Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery

Integrating minimally invasive bariatric surgery with lessons from gastric cancer surgery

Laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery are evolving to enhance cosmetic outcomes and minimize postoperative complications. This study demonstrates the results of bariatric surgery achieved through the application of surgical techniques derived from gastric cancer surgery. Several surgical techniques from gastric cancer surgery were implemented in bariatric surgery, including: (1) V-shaped liver retraction, (2) Reduced port surgery, (3) Intraoperative endoscopy and (4) Multi-degree-of-freedom articulating device. A single surgeon, with experience in over 1000 gastric cancer surgeries, performed consecutive bariatric surgeries starting from the initial case. The study analyzed short-term results, including operation details, postoperative complications, outcomes of weight loss, and the learning curve. A total 94 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cases were performed from 2019 to 2022. The mean age of 94 patients was 35.9 ± 9.7 years, with 58 (61.7%) being female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 40.9 ± 6.2. Type 2 diabetes was prevalent in 46.8% of the patients. On average, 3.3 ± 0.5 trocars were used per surgery. The mean estimated blood loss and hospital stay after surgery were 20.1 ± 36.3 cc and 3.3 ± 0.6 days, respectively. There were no complications reported for postoperative leakage, bleeding, or passage disturbance, and no mortality occurred. At 12 months, the mean percentage total weight loss (%TWL) and excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) were 28.5% and 79.7%, respectively. The mean operation times was 109.5 ± 27.4 min, with a plateau observed at around the 30th case. Bariatric surgery can be effectively performed by a gastric cancer expert surgeon using techniques derived from gastric cancer surgery.

Rare Complications Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable therapeutic intervention for patients with obesity. In recent years, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most commonly performed primary MBS procedure owing to its technical feasibility and excellent short-term outcomes. Despite these favorable results and perceived advantages, SG is associated with several unique complications. Complications such as a postoperative leak or bleeding have been more commonly observed and reported than others, and their management approaches are well described. However, other complications following SG are far less familiar to surgeons, which may delay recognition and result in poor patient outcomes. Of these complications, we describe splenic injuries; esophageal perforation; staple line malformations; stapling of intraluminal devices; phytobezoar formation; gastro-colic, gastro-pleural and gastro-bronchial fistula; pancreatic leak; and portomesenteric venous thrombosis. It is paramount for surgeons to be aware of these underreported issues and have the resources to learn how to recognize and manage them when they arise. This review aims to describe rare (i.e., reported incidence <1%) and underdescribed complications after SG, focusing on causes, clinical presentation, prevention strategies, and management.

Preoperative Dexamethasone for Airway-Related "Calibration Tube" Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomised Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgeries utilise Bougie device to guide stomach resection. The device implementation is associated with many underreported complications. This study aims to compare nebulised vs. intravenous preoperative dexamethasone in mitigating airway-related Bougie complications after sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODOLOGY

This is a prospective double-blinded interventional study conducted by a tertiary hospital. The study involved 105 patients allocated to 3 groups: Group (I) received 8 mg dexamethasone intravenously (IV) preoperatively, group (N) received 8 mg dexamethasone from a nebulizer mask preoperatively, and Group (S) received nebulised normal saline. Outcomes evaluated were postoperative sore throat, odynophagia, change of voice, and nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Nebulized dexamethasone was found to be significantly superior to IV dexamethasone in terms of postoperative sore throat at zero-hour (p = 0.001) and 1-h intervals (p = 0.011). No significant difference was found at 6- and 24-h intervals. For odynophagia, post hoc analysis showed there was no significant difference between (I), (N), and (S) groups. Incidence of change of voice was significantly lower in (N) and (I) groups compared to (S) group, with p values of 0.0067 and 0.00014, respectively. The incidence of post-operative sore-throat (PONV) in (I) group was significantly lower than incidences in (S) group (p = 0.00002) and (N) group (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative nebulized and IV dexamethasone are effective strategies in mitigating complications related to mechanical effects of Bougie insertion. IV dexamethasone was as effective as nebulized dexamethasone in terms of late postoperative sore throat, and was superior in postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Inadvertent stapling of the orogastric tube during bariatric surgery: Report of 3 cases and a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Entrapment of an orally introduced tube by stapling/stitching is an intra-operative complication of bariatric surgery with grave consequences. Incidence is unknown. No prevention/management strategy is available. A systematic review was performed to assess the absolute reported observed risk and incidence. Additionally, data on 3 cases during our entire sleeve gastrectomy (SG) experience is evaluated.

METHODS

Literature is reviewed using PubMed/Web of science data-bases. Data was recorded prospectively. Videos of orally introduced tube staplings were re-watched, presentation/recognition/management were re-evaluated. A protocol ensuring the removal of the small caliber orogastric tube (OGT) by the surgeons direct inspection was introduced after the 3rd entrapment.

RESULTS

Review revealed OGT as the most commonly entrapped tube following temperature probe and bougie. SG/stapling were the most common causative operation/reason, respectively. Leak rates over 20%, conversion, early-late re-operations and mortality were reported. During our 948 consecutive SGs, 3 OGT entrapments (0.32%), third one with double stapling, occurred. All were recognized/managed intraoperatively by freeing the entrapped-end of the OGT from the sleeve part of the staple-line. In doubly stapled case, second transected end could only be recognized when routine reinforcement suturing come in proximity. Defects were continuously stitched with barbed suture. No morbidity occurred. One-year excess-weight-loss was 82%. A pre-protocol incidence of 0.56% (n: 3/534) dropped to nil in the remaining 414.

CONCLUSION

Iatrogenic stapling of the OGT during SG is rare, but morbid. It must be avoided by a strict protocol. Upon occurrence/recognition, stapling must immediately stop until the "entirety" of the tube, including the "specimen-part", is retrieved, to avoid double entrapment.

Technical review: Vertical sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents

Sleeve gastrectomy is an effective tool for inducing sustainable weight loss in adolescents with obesity. It is a seemingly straight-forward procedure, and yet deceptive in technical nuances. This review highlights the technical preparation (equipment, patient positioning, pre-operative management), and conduct (anatomy, instruments, methodology, pitfalls) of the operation, and concludes with essentials for anticipating and managing complications of the operation. Throughout the discussion, we emphasize practical techniques to maintain patient safety while achieving maximum weight loss benefits.