1
|
Bougie O, Murji A, Velez MP, Pudwell J, Shellenberger J, Kroft J. Impact of Surgeon Characteristics on Endometriosis Surgery Outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2025:S1553-4650(25)00088-3. [PMID: 40097067 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2024] [Revised: 02/13/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the association between surgeon characteristics and postoperative surgical outcomes, including rates of complications, recurrence of symptoms, fertility outcomes, and need for reoperation for individuals undergoing surgical management of endometriosis. DESIGN Population cohort study. SETTING Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS 83787 Ontario patients, who are biologically identified as women, aged 18 to 50 who had an initial diagnosis of endometriosis (ICD-9-617 or ICD-10-N80) between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2018. INTERVENTIONS Surgeon volume of endometriosis cases, grouped into 4 categories: 6 or fewer in the prior year (low volume), 7 to 11 (moderate volume), 12 to 23 (high volume), and 24 or more (highest volume). A modified exposure variable defined by surgeon's volume of complex endometriosis surgery (based on Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing code) in the year before the index surgery was also used. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was the rate of reoperation within 30 days of index surgery and over the duration of follow-up in the study. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, the rate of infertility consults, and the live birth rate following endometriosis surgery. The majority of patients (80.3%) underwent surgery with a low-volume surgeon. In the 30-day postoperative period, the lowest rate of postoperative complication was noted among the highest-volume surgeons (5.5%). There was a significantly reduced risk of complications among high-volume surgeons compared to low-volume surgeons (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96). Higher-volume surgeons tended to refer patients for fertility assessment and these patients also had a higher chance of achieving a live birth postoperatively. Patients who underwent surgery with a high volume of complex endometriosis surgeon, were less likely to undergo repeat surgery (17.8% vs 32.9%, aHR 0.80 [0.72-0.88]), including all the surgery types examined. CONCLUSION Our study suggests the majority of patients undergoing surgery for endometriosis have surgery with a low-volume surgeon. Postoperative outcomes were impacted by surgeon volume, suggesting that there is a need to define criteria for surgical competency. Ongoing work to define surgeon characteristics and skills required to perform different types of endometriosis surgery is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Bougie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System (Dr. Bougie), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Ally Murji
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Trillium Health Partners (Dr. Murji), Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria P Velez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, McGill University Health Center, Reproductive Center (Dr. Velez), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jessica Pudwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Pudwell), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jamie Kroft
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (Dr. Kroft), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borowiec Z, Mrugała M, Nowak K, Bek W, Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk E. Concordance between Preoperative #ENZIANi Score and Postoperative #ENZIANs Score Classification-Why Do We Choose #ENZIAN and How Does It Impact the Future Classification Trend? J Clin Med 2024; 13:6005. [PMID: 39408066 PMCID: PMC11477665 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13196005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the concordance of the preoperative application of the #ENZIAN classification (#ENZIANi) with the postoperative result (#ENZIANs) using surgical findings as the reference standard. Methods: This retrospective study included 282 consecutive patients with deep endometriosis undergoing surgical treatment. Preoperative assessment with transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging was compared with postoperative assessment. Concordance and diagnostic test evaluation were calculated. Results: The highest concordance was observed in the F (abdominal wall endometriosis) with k Cohen of 0.837, following the values for pelvic locations, with 0.795 for T left, 0.791 for T right, 0.776 for F (adenomyosis), 0.766 for C (rectum), and 0.75 and 0.72 for O right k and O left, respectively. The highest sensitivity was demonstrated for the P compartment *(98%), T compartment (both sides 97%), and A, B, C (94-96%), corresponding with deep endometriosis. Conclusions: Preoperative assessment using TVS/TAS + MRI with the ENZIANi score correlates well with the ENZIANs postoperative score and demonstrates good concordance in the detection and localization of deep endometriosis, thereby minimizing false negative results and ensuring accurate preoperative staging. The ENZIAN classification is well-suited to surgeon needs and benefits from continuous development. Future improvements, such as adding the expanded C module, may be considered in the next edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zofia Borowiec
- The Clinical Department of Oncological Gynecology, Oncology Centre in Opole, Medical Faculty, University of Opole, 45-061 Opole, Poland; (M.M.); (K.N.); (W.B.); (E.M.-N.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen SB, Dabi Y, Burke Y, Mamadov N, Manoim N, Mashiach R, Berkowitz E, Bouaziz J, Nicolas-Boluda A, Porpora MG, Ziv-Baran T. Laparoscopic nerve lysis for deep endometriosis improves quality of life and chronic pain levels: A pilot study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2024; 53:102778. [PMID: 38570115 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the benefit of surgical management of patients with endometriosis infiltrating pelvic nerves in terms of pain, analgesic consumption, and quality of life (QOL). METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study In an Endometriosis referral center at a tertiary care university affiliated medical center. Patients diagnosed with endometriosis that underwent laparoscopic neurolysis for chronic pain were included. Patients rated their pain before and after surgery and differentiated between chronic pain and acute crises. Patients were requested to maintain a record of analgesic consumption and to evaluate their quality-of-life (QOL). RESULTS Of the 21 patients in our study 15 (71.5 %) had obturator nerve involvement, 2 (9.5 %) had pudendal nerve involvement and 4 (19 %) had other pelvic nerve involvement. Median postoperative follow - up was of 8 months. All but 2 patients (9.6 %) had significant chronic pain improvement with a mean decrease of VAS of 3.05 (±2.5). Analgesic habits changed postoperatively with a significant decrease of 66 % of patients' daily consumption of any analgesics. Surgery improved QOL in 12 cases (57.1 %) and two patients (9.6 %) completely recovered with a high QOL. CONCLUSION Neurolysis and excision of endometriosis of pelvic nerves could results in significant improvement of quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomo B Cohen
- Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Unit, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Sorbonne University,Department of obstetrics and gynecology Tenon Hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France.
| | - Yechiel Burke
- Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Unit, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Nicole Mamadov
- Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Unit, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Nir Manoim
- Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Unit, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Roy Mashiach
- Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Unit, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Elad Berkowitz
- Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Unit, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jerome Bouaziz
- Department of Research, One Clinic, 25 Boulevard Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Alba Nicolas-Boluda
- Department of Research, One Clinic, 25 Boulevard Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | | | - Tomer Ziv-Baran
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Debopadhaya S, Toogood P, Ding A, Marmor MT. Nonphysician Evaluators and Recording-Based Tools in Surgical Skill Assessment: A Feasibility Study. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2024; 81:1161-1176. [PMID: 38845300 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the feasibility of nonmedically trained evaluators and image- and video-based tools in the assessment of surgical skills in a key orthopedic procedure. DESIGN Orthopedic surgeons at varying skill levels were evaluated by their ability to repair a cadaveric bi-malleolar ankle fracture. Nonphysician viewers and expert orthopedic surgeons independently scored video recordings and fluoroscopy images of the procedure through Global Rating Scales (GRS) and procedure-specific checklist tools. Statistical analysis was used to determine if the evaluators and assessment tools were able to differentiate skill level. SETTING An academic tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS The surgical procedure was completed by 3 orthopedic residents, 3 orthopedic trauma fellows, and 4 orthopedic trauma attending surgeons. The procedure was independently evaluated by 2 orthopedic surgeons and 2 nonphysicians. RESULTS Operating participants were stratified by ≤ or >10 bimalleolar ankle fracture cases performed alone (inexperienced, n = 5 vs experienced, n = 5). Expert surgeon viewers could effectively stratify skill group through the GRS for video and fluoroscopy analysis (p < 0.05), and the video procedure-specific checklist (p < 0.05), but not the fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklist. Nonphysician viewers generally recognized skill groupings, although with less separation than surgeon viewers. These evaluators performed the best when aided by video and fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklists. Meanwhile, breakdowns of each tool into critical zones for improvement and evaluator-independent metrics such as case experience, self-reported confidence, and surgical time also indicated some skill differentiation. CONCLUSIONS The feasibility of using video recordings and fluoroscopic imaging based surgical skills assessment tools in orthopedic trauma was demonstrated. The tools highlighted in this study are applicable to both cadaver laboratory settings and live surgeries. The degree of training that is required by the evaluators and the utility of measuring surgical times of specific tasks should be the subject of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Toogood
- Orthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, 94110
| | - Anthony Ding
- Orthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, 94110
| | - Meir T Marmor
- Orthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, 94110.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barchi LC, Callado GY, Machado RB, Chico MA, Damico DC, Lacerda DP, Ricciardi R, Leite RMDA. INTESTINAL ENDOMETRIOSIS: OUTCOMES FROM A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SPECIALIZED REFERRAL CENTER. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA : ABCD = BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY 2024; 37:e1806. [PMID: 38958344 PMCID: PMC11216408 DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720202400013e1806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep penetrating endometriosis (DE) can affect abdominal and pelvic organs like the bowel and bladder, requiring treatment to alleviate symptoms. AIMS To study and investigate clinical and surgical outcomes in patients diagnosed with DE involving the intestines, aiming to analyze the effectiveness of surgical treatments. METHODS All cases treated from January 2021 to July 2023 were included, focusing on patients aged 18 years or older with the disease affecting the intestines. Patients without intestinal involvement and those with less than six months of post-surgery follow-up were excluded. Intestinal involvement was defined as direct invasion of the intestinal wall or requiring adhesion lysis for complete resection. Primary outcomes were adhesion lysis, rectal shaving, disc excision (no-colectomy group), and segmental resection (colectomy group) along with surgical complications like anastomotic leak and fistulas, monitored for up to 30 days. RESULTS Out of 169 patients with DE surgically treated, 76 met the inclusion criteria. No colectomy treatment was selected for 50 (65.7%) patients, while 26 (34.2%) underwent rectosigmoidectomy (RTS). Diarrhea during menstruation was the most prevalent symptom in the RTS group (19.2 vs. 6%, p<0.001). Surgical outcomes indicated longer operative times and hospital stays for the segmental resection group, respectively 186.5 vs. 104 min (p<0.001) and 4 vs. 2 days, (p<0.001). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) had an overall prevalence of 6 (7.9%) cases, without any difference between the groups. There was no mortality reported. Larger lesions and specific symptoms like dyschezia and rectal bleeding were associated with a higher likelihood of RTS. Bayesian regression highlighted diarrhea close to menstruation as a strong predictor of segmental resection. CONCLUSIONS In patients with DE involving the intestines, symptoms such as dyschezia, rectal bleeding, and menstrual period-related diarrhea predict RTS. However, severe complication rates did not differ significantly between the segmental resection group and no-colectomy group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro Cardoso Barchi
