Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible

Sequential comparison of single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is used to treat gallbladder (GB) stones combined with common bile duct (CBD) stones. Patients with GB stones combined with CBD stones who underwent single-stage LC + LCBDE surgery in our center from January 2020 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into LC-BDE and BDE-LC groups. LC-BDE was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter ≥ 0.5 cm, and BDE-LC was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter < 0.5 cm. Baseline data, preoperative conditions, operative details, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative care, and complication rates were compared between patients in the two groups. A total of 240 patients were included, including 72 in the LC-BDE group and 168 in the BDE-LC group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (5 (0, 16) mL vs. 16 (10, 20) mL, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (130.2 (110.0, 168.6) min vs. 125.0 (105.0, 150.0) min, P = 0.112), and postoperative complications such as bile leakage (8.3 vs. 11.9%, P = 0.415). Different operative sequences of cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration in the single-stage surgical treatment of GB stones combined with CBD stones were acceptable in terms of bile duct stone clearance and postoperative complication rates.

Clinical Evaluation of Primary Suturing of Normal-Diameter Common Bile Ducts After Microincision of Cystic Duct Confluence for Stone Removal

PURPOSE

In patients with gallstones complicated by common bile duct (CBD) stones, both normal and dilated common bile ducts have been reported. The goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of primary suturing after microincision of the cystic duct confluence in treating these patients.

METHOD

Between July 2018 and December 2021, 104 patients were admitted to the Department of General Surgery at Guannan County People's Hospital with gallstone complications, and their records were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups: normal CBD group (n=70, CBD diameter: 6.0 to 8.0 mm) and dilated CBD group (n=34, CBD diameter: >8.0 mm). In these 104 patients, there were 75 cases of CBD stones with acute cholangitis, 12 cases of CBD stones without cholangitis, and 17 cases of mild biliary pancreatitis with CBD stones (including 2 cases of biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis). Among all patients, there were 37 cases with jaundice, 67 cases without jaundice, and 5 cases of emergency surgery. All patients underwent microincision of the cystic duct confluence followed by primary suturing. Both groups were compared on a variety of general and perioperative indicators.

RESULT

All patients underwent laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy; there were no cases of biliary tract injury or conversion to laparotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in operation duration ( P =0.286), blood loss ( P =0.06), length of stay ( P =0.821), and time to drainage tube removal ( P =0.096) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Microincision of the cystic duct confluence, followed by a primary suture, is a safe and effective treatment for CBD stones in patients with a normal CBD diameter, as determined by preoperative imaging.

Assessing the application of barbed sutures in comparison to conventional sutures for surgical applications: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies

BACKGROUND

Following an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in recent research. Numerous preclinical animal experiments tried to generate evidence to guide the development of barbed sutures. However, discernible drawbacks and incongruities in outcomes have emerged between clinical and preclinical animal studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to review the preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The authors hope to facilitate clinical translation of barbed sutures by evaluating effectiveness, safety, and physical properties/reliability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify controlled preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE. GRADE approach was used to evaluate evidence quality. Revman was applied to analyze all the data. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 62 articles were eligible with low to moderate quality, including 2158 samples from 10 different animal species across 27 surgical procedures. Barbed suture exhibited a significant reduction in suture time, limited change in Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), and decreased instances of tissue disruption (all P <0.05). Subgroup analyses, considering both clinical and research significance, indicated that barbed sutures might cause more specific adverse events and demonstrate suboptimal performance of physical properties/reliability. Meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity resulted from variations in studies and animal models.

CONCLUSION

Although barbed suture demonstrated superiority in numerous surgeries for time efficiency, its safety and physical properties/reliability might be influenced by diverse preclinical models, sutures' brand, surgeries, and anatomical sites. Further evaluation, based on standardized and well-designed animal experiments, is essential for medical device development and applications in human beings.

Factors Influencing Suture Difficulty of T-tube Fixation and Closure in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

BACKGROUND

Suture under the laparoscopy was considered as one of the most difficult and time-consuming tasks in laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration. Difficult suturing can lead to prolonged suturing time and decreased suturing quality. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with the difficulty of T-tube suture following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who experienced successful laparoscopic CBD exploration with T-tube drainage were collected. Perioperative outcomes and short-term and long-term complications were recorded. Associations of the average suture time per stitch with preoperative demographic data and laboratory tests in patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 cases (46 males and 60 females) were included in this study. The average suture time per stitch was between 3 and 7.5 minutes with a median of 4.5 minutes (4, 5). There were no biliary leakage and other T-tube-related complications in all patients during follow-up. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that biliary tract reoperation (r=0.384, P<0.0001) and a higher body mass index (r=0.486, P<0.0001) were positively correlated with the average suture time per stitch, while there was no association between the average suture time per stitch and other preoperative demographic data and preoperative blood parameters, including CBD diameter, age, sex, operative time, preoperative white cell count, alanine transaminase, total bilirubin, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified 2 preoperative variables (biliary tract reoperation and a higher body mass index) that were positively associated with the suture difficulty under laparoscopy. An adequately powered prospective multicentre study is needed to validate our findings.

