Application of clips assisted with foreign body forceps in defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection

Endoscopic resection of extra-luminal gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors using a snare assisted external traction technique (with video)

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy of the novel snare assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal growing gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gastric GISTs) using external traction, and the secondary purpose was to compare the novel snare assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal GISTs with the standard laparoscopic procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent novel external traction assisted endoscopic resection or laparoscopic resection for their extraluminal gastric GIST ≤5 cm in diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients (27 in the endoscopic group and 84 in the laparoscopic group) were included in this study. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter and complication rate between the two groups. The overall procedure time was slightly higher in the endoscopic group compared to the laparoscopic group (P = 0.034). However, postoperative hospitalization time (P < 0.001) and postoperative fasting time (P = 0.005) were shorter in the endoscopic group compared to the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSION

Snare external traction-assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal growing gastric GISTs is safe and effective, and it provides a new adjunctive method for endoscopic resection of GIST.

How to close mucosal incisions?

This article provides an overview of the techniques for closure of the mucosal entry point following advanced procedures in the third space. The outbreak of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has significantly impacted the treatment of various benign and malignant conditions. Reliable and secure closure of the mucosal entrance is essential for avoiding serious adverse events. Although small defects are typically closed using through-the-scope clips (TTSCs) or over-the-scope clips (OTSCs), challenges may occur with larger or transmural defects. Alternative methods, such as specialised stitches and full-thickness suturing systems, have been developed to address these challenges with promising results. Each method has its own pros and cons, and the choice of closure technique depends on various factors such as anatomical location, endoscopist expertise, costs, and clinical context. By understanding the technical specifications of each closure device, endoscopists can make decisions that enhance patient outcomes and minimise the risk of complications associated with the approximation of defect edges. Continued research is essential to optimise the evolution of newer closure devices and techniques for advancing NOTES.

The value of single-channel endoscopic traction and kiss suture technique in closing wounds caused by endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal muscularis propria tumors

BACKGROUND

To investigate the value of single forceps endoscopic traction stapling suture technique (SFETSST) in closing wounds caused by endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal muscularis propria tumor (GMPT).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent submucosal tumor excavation (ESE) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) for GMPT in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College from January 2015 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected. They were divided into the SFETSST group and the standard group (patients who receive single forceps traction-free endoscopic suture technique). The healing effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were included in our study with 50 patients included in SFETSST group. The baseline characteristics had no significant difference between the two groups. The technical success rate of wound suture in SFETSST cluster was significantly upper than that within standard cluster (100% vs. 88.89%, P = 0.04). The wound suture time in SFETSST cluster was significantly lower than that within standard cluster (33.19 ± 10.64 min, P < 0.001). Moreover, the incidence rates of intra-operative and postoperative complications in SFETSST cluster were lower than standard cluster (0 vs. 7.41%, P = 0.051 and 0 vs. 11.11%, P = 0.016). Interestingly, the SFETSST cluster had lower cost of consumables (2485.40 ± 591.78 vs. 4098.52 ± 1903.06 Yuan, P = 0.01) and shorter hospital stay (4.96 ± 0.90 vs. 7.19 ± 2.45, P < 0.001) than standard cluster.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that to fully closure the full-thickness defects of digestive tract, SFETSST was effective, safe, and economical, which was worth popularizing.

Efficacy analysis of endoscopic treatment of giant gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (≥5 cm)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety, feasibility and prognosis of endoscopic treatment of giant (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gastric GISTs).

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent surgical resection of nonmetastatic gastric GISTs in our hospital from January 2016 to February 2022 were collected. The patients were divided into an endoscopic group and a laparoscopic group according to the surgical method. The clinical data and tumor recurrence information were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases were collected in the endoscopic group and sixty-three cases in the laparoscopic group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor diameter, tumor growth site, tumor growth mode, clinical manifestations, risk classification or complication rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The hospitalization cost, length of postoperative hospital stay and postoperative fasting time of the endoscopic group were less than those of the laparoscopic group, while the operation time was greater than that of the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). In the endoscopic group, the follow-up was 33.50 ± 19.410 months, and no patients were lost to follow-up. The laparoscopic group was followed up for 59.07 ± 12.964 months, and eleven patients were lost to follow-up. There was no recurrence or metastasis in the two groups during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic resection of gastric GIST with a diameter ≥5 cm is technically feasible. And it not only achieves a short-term prognosis similar to laparoscopic resection but also has the advantages of rapid postoperative recovery and low cost.

Current Status of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: A Literature Review Over Two Decades

BACKGROUND

With the development of endoscopic technology and devices, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been challengingly introduced for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). The resection and closure strategies are under investigation. This systematic review was performed to assess the current status and limitations of EFTR for gastric SETs.