- São Leopoldo Mandic, Faculty of Medicine, Campinas (SP), Brazil
- Gastromed Instituto Zilberstein, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- São Luiz Rede D'or, Hospital Osasco Endometriosis Centre, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Gustavo Yano Callado
- Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Rocco Ricciardi
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (MA), USA
| | - Rodrigo Moises de Almeida Leite
- Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (MA), USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker CM, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Pelvic Deep Endometriosis and Endometriosis Classification Systems: An International Consensus Statement. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:557-573. [PMID: 38819341 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
| | - Bassem Gerges
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia; Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Christian M Becker
- Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Harald Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Bruno J van Herendael
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium; Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino Italy
| | - Mauricio S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ertan Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Gernot Hudelist
- Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God Vienna; Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement. Eur J Radiol 2024; 176:111450. [PMID: 38879203 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies. This Consensus Statement should be cited as: 'G. Condous, B. Gerges, I. Thomassin-Naggara, C. Becker, C. Tomassetti, H. Krentel, B.J. van Herendael, M. Malzoni, M. S. Abrao, E. Saridogan, J. Keckstein, G. Hudelist and Collaborators. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement. Eur. J. Radiol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111450.'
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
| | - B Gerges
- Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP Hopital Tenon, Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - C Becker
- Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - B J van Herendael
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium; Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - M Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - M S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede, Germany
| | - G Hudelist
- Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God Vienna, Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2024; 64:129-144. [PMID: 38808587 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies. © 2024 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, by Universa Press, by The International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and by Elsevier B.V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - B Gerges
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
- Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP Hopital Tenon, Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - C Becker
- Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - B J van Herendael
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
- Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - M Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - M S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede, Germany
| | - G Hudelist
- Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God Vienna; Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cooper NAM, Daniels NF, Magama Z, Aref-Adib M, Odejinmi F. Opportunities for change and levelling up: a trust wide retrospective analysis of 8 years of laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2024; 16:195-201. [PMID: 38950533 PMCID: PMC11366112 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.16.2.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic myomectomy is increasingly considered the gold standard uterine preserving procedure and has well documented benefits over the open approach. Barriers that women have in accessing the most appropriate treatment need to be addressed to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes. Objectives To analyse rates of open and laparoscopic myomectomy at a large NHS trust and identify how many cases could potentially have been performed laparoscopically, and any variation between sites. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of preoperative imaging reports and a surgical database containing information for all myomectomies performed between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2022. Main outcome measures Number of procedures suitable for alternative surgical approach; length of hospital stay; estimated blood loss; cost differences. Results 846 myomectomies were performed; 656 by laparotomy and 190 by laparoscopy. 194/591 (32.8%) open myomectomies could have been performed laparoscopically and 26/172 (15.1%) laparoscopic myomectomies may have been better performed via an open approach. Length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss were significantly higher in the open group. Had cases been performed as indicated by pre-operative imaging, the cost differences ranged from -£115,752 to £251,832. Conclusions There is disparity in access to the gold standard care of laparoscopic myomectomy. Due to multifactorial reasons, even at sites where the rate of laparoscopic myomectomy is high, there is still underutilisation of this approach. It is clear that there is scope for change and "levelling up" of this imbalance. What is new? Robust pathways and guidelines must be developed, and more laparoscopic surgeons should be trained to optimise care for women with fibroids.
Collapse
|
10
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement†,‡. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2024; 16:127-144. [PMID: 38807551 PMCID: PMC11366111 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.16.2.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on a review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement . Hum Reprod Open 2024; 2024:hoae029. [PMID: 38812884 PMCID: PMC11134890 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - B Gerges
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
- Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP Hopital Tenon, Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - C Becker
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - B J van Herendael
- Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
- Università degli Studi dell‘Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - M Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - M S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede, Germany
| | - G Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St John of God Vienna, Vienna,Austria
- Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Challine A, Kirouani M, Markar SR, Tzedakis S, Jaquet R, Piessen G, Dabakoyo-Yonli TS, Lefèvre JH, Lazzati A, Voron T. MIRO study: Do the results of a randomized controlled trial apply in a real population? Surgery 2024; 175:1055-1062. [PMID: 38490752 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to evaluate the external validity of the MIRO randomized controlled trial findings in a similar nationwide setting "real life" population, especially the benefit of a hybrid approach in esophageal resection for pulmonary complication. The external validity of randomized controlled trial findings to the general population with the same condition remains problematic because of the inherent selection bias and rigid inclusion criteria. METHODS This study was a cohort study from a National Health Database (Programme de Medicalisation des Systemes d'Informations) between 2010 and 2022. All adult patients operated on using Ivor Lewis resection for esophageal cancer were included. We first validated the detection algorithm of postoperative complications in the health database. Then, we assessed the primary outcome, which was the comparison of postoperative severe pulmonary complications, leak rate, and 30-day mortality between the 2 surgical approaches (hybrid versus open) over a decade. RESULTS Between 2010 and 2012, 162 of 205 patients in the MIRO trial were anonymously identified in the health care database. No difference between randomized controlled trials and healthcare database measurements was found within severe respiratory complications (24% vs 22%, respectively) nor within leak rate (10% vs 9%, respectively). After application of selection criteria according to the MIRO trial, 3,852 patients were included between 2013 and 2022. The hybrid approach was a protective factor against respiratory complications after adjustment for confounding variables (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.98, P = .025). No significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate or 30-day leakage rate between the types of approach was reported. CONCLUSION This national cohort study demonstrates the external validity of the MIRO randomized controlled trial findings in a real-life population within France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Challine
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France; HeKA, Inria, Paris, France; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Mehdi Kirouani
- Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Guillaume Piessen
- CHU Lille, Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
| | | | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Lazzati
- HeKA, Inria, Paris, France; Service de chirurgie digestive et bariatrique, Centre intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Thibault Voron
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grigoriadis G, Daniilidis A, Merlot B, Stratakis K, Dennis T, Crestani A, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Roman H. Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 93:102455. [PMID: 38181664 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on obstetric outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelos Daniilidis
- 1st Department in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54643, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Benjamin Merlot
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Konstantinos Stratakis
- 1st Surgical Department, Peripheral General Hospital Giorgos Gennimatas, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Dennis
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Adrien Crestani
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Isabella Chanavaz-Lacheray
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Horace Roman
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Franco-European Multidisciplinary Endometriosis Institute (IFEMEndo), Middle East Clinic, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, 7400, United Arab Emirates; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Piozzi GN, Burea V, Duhoky R, Stefan S, So C, Wilby D, Tsepov D, Khan JS. Robotic surgery for bowel endometriosis: a multidisciplinary management of a complex entity. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:31. [PMID: 38329622 PMCID: PMC10853297 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02904-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bowel endometriosis impacts quality of life. Treatment requires complex surgical procedures with associated morbidity. Precision approach with robotic surgery leads to organ preservation. Bowel endometriosis requires a multidisciplinary management to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes of bowel endometriosis undergoing multidisciplinary planning and robotic surgery. METHODS Consecutive cases of multidisciplinary robotic bowel endometriosis procedures (January 2021-December 2022) were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database in a national endometriosis accredited centre. Patients were managed through a multidisciplinary setting including gynaecologists, colorectal robotic surgeons, and other specialists. Dyschezia (menstrual and non-cyclical) and quality of life were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 months) through validated questionnaires. RESULTS Sixty-eight consecutive cases of robotic bowel endometriosis were included. Median age was 35.0 (30.2-42.0) years. Median body mass index was 24.0 (21.0-26.7) kg/m2. Procedures performed were 48 (70.6%) shavings, 11 (16.2%) deep shavings, 3 (4.4%) disc excisions, and 6 (8.8%) segmental resections. One (1.5%) patient required temporary stoma. Median operating time was 150 (120-180) min. There were no conversions/return to theatre postoperatively. Median endometriotic nodule size was 25.0 (15.5-40.0) mm. Two (2.9%) patients developed postoperative complications. Median length of postoperative stay was 2 (2-4) days. Median follow-up was 12 (7-17) months. One (1.5%) patient recurred. Median menstrual dyschezia score improved from 5.0 (2.0-8.0) to 1.0 (0.0-5.7). Median non-cyclical dyschezia significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 1.0 (0.0-5.7) to 0.0 (0.0-2.0). Median quality of life score improved from 52.5 (35.0-70.0) to 74.5 (60.0-80.0). CONCLUSIONS Robotic multidisciplinary approach to bowel endometriosis provides good perioperative outcomes with improvement of dyschezia and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G N Piozzi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - V Burea
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - R Duhoky
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - S Stefan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - C So
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - D Wilby
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - D Tsepov
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - J S Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK.
