1
|
Barbosa EC, Ortegal GHPC, de Andrade LS, Costa MR, Santos AMS. Efficacy and safety of preoperative duloxetine in reducing post-laparoscopic surgery pain: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Int J Clin Pharm 2025; 47:294-303. [PMID: 39812914 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01855-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies suggest that duloxetine administration before non-laparoscopic surgery may reduce postoperative pain and analgesic requirement without increasing adverse event occurrence. AIM To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on preoperative administration of duloxetine versus placebo for postoperative pain relief in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery, assessing efficacy- and safety-related outcomes. METHOD We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library, covering all records up to July 19, 2024. Inclusion criteria consisted of RCTs comparing preoperative administration of duloxetine versus placebo in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery and reporting at least one outcome of interest. The random-effects model was used to estimate the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR), along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). RESULTS We included four RCTs (227 patients). Compared with placebo, duloxetine provided a statistically lower pain scores at 2 (MD - 1.04; 95%CI - 1.75, - 0.33), 4 (MD - 1.28; 95%CI - 1.77, - 0.79), 8 (MD - 1.22; 95%CI - 1.72, - 0.72), 12 (MD - 1.64; 95%CI - 2.88, - 0.41), and 24 h (MD - 1.05; 95%CI - 1.72, - 0.39) after surgery. Duloxetine also granted a statistically longer time to first analgesic requirement (MD 128.38 min; 95%CI 41.31, 215.46), compared with placebo. Additionally, the duloxetine group had a significantly lower risk of nausea/vomiting (RR 0.48; 95%CI 0.25, 0.90), while there were no significant differences between both groups for the risk of dizziness, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, duloxetine administration before laparoscopic surgery significantly minimized postoperative pain intensity, delayed analgesic requirement, and reduced nausea/vomiting risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Cerchi Barbosa
- Department of Medicine, Evangelical University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Km 3.5, Cidade Universitária, Anápolis, GO, 75083-515, Brazil.
| | | | - Lucas Santos de Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Evangelical University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Km 3.5, Cidade Universitária, Anápolis, GO, 75083-515, Brazil
| | - Milena Rodrigues Costa
- Department of Medicine, Evangelical University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Km 3.5, Cidade Universitária, Anápolis, GO, 75083-515, Brazil
| | - Andreia Moreira Silva Santos
- Department of Medicine, Evangelical University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Km 3.5, Cidade Universitária, Anápolis, GO, 75083-515, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leyendecker J, Prasse T, Park C, Köster M, Rumswinkel L, Shenker T, Bieler E, Eysel P, Bredow J, Zaki MM, Kathawate V, Harake E, Joshi RS, Konakondla S, Kashlan ON, Derman P, Telfeian A, Hofstetter CP. 90-Day Emergency Department Utilization and Readmission Rate After Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis of 821 Patients. Neurosurgery 2025; 96:318-327. [PMID: 39023273 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Emergency department (ED) utilization and readmission rates after spine surgery are common quality of care measures. Limited data exist on the evaluation of quality indicators after full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS). The objective of this study was to detect rates, causes, and risk factors for unplanned postoperative clinic utilization after FESS. METHODS This retrospective multicenter analysis assessed ED utilization and clinic readmission rates after FESS performed between 01/2014 and 04/2023 for degenerative spinal pathologies. Outcome measures were ED utilizations, hospital readmissions, and revision surgeries within 90 days postsurgery. RESULTS Our cohort includes 821 patients averaging 59 years of age, who underwent FESS. Most procedures targeted the lumbar or sacral spine (85.75%) while a small fraction involved the cervical spine (10.11%). The most common procedures were lumbar unilateral laminotomies for bilateral decompression (40.56%) and lumbar transforaminal discectomies (25.58%). Within 90 days postsurgery, 8.0% of patients revisited the ED for surgical complications. A total of 2.2% of patients were readmitted to a hospital of which 1.9% required revision surgery. Primary reasons for ED visits and clinic readmissions were postoperative pain exacerbation, transient neurogenic bladder dysfunction, and recurrent disk herniations. Our multivariate regression analysis revealed that female patients had a significantly higher likelihood of using the ED ( P = .046; odds ratio: 1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.1 5.69% vs 10.33%). Factors such as age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index, comorbidities, and spanned spinal levels did not significantly predict postoperative ED utilization. CONCLUSION This analysis demonstrates the safety of FESS, as evidenced by acceptable rates of ED utilization, clinic readmission, and revision surgery. Future studies are needed to further elucidate the safety profile of FESS in comparison with traditional spinal procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannik Leyendecker
