A comprehensive study comparing tack and glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for adult groin hernias

Laparoscopic versus robotic TAPP/TEP inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter, propensity score weighted study

PURPOSE

The objective of this retrospective study was to assess safety and comparative clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) from multi-institutional experience in Taiwan.

METHODS

Medical records from a total of eight hospitals were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients primarily diagnosed of inguinal hernia, recurrent inguinal hernia or incarceration groin hernia patients who either underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair between January 2018 and December 2022 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics, intra-operative and post-operative results were analyzed. To compare two cohorts, overlap weighting was employed to balance the significant inter-group differences. We also conducted subgroup analyses by state of a hernia (primary or recurrent/incarceration) and laterality (unilateral or bilateral) that indicated complexity of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1,080 patients who underwent minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair from 8 hospitals across Taiwan were collected. Following the application of inclusion criteria, there were 279 patients received RIHR and 763 patients received LIHR. In the baseline analysis, RIHR was more often performed in recurrent/incarceration (RIHR 18.6% vs LIHR 10.3%, p = 0.001) and bilateral cases (RIHR 81.4 vs LIHR 58.3, p < 0.001). Suturing was dominant mesh fixation method in RIHR (RIHR 81% vs LIHR 35.8%, p < 0.001). More overweight patients were treated with RIHR (RIHR 58.8% vs LIHR 48.9%, p = 0.006). After overlap weighting, there were no significant difference in intraoperative and post-operative complications between RIHR and LIHR. Reoperation and prescription rates of pain medication (opioid) were significantly lower in RIHR than LIHR in overall group comparison (reoperation: RIHR 0% vs. LIHR 2.9%, p = 0.016) (Opioid prescription: RIHR 3.34 mg vs LIHR 10.82 mg, p = 0.001) while operation time was significantly longer in RIHR (OR time: RIHR 155.27 min vs LIHR 95.30 min, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world experience suggested that RIHR is a safe, and feasible option with comparable intra-operative and post-operative outcomes to LHIR. In our study, RIHR showed technical advantages in more complicated hernia cases with yielding to lower reoperation rates, and less opioid use.

Cyanoacrylate mesh fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is among the most frequently performed surgical procedures. Alternatives to penetrating mesh fixation, such as surgical glue, are being investigated for their potential benefit in reducing chronic pain. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the n-hexyl cyanoacrylate glue Ifabond™ for mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study collected data from laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs using Ifabond™ (Peters Surgical, Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex, France) and a standard [Promesh® SURG ST (Peters Surgical)/Biomesh® P1 (Cousin Biotech, Wervicq-Sud, France)] or lightweight [Promesh® SURG LI (Peters Surgical)/Premium® Implant (Cousin Biotech)] polypropylene mesh. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain [100-scale Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]. Secondary endpoints were complications, hernia recurrences, and quality of life (QoL) (EQ-5D-3L health index and EQ-VAS). Patients were followed up at 5 weeks and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Six-hundred and thirteen patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Postoperative pain decreased at 5-week (3.97 ± 10.04; p < 0.0001) and 12-month (3.83 ± 11.26; p < 0.0001) follow-up compared with before surgery (26.96 ± 19.42). One hundred and fifteen patients (13.74%) experienced chronic pain in the groin at 12-month follow-up, of whom 14 (2.67%) required analgesics. There were 6 patients with major morbidities and one patient died of an unrelated cause. Two hernia recurrences occurred within 12-month follow-up. Patients' QoL increased from an EQ-5D-3L index score of 0.82 ± 0.19 preoperatively to 0.90 ± 0.15 at 5 weeks (p < 0.0001) and 0.92 ± 0.15 at 12 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). The EQ-VAS general health scoring increased from 79.03 ± 12.69 preoperatively to 84.31 ± 9.97 at 5-week (p < 0.0001) and 84.16 ± 14.48 at 12-month follow-up (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ifabond™ (Peters Surgical) is a safe, reliable, and feasible fixation method for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with a very high surgeon satisfaction score, improved patients' QoL, and comparable risk of developing chronic pain and postoperative complications as described in the literature.

Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Unilateral Repair of Non-recurrent Inguinal Hernia

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data comparing open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches on unilateral, non-recurrent inguinal hernias. Our study presents a large, retrospective triple-arm outcome analysis between robotic, laparoscopic, and open unilateral, non-recurrent inguinal hernia repairs at a single institution.

METHODS

706 patients who underwent elective, non-recurrent inguinal hernia repair performed by 8 general surgeons at a single institution from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient baseline characteristics, operative times, resident involvement, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed for all repair types. A cost analysis of the different procedures was performed.