- University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dabi Y, Ebanga L, Favier A, Kolanska K, Puchar A, Jayot A, Ferrier C, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Darai E. Discoid excision for colorectal endometriosis associated infertility: A balance between fertility outcomes and complication rates. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2024; 53:102723. [PMID: 38211693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to study the impact of discoid excision for deep endometriosis (DE) with colorectal involvement on fertility outcomes. METHODS 49 patients with a desire for pregnancy treated with discoid excision for colorectal endometriosis in our endometriosis expert center between January 2015 and August 2020 were selected from our prospectively maintained database. Indications for surgery were either infertility and / or pelvic pain. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Fertility outcomes, both spontaneous and post-ART pregnancies, were analyzed. RESULTS Among the 49 patients who underwent discoid excision exclusively (no other digestive resection) with a desire to conceive, 25 had a pregnancy after surgery and 24 did not. Double discoid excision was performed in 6.1 % of the cases (3/49). A colpectomy was performed in 12.2 % of the patients (6/49), and a protective stoma in 12.2 % (6/49). Fenestration of endometriomas was performed in 28.6 % of the patients (14/49), and parametrectomy in 40.8 % (20/49). The postoperative complication rate was 24.5 % (12/49) including 10.2 % (5/49) grade I, 12.2 % (6/49) grade II, and 2 % (1/49) grade III. Prior to surgery, 28 (57.1 %) patients had infertility including 13 (52 %) that successfully conceived following surgery and 15 (62.5 %) that remain infertile. Spontaneous pregnancy was achieved in 60 % (15/25) of infertile patients' prior surgery. The live-birth rate in patients conceiving spontaneously was 75 % (12/16). CONCLUSION Our results support that discoid excision is safe and associated with good fertility outcomes. Whether first-line surgery using discoid excision is superior to first-line ART remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Dabi
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
| | - Lea Ebanga
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Amélia Favier
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Kamila Kolanska
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Anne Puchar
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Aude Jayot
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Clément Ferrier
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; GRC-6 Sorbonne University: Centre Expert en Endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; Unité INSERM UMR S 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; GRC-6 Sorbonne University: Centre Expert en Endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; Unité INSERM UMR S 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Emile Darai
- Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; GRC-6 Sorbonne University: Centre Expert en Endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; Unité INSERM UMR S 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fujii M, Koshiba A, Ito F, Kusuki I, Kitawaki J, Mori T. Postoperative Pregnancy Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Surgical Management in Women with Stage III/IV Endometriosis: A Single-Center Follow-Up Study. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2023; 12:153-160. [PMID: 37807984 PMCID: PMC10553597 DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_132_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The effects of laparoscopic surgical management in women with stage III/IV endometriosis remain controversial. The standard extent of resection for stage III/IV endometriosis with deep endometriosis to treat endometriosis-associated infertility is debatable. This study aimed to assess the postoperative pregnancy outcomes following a routine surgical intervention for stage III/IV endometriosis patients. Materials and Methods Patients with stage III/IV endometriosis who underwent conservative laparoscopic surgery at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the correlations between endometriosis features and postoperative pregnancy outcomes. Results Of 256 patients enrolled, 94 wished to conceive. Exclusion criteria: ≥40 years, adenomyosis, partners with infertility issues. Finally, 71 women were included. The overall postoperative pregnancy rate was 76.1% (n = 54): 49 and five from non-assisted reproductive technology (ART) and ART, respectively. The postoperative pregnancy rate in patients diagnosed with infertility presurgery (40/71) was 70.0% (n = 28): 24 (non-ART) and four (ART). The endometriosis fertility index (EFI) score was higher in the pregnant than in the nonpregnant group (P = 0.03). The EFI score and surgical score of EFI were higher in the non-ART than in the ART group (P = 0.04; P = 0.02); in the infertile group, they were higher in the pregnant than in the nonpregnant group (P = 0.018; P = 0.027). Conclusion Our postoperative pregnancy rate after conservative laparoscopic surgery for patients with stage III/IV endometriosis compared favorably with previous reports. EFI was a significant predictor of postoperative pregnancy. Our surgical approach to maintain a high surgical score of EFI might help treat endometriosis-associated infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Fujii
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akemi Koshiba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Fumitake Ito
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Izumi Kusuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jo Kitawaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Taisuke Mori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leborne P, Huberlant S, Masia F, de Tayrac R, Letouzey V, Allegre L. Clinical outcomes following surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21800. [PMID: 36526707 PMCID: PMC9758215 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25751-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The main aim of the study was to evaluate severe post-operative complications following deep endometriosis surgery in a tertiary referral centre. This is a retrospective cohort study that included women who had surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2019. Endometriosis was diagnosed based on clinical, imaging and histological parameters. We evaluated the rates of post-operative complications, potential risk factors for such complications and postoperative pregnancy rates. A total of 165 patients were included in the final analysis. The median follow-up was 63 (25-106) months. Thirty-seven patients (22.42%) had hysterectomy, 60 (36.81%) had ureterolysis and 44 (26.67%) had colorectal surgery. The overall and severe rates of post-operative complications were 16.20% (n = 23) and 2.42% (n = 4) respectively. Of the variables assessed, operative time and age were the only statistically significant risk factor for complications on multivariate analysis. Among women operated on for infertility, 34.5% (n = 20/58) got pregnant following surgery with 30% of these spontaneously. This study demonstrates acceptable overall and severe post-operative complications and pregnancy rates after deep endometriosis surgery. This information should help clinicians when counselling women to enable them making an informed choice about their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Leborne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.