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle , Washington , USA
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
| | - Tobias Prasse
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
| | - Christine Park
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Malin Köster
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
| | - Lena Rumswinkel
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
| | - Tara Shenker
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale-Davie , Florida , USA
| | - Eliana Bieler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Peer Eysel
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
| | - Jan Bredow
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany
| | - Mark M Zaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Varun Kathawate
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Edward Harake
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Rushikesh S Joshi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Sanjay Konakondla
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Neuroscience Institute, Danville , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Osama N Kashlan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | | | - Albert Telfeian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence , Rhode Island , USA
| | - Christoph P Hofstetter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle , Washington , USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wachtendorf LJ, Ahrens E, Suleiman A, von Wedel D, Tartler TM, Rudolph MI, Redaelli S, Santer P, Munoz-Acuna R, Santarisi A, Calderon HN, Kiyatkin ME, Novack L, Talmor D, Eikermann M, Schaefer MS. The association between intraoperative low driving pressure ventilation and perioperative healthcare-associated costs: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. J Clin Anesth 2024; 98:111567. [PMID: 39191081 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE A low dynamic driving pressure during mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia has been associated with a lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications (PRC), a key driver of healthcare costs. It is, however, unclear whether maintaining low driving pressure is clinically relevant to measure and contain costs. We hypothesized that a lower dynamic driving pressure is associated with lower costs. DESIGN Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING Two academic healthcare networks in New York and Massachusetts, USA. PATIENTS 46,715 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for non-ambulatory (inpatient and same-day admission) surgery between 2016 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS The primary exposure was the median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs, which were matched with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to report absolute differences in total costs in United States Dollars (US$). We assessed effect modification by patients' baseline risk of PRC (score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications [SPORC] ≥ 7) and effect mediation by rates of PRC (including post-extubation saturation < 90%, re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation within 7 days) and other major complications. MAIN RESULTS The median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure was 17.2cmH2O (IQR 14.0-21.3cmH2O). In adjusted analyses, every 5cmH2O reduction in dynamic driving pressure was associated with a decrease of -0.7% in direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs (95%CI -1.3 to -0.1%; p = 0.020). When a dynamic driving pressure below 15cmH2O was maintained, -US$340 lower total perioperative healthcare-associated costs were observed (95%CI -US$546 to -US$132; p = 0.001). This association was limited to patients at high baseline risk of PRC (n = 4059; -US$1755;97.5%CI -US$2495 to -US$986; p < 0.001), where lower risks of PRC and other major complications mediated 10.7% and 7.2% of this association (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative mechanical ventilation targeting low dynamic driving pressures could be a relevant measure to reduce perioperative healthcare-associated costs in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Queen Rania St, Amman, 11942, Jordan; Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America.
| | - Dario von Wedel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America
| | - Maíra I Rudolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, Cologne 50937, Germany.
| | - Simone Redaelli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126 Milan, Italy.
| | - Peter Santer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Abeer Santarisi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America; Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Jordan University Hospital, Queen Rania St, Amman 11942, Jordan.
| | - Harold N Calderon
- Department of Finance, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Michael E Kiyatkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America.
| | - Lena Novack
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Daniel Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Matthias Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America; Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen 45147, Germany.