3D Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary repair by absorbable barbed suture is safe and feasible

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is the most common treatment approach for common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, recent studies show that single-stage laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is safe and feasible. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy enhances depth perception and facilitates intracorporeal suturing. The application of 3D technology for LCBDE is emerging, and we report our case series of 3D LCBDE.

METHODS

We audited the 27 consecutive 3D LCBDE performed from July 2017 to January 2020. We have a liberal policy for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with deranged liver function tests (LFT). All CBD explorations were done through choledochotomy with a 5 mm flexible choledochoscope and primarily repaired with an absorbable barbed suture without a stent or T-tube.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 68 (range 44-91) years, and 12 (44%) were male. The indications for surgery were choledocholithiasis 67% (n=18), cholangitis 22% (n=6), and gallstone pancreatitis 11% (n=3). About 67% (n=18) had pre-operative ERCP. About 37% (n=10) had pre-operative biliary stent. Pre-operative MRCP was done in 74% (n=20), and the mean diameter of CBD was 14.5 mm (range 7-30). The median operative time was 160 (range 80-265) min. The operative drain was inserted in 18 patients. One patient each (4%) had a bile leak and a retained stone. There was no open conversion, readmission, or mortality.

CONCLUSION

3D LCBDE with primary repair by an absorbable barbed suture is safe and feasible.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

This paper emphasized that one stage LCBDE should be a treatment option which is comparable with two stage ERCP followed by LC to treat CBD stones. In addition, 3D technology and barbed sutures use in LCBDE are safe and useful.

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult cases of acute cholecystitis: a simple technique using barbed sutures

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for difficult acute cholecystitis (AC) cases bears a high risk of vasculobiliary injuries (VBI). The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) recommend the use of bailout procedures and subtotal cholecystectomy to prevent VBI. Performing a safe LC is challenging, even when followed by an accurate pre-surgical assessment. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC) requires advanced skills, and there is a risk of recurrence of cancer and/or gallbladder stones (GBS) in the remnant gallbladder (GB). Moreover, it is sometimes impossible to safely close the cystic duct with either a loop tie or linear staples because of anatomical and fragility problems. Here, we report a novel technique employing barbed sutures for LSC in difficult AC cases.

Case presentation

We performed urgent LSC using barbed sutures for the stump of the cystic duct in two patients. In preoperative assessments, we found that these cases were qualified for operations rather than GB drainages, but the cystic ducts appeared difficult to close due to their severe inflammation and fragility during the operations. We applied barbed suture as a surrogate technique to close the stump of cystic duct. In patient 1, a 67-year-old woman with severe heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus was diagnosed with grade III AC. Pathological diagnosis was gangrenous cholecystitis. In patient 2, a 68-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital after 15 days of treatment for AC with antibiotics without drainage. The severity of AC was grade II according to TG18. Pathological diagnosis was acute-on-chronic cholecystitis. Both patients were discharged without complication.

Conclusions

The utilization of barbed sutures in LSC stems as a feasible and safe surrogate technique. Furthermore, this approach could decrease the risks associated with the remnant GB.

Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis

Background

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is currently the best approach for complex cases of choledocholithiasis or the cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus on the optimal duct closure method after LCBDE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 duct closure methods after LCBDE for choledocholithiasis.

Material/Methods

In this analysis, 189 patients with choledocholithiasis underwent LCBDE between June 2014 and December 2018. According to different duct closure methods, these patients were divided into T-tube drainage (TTD) group (n=66), common suture group (n=64) and barbed suture group (n=59). The operation time, suturing time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, tube-carried time, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, pre- and post-operative common bile duct (CBD) diameters were all compared among the 3 groups. Six months after discharge, the incidence of complications and recurrent stones was observed.