| | - Stephanie Huberlant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
- Department of Artificial Polymers, Max Mousseron Institute of Biomolecules, CNRS UMR 5247, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Florent Masia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| | - Renaud de Tayrac
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
- Department of Artificial Polymers, Max Mousseron Institute of Biomolecules, CNRS UMR 5247, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Vincent Letouzey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
- Department of Artificial Polymers, Max Mousseron Institute of Biomolecules, CNRS UMR 5247, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Lucie Allegre
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hudelist G, Korell M, Burkhardt M, Chvatal R, Darici E, Dimitrova D, Drahonovsky J, Haj Hamoud B, Hornung D, Krämer B, Noe G, Oppelt P, Schäfer S, Seeber B, Ulrich UA, Wenzl R, De Wilde RL, Wimberger P, Senft B, Keckstein J, Montanari E, Vaineau C, Sillem M. Rates of severe complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery for deep endometriosis-a retrospective multicenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:1057-1064. [PMID: 35818905 PMCID: PMC9812092 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical experience and hospital procedure volumes have been associated with the risk of severe complications in expert centers for endometriosis in France. However, little is known about other certified units in Central European countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective observational study included 937 women who underwent surgery for colorectal endometriosis between January 2018 and January 2020 in 19 participating expert centers for endometriosis. All women underwent complete excision of colorectal endometriosis by rectal shaving, discoid or segmental resection. Postoperative severe complications were defined as grades III-IV of the Clavien-Dindo classification system including anastomotic leakage, fistula, pelvic abscess and hematoma. Surgical outcomes of centers performing less than 40 (group 1), 40-59 (group 2) and ≥60 procedures (group 3) over a period of 2 years were compared. RESULTS The overall complication rate of grade III and IV complications was 5.1% (48/937), with rates of anastomotic leakage, fistula formation, abscess and hemorrhage in segmental resection, discoid resection and rectal shaving, respectively, as follows: anastomotic leakage 3.6% (14/387), 1.4% (3/222), 0.6% (2/328); fistula formation 1.6% (6/387), 0.5% (1/222), 0.9%; (3/328); abscess 0.5% (2/387), 0% (0/222) and 0.6% (2/328); hemorrhage 2.1% (8/387), 0.9% (2/222) and 1.5% (5/328). Higher overall complication rates were observed for segmental resection (30/387, 7.8%) than for discoid (6/222, 2.7%, P = 0.015) or shaving procedures (12/328, 3.7%, P = 0.089). No significant correlation was observed between the number of procedures performed and overall complication rates (rSpearman = -0.115; P = 0.639) with a high variability of complications in low-volume centers (group 1). However, an intergroup comparison revealed a significantly lower overall severe complication rate in group 3 than in group 2 (2.9% vs 6.9%; P = 0.017) without significant differences between other groups. CONCLUSIONS A high variability in complication rates does exist in centers with a low volume of activity. Major complications may decrease with an increase in the volume of activity but this effect cannot be generally applied to all institutions and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gernot Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Center for EndometriosisHospital St. John of God; Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic and CampusViennaAustria
| | - Matthias Korell
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJohanna‐Etienne‐HospitalNeussGermany
| | - Michael Burkhardt
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedius Klinik OstfildernOstfildernGermany
| | - Radek Chvatal
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZnojmo District HospitalZnojmoCzech Republic
| | - Ezgi Darici
- Brussels IVF, Center for Reproductive Medicine Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
| | - Desislava Dimitrova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Center for Oncological SurgeryCharité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Drahonovsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Department of GynecologyUniversity of PraguePragueCzech Republic
| | - Bashar Haj Hamoud
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity SaarlandHomburgGermany
| | - Daniela Hornung
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyVidiakliniken, Diakonissen Hospital KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
| | - Bernhard Krämer
- Department of Obstetrics and Department of GynecologyUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Guenter Noe
- Department of Obstetrics and Department of GynecologyRhineland ClinicDormagenGermany
| | - Peter Oppelt
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsKepler Medical University of LinzLinzAustria
| | | | - Beata Seeber
- Department of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | - Uwe Andreas Ulrich
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMartin Luther Hospital BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Rene Wenzl
- Department of Gynecology and ObstericsMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsPius Hospital, Universitätsmedizin Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University of OldenburgOldenburgGermany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTechnical University DresdenDresdenGermany
| | | | | | - Eliana Montanari
- Department of Gynecology, Center for EndometriosisHospital St. John of God; Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic and CampusViennaAustria
| | - Cloe Vaineau
- Department of Gynecology and ObstericsMedical University of Bern, InselspitalBernSwitzerland
| | - Martin Sillem
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity SaarlandHomburgGermany,Praxisklinik am RosengartenMannheimGermany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kristine Aas-Eng M, Keckstein J, Condous G, Abrão MS, Hudelist G. Deep endometriosis: can surgical complexity and associated risk factors be evaluated with transvaginal sonography and classification systems? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 276:204-206. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
20
|
Darici E, Salama M, Bokor A, Oral E, Dauser B, Hudelist G. Different segmental resection techniques and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal endometriosis: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:705-718. [PMID: 35661342 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to analyze the available literature by conducting a systematic review to assess the possible effects of nerve-sparing segmental resection and conventional bowel resection on postoperative complications for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pubmed, Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched from 1997 to 2021 in order to perform a systematic review. Studies including patients undergoing segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis including adequate follow-up, data on postoperative complications and postoperative sequelae were enrolled in this review. Selected articles were evaluated and divided in two groups: Nerve-sparing resection (NSR), and conventional segmental resection not otherwise specified (SRNOS). Within the NSRs, studies mentioning preservation of the rectal artery supply (artery and nerve-sparing SR - ANSR) and not reporting preservation of the artery supply (NSR not otherwise specified - NSRNOS) were further analyzed. PROSPERO ID CRD42021250974. RESULTS A total of 7549 patients from 63 studies were included in the data analysis. Forty-three of these publications did not mention the preservation or the removal of the hypogastric nerve plexus, or main rectal artery supply and were summarized as SRNOS. The remaining 22 studies were listed under the NSR group. The mean size of the resected deep endometriosis lesions and patients' body mass index were comparable between SRNOS and NSR. A mean of 3.6% (0-16.6) and 2.3% (0-10.5%) of rectovaginal fistula development was reported in patients who underwent SRNOS and NSR, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates varied from 0% to 8.6% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in SRNOS compared with 0% to 8% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in patients undergoing NSR. Urinary retention (4.5% and 4.9%) and long-term bladder catheterization (4.9% and 5.6%) were frequently reported in SRNOS and NSR. There was insufficient information about pain or the recurrence rates for women undergoing SRNOS and NSR. CONCLUSIONS Current data describe the outcomes of different segmental resection techniques. However, the data are inhomogeneous and not sufficient to reach a conclusion regarding a possible advantage of one technique over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezgi Darici
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kâmil Women and Children's Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.,European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mohamed Salama
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nord Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Attila Bokor
- European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Engin Oral
- European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bernhard Dauser
- Department of General Surgery, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gernot Hudelist
- European Endometriosis League, Bordeaux, France.,Center for Endometriosis, Department of Gynecology, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ferrier C, Le Gac M, Kolanska K, Boudy A, Dabi Y, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Daraï E. Comparison of robot‐assisted and conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery for endometriosis: A prospective cohort study. Int J Med Robot 2022; 18:e2382. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Ferrier
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Marjolaine Le Gac
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Kamila Kolanska
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Anne‐Sophie Boudy
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Yohan Dabi
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
- Groupe de Recherche Clinique en endometriose (GRC‐6 Sorbonne University) Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E) Paris France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
- Groupe de Recherche Clinique en endometriose (GRC‐6 Sorbonne University) Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E) Paris France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- UMRS‐938 Sorbonne University Paris France
- Groupe de Recherche Clinique en endometriose (GRC‐6 Sorbonne University) Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E) Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Kok L, van Hanegem N, van Kesteren P, Klinkert E, Maas J, Mijatovic V, Rhemrev J, Verhoeve H, Nap A. Endometriosis centers of expertise in the Netherlands: Development toward regional networks of multidisciplinary care. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5:e447. [PMID: 35024453 PMCID: PMC8733843 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laura de Kok
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Nehalennia van Hanegem
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Paul van Kesteren
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics OLVG Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Klinkert
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Maas
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Grow - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - Velja Mijatovic
- Department of Reproductive Medicine Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Johann Rhemrev
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology Haaglanden Medical Center The Hague The Netherlands
| | - Harold Verhoeve
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics OLVG Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek Nap
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tummers FHMP, Hoebink J, Driessen SRC, Jansen FW, Twijnstra ARH. Decline in surgeon volume after successful implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: An undesired side effect? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:2082-2090. [PMID: 34490608 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The implementation of advanced minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques has broadened. An extensive body of literature shows that high hospital and surgeon volumes lead to better patient outcomes. However, no information is available regarding volume trends in the post-implementation phase of MIS. This study investigated these trends and poses suggestions to adjust these developments. This knowledge can provide guidance to optimize patient safe performance of new surgical techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS A national retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands. The number of advanced laparoscopic (level 3 and 4) and robotic procedures and the number of gynecologists performing them were collected through a web-based questionnaire to determine hospital and gynecological surgeon volume. These volumes were compared with our previously collected data from 2012. RESULTS The response rate was 85%. Hospitals produced larger volumes for advanced laparoscopic and robotic procedures. However, still 63% of the hospitals perform low-volume level 4 laparoscopic procedures. Additionally, gynecological surgeon volumes appeared to decrease for level 3 procedures, as the group of gynecologists performing fewer than 20 procedures expanded (64% vs. 44% in 2012), with 15% of the gynecologists performing fewer than ten procedures. Despite an increase in surgeon volumes for level 4 laparoscopy and robotic surgery, volumes continued to be low, as still 49% of gynecologists performed fewer than 10 level 4 procedures per year and 41% performed fewer than 20 robotic procedures per year. CONCLUSIONS The broad implementation of advanced MIS procedures resulted in an increasing number of these procedures with increasing hospital volumes. However, as a side-effect, a disproportionate rise in number of gynecologists performing these procedures was observed. Therefore, surgeon volumes remain low and even decreased for some procedures. Centralization of complex procedures and training of specialized MIS gynecologists could improve surgeon volumes and therefore consequently enhance patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasmin Hoebink
