Outcomes of routine upper gastrointestinal series screening and surveillance after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the surgically altered patient

As management of upper gastrointestinal malignancies improves, and with popularization of bariatric surgery, endoscopists are likely to meet patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy. Short-term, the surgery can cause complications like bleeding, leaks, and fistulas, and longer-term problems such as intestinal or biliary anastomotic strictures or biliary stones can arise, all necessitating endoscopy. In addition, the usual upper gastrointestinal pathologies can also still occur. These patients pose unique challenges. To proceed, understanding the new layout of the upper gastrointestinal tract is essential. The endoscopist, armed with a clear plan for navigation, can readily diagnose and manage most commonly occurring conditions, such as marginal ulcers and proximal anastomotic strictures with standard endoscopic instruments. With complex reconstructions involving long segments of small bowel, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, utilization of balloon-assisted enteroscopy may be necessary, mandating modification of procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Successful endoscopic management of patients with altered anatomy will require prior planning and preparation to ensure the appropriate equipment, setting, and skill set is provided.

Late-Onset Gastric Band Erosion Following Heavy Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) surgery is now an uncommon bariatric procedure; however, complications may still be encountered. A 64-year-old man with a history of LAGB placement 13 years prior presented with 2 months of epigastric pain. He endorsed chronic heavy nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Computed tomography showed inflammation around the LAGB tubing with near-complete, circumferential erosion of the LAGB into the fundus. Upper endoscopy confirmed erosion of the LAGB along with port tubing into the gastroesophageal junction and fundus. The patient was referred to a foregut surgeon who performed robotic band removal.

Third time's a charm: band to sleeve to bypass

BACKGROUND

Adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are frequently converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to weight recurrence or band complications. Such conversions carry a higher-risk than primary procedures. Some patients undergo two conversions-from AGB to SG, and subsequently from SG to RYGB. This presents a unique situation with limited literature on indications and complication rates associated with these double conversions.

METHODS

We examined the 2020-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use File to evaluate conversions from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. Patient and operative characteristics, along with outcomes, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

We identified 276 patients who underwent a conversion from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. The primary reason for the second conversion (SG to RYGB) was gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at 55.1%, followed by inadequate weight loss or weight regain (IWL/WR) at 36.9%. The remaining reasons included dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, or others. Patients converted for IWL/WR demonstrated a higher baseline body mass index and prevalence of sleep apnea compared to other cohorts (both p < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients in the "other reasons" group had the highest rate of open surgical approaches (9.1%) and concurrent lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.022), with correspondingly higher rates of anastomotic leak, reoperations, serious complications, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing double conversions (AGB to SG to RYGB) do so primarily for GERD or IWL/WR. Further research is required to better define the optimal primary operation for each patient, aiming to reduce the necessity for multiple conversions.

Surgical approaches for achalasia and obesity: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Synchronous and metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity are increasingly common. There is limited data to guide the combined or staged surgical approaches to these conditions.

METHODS

A systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) and patient-level meta-analysis of published cases were performed to examine the most effective surgical approach for patients with synchronous or metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies with 93 patients were reviewed. Eighteen patients underwent concurrent achalasia and bariatric surgery, with the most common (n = 12, 72.2%) being laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This combination achieved 68.9% excess weight loss and 100% remission of achalasia (mean follow-up: 3 years). Seven (6 RYGB, 1 biliopancreatic diversion) patients had bariatric surgery following achalasia surgery. Of these, all 6 RYGBs had satisfactory bariatric outcomes, with complete remission of their achalasia (mean follow-up: 1.8 years). Sixty-eight patients underwent myotomy following bariatric surgery; the majority (n = 55, 80.9%) were following RYGB. In this scenario, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) achieved higher treatment success than LHM (n = 33 of 35, 94.3% vs. n = 14 of 20, 70.0%, p = 0.021). Moreover, conversion to RYGB following a restrictive bariatric procedure during achalasia surgery was also associated with higher achalasia treatment success.

CONCLUSION

In patients with concurrent achalasia and obesity, LHM and RYGB achieved good outcomes for both pathologies. For those with weight gain post-achalasia surgery, RYGB provided satisfactory weight loss, without adversely affecting achalasia symptoms. For those with achalasia after bariatric surgery, POEM and conversion to RYGB produced greater treatment success.

[One-anastomosis gastric bypass with a short limb]

OBJECTIVE

To develop an acceptable method of surgical treatment of patients with obesity grade 1 and 2 in accordance with the following criteria: high safety, no risk or minimal risk of intestinal malabsorption, no limitations for postoperative gastrointestinal examination, no need for organ resection and surgical reversibility in case of necessity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In accordance with the above-mentioned criteria, we have modified OAGB (one-anastomosis gastric bypass). A gastric tube was formed from a lesser curvature using 33Fr stomach catheter with a length of at least 25 cm. Manual retrogastric retrocolic anastomosis in «end-to-side» fashion was performed within 20 cm from the ligament of Treitz. This type of anastomosis made it possible to preserve gastric tube length as much as possible that reduces the risk of jejunogastroesophageal reflux.

RESULTS

There were 16 patients (15 females and 1 male) aged 23-48 years for the period from June 2019 till March 2020. Mean weight of patients was 86.12 kg (range 62-124). Mean BMI was 35.15 kg/m² (ranged 21.96-39.62). In 6 months after surgery, all patients achieved normal BMI. Man BMI dropped to 23.8 kg/m². Minimal excessive weight loss was 81.8%, maximal excessive weight loss - 125%. Control esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in 5 patients after 6 months and later. During retrograde duodenoscopy, we visualized major duodenal papilla in all cases using a flexible endoscope with standard optic system.

CONCLUSION

The proposed modification of one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a short limb is a safe and effective procedure in bariatric surgery. This surgery ensures postoperative diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures in all parts of stomach and duodenum. This method could be recommended for surgical treatment of patients with obesity grade 1 and 2 after additional clinical trials and analysis of long-term results.