.03 ± 1.66 versus 2.48 ± 2.17; p = 0.123). Multivariable analysis found that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly reduced for the LA group, in comparison with the postoperative-complication rate of the OA group (16.7% versus 27%; odds ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.153–0.923; p = 0.0327). Conclusions These results suggest that LA is a safe and efficient operative procedure that provides clinically beneficial advantages in comparison with OA. Thus, when possible, appendectomy for complicated appendicitis should be attempted using a laparoscopic approach. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoya Takami
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan.
| | - Tomoyuki Yamaguchi
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yoshitake
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan
| | - Kotaro Hatano
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan
| | - Naoki Kataoka
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan
| | - Masafumi Tomita
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Makimoto
- Department of General Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cocorullo G, Falco N, Tutino R, Fontana T, Scerrino G, Salamone G, Licari L, Gulotta G. Open versus laparoscopic approach in the treatment of abdominal emergencies in elderly population. G Chir 2017; 37:108-112. [PMID: 27734793 DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.3.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of surgical emergency in old population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Over-70 years-old patients submitted to emergency abdominal surgery from January 2013 to December 2014 were collected and grouped according to admission diagnoses. These accounted small bowel obstruction, colonic acute disease, appendicitis, ventral hernia, gastro-duodenal perforation, biliary disease. In each group it was analyzed the operation time (OT), the morbidity rate and the mortality rate comparing open and laparoscopic management using T-test and Chi-square test. RESULTS 159 over 70-years-old patients underwent emergency surgery in the General and Emergency surgery Operative Unit (O.U.) of the Policlinic of Palermo. 75 patients were managed by a laparoscopic approach and 84 underwent traditional open emergency surgery. T-Test for OT and Chi-square test for morbidity rate and mortality rate showed no differences in small bowel emergencies (p=0,4; 0,25<p<0,9; 0,25<p<0,9), in colonic acute diseases (p=0,35; 0,25<p<0,9; 0,25<p<0,9), in appendicitis (p=0,22; 0,05<p<0,1; 0,25<p<0,9), in complicated ventral hernia (p=0,12; p>0,9; p>0,95) and in gastro-duodenal perforation (p=0,9; p>0.9; p>0.95). In cholecystitis, laparoscopy group showed lower OT (T-Test: p= 0,0002) while Chi-square test for morbidity rate (0,1<p<0,25) and mortality rate (0,25<p<0,9) showed no differences. CONCLUSIONS The collected data showed the feasibility of laparoscopic management as an alternative to open surgery in surgical emergencies in elderly population.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abscess rates have been reported to be as low as 1% and as high as 50% following perforated appendicitis (PA). This range may be because of lack of universal definition for PA. An evidence-based definition (EBD) is crucial for accurate wound classification, risk-stratification, and subsequent process optimization. ACS NSQIP-Pediatric guidelines do not specify a definition of PA. We hypothesize that reported postoperative abscess rates underrepresent true incidence, as they may include low-risk cases in final calculations. METHODS Local institutional records of PA patients were reviewed to calculate the postoperative abscess rate. The ACS NSQIP-Pediatric participant use file (PUF) was used to determine cross-institutional postoperative abscess rates. A PubMed literature review was performed to identify trials reporting PA abscess rates, and definitions and rates were recorded. RESULTS 20.9% of our patients with PA developed a postoperative abscess. The ACS NSQIP-Pediatric abscess rate was significantly lower (7.61%, p<0.001). In the eighteen published studies analyzed, average abscess rate (14.49%) was significantly higher than ACS NSQIP-Pediatric (p<0.001). There was significantly more variation in trials that do not employ an EBD of perforation (Levene's test F-value =6.980, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS A standard EBD of perforation leads to lower variability in reported postoperative abscess rates following PA. Nonstandard definitions may be significantly altering the aggregate rate of postoperative abscess formation. We advocate for adoption of a standard definition by all institutions participating in ACS NSQIP-Pediatric data submission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gomes CA, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Gomes FC, Gomes CC. Acute appendicitis: proposal of a new comprehensive grading system based on clinical, imaging and laparoscopic findings. World J Emerg Surg 2015; 10:60. [PMID: 26640515 PMCID: PMC4669630 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0053-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in the technology and improved access to imaging modalities such as Computed Tomography and laparoscopy have changed the contemporary diagnostic and management of acute appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis (phlegmon, abscess and/ or diffuse peritonitis), is now reliably distinguished from uncomplicated cases. Therefore, a new comprehensive grading system for acute appendicitis is necessary. The goal is review and update the laparoscopic grading system of acute appendicitis and to provide a new standardized classification system to allow more uniform patient stratification. During the last World Society of Emergency Surgery Congress in Israel (July, 2015), a panel involving Acute Appendicitis Experts and the author’s discussed many current aspects about the acute appendicitis between then, it will be submitted a new comprehensive disease grading system. It was idealized based on three aspect of the disease (clinical and imaging presentation and laparoscopic findings). The new grading system may provide a standardized system to allow more uniform patient stratification for appendicitis research. In addition, may aid in determining optimal management according to grade. Lastly, what we want is to draw a multicenter observational study within the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) based on this design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Surgery Department, Therezinha de Jesus University Hospital, Medical and Health Science School, Surgery Unit, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Rua Senador Salgado Filho 510 / 1002, Bairro Bom Pastor, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais 36021-660 Brasil
| | | | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Emergency Surgery Department, Maggiore Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Kenji Inaba
- University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Demetrios Demetriades
- University of California, San Francisco, USA ; Department of Surgery (K.I.), Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Felipe Couto Gomes
- Internal Medicine Departament, Therezinha de Jesus University Hospital, Medical and Health Science School, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - Camila Couto Gomes
- Internal Medicine Departament, Monte Sinai Hospital, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Popa D, Soltes M, Uranues S, Fingerhut A. Are There Specific Indications for Laparoscopic Appendectomy? A Review and Critical Appraisal of the Literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2015; 25:897-902. [PMID: 26575247 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dorin Popa
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Marek Soltes
- I. Chirurgicka Klinika, University of Pavol Jozef Safarik, Kosice, Slovak Republic
| | - Selman Uranues
- Section of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Section of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- First Department of Surgery, University of Athens, Hippokration University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamoto E, Norimizu S, Shingu Y, Hasegawa H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:1705-12. [PMID: 26275544 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4453-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for complicated appendicitis (CA) effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative complications and improves various measurements of postoperative recovery in adults compared with open appendectomy (OA). METHODS This single-center, randomized controlled trial was performed in the Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital. Patients diagnosed as having CA with peritonitis or abscess formation were eligible to participate and were randomly assigned to an LA group or an OA group. The primary study outcome was development of infectious complications, especially surgical site infection (SSI), within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS Between October 2008 and August 2014, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned with a 1:1 allocation ratio (42, LA; 39, OA). All were eligible for study of the primary endpoint. Groups were well balanced in terms of patient characteristics and preoperative levels of C-reactive protein. SSI occurred in 14 LA group patients (33.3 %) and in 10 OA group patients (25.6 %) (OR 1.450, 95 % CI 0.553-3.800; p = 0.476). Overall, the rate of postoperative complications, including incisional or organ/space SSI and stump leakage, did not differ significantly between groups. No significant differences between groups were found in hospital stay, duration of drainage, analgesic use, or parameters for postoperative recovery except days to walking. CONCLUSION These results suggested that LA for CA is safe and feasible, while the distinguishing benefit of LA was not validated in this clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiro Taguchi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9, Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan.
| | - Shunichiro Komatsu
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9, Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Eiji Sakamoto
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9, Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan
| | - Shinji Norimizu
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9, Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan
| | - Yuji Shingu
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9, Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 2-9, Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Levin
- Department of General Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Walter Pegoli
- Department of General Surgery, Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Quezada F, Quezada N, Mejia R, Brañes A, Padilla O, Jarufe N, Pimentel F. Laparoscopic versus open approach in the management of appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis: a single center experience. Int J Surg 2014; 13:80-83. [PMID: 25461855 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Revised: 11/03/2014] [Accepted: 11/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversial evidence exists regarding the laparoscopic approach in patients with acute appendicitis complicated with peritonitis due to a higher rate of surgical complications. The aim of this study was to compare post-operatory outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis approached by laparoscopy versus open surgery. METHODS Single center retrospective analysis of clinical records of patients with appendicitis complicated with peritonitis operated from January 2003 until October 2013. Demographic data, intra-operative variables, length of stay, surgical complications, mortality, readmissions and reoperations were retrieved. RESULTS 227 patients were identified, 43% males, mean age 39±17 years (range: 12-85 years). Ninety-seven patients (43%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, 13 of them were converted to open surgery (13%). Ninety-four patients presented with diffuse peritonitis (41.4%). Laparoscopic appendectomy showed longer operative time but shorter hospital stay (p<0.05). There were no differences in post-operatory complications (intra-abdominal abscess, surgical site infection and prolonged ileus). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with lower odds for developing any surgical complication in the multivariate analysis (OR 0.301, p=0.036). CONCLUSION Both approaches showed no differences in complications in the management of appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis. In our experience, laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe approach in cases of appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Quezada
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolas Quezada
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Ricardo Mejia
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alejandro Brañes
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Oslando Padilla
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolas Jarufe
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fernando Pimentel
- Digestive Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|