Gender differences in both the pathology and surgical outcome of patients with esophageal achalasia

[Gender medicine in diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract]

Benign and malignant diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract show gender-specific differences. The frequent gastroesophageal reflux disease is a prime example: men have an erosive reflux disease more often than women and are also younger at the time of onset. The rate of progression to a metaplastic Barrett's esophagus is also higher in men. In the case of achalasia, there are indications that surgical treatment by laparoscopic Heller's myotomy and semifundoplication 180° according to Dor leads to a markedly better improvement in the symptoms in women compared to men, although they showed a more pronounced dilation of the tubular esophagus. The female hormone status influences the localization and histopathology of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and gastric carcinoma. Premenopausal and postmenopausal carcinomas differ significantly in women. In addition, high microsatellite instability (MSI high) is more frequent in women and is associated with a generally significantly better prognosis. The MSI high gastric carcinomas of women show better survival than MSI high carcinomas of men. The future inclusion of gender-specific aspects in studies of the upper gastrointestinal tract is desirable in order to generate adequate data and to enable differentiated treatment stratification in the future.

The effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy by achalasia subtype as measured by impedance planimetry

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder with three subtypes based on manometry that can treated with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). With the advent of impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP®), we hypothesized the three achalasia subtypes would have different pre-POEM EndoFLIP® diameter and distensibility index (DI) measurements but would be similar after POEM.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of consecutive POEM cases by a single surgeon-endoscopist team from 04/07/2017 to 08/28/2023. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia were stratified into type 1, 2, or 3 based on pre-POEM manometry. Patient characteristics, Eckardt scores, and pre-and-post-POEM diameter and DI were compared by subtype with descriptive, univariate, and multivariable linear regression statistics.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 9(14.1%) had Type 1, 36(56.3%) had Type 2, and 19(29.7%) had Type 3. There were no differences between Types with respect to median pre-POEM Eckardt scores (9[IQR:7-9) vs. 8[IQR:6-9] vs. 7[IQR:5-8], p = 0.148), median post-POEM Eckardt scores (0[IQR:0-1] vs. 0[IQR:0-0] vs. 0[IQR0-0.5], p = 0.112). EndoFLIP® data revealed variation in median pre-POEM diameter and DI between Subtypes (6.9[IQR:6-8.5] vs. 5.5[IQR:5-6.8] vs. 5[IQR:5-6.1], p = 0.025 and 1.8[IQR:1.3-3.2] vs. 0.9[IQR:0.6-1.6] vs. 0.6[IQR:0.5-0.8], p = 0.003, respectively), but not in the change in diameter or DI post-POEM (5.1[IQR:4.3-5.9] vs. 5.1[IQR:4.1-7.1] vs. 5.9[IQR:5-6.4], p = 0.217 and 3.9[IQR:2.5-4.7] vs. 3.4[IQR:2.4-4.7] vs. 2.7[IQR:2.3-3.7], p = 0.461, respectively). However, after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, pre- or post-POEM diameter and DI did not demonstrate statistically significant differences among subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Achalasia subtypes did not demonstrate different pre-POEM diameters or DI as measured by EndoFLIP® nor are there differences after POEM completion. While achalasia subtypes may have slightly different pathophysiology based on manometry findings, similar pre- and post-POEM impedance planimetry findings, along with similar Eckardt scores, support the use of POEM in the treatment of any achalasia subtype.

Sex differences in symptoms, high-resolution manometry values and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy in Chinese patients with achalasia

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the differences in symptoms, high-resolution manometry (HRM) characteristics, and the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) regarding patients' sex in achalasia.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with achalasia by HRM who underwent POEM and were followed up for more than 6 months were included. The individual characteristics, symptoms and signs, POEM findings, HRM results and potentially related complications in male and female patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Prior to POEM, dysphagia was more severe in female than male patients (P = 0.044), while regurgitation was more severe (P = 0.013) and heartburn was more common in male patients (P = 0.003). Regarding HRM characteristics, the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) was higher (P = 0.01) and length of esophagus was shorter in female patients than in male patients. Eckardt scores, LESP and integrated relaxation pressure were significantly improved after the POEM procedure (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the sexes regarding the efficacy of POEM, reflux symptoms, HRM data and complications after POEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Before they seek treatment, female patients with achalasia may experience severe dysphagia and male patients are more likely to experience heartburn and more severe regurgitation. POEM is a safe and effective option for treating both male and female patients with achalasia.

The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool can predict malnutrition in patients with esophageal achalasia

BACKGROUND

At present, little research has been done to clarify why some achalasia patients do not lose weight or are even obese and to investigate their nutritional status. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of malnutrition in these patients and to assess their response to treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients referred to a tertiary-care center for laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment of achalasia. Demographics, anthropometric variables, presenting symptoms, and results of the objective investigation were recorded on a prospectively collected database. The severity of symptoms and the nutritional risk were assessed by the Eckardt score and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), respectively, before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2019, 171 patients met the study inclusion criteria. There were 87 (50.9%) male and the median age was 53.0 (39-66) years. The median Eckardt score was 6 (interquartile range 3). Based on the MUST score, 121 (70.8%) patients were classified at moderate/high risk of malnutrition. Of these, 93 (76.9%) were overweight or obese. Compared to low-risk group, predictive factors of moderate/high risk of malnutrition were higher Eckardt score [odds ratio (OR) 1.63; 95% CI, 1.35-1.99], more severe dysphagia (OR 2.68, 95% CI, 1.66-4.30), and greater absolute weight loss (OR 2.37; 95% CI, 1.77-3.17). The latter was the only independent predictive factor of malnutrition (OR 2.54; 95% CI, 1.69-3.82). After treatment, the measured MUST score was 0 in 96% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 70% of achalasia patients were at moderate/high risk of malnutrition. These individuals may benefit from a perioperative multidisciplinary approach including dietary intervention to stabilize weight and improve their nutritional status.