Effective stepwise training and procedure standardization for young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy

Study on the application of progressive training method combined with imagery training method in laparoscopic suturing skills training for resident physicians

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore an efficient teaching method to improve laparoscopic suturing skills in resident physicians by combining the progressive training method with the imagery training method.

METHODS

This study used a randomized controlled trial methodology. The experimental group received training utilizing a combination of the progressive training method and the imagery training method In contrast, the control group followed the traditional teaching method of practicing continuous complete actions. Both groups were trained in intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying under laparoscopy. The training effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed before and after the training, including LS-CAT scores and suturing time.

RESULTS

In the second test, the experimental group had much higher LS-CAT scores than the control group, as well as a considerably lower number of operation errors. In the experimental group, 88.9% of the trainees were proficient, compared to only 28.6% in the control group. There was no significant difference in suturing time between the two groups. The results of the third test indicated that, although there were no significant differences in LS-CAT total scores or suturing time between the two groups, the experimental group demonstrated a significantly lower number of operational errors compared to the control group. Additionally, the LS-CAT scores for tissue handling in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of the progressive training method and the imagery training method significantly improved resident physicians' laparoscopic suturing skills. This method greatly enhanced the efficiency and quality of learning laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying skills among surgical and gynecological resident doctors.

Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma.

METHODS

This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement.

RESULTS

A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.

Simulation training of laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy and stepwise training program on a 3D-printed model

AIM

Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy is among the most difficult and high-risk operations. Surgeons with low or moderate seniority rarely are allowed to perform this surgery in clinics. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a reliable simulation training model focused on laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy and an effective stepwise training program.

METHODS

Surgeons with different working experiences or exposure to different training programs at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital were divided into four groups. Each was required to perform laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy using a designed three-dimensional dry lab model. All surgeons' baseline characteristics and surgical performance, including operation time and score, were recorded and analysed. The authenticity of the model was evaluated by four senior surgeons.

RESULTS

The surgeon group with higher seniority had an older average age, longer working time, and had completed more laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration procedures. Meanwhile, the surgeon group with higher seniority presented better operation performance, including shorter operation time and higher operation score in their initial simulation training. Resident surgeons who underwent stepwise training with the laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis training program showed better initial performance than resident surgeons who underwent stepwise training with the laparoscopic basic suture training program. After repeated training, the surgeons showed improved surgical performance.

CONCLUSION

Our pancreaticojejunostomy model showed a good degree of discernibility, as surgeons with more experience performed better with the model for their initial simulation training in laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy. Stepwise training of the laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis training program helped surgeons obtain a better initial performance, and repeated simulation training on this model improved the surgeon's operative performance.

Crucial Roles of the Assistant Surgeon During Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy

Background

Although left hemihepatectomy has been widely performed via the laparoscopic approach, the roles of the assistant surgeon have not been well-documented so far. We herein present our standardized procedures of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy without Spiegel’s lobe resection, focusing on the crucial roles of the assistant surgeon.

Methods

During laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy without Spiegel’s lobe resection, countertraction by the assistant surgeon is quite important especially during isolating the left Glissonean pedicle and transecting liver parenchyma. When securing the left hepatic pedicle using the Glissonean approach, the assistant surgeon pushes Segment 4 of the liver cranially and pulls the tape encircling the hepatoduodenal ligament caudally in the opposite way, orthogonal to the direction of the laparoscopic forceps toward the left portal triad. During liver parenchymal transection, the assistant surgeon pulls the hanging tape across the left lobe of the liver in order to provide a wide and stable liver transection plane.

With this standardized technique, nine cases of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy were performed over the last two years in our department, and the perioperative data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The median age of the nine patients was 70 years (range: 58 - 84 years). Most of the patients were males (77.8%). Five of nine patients were diagnosed with colorectal liver metastasis, two with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one with inflammatory pseudotumor, and the other one with hepaticolithiasis. There were no conversions to open surgery. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 337 minutes (range: 219 - 478 minutes) and 100 ml (range: 41 - 375 ml), respectively. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was nine days (range: 7 - 16 days). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or more) were not encountered in our cohort postoperatively.

Conclusion

We presented here our standardized assistant roles during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy without Spiegel’s lobe resection, which was revealed to be safe and feasible in our cohort.

Usefulness of a stepwise training program for laparoscopic gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is a complicated procedure with a long learning curve. This study was performed to investigate the usefulness of our stepwise training program for LG for improving the quality of the surgery.

METHODS

The stepwise training method comprised the following four steps: (1) basic training using a dry box and checking by mentors; (2) advanced training, including the use of animals and cadavers; (3) clinical experience, including standardization and preoperative three-dimensional simulation; and (4) self-assessment and feedback. In total, 153 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included in this study.

RESULTS

The operative time gradually decreased for both laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) (2013, 395 minutes; 2017, 278 minutes; P < .001; ρ = -0.68) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) (2013, 476 minutes; 2017, 319 minutes; P < .001; ρ = -0.56). The blood loss volume gradually decreased for both LDG (2013, 43.0 mL; 2017, 18.6 mL; P < .005; ρ = -0.30) and LTG (2013, 143.8 mL; 2017, 13.5 mL; P < .005; ρ = -0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Our stepwise training program contributes to reduce operation time and blood loss in LG.