Results

The operation time, suturing time, and amount of intraoperative bleeding in barbed suture group were both significantly less than those in the common suture group and the TTD group (P<0.01). When compared with the TTD group, the suturing time, tube-carried time, and LOS were decreased markedly in the common suture group and the barbed suture group (P<0.01). The post-operative CBD diameters in the 3 groups were all significantly larger than the pre-operative CBD diameters (P<0.01). There was no statistical significance among the 3 groups regarding the incidence of complications and recurrent stones (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Barbed suture shortened the suturing time, operation time, tube-carried time, and LOS, and lessened the amount of intraoperative bleeding in patients with choledocholithiasis after LCBDE. It was more effective than the common suture and TTD.

Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience

Objective

Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method.

Methods

This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 79 patients who underwent primary CBD closure with a knotless unidirectional barbed suture or traditional T-tube drainage after LCBDE for CBD stones.

Results

The average suturing time, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the primary closure group than T-tube group. There were no significant differences in the mean diameter of the CBD, number of stones, or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. No patients developed recurrence of CBD stones during the median follow-up of 21.5 months.

Conclusions

After LCBDE and intraoperative choledochoscopy, primary closure with knotless unidirectional barbed sutures is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with cholelithiasis and concurrent CBD stones. This is especially true when the CBD is dilated more than 8 mm.

Laparoscopic percutaneous jejunostomy with intracorporeal V-Loc jejunopexy in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Barbed sutures are widely used in various laparoscopic digestive surgeries. The purpose of this paper is to present our initial experience of laparoscopic percutaneous jejunostomy with unidirectional barbed sutures in esophageal cancer patients and compare it with our early cases using traditional transabdominal sutures.

METHODS

A total of 118 esophageal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic percutaneous jejunostomy were identified in a single institution in Taiwan from June 2014 to May 2016. The authors' traditional technique consisted of using transabdominal sutures with bolsters to fix a jejunum loop onto the anterior abdominal wall. A novel technique was introduced using intracorporeal suturing with knotless unidirectional barbed monofilament absorbable sutures (V-Loc) to attain a seal around the feeding catheter. A comparison between these two techniques was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty cases with barbed V-Loc sutures and 98 cases with transabdominal sutures were identified. The V-Loc sutures appeared to reduce peristomal skin ulcers (19.4 vs. 0 %, p = 0.040), postoperative pain scores during the first 24 h (1.8 ± 1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.007) and on postoperative day 2 (1.7 ± 1.4 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, p = 0.026) when compared to patients receiving transabdominal sutures. The mean suturing time using V-Loc sutures was 22 min (14-60 min). The mean onset to resumption of enteral feeding was 1.8 ± 0.8 days and the mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 ± 5.1 days, both of which were comparable in the two groups. There was no surgical mortality in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study cohort, the use of knotless unidirectional barbed sutures instead of traditional transabdominal sutures had similar outcomes and appears to be a feasible option for intracorporeal jejunopexy when performing laparoscopic jejunostomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Effectiveness of a barbed suture in the repair of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of two cases

INTRODUCTION

Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy occurs in rare cases. We report two cases using barbed suture for repair in bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

The first patient was a 73-year-old woman who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis. When the gallbladder was dissected from the bed, bile spillage was observed and an injured small bile duct was detected. The bile duct could not be managed using a titanium clip. The second patient was an 83-year-old woman who underwent emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder torsion. After the gallbladder was dissected from the bed, bile spillage was observed. In both cases, a running suture, of absorbable monofilament 3-0 barbed suture, was used to laparoscopically repair the injuries.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic repair of a bile duct injury is technically challenging, especially in the gallbladder bed where suturing is very difficult because of the tangential approach and the risk of additional liver laceration. Barbed sutures have the benefit of being knotless, thus, performing a running suture is not difficult, even in laparoscopic procedures. Further, absorbable and monofilament threads are generally better suited for biliary surgery, compared with non-absorbable and braided sutures, because of the potential association of the other types of materials with bile duct stone and stricture formation.

CONCLUSION

We believe that the V-Loc™ device is an effective and appropriate option for bile duct injuries that occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomies, particularly around the gallbladder bed, and it is especially useful for surgeons unfamiliar with intracorporeal knot tying.

Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature

Performing intracorporeal anastomoses and sutures is possibly the technique that requires the greater skill in laparoscopy. The emergence of new barbed sutures seems to facilitate the practice, with bariatric surgery (mainly in mixed and malabsorptive techniques) being one of the specialties that can most benefit from them. This review aims to evaluate barbed sutures' use and safety in bariatric surgery. Barbed sutures might facilitate the practice by improving some aspects of surgery such as reproducibility and operative time, although further research is needed.