RESULTS

There were 305 laparoscopic repairs, 207 robotic repairs, and 194 open repairs. Open and laparoscopic repairs were performed on patients who were older (p =< .001) and with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p =< .001). Patient BMI was higher in minimally invasive repair than open repair (P = .021). There were no significant differences in complication rates on pairwise analysis. Robotic and open repairs had significantly longer operative times than laparoscopic repairs (P < .001). There was less resident involvement in robotic repair than with the other approaches (P < .001). Resident involvement was associated with shorter OR times (P = .001) and no significant difference in postoperative complications. There was a trend over the study period toward faster operative times and more robotic repair. Robotic repair is the most expensive repair, followed by laparoscopic and open repairs.

CONCLUSION

All 3 repair techniques can be performed without significant differences in outcomes. The technique utilized should be based on surgeon preference and patient characteristics.

Chronic pain following totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing glue and absorbable tackers

PURPOSE

Chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair occurs in up to 20% of patients. The underlying mechanism probably involves sensory nerve damage and abnormal healing that might be influenced by the materials chosen for mesh fixation. The main objective of this study was to compare glue and absorbable tackers on the rate of chronic pain after surgery in patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP).

METHODS

Patients undergoing (TEP) inguinal hernia repair were enrolled in a single-blind randomized clinical trial and were randomized for mesh fixation with glue (LIQUIBAND FIX 8 Neopharm) or absorbable tackers (SECURE STRAP Johnson & Johnson). Pain was assessed using a validated 4-point verbal-rank scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Chronic pain was defined as pain persisting beyond 3 months.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight patients were analyzed. The groups were similar in age, gender, and hernia side. Chronic pain of any intensity was reported in 31.7% (66/208) after 6 months and in 13% (29/208) after 12 months. No differences in postoperative pain were observed between the two forms of mesh fixation. Still, when only those with severe pain were considered, mesh fixation with glue resulted in less pain compared to fixation by tackers (log-rank p = 0.025). At 1 year, 4 symptomatic recurrent hernias were identified in patients whose mesh was fixated with absorbable tackers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent TEP inguinal hernia repair with mesh fixated by glue suffered from less pain.

Mesh fixation with fibrin glue versus tacker in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The advent of mesh was a breakthrough in the field of hernia surgery. Mechanical methods of mesh fixation are hypothesized to cause more tissue trauma than nonmechanical methods. The present study was conducted to study the outcomes of mesh fixation using fibrin glue, a nonmechanical method versus tackers in totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) of unilateral inguinal hernia.

METHODS

A randomized controlled single blinded study was conducted in India from June 2017 to March 2019. Patients diagnosed with unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia with a hernial sac of size not more than 5 cm were invited to participate in the study. Sample size was 60 patients randomized into groups just before mesh fixation. In group A mesh was fixed using tackers while in group B mesh was fixed using fibrin glue. Patients were followed-up prospectively for 3 months.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between the two groups with respect to operating time. Average hospital stay and pain scores at all follow-ups were better for fibrin glue group. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative urinary retention, seroma formation and hematoma formation between the two groups. Patients of fibrin glue group had early restart of daily activities at 15 days follow-up when compared to tacker group.

CONCLUSION

Fibrin glue fixation technique should be advocated over tackers for mesh fixation in TEP considering the better outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the technique.

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Tacks in Mesh Fixation for Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran 2) is a synthetic adhesive mesh fixation material. Its utility is being evaluated in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR). A multicentre randomized controlled trial was performed comparing Glubran 2 to standard of care absorbable tacks, particularly assessing chronic postoperative inguinal pain and its effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing elective TEP IHR at 2 centers from 2017 to 2019 were randomly assigned to Glubran 2 or absorbable tack mesh fixation, and followed for 6 months. All other aspects of surgery and aftercare remained the same. Surgeons documented operative and fixation time, and the placement of fixation on standardized diagrams. Via a questionnaire, aspects of inguinal pain were evaluated before surgery, and at various time-points postoperatively over 6 months. Postoperative clinical factors were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 106 operative sides were randomized to either glue (51) or tack (55) mesh fixation over a 14-month period. Similar median operative times between tack (83.0 min) and glue fixation (75.0 min) were observed. There were no significant surgical complications or observed hernia recurrences in either group. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at all time-points after analysis through mixed effects modeling. Temporal pain profiles over time were also similar. Totally, 55% of patients in the glue group had returned to work within 2 weeks of surgery. There was no increase in complications or pain scores despite regular lateral fixation of glue in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Adding to known data, we observed no significant difference in postoperative pain, demonstrating that cyanoacrylate glue is a viable and safe alternative fixation method to absorbable tacks in laparoscopic TEP IHR. As secondary outcomes, cyanoacrylate glue permits some patients to return to work early, and we observed regular lateral mesh glue fixation without increased pain or complications.