Deformation modeling based on mechanical properties of liver tissue for virtuanormal vectors of trianglesl surgical simulation

PURPOSE

In this paper, a method for rapidly constructing a virtual surgical simulation system is proposed. A deformation model based on the mechanical properties of the liver and a rapid collision detection between the surgical micro-instruments and the liver tissue are included in this method. The purpose of this work is to improve the accuracy and real time of particle model deformation interaction in virtual surgery system.

METHODS

Firstly, a finite element model is established based on the constitutive model parameters of liver tissue. According to the simulation results, a mathematical model of node displacement is established. Secondly, the virtual liver is established based on the fast model reconstruction method, and the virtual manipulator is controlled by Geomagic Touch manipulator. Based on the hybrid bounding box, a rapid collision detection process between the instrument and liver is realized and the proposed deformation method is used to simulate the deformation of liver tissue.

RESULTS

The simulation and experiment results show that the proposed deformation model can achieve high deformation interaction accuracy. The collision detection algorithm based on the hybrid bounding boxes can realize the collision between the liver and the instrument, and the established virtual surgical simulation system can simulate the liver tissue deformation in the case of small loading displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the collision detection algorithm and deformation model was verified by an established virtual surgery simulation system. The proposed rapid construction method of virtual surgical simulation is feasible.

Intention to Treat Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemi-Hepatectomy: A Paired Case-Matched Comparison Study

BACKGROUND

The benefits of laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy compared to open hemi-hepatectomy are not clear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to share our experience with the laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy compared to an open approach.

METHODS

A total of 40 consecutive laparoscopically started hemi-hepatectomy (intention-to-treat analysis) cases between August 2012 and October 2015 were matched against open cases using the following criteria: laterality of surgery and pathology (essential criteria); American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, pre-operative bilirubin, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, additional procedures, portal vein embolization, and presence of cirrhosis/fibrosis on histology (secondary criteria); age and gender (tertiary criteria). Hand-assisted and extended hemi-hepatectomy cases were excluded from the study. The two groups were compared for blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes. All complications were quantified using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

Two groups were well matched (p = 1.00). In the two groups, 10 patients had left and 30 had right hemi-hepatectomy. Overall conversion rate was 15%. Median length of hospital and high dependency unit stay was less in the intention to treat laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy group: 6 versus 8 days, p = 0.025 and 1 versus 2 days, p = 0.07. Median operative time was longer in the intention to treat laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy group: 420 min (range: 389.5-480) versus 305 min (range: 238.8-348.8; p = 0.001). Intra-operative blood loss was equivalent, but the overall blood transfusions were higher in the intention to treat laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy (50 vs 29 units, p = 0.36). The overall morbidity (18 vs 20 patients, p = 0.65), mortality (2.5%), and the positive resection margin status were similar (18% vs 21%, p = 0.76). The 1- (87.5% vs 92.5%, p = 0.71) and 3-year survival (70% vs 72.5%, p = 1.00) was also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed lower hospital and high dependency unit stay in the laparoscopic group. However, the laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operating time and a non-significant increase in blood transfusion requirements. There was no difference in morbidity, mortality, re-admission rate, and oncological outcomes.

Major Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Based on Surgeons' Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Surgical complications for surgeons still in the learning phase of major laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have been frequently observed. We aimed to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery based on the surgeons' learning curve for LLR after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all patients with a histologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent major hepatectomy between January 2013 and December 2018. A PSM analysis was used to compare the groups of patients who underwent LLR and open major liver resection (OLR) before and after the learning curve was maximized.

RESULTS

Among 405 patients, 106 underwent LLR and 299 underwent OLR. The learning curve was maximized after 42 cases. Compared with OLR, LLR had more liver-related injury and grade III or higher complications during the learning phase. The LLR group had less blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements, and fewer liver-related complications during the 'experienced' phase. Hospital stay was significantly shorter during and after maximization of the learning curve in LLR compared with OLR. Operative time was comparable in the two phases. Overall, LLR was associated with less blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. There was no significant difference in long-term survival outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR had a higher incidence of liver-related complications during the surgeon's learning phase compared with OLR. This association was significantly diminished with surgeon experience. Overall perioperative outcomes such as estimated blood loss, surgical complications, and hospital stay remained better for LLR compared with OLR.

The Differences in the Characteristics of Insulin-producing Cells Using Human Adipose-tissue Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Subcutaneous and Visceral Tissues

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of insulin producing cells (IPCs) differentiated from adipose-tissue derived stem cells (ADSCs) isolated from human subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues and identify ADSCs suitable for differentiation into efficient and functional IPCs. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues collected from four (4) patients who underwent digestive surgeries at The Tokushima University (000035546) were included in this study. The insulin secretion of the generated IPCs was investigated using surface markers by: fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis; cytokine release; proliferation ability of ADSCs; in vitro (glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: (GSIS) test/in vivo (transplantation into streptozotocin-induced diabetic nude mice). The less fat-related inflammatory cytokines secretions were observed (P < 0.05), and the proliferation ability was higher in the subcutaneous ADSCs (P < 0.05). Insulin expression and GISI were higher in the subcutaneous IPCs (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). The hyperglycaemic state of all mice that received IPCs from subcutaneous fat tissue converted into normo-glycaemia in thirty (30) days post-transplantation (4/4,100%). Transplanted IPCs were stained using anti-insulin and anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The IPCs generated from the ADSCs freshly isolated from the human fat tissue had sufficient insulin secreting ability in vitro and in vivo.