Results of the FUSE Evaluation Project in France

SAGES SAFE CHOLE program changes surgeons practice in France-results of the FCVD implementation of SAFE CHOLE in France

BACKGROUND

With the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons supervision, the Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force (SAFE CHOLE) was translated into French by the the Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) and adopted to run on its national e-learning platform for surgical continuing medical education (CME). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the SAFE CHOLE (SF) program on the knowledge and practice of French surgeons performing cholecystectomy and participating in the FCVD lead CME activity.

METHODS

To obtain CME certification, each participant must fill out three FCVD validated questionnaires regarding (1) the participants' routine practice for cholecystectomy, (2) the participants' knowledge and practice after successful completion of the program, and (3) the educational value of the SC program.

RESULTS

From 2021 to 2022, 481 surgeons completed the program. The overall satisfaction rate for the program was 81%, and 53% of the surgeons were practicing routine cholangiography before the SC program. Eighty percent declared having acquired new knowledge. Fifty-six percent reported a change in their practice of cholecystectomy. Of those, 46% started routinely using the critical view of safety, 12% used a time-out prior transection of vital structures, and 11% adopted routine intraoperative cholangiography. Sixty-seven percent reported performing a sub-total cholecystectomy in case the CVS was unobtainable. If faced with BDI, 45% would transfer to a higher level of care, 33% would seek help from a colleague, and 10% would proceed with a repair. Ninety percent recommended adoption of SC by all general surgeons and 98% reported improvement of patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Large-scale implementation of the SC program in France is feasible within a broad group of diverse specialty surgeons and appears to have a significant impact on their practice. These data should encourage other surgeons and health systems to engage in this program.

Impact of the fundamental use of surgical energy certification on surgeons' behavior and awareness of safe use of energy devices: a cross-sectional survey research

BACKGROUND

The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program was established to educate surgeons and trainees to promote awareness and behaviors for the safe use of surgical energy devices. Despite its implementation, the impact of FUSE certification on surgeons' behavior and safety awareness regarding practice of energy devices remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the perceived impact of FUSE certification on surgeons' behavior and awareness regarding the safe use of surgical energy devices.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive cross-sectional survey study, using non probabilistic purposive sampling, and distributed 22-item web-based questionnaires among all 59 FUSE-certified surgeons in Japan, excluding operating room nurses and medical students. The questionnaire items covered demographics, surgical techniques using various energy devices, changes in behavior and safety awareness, communication with colleagues about surgical energy devices, and educational activities related to energy devices.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven participants completed the questionnaire (response rate 96.6%). Most surgeons (91.3%) could apply material learned from the FUSE program in practice, especially material related to monopolar electrosurgery. Fifty-six surgeons (98.3%) reported increased awareness of surgical safety, and 35 (61.5%) reported increased communication with operating room personnel about the safe use of energy devices. Moreover, 56 participants (98.3%) indicated a need for systematic education in surgical energy, with participants recommending fellows (94.7% of participants specified that fellows should participate in further education), residents (75.4%), and attending surgeons (63.2%) as the target recipients of this training. Conclusions After FUSE certification, not only did surgeons' knowledge increase, but their energy-related surgical techniques in practice also improved. Furthermore, FUSE-certified surgeons felt that they were more aware of surgical-energy safety and were dedicated to its promotion.

Knowledge Assessment among Surgeons about Energy Devices safe use: A Multicenter Cross Sectional Study

Objective: To assess General Surgery trainee’s knowledge about safe use of energy devices in two tertiary hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Electro surgery is the use of high-frequency electrical energy to achieve cutting, and coagulation. This method has become ubiquitous worldwide for the purpose of achieving rapid hemostasis and rapid dissection of tissues Methods:   Participants completed a 35-item multiple choice question examination, testing critical knowledge of ES. The examination was developed according to the objectives and blueprints of SAGES’ Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy curriculum. Sections of the examination included: principles of ES, ES-related adverse events, monopolar and bipolar devices, and pediatric considerations and interference with implantable devices.’’ Scores were compared between juniors and seniors participants. Results: A total of 51 general surgical trainees from two academic hospitals completed the assessment. 15.69% of the participants correctly answered 30 questions out of 35 questions, 39.22% of the participants responded correctly to 20 questions out of 35 answers, and 45.09 who responded correctly to less than 20 questions. It was found that 52.2% of the individuals with a low level of understanding were junior residents as opposed to 87.5% of the participants with the highest level of understanding were senior residents with a significant P-value of 0.04. Conclusions: majority of general surgery residents enrolled in the Saudi Arabian board of surgery lack adequate knowledge about the safe and efficient use of surgical energy devices. The level of understanding is lower among the junior residents than seniors.