SUMMARY

MEDLINE was searched using the keywords "endoscopic full-thickness resection" or "gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure" AND "gastric" or "stomach" from January 2001 to July 2022. The outcome variables were the complete resection rate, major adverse event (AE) rate including delayed bleeding and delayed perforation, and closure-associated outcomes. Among 288 studies, 27 eligible studies involving 1,234 patients were included in this review. The complete resection rate was 99.7% (1,231/1,234). The major AE rate was 1.13% (14/1,234), with delayed bleeding in two (0.16%) patients, delayed perforation in one (0.08%), panperitonitis or abdominal abscess in three (0.24%), and other AEs in eight (0.64%). Surgical interventions were required intraoperatively or postoperatively in 7 patients (0.56%). Three patients underwent intraoperative conversion to surgery, due to intraoperative massive bleeding, technical difficulty of closure, and retrieval of falling tumor in the peritoneal cavity. Postoperative surgical rescues for AEs were required in four (0.32%). Subgroup analysis of AE outcomes showed no significant differences among closure techniques consisting of endoclips, purse-string suturing, and over-the-scope clips.

KEY MESSAGES

This systematic review demonstrated acceptable outcomes of EFTR and closure for gastric SETs, indicating that EFTR is a promising forthcoming procedure.

Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic purse-string suture-assisted closure for mucosal defects induced by endoscopic manipulations

BACKGROUND

Large or transmural defects induced by gastrointestinal endoscopic manipulations are difficult to close, although complete closure is recommended for better recovery. Endoscopic purse-string assisted suturing (EPSS) has been used in clinical practice and has proven to be an effective and safe technique for the closure of large mucosal defects. However, details regarding the efficacy of endoscopic pre-purse-string suture (P-EPSS) are unknown, especially that it offers several advantages over conventional EPSS (C-EPSS).

AIM

To elucidate the outcomes of EPSS-assisted closure in different clinical situations, and evaluate the efficacy of P-EPSS.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included a total of 180 patients who underwent closure assisted by P-EPSS (n = 63) or C-EPSS (n = 117) between July 2014 and June 2020. The P-EPSS and C-EPSS groups were compared and the intergroup differences in aspects such as the lesion size, location, and mor-phology, incidence of complete closure, intraoperative perforation, and delayed adverse events were evaluated. Data on the features and clinical course of cases with adverse events were collected for further analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with lesion size larger than 3 cm, lesions located at the fundus of stomach, or submucosal tumors originating from the deep mucosa were more likely to undergo P-EPSS-assisted closure. The P-EPSS group showed a sign-ificantly higher proportion of intraoperative perforation (56% vs 17%) and a much shorter procedure time (9.06 ± 6.14 min vs 14.84 ± 7.25 min). Among adverse events, the incidence of delayed perforation (5% vs 4%; P = 0.82) and delayed bleeding (3% vs 4%; P = 0.96) did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that lesions with incomplete closure [odds ratio (OR) = 21.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.45-83.45; P < 0.01] or size greater than 3 cm (OR = 3.14; 95%CI: 1.08-9.18; P = 0.039) showed a statistical tendency to result in an increase in delayed adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that EPSS could achieve secure complete closure of mucosal defect. P-EPSS could shorten the procedure and yield complete closure of mucosal defects. Rather than closure-type selection, incomplete closure or lesion size larger than 3 cm were associated with worse outcomes.

Gastric defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection: the closing while dissecting technique

BACKGROUND

Complete closure of gastric wall defects is critical following endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcome of a new endoscopic method: closing while dissecting.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients who underwent EFTR were retrospectively analyzed between January 2020 and March 2021. Gastric defects resulting from EFTR were closed using the "interrupted-close during dissection" technique with endoclips. Tumor characteristics, en bloc resection rates, and postoperative adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

All submucosal tumors were successfully resected and complete resection was histologically confirmed. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 1.3 cm (ranging from 0.8 to 3.0 cm). The majority of these tumors were gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n = 20), Leiomyoma (n = 3), schwannomas (n = 2), others included fibroma (n = 1) and neurogenic tumor (n = 1). There were no cases of hemorrhage, peritonitis, or delayed perforation. Four patients complained of slight abdominal pain, but no hyperpyrexia or serious elevated white blood cell count was detected in the first 24 h after treatment. All wounds were healed on follow-up endoscopy 3 months after the procedure. The mean follow-up duration was 8.5 months (ranging from 3 to 17) and no tumor recurrences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility and safety of this interrupted-close during dissection approach allows for clinical applications in EFTR of gastric submucosal tumors.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR.

Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022.

Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery.

Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.

Application of a traction metal clip with a fishhook-like device in wound sutures after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic wound suturing is an important factor that affects the ability to remove large and full-thickness lesions during endoscopic resection. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a traction metal clip with a fishhook-like device on wound sutures after endoscopic resection.

METHODS

From July 2020 to April 2021, patients who met the enrollment criteria were treated with a fishhook-like device during the operation to suture the postoperative wound (group A). Patients with similar conditions and similar size wounds who were treated with a "purse-string suture" to suture the wounds were retrospectively analyzed as the control group (group B). Difference in the suture rate, adverse events, time required for suturing, and number of metal clips were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The time required for suturing was 7.72±0.51 minutes in group A and 11.50±0.91 minutes in group B. This difference was statistically significant (F=13.071, p=0.001). The number of metal clamps used in group A averaged 8.1 pieces/case, and the number of metal clamps used in group B averaged 7.3 pieces/case. This difference was not statistically significant (F=0.971, p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The traction metal clip with the fishhook-like device is ingeniously designed and easy to operate. It has a good suture effect on the wound after endoscopic submucosal dissection and effectively prevents postoperative adverse events.

Closure techniques in exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection: Overview and future perspectives in the endoscopic suturing era

Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance is a minimally invasive natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique that is emerging as a promising effective and safe alternative to surgery for the treatment of muscularis propria-originating gastric submucosal tumors. To date, various techniques have been used for the closure of the transmural post-EFTR defect, mainly consisting in clip- and endoloop-assisted closure methods. However, the recent advent of dedicated tools capable of providing full-thickness defect suture could further improve the efficacy and safety of the exposed EFTR procedure. The aim of our review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different closure methods adopted in gastric-exposed EFTR without laparoscopic assistance, also considering the recent advent of flexible endoscopic suturing.

Comparing about three types of endoscopic therapy methods for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

Background: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) have been widely applied to upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer in recent years. But until now, there are few studies that comparing the efficacy and safety of three endoscopic therapy methods.Method: From January 2013 to August 2018, a total of 218 patients with SMTs who underwent ESE, EFTR or STER were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic features, complication and follow-up data were analyzed.Result: There were 114 patients underwent ESE, 61 underwent EFTR and 43 underwent STER, respectively. The en bloc and complete resection rates in STER group (83.7% and 90.0%) were significantly lower and postoperative complication rate (62.8%) was significantly higher than those of the other 2 methods. Furthermore, for lesions <40 mm, no significant differences were found in the en bloc rate, complete rate and postoperative complication rate among 3 methods. The perforation rate decreased in the order of EFTR (100%), ESE (23.7%), STER (7.0%). The median number of clips, fasting time and hospital stay were lowest in ESE group (5, 2 days, and 7 days). And the cost was highest in EFTR group ($4993.1). There were no differences in the bleeding and recurrence rates among three groups.Conclusion: For SMTs <40 mm, the efficacy among 3 ER methods are comparative. The choice of ER methods mainly based on the comprehensive consideration of lesion size, location, growth pattern and clinical experience of endoscopists. For benign SMTs ≥40 mm in stomach, ESE and EFTR becomes alternative choices.

A novel grasp-and-loop closure method for defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection (with video)

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a minimally invasive method for en bloc resection of gastrointestinal (GI) lesions originating from the muscularis propria layer. Successful closure of the wall defect is a critical step.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel and simplified endoscopic grasp-and-loop (GAL) closure method using an endo-loop assisted with grasping forceps for defect closure.

METHODS

From January 2015 to March 2016, 13 patients with submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer underwent EFTR and were enrolled in this study. After successful tumor resection, an endo-loop was anchored onto the circumferential margin of the gastric defect with grasping forceps assistance and tightened gently. Patient characteristics, tumor size, en bloc resection, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 13 lesions in the stomach, two were located in the greater curvature of the mid-upper body, 11 were located in the fundus. The endoscopic GAL closure method was successfully performed after EFTR in all the 13 patients without laparoscopic assistance. The mean procedure time was 43.5 min (range 20-80 min), while the GAL closure procedure took a mean of 9.4 min (range 3-18 min). The mean resected lesion size was 1.5 cm (range 0.5-3.5 cm). Pathological diagnoses of these lesions were 11 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and two leiomyomas. No major adverse events occurred during or after the procedure. All the patients were discharged after a mean time of 2.4 days (range 1-4 days). No residual lesion or tumor recurrence was found during the follow-up period (median, 5 months; range, 1-15 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic GAL closure method is feasible, effective, and safe for closing the gastric defect after EFTR in patients.