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Moorenstraße 5, Duesseldorf 40225, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoo N, Mun JY, Kye BH, Kim CW, Lee JI, Park YY, Kang BM, Park BK, Kwak HD, Kang WK, Bae SU, Oh HK, Hong Y, Kim HJ. Plastic Wound Protector vs Surgical Gauze for Surgical Site Infection Reduction in Open GI Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:737-746. [PMID: 38656413 PMCID: PMC11044008 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Surgical site infections (SSIs) are prevalent hospital-acquired infections with significant patient impacts and global health care burdens. The World Health Organization recommends using wound protector devices in abdominal surgery as a preventive measure to lower the risk of SSIs despite limited evidence. OBJECTIVE To examine the efficacy of a dual-ring, plastic wound protector in lowering the SSI rate in open gastrointestinal (GI) surgery irrespective of intra-abdominal contamination levels. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter, patient-blinded, parallel-arm randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2017 to October 2022 at 13 hospitals in an academic setting. Patients undergoing open abdominal bowel surgery (eg, for bowel perforation) were eligible for inclusion. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized 1:1 to a dual-ring, plastic wound protector to protect the incision site of the abdominal wall (experimental group) or a conventional surgical gauze (control group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was the rate of SSI within 30 days of open GI surgery. RESULTS A total of 458 patients were randomized; after 1 was excluded from the control group, 457 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [12.1] years; 256 [56.0%] male; 341 [74.6%] with a clean-contaminated wound): 229 in the wound protector group and 228 in the surgical gauze group. The overall SSI rate in the intention-to-treat analysis was 15.7% (72 of 458 patients). The SSI rate for the wound protector was 10.9% (25 of 229 patients) compared with 20.5% (47 of 229 patients) with surgical gauze. The wound protector significantly reduced the risk of SSI, with a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 46.81% (95% CI, 16.64%-66.06%). The wound protector significantly decreased the SSI rate for clean-contaminated wounds (RRR, 43.75%; 95% CI, 3.75%-67.13%), particularly for superficial SSIs (RRR, 42.50%; 95% CI, 7.16%-64.39%). Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (mean [SD], 15.2 [10.5] vs 15.3 [10.2] days), as were the overall postoperative complication rates (20.1% vs 18.8%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found a significant reduction in SSI rates when a plastic wound protector was used during open GI surgery compared with surgical gaze, supporting the World Health Organization recommendation for use of wound protector devices in abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03170843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Yoo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Mun
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Bong-Hyeon Kye
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Chang Woo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jae Im Lee
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Youn Young Park
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Mo Kang
- Department of Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byung Kwan Park
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han Deok Kwak
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Won-Kyung Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yeouido St Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Uk Bae
- Department of Surgery, Keimyung University and Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Heung-Kwon Oh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Youngki Hong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyung Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, EunPyeong St Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kirkpatrick J, Wang Y, Greene M, Armstrong D, Srinivasa S, Koea J. The increasing use of minimally invasive surgery in acute general surgical conditions: A decade of results from a national data set. Surgery 2024; 175:1205-1211. [PMID: 38171968 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the rate of uptake of acute laparoscopic surgery for common general surgical conditions using national-level data. METHODS The use of laparoscopic surgery in the acute management of appendicitis, cholecystitis, adhesive small bowel obstruction, and inguinal hernias was assessed between 2013 and 2022 at a national level in New Zealand. RESULTS Laparoscopic appendicectomy increased from 83% to 95% (P = .0002). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy increased from 94% to 96% (P = .001). Laparoscopic adhesiolysis increased from 42% to 60% (P = .001). Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair increased from 3% to 18% (P = .004). The rate of laparoscopic conversion demonstrated a decrease for appendicectomy (1.9% to 0.24%), cholecystectomy (0.77% to 0.39%), and adhesiolysis (9% to 2.4%) across this time. The laparoscopic cohorts were all associated with a shorter and less expensive length of stay compared to the open cohort. Māori and Pacific Island patients had largely equitable or superior rates of laparoscopic use compared to the rest of the population. No changes in laparoscopic use were detected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy are similar throughout the regions. The largest difference in rates detected was for adhesiolysis, which was more common in the northern region. CONCLUSION There has been a statistically significant rise in the use of acute laparoscopic surgery for acute general surgical procedures. This rise is likely clinically and economically significant, particularly in appendicectomy and adhesiolysis, with rises of 12% and 17% across the 10 years, with the known associated patient and health care system benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Kirkpatrick
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Private Bag, Takapuna, Auckland.