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Casals G, Carrera M, Domínguez JA, Abrão MS, Carmona F. Impact of Surgery for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis before In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:1303-1312.e5. [PMID: 33582380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare reproductive outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) before in vitro fertilization (IVF) with those in patients who underwent IVF without a previous surgery for DIE, to analyze data according to different types of surgery (complete or incomplete) or subgroups of patients (DIE with or without bowel involvement), and to assess surgical and IVF complications and data regarding safety concerns. DATA SOURCES A systematic literature search from January 1980 to November 2019 with no language restriction was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: "in vitro," "fertilization," "IVF," "assisted reproduction," "colorectal," "endometriosis," "deep," "infiltrating," "deep infiltrative endometriosis," "intestinal," "bowel," "rectovaginal," "uterosacral," "vaginal," and "bladder." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION We included studies that compared reproductive outcomes in women with infertility with DIE who received IVF with or without a previous surgery for DIE lesions. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan v.5.3; Cochrane Training, London, United Kingdom). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS The systematic search retrieved 150 articles; 98 studies were potentially eligible, and their full texts were reviewed. Of these, 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 5 presented data suitable for inclusion in a meta-analysis; however, 2 of the studies provided overlapping data, and only the larger study was finally included. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were found. The pregnancy rate per patient was 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.64), the pregnancy rate per cycle was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26-2.70), and the live birth rate per patient was 2.22 (95% CI, 1.42-3.46) times more likely for operated patients than for nonoperated ones. The addition of data from the incomplete surgery groups also showed a higher pregnancy rate per patient for surgery before IVF (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95% CI, 1.16-2.28). The results favor previous surgery in DIE with digestive involvement (OR 2.43; 95% CI, 1.13-5.22) and also in DIE without digestive involvement (OR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.61-3.95). A qualitative analysis of the complications of surgery and IVF showed a partial or complete lack of information on these issues as well as high heterogeneity in the reported data. None of these studies is an RCT; therefore, all have a high risk of selection and allocation bias, except for 1 study that statistically controlled the latter risk by using propensity scores. Funnel plots showed no asymmetry. CONCLUSION The results were very consistent for all the studied outcomes, showing a statistically significant benefit for surgery before IVF, although they should be confirmed with RCTs. In addition to the reproductive outcomes, safety data should also be reported to obtain a complete assessment of the risks and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Casals
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona (Drs. Casals and Carmona), Barcelona
| | - María Carrera
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre (Dr. Carrera), Madrid
| | - José Antonio Domínguez
- Instituto Extremeño de Reproducción Asistida (IERA Badajoz-Lisboa), Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Uson (Dr. Domínguez), Cáceres, Spain
| | - Mauricio Simões Abrão
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (Dr. Abrão), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Francisco Carmona
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona (Drs. Casals and Carmona), Barcelona.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Roman H, Marabha J, Polexa A, Prosszer M, Huet E, Hennetier C, Tuech JJ, Marpeau L. Crude complication rate is not an accurate marker of a surgeon's skill: A single surgeon retrospective series of 1060 procedures for colorectal endometriosis. J Visc Surg 2021; 158:289-298. [PMID: 33451966 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between the rate of postoperative bowel fistula and surgeon experience. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Two referral centers. PATIENTS 1060 women managed for colorectal deep endometriosis by one gynecologist surgeon from January 2005 to March 2020. INTERVENTIONS Shaving, disc excision and segmental colorectal resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rate of bowel fistula stratified according to 4 time periods: P1 from 2005 to 2009, P2 from 2010 to 2014, P3 from 2015 to June 2018 and P4 from September 2018 to March 2020. RESULTS 68 patients (6.4%) were managed during P1, 299 patients (28.2%) during P2, 422 patients (39.8%) during P3 and 271 patients (25.6%) during P4. Both diameter of rectal infiltration and rate of complex surgical procedures progressively increased from P1 to P4. Bowel fistula rate was comparable between all 4 time periods, respectively 2.9, 3.3, 4 and 4.4%. Logistic regression model revealed that risk of fistula decreased when shaving was performed when compared to segmental resection (adj OR 0.1, 95% CI 0-0.5) and increased when deep endometriosis nodules also involved sacral roots (adjOR 4.9, 95%CI 1.8-13.3) and infiltration of the vagina (adj OR 3, 95%CI 1.3-7). No statistically significant relationship was found between surgery time period and risk of fistula. CONCLUSION Crude rates of bowel fistula following surgical management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the colon and the rectum are not an accurate marker of surgeon expertise and should be considered in conjunction with expected higher risks related to challenging procedures performed by experienced surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Roman
- Endometriosis centre, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France; Department of gynaecology and obstetrics, university hospital Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - J Marabha
- Endometriosis centre, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Polexa
- Endometriosis centre, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Prosszer
- Endometriosis centre, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France
| | - E Huet
- Department of surgery, Rouen university hospital, Rouen, France
| | - C Hennetier
- Expert center in the diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of endometriosis, Rouen university hospital, Rouen, France
| | - J-J Tuech
- Department of surgery, Rouen university hospital, Rouen, France
| | - L Marpeau
- Expert center in the diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of endometriosis, Rouen university hospital, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aas-Eng MK, Montanari E, Lieng M, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Transvaginal Sonographic Imaging and Associated Techniques for Diagnosis of Ovarian, Deep Endometriosis, and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review. Semin Reprod Med 2020; 38:216-226. [PMID: 33232986 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of endometriosis and in particular deep endometriosis (DE) is crucial in the clinical management of women facing this debilitating condition. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is the first-line imaging method and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide supplemental information. However, the delay in diagnosis of up to 10 years and more is of concern. This problem might be overcome by simple steps using imaging with emphasis on TVS and referral to tertiary care. Finally, TVS is crucial in mapping extent and location of disease in planning surgical therapy and counseling women regarding various therapeutic options. This review presents the available data on imaging of endometriosis with a focus on TVS and MRI for DE, adenomyosis, and ovarian endometriomas including endometriomas in pregnancy as well as the use of "soft markers." The review presents an approach that is in accordance with the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mee Kristine Aas-Eng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eliana Montanari
- Department of Gynecology, Certified Center for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marit Lieng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joerg Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung/Endometriosis Research Group Central Europe
| | - Gernot Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Certified Center for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.,Stiftung Endometrioseforschung/Endometriosis Research Group Central Europe
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, Moawad G, Daraï E, Roman H. Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:453-466. [PMID: 32841755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of type of surgery for colorectal endometriosis-rectal shaving or discoid resection or segmental colorectal resection-on complications and surgical outcomes. DATA SOURCES We performed a systematic review of all English- and French-language full-text articles addressing the surgical management of colorectal endometriosis, and compared the postoperative complications according to surgical technique by meta-analysis. The PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies published before March 27, 2020. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: ("bowel endometriosis" or "colorectal endometriosis") AND ("surgery for endometriosis" or "conservative management" or "radical management" or "colorectal resection" or "shaving" or "full thickness resection" or "disc excision") AND ("treatment", "outcomes", "long term results" and "complications"). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Two authors conducted the literature search and independently screened abstracts for inclusion, with resolution of any difference by 3 other authors. Studies were included if data on surgical management (shaving, disc excision, and/or segmental resection) were provided and if postoperative outcomes were detailed with at least the number of complications. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendations. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Of the 168 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 60 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seventeen of these were included in the meta-analysis on rectovaginal fistula, 10 on anastomotic leakage, 5 on anastomotic stenosis, and 9 on voiding dysfunction <30 days. The mean complication rate according to shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection were 2.2%, 9.7%, and 9.9%, respectively. Rectal shaving was less associated with rectovaginal fistula than disc excision (odds ratio [OR] = 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.36; p <.001; I2 = 33%) and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; p <.001; I2 = 0%). No difference was found in the occurrence of rectovaginal fistula between disc excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.70-1.63; p = .76; I2 = 0%). Rectal shaving was less associated with leakage than disc excision (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; p = .01; I2 = 86%). No difference was found in the occurrence of leakage between rectal shaving and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-1.01; p = .05; I2 = 71%) or between disc excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.30-1.58; p = .38; I2 = 0%). Disc excision was less associated with anastomotic stenosis than segmental resection (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.48; p = .001; I2 = 59%). Disc excision was associated with more voiding dysfunction <30 days than rectal shaving (OR = 12.9; 95% CI, 1.40-119.34; p = .02; I2 = 0%). No difference was found in the occurrence of voiding dysfunction <30 days between segmental resection and rectal shaving (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 0.55-16.87; p = .20; I2 = 0%) or between segmental colorectal and discoid resections (OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.54-1.85; p = .99; I2 = 71%). CONCLUSION Colorectal surgery for endometriosis exposes patients to a risk of severe complications such as rectovaginal fistula, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and voiding dysfunction. Rectal shaving seems to be less associated with postoperative complications than disc excision and segmental colorectal resection. However, this technique is not suitable for all patients with large bowel infiltration. Compared with segmental colorectal resection, disc excision has several advantages, including shorter operating time, shorter hospital stay, and lower risk of postoperative bowel stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï); UMRS-938 (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï); Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6, Centre Expert En Endométriose (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Anne Puchar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï)
| | - Elie Vesale
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï)
| | - Gaby Moawad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia (Dr. Moawad)
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Bendifallah, Puchar, Vesale, and Daraï); UMRS-938 (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï); Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6, Centre Expert En Endométriose (Drs. Bendifallah and Daraï), Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Centre, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux (Dr Roman), France; Department of Surgical Gynaecology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark (Dr. Roman).
