Multicenter prospective evaluation of a new articulating 5-mm endoscopic linear stapler

Totally laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts with hand‑sewn Roux‑en‑Y reconstruction in a pediatric population

Cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) is the standard treatment for choledochal cysts (CCs). In the present study, the results of totally laparoscopic surgery for CCs (TLCCs) in a pediatric population were evaluated. The clinical data of 28 children with CCs between June 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent TLCCs involving cyst excision and RYHJ. The jejunojejunal anastomosis was completed laparoscopically using manual sutures. Age at operation, operative time, postoperative recovery and complications were evaluated. The 28 patients comprised 8 boys and 20 girls who underwent TLCCs at a mean age of 4.2 years (range, 1 month-12.3 years) with a mean weight of 15.9 kg (range, 4.6-43 kg). All patients received ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations, which revealed a mean cyst diameter and length of 1.74±0.76 cm and 3.85±1.25 cm, respectively. The mean operative time was 214±43.8 min. The mean time until starting an oral diet after surgery was 2.89±1.23 days. Apart from bile leakage and wound infection, no other complications occurred during a median follow-up period of 18 months (range, 4-42 months). TLCCs can be performed safely by skilled surgeons in pediatric patients. TLCCs may be more physiologically compatible and accelerate recovery of intestinal function with reduced trauma and better esthetic outcomes than conventional laparoscopic surgery for CCs. Therefore, TLCCs with manual sutures may be considered as an option for minimally invasive surgery in pediatric patients with CCs.

Comparison of Hand-Sewn with Stapled Anastomosis in Neonatal Intestinal Atresia Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of hand-sewn versus stapled anastomosis therapy in intestinal atresia neonatal patients. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial in which 90 neonates with intestinal atresia were randomly divided into the hand-sewn group and the stapled group. All patients were assigned to undergo intestinal anastomosis by hand-sewn or stapler. The primary outcome measure was to analyze the anastomotic complications between groups. The secondary outcome measures were operative time, blood loss, length to initial feeds, length to full feeds, length of hospital stay, the incidence of bowel obstruction, reoperation and mortality, and weight and height 1 year after operation. Results: A total of 82 patients were included (43 for hand-sewn and 39 for stapled group) for primary analysis. A total of 16 patients suffered from anastomotic complications in both groups. The incidence rate of anastomotic complications in the stapled group was significantly lower than that of the hand-sewn group (27.9% versus 10.3%, P = .044). There were no differences in anastomotic leak, stricture, and bleeding in the hand-sewn group compared with stapled group. The operative time in the hand-sewn group was longer than the stapled group (P < .001), the length to initial and full feeds in the stapled group was shorter than that of the hand-sewn group (P < .001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stapled group than the hand-sewn group (P = .016). The bowel obstruction, reoperation, weight and height, and mortality had no differences between groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Study results demonstrate that stapled anastomosis is safe and effective for intestinal atresia with distal diameter >1 cm, as it can decrease the incidence of anastomotic complications. However, the risk of anastomotic failure should be considered among type III b atresia. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03754907.

A real world cost-minimization analysis comparing the use of different endoscopic staplers in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy procedures

Aim: China's cost-containment measures increasingly focus solely on the prices of consumable medical supplies without taking a broader perspective on differences in features and overall costs. This study compared two types of endoscopic staplers in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. Materials & methods: Electronic medical records for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery from 2016 to 2017 were collected from a hospital in Anhui province. Two cohorts were retroactively defined based on stapler type. Total costs were compared using a cost-minimization analysis model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: In the base case, the group using more expensive staplers achieved overall cost savings of about $300 per procedure. Sensitivity analysis confirmed this result in 86.5% of cases. Conclusion: A price-only supply selection strategy may have unintended cost consequences.

Literature Review on the Incidence of Primary Stapler Malfunction

Background. Surgical stapling devices are known for their reliability and convenience. A letter to health care professionals published by the US Food and Drug Administration in March 2019 highlighted the increasing number of adverse events associated with surgical staplers. Driven by a case of stapler malfunction during an elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, we performed a literature review to investigate the incidence of primary stapler malfunction. We also discuss the common types and an approach to its management. Methods. PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched for articles discussing surgical stapler malfunction. Twelve studies were selected that described the incidence and/or consequences of primary stapler malfunction. A narrative synthesis was performed. Results. From observational studies, the incidence ranged from 0.022% to 2.3%. A prospective survey reported that 86% of laparoscopic surgeons either had personal experience with or knew of surgeons who experienced stapler malfunction, implying a higher incidence. Underreporting has been an issue as manufacturers can get exemptions from public reporting. Significantly, higher malfunctions have been reported after exemptions were lifted. The most common types of stapler malfunction are stapler misfire and stapler locking. Major morbidity and mortality have been reported. Conclusion. Surgeons are increasingly reliant on technological innovations. Stapling failure occurs and it is imperative to be aware of this. Given the high volume of stapler use, a high percentage of surgeons are likely to encounter this problem in their career. It is important to have an approach to the prevention and management of this potentially catastrophic complication.

A Single Institution Review of Initial Application of a 5-mm Stapler

BACKGROUND

Operating in small spaces presents physical constraints that can be even more challenging in minimally invasive operations. Recently, a 5-mm stapler was approved for use in general surgery and pediatric surgery. Here, we present our initial experience using the 5-mm stapler in pediatric general surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify cases using the 5-mm stapler at our institution. Demographic data included age (in months) and weight (in kilograms). Operative data included indication for use, number of loads used, complications related to 5-mm stapler use, and interventions to address complications. A second review focused on patients undergoing the same operations, but using a 10-mm stapler.

RESULTS

A total of 60 staple loads were deployed in 32 procedures. There were four adverse outcomes, all recognized intraoperatively. One bleed resulted from application on irradiated tissue and another bleed from application to a small noninflamed mesoappendix. A bronchial staple line leak resulted from improper stapler loading, and a bowel anastomosis leak was oversewn with a single stitch. When compared with 32 matched cases using a 10-mm stapler, there was no difference in age (5-mm = 39.11 months, 10-mm = 50.21 months, P = .49) or weight (5-mm = 16.34 kg, 10-mm = 19.93 kg, P = .51). A total of 60 staple applications were used, with one bleed noted. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (5-mm rate = 4/60, 10-mm rate = 1/60; P = .36).

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience suggests that although there were more complications with the 5-mm stapler, there is no statistically significant difference in complication rates when compared with the 10-mm stapler. Furthermore, the 5-mm stapler complications can be corrected with device training and proper patient selection. In appropriately selected pediatric surgery cases with size limitations, the 5-mm stapler can be used to minimize the invasiveness of the operation.