| | - Yijiao Wang
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Private Bag, Takapuna, Auckland
| | - Monique Greene
- Departments of Surgery and I3 Innovation, North Shore Hospital, Private Bag, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Delwyn Armstrong
- Departments of Surgery and I3 Innovation, North Shore Hospital, Private Bag, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Jonathan Koea
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheung TS, Giacomini C, Cereda M, Avivar-Valderas A, Capece D, Bertolino GM, delaRosa O, Hicks R, Ciccocioppo R, Franzoso G, Galleu A, Ciccarelli FD, Dazzi F. Apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cells activates an immunosuppressive secretome predicting clinical response in Crohn's disease. Mol Ther 2023; 31:3531-3544. [PMID: 37805713 PMCID: PMC10727969 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
In vivo apoptosis of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) plays a critical role in delivering immunomodulation. Yet, caspase activity not only mediates the dying process but also death-independent functions that may shape the immunogenicity of apoptotic cells. Therefore, a better characterization of the immunological profile of apoptotic MSCs (ApoMSCs) could shed light on their mechanistic action and therapeutic applications. We analyzed the transcriptomes of MSCs undergoing apoptosis and identified several immunomodulatory factors and chemokines dependent on caspase activation following Fas stimulation. The ApoMSC secretome inhibited human T cell proliferation and activation, and chemoattracted monocytes in vitro. Both immunomodulatory activities were dependent on the cyclooxygenase2 (COX2)/prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) axis. To assess the clinical relevance of ApoMSC signature, we used the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a cohort of fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) patients who had undergone MSC treatment (ADMIRE-CD). Compared with healthy donors, MSCs exposed to patients' PBMCs underwent apoptosis and released PGE2 in a caspase-dependent manner. Both PGE2 and apoptosis were significantly associated with clinical responses to MSCs. Our findings identify a new mechanism whereby caspase activation delivers ApoMSC immunosuppression. Remarkably, such molecular signatures could implicate translational tools for predicting patients' clinical responses to MSC therapy in CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tik Shing Cheung
- School of Cancer and Pharmacological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Chiara Giacomini
- School of Cancer and Pharmacological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matteo Cereda
- Department of Biosciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, Italy; Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Str. Prov.le 142, km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | | | - Daria Capece
- Centre for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Olga delaRosa
- Takeda Madrid, Cell Therapy Technology Center, Tres Cantos, Spain
| | - Ryan Hicks
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; BioPharmaceuticals R&D Cell Therapy, Research and Early Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rachele Ciccocioppo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, A.O.U.I. Policlinico G.B. Rossi & University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Guido Franzoso
- Centre for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Antonio Galleu
- School of Cancer and Pharmacological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Francesca D Ciccarelli
- School of Cancer and Pharmacological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Francesco Dazzi
- School of Cancer and Pharmacological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; BioPharmaceuticals R&D Cell therapy, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wachtendorf LJ, Tartler TM, Ahrens E, Witt AS, Azimaraghi O, Fassbender P, Suleiman A, Linhardt FC, Blank M, Nabel SY, Chao JY, Goriacko P, Mirhaji P, Houle TT, Schaefer MS, Eikermann M. Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:133-141. [PMID: 36564246 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block facilitates recovery of neuromuscular function after surgery, but the drug is expensive. We evaluated the effects of sugammadex on hospital costs of care. METHODS We analysed 79 474 adult surgical patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal from two academic healthcare networks between 2016 and 2021 to calculate differences in direct costs. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to calculate differences in total costs in US dollars. Perioperative risk profiles were defined based on ASA physical status and admission status (ambulatory surgery vs hospitalisation). RESULTS Based on our registry data analysis, administration of sugammadex vs neostigmine was associated with lower direct costs (-1.3% lower costs; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.5 to -2.2%; P=0.002). In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, sugammadex use was associated with US$232 lower total costs (95% CI, -US$376 to -US$88; P=0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that sugammadex was associated with US$1042 lower total costs (95% CI, -US$1198 to -US$884; P<0.001) in patients with lower risk. In contrast, sugammadex was associated with US$620 higher total costs (95% CI, US$377 to US$865; P<0.001) in patients with a higher risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 and preoperative hospitalisation). CONCLUSIONS The effects of using sugammadex on costs of care depend on patient risk, defined based on comorbidities and admission status. We observed lower costs of care in patients with lower risk and higher costs of care in hospitalised surgical patients with severe comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Annika S Witt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Omid Azimaraghi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Philipp Fassbender