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Le Gac M, Ferrier C, Touboul C, Owen C, Arfi A, Boudy AS, Jayot A, Bendifallah S, Daraï E. Comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis: Pilot study of an expert center. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49:101885. [PMID: 32738498 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical management of deep endometriosis with colorectal involvement remains an option after failure of medical treatments. Conventional laparoscopy is currently considered the standard approach for surgical treatment. Recently, assisted-robotic laparoscopy emerged as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy but with low evidence. METHODS From March 2019 to September 2019, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 48 patients undergoing a surgical treatment for colorectal endometriosis (rectal shaving, discoid excision or segmental resection). The interventions were either performed by robotic or conventional laparoscopy. Patients' characteristics, operative and post-operative data were compared between the robotic and the conventional laparoscopic group. RESULTS 48 patients were included, 25 in the conventional laparoscopy group and 23 in the robotic group. Patients' characteristics and operative findings were similar between the two groups, except for a trend in a higher incidence of associated surgical urinary or digestive procedures in the robotic group (p = 0.06). The mean total surgical room occupancy time and operating time were longer in the in the robotic group (281 ± 97 min vs 208 ± 85 min; p = 0.008) and (221 ± 94 min vs 163 ± 83 min (p = 0.03), respectively. The mean intra operative blood loss, the incidence of intra operative, post-operative complication (according to Clavien-Dindo classification) rates and voiding dysfunction were similar in the two groups. The rate of grade III complication was higher in the robotic group (13 % vs 0%) without reaching a significance (p = 0.17). The mean hospital stay was 8 ± 4.4 days in the robotic group and 6.5 ± 2.6 days in the conventional laparoscopy group (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION Despite our initial experience in robotic surgery, our results support that robotic surgery is an adequate alternative to conventional laparoscopy for endometriosis colorectal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolaine Le Gac
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Clément Ferrier
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), France; UMRS-938 Sorbonne University, France
| | - Clémentine Owen
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Arfi
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Boudy
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Aude Jayot
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), France; UMRS-938 Sorbonne University, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Medicine of Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique in endometriosis (GRC-6 Sorbonne University), Centre Expert En Endometriose (C3E), France; UMRS-938 Sorbonne University, France.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gornes H, Vaysse C, Leguevaque P, Gallini A, André B, Guerby P, Kirzin S, Suc B, Motton S, Rimailho J, Weyl A, Chantalat E. Identification of a group with high risk of postoperative complications after deep bowel endometriosis surgery: a retrospective study on 164 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302:383-391. [PMID: 32500217 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05604-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identify a group with a high risk of postoperative complications after deep bowel endometriosis surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated from 2012 to 2018 in two departments of gynecological surgery at the Toulouse University Hospital, France. The postoperative complications were evaluated in relation to the surgical management, associated with or without non-digestive surgical procedures, initial disease and patient's characteristics. RESULTS 164 patients were included. A postoperative complication occurred in 37.8% (n = 62) of the cases and required a secondary surgery in 18.3% (n = 30) of the cases. In the univariate analysis, the risk of postoperative complications increased significantly in the presence of segmental resection, disease progression, and associated urinary tract procedure or vaginal incision. In the multivariate analysis, the risk of overall postoperative complications was associated with the surgical management (p = 0.013 and 0.017) and particularly in the presence of segmental resection [Odds Ratio (OR): 20.87; CI 95% (1.96-221.79)]. The risk of rectovaginal fistula increased in the presence of segmental resection [OR: 22.71; CI 95% (2.74-188.01)] as well as in vaginal incision [OR: 19.67; CI 95% (2.43-159.18); p = 0.005]. CONCLUSION The risk of overall postoperative complications and rectovaginal fistula in particular increases significantly in the presence of vaginal incision, segmental resection and urinary tract procedures after deep bowel endometriosis surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gornes
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - C Vaysse
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - P Leguevaque
- Department of General Gynecological Surgery and Breast Diseases, Clinique Pasteur - Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - A Gallini
- Epidemiology Department, Research Methodology Support Unit (USMR), Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
| | - B André
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - P Guerby
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center-Purpan, Hôpital Paule de Viguier, Toulouse, France
| | - S Kirzin
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Center-Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - B Suc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Center-Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - S Motton
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - J Rimailho
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - A Weyl
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - E Chantalat
- Department of General and Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Center (CHU)-Rangueil, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31400, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Roman H, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Forestier D, Magne E, Celhay O, Pasticier G, Susperregui J, Merlot B. [Early postoperative complications in a multidisciplinary surgical center exclusively dedicated to endometriosis: A 491-patients series]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:484-490. [PMID: 32173597 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of our study is to present the activity volume and postoperative complications in a center exclusively destined to endometriosis surgery. METHODS Retrospective mono-centric study analyzing data collected prospectively in patients surgically managed for endometriosis from September 2018 to August 2019. RESULTS Four hundred and ninety-one patients underwent surgery for endometriosis during 12 consecutive months: 268 for colorectal localizations (54.6%), 51 for endometriosis of the urinary tract (10.4%), 17 for nodules of ileum and right colon (3.5%), 43 for nodules of parametriums (8.8%), 12 for nodules of sacral roots and sciatic nerves (2.4%), 7 for diaphragmatic localizations (1.4%). Among 268 patients with colorectal endometrioses, of which 48.1% concerned the low and mid rectum, shaving was performed in 102 cases, disc excision in 96 cases and colorectal resection in 100 cases. Stoma was performed in 13.1% of the cases. Patients could have 2 different procedures for multiple colorectal nodules. One hundred and ninety-nine ovarian endometriomas were managed by plasma energy ablation in 64.8%, sclerotherapy in 11.1%, cystectomy in 13.1%, oophorectomy in 11.1%. Major postoperative complications included 12 rectovaginal fistulas, while 18 other surgical procedures were carried out for various complications. In all, 38.1% of procedures involved a general surgeon and 5.3% an urologist. CONCLUSION The creation of centers exclusively destined to endometriosis surgery allows the multidisciplinary management of a high number of patients, with an over-representation of severe forms and rare locations of the disease, followed by satisfactory complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Roman
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Département de chirurgie gynécologique et neuropelvéologie, Hôpital Universitaire d'Aarhu, Aarhus, Danemark.