Equipment failures in laparoscopic surgery: Causes and consequences

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess incidence, causes and consequences of equipment failures in a high volume, advanced endoscopic surgery department.

METHODS

This is a prospectical observational single centre study between April and July of 2019 in the Gynecological surgery department of the Estaing University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France. During the study period, 171 laparoscopies were observed. Data were collected real time by three supernumerary observers.

RESULTS

In total, 66 (38.6%) laparoscopies were complicated by equipment failures. The bipolar cable and forceps accounted for 31% of the total amount of malfunctions in laparoscopy. Causes of malfunctions were in 45% due to the instrument per se and in 43% due to the incorrect combination of elements. Less commonly, the equipment was not available or a mismatched was reported. The total length of the surgery increased by 1.35% due to the malfunctions. Human error was identified in 50% of cases. No morbility, neither mortality was reported in this series; however we observed 34 malfunctions that could have led to serious consequences for the patients and 3 incidents induced a real consequence on the operation workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Equipment failure is a common event in endoscopy. On the opposite, time wasted for the malfunctions is low in laparoscopy, as it only accounts for 1.35% of the overall surgical time. Human decisions contributed to malfunctions in almost half of cases. This alarming finding may advise for intensification in training on instruments of the whole surgical team.

Lack of awareness among surgeons regarding safe use of electrosurgery. A cross sectional survey of surgeons in Pakistan

Objective

To assess our surgeons perceptive regarding the safe usage of electrosurgical devices.

Method

ology: This cross sectional survey was carried out at two hospitals, A cancer hospital and a public sector general hospital. Consultants, fellows and senior residents (Resident year 3rd and year 4th) on the surgical floor were requested to fill up the questionnaire. Calculations were performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 20) for Windows version 20 statistical software. Data was described using median with minimum and maximum value for quantitative variables. For categorical variables, number of observations and percentages were reported. The study is complied with hospital guidelines on research involving human subjects.

Results

Out of 80 questionnaires 52 were filled and returned. 12 consultants, 16 fellows/Senior registrars and 24 senior residents filled their questionnaires. For the sake of anonymity no information was obtained regarding the level of training and experience. Total 12 questions were asked. An expert level was set for a score above 10/12. A moderate level was set at 8/12. A score of less than 8 was considered unsafe for using electrosurgical devices. Only 6 (11.5%) participants had an expert level of understanding. 16 (30.7%) had moderate understanding. 30 (57.7%) were considered unsafe regarding use of electrosurgical devices. 85% participants were not aware of the correct mode of current to use for coagulating vessels. 69% of surgeons would use electrocautery to control staple line bleeds. 67% participants weren't aware of the correct placement of dispersive electrode. 60% couldn't identify a safe device for use in patients with a pacemaker. 46% of surgeons would cut a dispersive electrode to fit it on a child. 69% believed that harmonic scalpel was a bipolar cautery. 61% couldn't differentiate between RFA and Microwave Ablation. 63% didn't know how to handle an operating room fire.

Conclusion

In these two hospitals, high level of ignorance noticed regarding the procedure and indications of basic electrosurgical equipment which needs raising awareness and further training.

•

The first study to show the lack of understanding of electrosurgical devices among surgeons in Pakistan.

•

Study was performed in 2 hospitals and included consultants, fellows and residents

•

A survey was distributed and questions pertinent to the use of electrosurgical devices were asked.

•

Surgical residents, fellows and consultants were equally unaware of how these devices work.

•

Study highlights the need to start training courses for these devices.