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin, Schmerz- und Palliativmedizin, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Felix C Linhardt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Blank
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Y Nabel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jerry Y Chao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Pavel Goriacko
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Parsa Mirhaji
- Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Clinical Research Informatics at Einstein and Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Timothy T Houle
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Matthias Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bartos A, Mărgărit S, Bocse H, Krisboi I, Iancu I, Breazu C, Plesa-Furda P, Brînzilă S, Leucuta D, Iancu C, Puia C, Al Hajjar N, Ciobanu L. Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12111810. [PMID: 36362961 PMCID: PMC9695297 DOI: 10.3390/life12111810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: Recent single-center retrospective studies have focused on laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients, and compared the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open approaches. Our study aimed to determine the outcomes of LPD in the elderly patients, by performing a systematic review and a meta-analysis of relevant studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing the Embase, Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases to identify all studies that compared laparoscopic vs. open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results: Five retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Overall, 90-day mortality rates were significantly decreased after LPD in elderly patients compared with open approaches (RR = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.32−0.96; p = 0.037, I2 = 0%). The laparoscopic approach had similar mortality rate at 30-day, readmission rate in hospital, Clavien−Dindo complications, pancreatic fistula grade B/C, complete resection rate, reoperation for complications and blood loss as the open approach. Additionally, comparing with younger patients (<70 years old), no significant differences were seen in elderly cohort patients regarding mortality rate at 90 days, readmission rate to hospital, and complication rate. Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, we identify that LPD in elderly is a safe procedure, with significantly lower 90-day mortality rates when compared with the open approach. Our results should be considered with caution, considering the retrospective analyses of the included studies; larger prospective studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Bartos
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Correspondence: (A.B.); (S.M.)
| | - Simona Mărgărit
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Correspondence: (A.B.); (S.M.)
| | - Horea Bocse
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Iulia Krisboi
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ioana Iancu
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Caius Breazu
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Patricia Plesa-Furda
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Sandu Brînzilă
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniel Leucuta
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cornel Iancu
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cosmin Puia
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nadim Al Hajjar
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Lidia Ciobanu
- Medicine Faculty, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Prof. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Syvyk S, Roberts SE, Finn CB, Wirtalla C, Kelz R. Colorectal cancer disparities across the continuum of cancer care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2022; 224:323-331. [PMID: 35210062 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparate colorectal cancer outcomes persist in vulnerable populations. We aimed to examine the distribution of research across the colorectal cancer care continuum, and to determine disparities in the utilization of Surgery among Black patients. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of colorectal cancer disparities studies was performed. The meta-analysis assessed three utilization measures in Surgery. RESULTS Of 1,199 publications, 60% focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, 20% on Survivorship, 15% on Treatment, and 1% on End-of-Life Care. A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Black patients were less likely to receive surgery, twice as likely to refuse surgery, and less likely to receive laparoscopic surgery, when compared to White patients. CONCLUSIONS Since 2011, the majority of research focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis. Given the observed treatment disparities among Black patients, future efforts to reduce colorectal cancer disparities should include interventions within Surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solomiya Syvyk
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA
| | - Sanford E Roberts
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caitlin B Finn
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chris Wirtalla
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel Kelz
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|