| | - I Chanavaz-Lacheray
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - D Forestier
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - E Magne
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - O Celhay
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - G Pasticier
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - J Susperregui
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - B Merlot
- Centre d'endométriose, clinique Tivoli-Ducos, 220, rue Mandron, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Raimondo D, Turco LC, Cosentino F, Mabrouk M, Mastronardi M, Borghese G, Giaquinto I, Vargiu V, Fagotti A, Meriggiola MC, Chiantera V, Scambia G, Seracchioli R. Feasibility and safety of two different surgical routes for the eradication of recto‐vaginal endometriosis with vaginal mucosa infiltration (Endo‐Vag‐r study). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99:1050-1056. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Raimondo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Luigi C. Turco
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Campobasso Italy
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Campobasso Italy
| | - Mohamed Mabrouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria Alexandria Egypt
| | - Manuela Mastronardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Giulia Borghese
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Ilaria Giaquinto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Virginia Vargiu
- Department of Women's and Children's Health Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Gynecologic Oncology Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
| | - Maria C. Meriggiola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology University of Palermo Palermo Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC) S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prevesical peritoneum interposition to prevent risk of rectovaginal fistula after en bloc colorectal resection with hysterectomy for endometriosis: Results of a pilot study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019; 49:101649. [PMID: 31760180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.101649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of rectovaginal fistula after en bloc hysterectomy and colorectal resection (H-CR) for endometriosis using prevesical peritoneum interposition. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study conducted at Tenon University Hospital, expert center in endometriosis, from June 2016 to June 2018. Patients undergoing H-CR with prevesical peritoneum interposition without protective defunctioning stoma were included. RESULTS Of the 160 patients who underwent surgery with colorectal resection for endometriosis during the study period, 27 had H-CR (15 with segmental and 12 with discoïd colorectal resection) and were included. The median age (range) was 45 years (41-47.5). Eight patients (13 %) were nulliparous. All procedures were performed by laparoscopy. Parametrial resection was performed in 14 cases (52 %). Associated bowel procedures were ileocecal resection (n = 5) and appendectomy (n = 2). Median follow-up (range) was 14.6 months (10.5-20.2). Nine (33.3 %) patients experienced intra- or postoperative complications including one grade I, four grade II, two grade IIIA and two grade IIIB complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). Seven patients (26 %) experienced postoperative voiding dysfunction. One suspicion of rectovaginal fistula associated with pelvic abscess was diagnosed 4 weeks after surgery but not confirmed during a second operation. CONCLUSION Despite the small sample size, the present pilot study supports the practice of prevesical peritoneum interposition to limit the risk of rectovaginal fistula in patients who undergo H-CR for deep endometriosis.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abo C, Bendifallah S, Jayot A, Nyangoh Timoh K, Tuech JJ, Roman H, Daraï E. Discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: results from a prospective cohort from two French tertiary referral centres. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:1312-1320. [PMID: 31211894 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Using a prospective database of discoid resection performed in two tertiary referral centres, the aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, short-term complication rates and clinical outcomes, including voiding dysfunction, of the procedure. METHOD A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort database was conducted from February 2010 to October 2017 in two tertiary referral centres. One hundred and forty-eight consecutive patients scheduled for colorectal endometriosis by discoid resection were enrolled. The median follow-up was 21 months. All the women underwent complete preoperative assessment (MRI, transvaginal ultrasonography and rectal echo-endoscopy) before the removal of colorectal endometriosis. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system as minor (grades I and II) or major (grades IIIA, IIIB and IV). Cases of voiding dysfunction were also noted. RESULTS The procedure was abandoned in seven patients. In 91 (64.5%) of the remaining 141 patients, the diameter of discoid resection removed was ≥ 30 mm. Surgery was performed by laparoscopy in 137/141 cases (92.7%). Grade I-III complications were observed in 37 patients (26.2%) with 11 grade IIIb (7.8%). Postoperative voiding dysfunction occurred in 16 patients (11.3%), 11 of whom required self-catheterization for < 1 month. In a multivariate analysis including age, body mass index, lesion size and history of previous surgery for endometriosis, a history of previous surgery was independently correlated to complication outcome (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests that discoid resection is associated with good short-term results for women with colorectal endometriosis in a tertiary referral centre as it is associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Abo
- Expert Centre in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6 (GRC6-UPMC): Centre Expert En Endométriose (C3E), Paris, France.,UMR_S938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - A Jayot
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - K Nyangoh Timoh
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - J-J Tuech
- Department of Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - H Roman
- Centre of Endometriosis, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France
| | - E Daraï
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6 (GRC6-UPMC): Centre Expert En Endométriose (C3E), Paris, France.,UMR_S938 Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Guerra A, Daraï E, Osório F, Setúbal A, Bendifallah S, Loureiro A, Thomassin-Naggara I. Imaging of postoperative endometriosis. Diagn Interv Imaging 2019; 100:607-618. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
35
|
Breteau P, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Rubod C, Turck M, Sanguin S, Pop I, Resch B, Roman H. Pregnancy Rates After Surgical Treatment of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis in Infertile Patients With at Least 2 Previous In Vitro Fertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Failures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 27:1148-1157. [PMID: 31518714 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the postoperative probabilities of pregnancy in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and ≥2 previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) failures. DESIGN Retrospective study using data prospectively recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis (CIRENDO) database. SETTING University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Infertile patients under the age of 43 years, having undergone ≥2 previous IVF or ICSI failures, who were surgically managed for DIE. INTERVENTIONS Complete excision of DIE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The pregnancy rate after surgery was assessed. One hundred and four infertile patients had surgery in 7 different centers participating in the database. Seventy-seven women intended to get pregnant postoperatively. Four patients who got pregnant by oocyte donation were excluded, resulting in a sample of 73 women. The mean patient age was 31.9 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.1), and the mean length of history of infertility was 48.4 months (SD, 26.5). Stage III and IV endometriosis were recorded in 83.6% of patients. The mean postoperative follow-up was 46.6 months (SD, 20.5). The postoperative pregnancy rate was 43.8% with a mean time from surgery to pregnancy of 11.1 months. 21.8% of pregnancies were spontaneous, 31.2% were obtained by IVF, 21.8% by frozen embryo transfer, 18.7% by IVF-ICSI, and 3.1% by intrauterine insemination. Multivariate analysis revealed that ovarian surgery, age ≥35 years old, and stage II endometriosis was associated with the probability of conception. CONCLUSION Infertile women with ≥2 IVF-ICSI failures may be referred for surgery as it appears related to reasonable postoperative pregnancy rates, particularly when endometriomas surgery is either not required or not performed. Surgery for DIE does not routinely delay conception, as it usually occurs during the year following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Breteau
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs. Breteau, Chanavaz-Lacheray, and Resch)
| | - Isabella Chanavaz-Lacheray
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs. Breteau, Chanavaz-Lacheray, and Resch)
| | - Chrystele Rubod
- Department of Gynaecology, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France (Dr. Rubod)
| | - Mélusine Turck
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France (Dr. Turck)
| | - Sophie Sanguin
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France (Dr. Sanguin)
| | - Ionut Pop
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Dieppe General Hospital, Dieppe, France (Dr. Pop)
| | - Benoit Resch
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs. Breteau, Chanavaz-Lacheray, and Resch); Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clinique Mathilde, Rouen, France (Dr. Resch)
| | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Centre, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France (Dr. Roman); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (Dr. Roman).
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Favier A, Owen C, Jayot A, Ilenko A, Daraï E, Bendifallah S. [How I do…to perfom a laparoscopic colorectal discoid resection for endometriosis]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:698-699. [PMID: 31352144 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Favier
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75012 Paris, France.
| | - C Owen
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - A Jayot
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - A Ilenko
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - E Daraï
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75012 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Roman H, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Ballester M, Bendifallah S, Touleimat S, Tuech JJ, Farella M, Merlot B. High postoperative fertility rate following surgical management of colorectal endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:1669-1676. [PMID: 30052994 PMCID: PMC6112593 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are fertility outcomes in patients surgically managed for large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum who intend to get pregnant postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER Surgical management for rectal endometriosis is followed by high pregnancy rates, with a majority of natural conceptions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Optimal management such as surgery versus first-line ART for patients with severe deep endometriosis who desire pregnancy is not defined. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study included the patients enrolled in ENDORE randomized trial who attempted pregnancy after the surgery. From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a two-arm randomized trial, enrolling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring more than 20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth, and up to 50% of rectal circumference. Postoperative follow-up was prolonged in 55 patients recruited at Rouen University Hospital, and varied from 50 to 79 months. No women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients had either conservative surgery by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery by segmental resection. One gynecologist experienced in deep endometriosis surgery performed all the procedures, assisted when required by three general surgeons experienced in colorectal surgery. Institutional review board approval was obtained to extend postoperative follow-up to 10 years after the surgery. Among patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, women who intended to get pregnant after surgery were selected and followed up postoperatively every 6 months for 2 years, then every year. Pregnancy intention, fertility outcomes, conception mode, endometriosis recurrences and digestive and urinary outcomes were rigorously recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were conception mode, the delay to conception from the day of surgery and the day when hormonal treatment was stopped, and delivery rate. Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of conception after surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Among the 55 patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, 25 had conservative and 30 had radical surgery, and their postoperative follow-up varied from 50 to 79 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 55 patients, 36 intended to get pregnant after surgery, 23 of whom had unsuccessfully attempted to conceive for more than 12 months before surgery (63%). At the end of follow-up, 29 patients achieved pregnancy (81%), and natural conception was recorded in 17 of them (59% of conceptions). As several women had more than 1 pregnancy (range: 0–3), we recorded 37 pregnancies, 24 natural conceptions (65%) and 29 deliveries (78%). The probabilities of achieving pregnancy at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months postoperatively were 33.4% (95% CI: 20.6–51.3%), 60.6% (44.8–76.8%), 77% (61.5–89.6%) and 86.8% (72.8–95.8%), respectively. Women who had been advised to attempt natural conception achieved pregnancy significantly earlier than patients referred for ART (P = 0.008). In infertile patients, the postoperative pregnancy rate was 74%, and 53% of conceptions were natural. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The main outcomes of the original trial were related to digestive function and not to fertility. Several factors impacting fertility could not be revealed due to small sample size. The study included a high percentage of young women with an overall satisfactory prognosis for fertility, as patients’ median age was 28 years. The inclusion of only large infiltrations of the rectum does not allow the extrapolation of conclusions to small nodules of <2 cm in length. Only one skilled gynecologic surgeon performed all the procedures. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS First-line surgery can be considered in patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum and pregnancy intention. Patients receiving advice from experienced surgeons on conception modes were more likely to conceive faster after surgery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by a grant from the clinical research program for hospitals (PHRC) in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The original randomized trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT 01291576).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horace Roman
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Isabella Chanavaz-Lacheray
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Marcos Ballester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,GRC-6 UPMC: Centre Expert en Endométriose (C3E), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.,Unité INSERM UMR_S 938, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,GRC-6 UPMC: Centre Expert en Endométriose (C3E), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.,Unité INSERM UMR_S 938, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Salma Touleimat
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | - Marilena Farella
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vercellini P, Viganò P, Frattaruolo MP, Borghi A, Somigliana E. Bowel surgery as a fertility-enhancing procedure in patients with colorectal endometriosis: methodological, pathogenic and ethical issues. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:1205-1211. [PMID: 29741687 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Bowel surgery for colorectal endometriosis is being promoted to infertile women without severe sub-occlusive symptoms, with the objective of improving the likelihood of conception. Contrary to rectal shaving, bowel surgery involving full-thickness disk excision and segmental resection entails opening of the intestinal lumen thus increasing the risk of postoperative infectious complications. About 1 in 10 patients undergoing colorectal resection for intestinal endometriosis will experience severe sequelae, including anastomotic dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula formation, and bladder and bowel denervation. Similar to other surgical procedures aiming at enhancing fertility in women with endometriosis, bowel surgery has been introduced into clinical practice without adequate evaluation through randomized controlled trials. According to systematic literature reviews based mainly on case series, the incremental gain of adding bowel procedures to standard surgery appears uncertain in terms of pregnancy rate after both natural attempts and IVF. Considering the methodological drawbacks and the high risk of bias in the available observational studies, it is not possible to exclude the suggestion that the benefit of colorectal surgery has been overestimated. Given the risk of harms to women's health and the important ethical implications, less emphasis should be put on strict statistical significance and more emphasis should be placed on the magnitude of the effect size. In this regard, the published data may not be generalizable, as the surgeons publishing their results may not be representative of all surgeons. Until the results of adequately designed and conducted RCTs are available, colorectal surgery with the sole intent of improving the reproductive performance of infertile patients with intestinal endometriosis should be performed exclusively within research settings and by highly experienced surgeons. Women should be informed about the uncertainties regarding the harms and benefits of bowel surgery in different clinical conditions, and preoperative counselling must be conducted impartially with the objective of achieving a truly shared medical decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Vercellini
- Gynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda 12, Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Viganò
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Pina Frattaruolo
- Gynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda 12, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borghi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan, Italy
| | - Edgardo Somigliana
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan, Italy.,Infertility Departmental Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Fanti 6, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Surgeon Volume in Benign Gynecologic Surgery: Review of Outcomes, Impact on Training, and Ethical Contexts. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26:279-287. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
40
|
Bar-Shavit Y, Jaillet L, Chauvet P, Canis M, Bourdel N. Use of indocyanine green in endometriosis surgery. Fertil Steril 2018; 109:1136-1137. [PMID: 29885885 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report and visually demonstrate the feasibility of using indocyanine green (ICG) in endometriosis surgery and to discuss potential benefits. DESIGN ICG fluorescent imaging has been validated to assess tissue perfusion with clinical use in many medical fields, including gynecology and digestive surgery, but has not described in endometriosis surgery for bowel assessment. To our knowledge, there is no validated, objective, intraoperative method to assess the vascularity of the operated bowel in endometriosis surgery, a potentially good indicator for postoperative fistula formation. Our center is conducting a registered clinical trial examining the use of ICG to evaluate the bowel vascularization after endometriosis rectal shaving surgery, and the potential role in reducing fistula rates (Institutional Review Board no 2016-002773-35). SETTING Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT(S) Three patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with the use of a rectal shaving procedure. INTERVENTIONS(S) Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DIE with a rectal shaving procedure were injected with ICG intravenously at the end of endometriosis resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Visual assessment of the rectal shaving area was assessed as fluoresced or not with the use of a Likert-type scale (0 = no fluorescence; 4 = very good fluorescence). RESULT(S) After ICG injection, all three patients have showed very good fluorescence levels at the rectal shaving area with no adverse reactions. Other uses of ICG are demonstrated throughout the video (vaginal cuff, ureter, and ovary assessment). CONCLUSION(S) ICG fluorescent imaging is feasible in endometriosis surgery, and there is an ongoing trial to determine if its use reduces postoperative fistula formation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03080558.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yochay Bar-Shavit
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Estaing, Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Lucie Jaillet
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Estaing, Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Faculty of Medecine, ALCoV UMR6284, CNRS/Université d'Auvergne, ISIT, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Pauline Chauvet
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Estaing, Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Faculty of Medecine, ALCoV UMR6284, CNRS/Université d'Auvergne, ISIT, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michel Canis
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Estaing, Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Faculty of Medecine, ALCoV UMR6284, CNRS/Université d'Auvergne, ISIT, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Bourdel
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Estaing, Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Faculty of Medecine, ALCoV UMR6284, CNRS/Université d'Auvergne, ISIT, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Daraï E, Bendifallah S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Golfier F. [Creation of expert centers on endometriosis]. Presse Med 2017; 46:1218-1222. [PMID: 29169709 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2017.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is a frequent pathology with a high incidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis and complex forms that can affect 20% of patients with endometriosis. The incidence of infertility associated with endometriosis can reach 50%. The complexity of care requires the creation of expert centers working in networks with general practitioners. Criteria for defining these expert centers are being drawn up, based on structural criteria (multidisciplinary consultation meeting), links with medical assistance structures for procreation and activity criteria for severe and complex forms (number of interventions per center and per surgeon).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Daraï
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Tenon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine, 4, rue de La Chine, 75020 Paris 6, France; Hôpital Tenon, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), groupe de recherche clinique (GRC-6 UMPC), 75020 Paris, France; UMRS-938, Paris 6, 75012, Paris, France; Hôpital Tenon, centre de diagnostic en un jour de l'endométriose (CDJE), 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Tenon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine, 4, rue de La Chine, 75020 Paris 6, France; Hôpital Tenon, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), groupe de recherche clinique (GRC-6 UMPC), 75020 Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Tenon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine, 4, rue de La Chine, 75020 Paris 6, France; Hôpital Tenon, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), groupe de recherche clinique (GRC-6 UMPC), 75020 Paris, France; UMRS-938, Paris 6, 75012, Paris, France; Hôpital Tenon, centre de diagnostic en un jour de l'endométriose (CDJE), 75020 Paris, France
| | - François Golfier
- CHU de Lyon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique, 69000 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|