Safety and feasibility of reduced-port site surgery for robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy

Single-Port Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: Current Perspectives, Technical Considerations, and Future Directions

Single-port (SP) robotic posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SP-PRA) represents a State-of-the-Art innovation in endocrine surgery, offering a minimally invasive approach for adrenal gland resection with significant improvements in surgical precision, cosmetic outcomes, and patient quality of life. The SP robotic system facilitates surgery through a single incision in the back, avoiding the transperitoneal cavity and enabling direct retroperitoneal access to the adrenal gland. This review explores the evolution, techniques, and clinical outcomes of SP-PRA, emphasizing its advantages over traditional multi-port and laparoscopic methods. Enhanced visualization and precise articulation of the SP robotic system minimize trauma to surrounding tissues, leading to fewer complications and faster recovery times. Initial studies suggest superior patient satisfaction due to hidden incisions and excellent postoperative outcomes. However, challenges such as a steep learning curve, high costs, and limited long-term data remain. This review highlights the need for continued research and innovation to optimize the adoption of SP-PRA and expand its indications.

Exploring the Benefits of a Reduced-Port Approach in Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparative Study of the Two-Port and Three-Port Techniques

Background: Robotic adrenalectomy has become a surgical treatment option for benign and selected malignant adrenal diseases. We aimed to evaluate the eligibility of two-port robotic posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) as an alternative to the conventional three-port technique by comparing their surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes among 197 patients who underwent two-port or three-port robotic adrenalectomy between 2016 and 2020 in a single tertiary center. For further evaluation, propensity score matching was performed to reduce the selection bias in population characteristics. Results: Patients were categorized by the number of ports (two-port group, 87; and three-port group, 110). The two-port group compared with the three-port group was significantly older (P = .006) and had a smaller mean tumor size (P = .003) and shorter mean operation time (P = .001). Upon comparing clinicopathologic characteristics according to adrenal disorders, for pheochromocytoma, the three-port group had a larger tumor size and a longer operation time. For Cushing's syndrome, the operation time was short and numeric rating scale pain score was significantly low in the two-port group. After propensity score matching, the two-port group had a short operation time and a significantly low postoperative pain score (P < .05). Predictive factors associated with prolonged operation time included male gender, an increased number of ports, and large tumor size. Conclusions: The two-port technique resulted in a shorter operation time and lower pain score compared with the three-port technique. The two-port technique may be a safe alternative to the conventional three-port technique for robotic PRA.

Safety and feasibility of single-port surgery for posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study demonstrates our experience of single-port robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (RPRA) using the da Vinci SP robot system and evaluates its technical feasibility and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 250 RPRAs, including 117 conventional 3-port RPRAs, 103 reduced 2-port RPRAs, and 30 single-port RPRAs. Each RPRA type was compared by analyzing 30 patients in the early phase of surgery.

RESULTS

All patients who underwent single-port RPRA showed excellent surgical outcomes. Age, sex, BMI, and tumor location site did not significantly differ between the three groups. In the early phase, the size of the adrenal tumor was similar between three groups, and it tended to increase as the number of ports increased (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was shorter for patients who underwent single-port RPRA than those who underwent RPRA types (p < 0.001). The numeric rating scale score did not significantly differ between the groups on most days. No major complications were observed, and no patients were converted to open surgery or required additional port insertion.

CONCLUSION

Single-port RPA using the da Vinci SP robotic system showed the effectiveness of the surgical procedure and improved cosmetic outcomes for patients, while also enabling surgeons to perform operations with greater ease and convenience. Therefore, single-port RPRA could be a good alternative option for the treatment of adrenal tumors in selected situations.

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial adrenalectomy with a new robotic surgical system: A prospective clinical study

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the newly developed KD-SR-01® robotic system for retroperitoneal partial adrenalectomy.

Subjects and Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with benign adrenal mass undergoing KD-SR-01® robot-assisted partial adrenalectomy in our institution from November 2020 to May 2022. Surgeries were performed via a retroperitoneal approach using the KD-SR-01® robotic system. The baseline, perioperative and short-term follow-up data were prospectively collected. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 23 patients were enrolled, including nine (39.1%) patients with hormone-active tumors. All patients received partial adrenalectomy via the retroperitoneal approach without conversions to other procedures. The median operative time was 86.5 min [interquartile range (IQR), 60.0-112.5] and the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (range, 20-400). Three (13.0%) patients developed Clavien-Dindo grade I-II postoperative complications. The median postoperative stay was 4.0 days (IQR, 3.0-5.0). All surgical margins were negative. The short-term follow-up demonstrated complete or partial clinical and biochemical success as well as absence of imaging recurrence in all patients with hormone-active tumors.

Conclusions

Initial results illustrate that the KD-SR-01® robotic system is safe, feasible and effective for the surgical management of benign adrenal tumors.

Minimally invasive techniques in benign and malignant adrenal tumors

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy has become the main treatment modality for most adrenal lesions. Both laparoscopic transabdominal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches are safe and feasible options, each with respective advantages, including better surgical outcomes, fewer complications, and faster recovery over open adrenalectomy. While open surgery remains a valid modality in treatment of adrenocortical cancer in the presence of some findings such as invasion, robotic platforms, and minimally invasive surgery have gained popularity as technology continues to evolve. Organ preservation during adrenalectomy is feasible in some conditions to prevent adrenal insufficiency. Ablative technologies are increasingly utilized in benign and malignant tumors, including the adrenal gland, with various outcomes. A multidisciplinary team, an experienced surgeon, and a high-volume center are recommended for any surgical approaches and management of adrenal lesions. This review article evaluated recent findings and current evidence on minimally invasive adrenalectomy.

[Minimally invasive techniques in adrenal gland surgery]

Today, adrenalectomy can be performed by a variety of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approaches. Of particular importance are the lateral transperitoneal and the posterior retroperitoneoscopic access routes. Comparative studies of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal procedures still demonstrate heterogeneous results. Nevertheless, retroperitoneal access techniques seem to enable less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. Robotic procedures are gaining in popularity but the final importance cannot yet be determined. All minimally invasive techniques are considered to be so safe and reliable that open approaches are only justified in exceptional cases.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy

Background

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery has been utilized in several surgical procedures. We aim to describe our institution’s approach and perioperative experience with SP robotic adrenalectomy and compare it to the traditional multi-port (MP) approach.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy by a single surgeon between March 2019 and March 2020. Patient demographic, perioperative factors, and pathologic outcomes were recorded and analyzed using t-tests, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

Thirty-six patients underwent SP (n = 11) and MP (n = 25) robotic adrenalectomy. Age, body mass index, gender, operative time, major Clavien-Dindo complications, and margin status showed no differences. Patients undergoing SP adrenalectomy had a lower estimated blood loss (18.1 ± 13.0 vs 65.6 ± 95.0 cc, P = .02) and smaller lesion size (2.8 ± 1.3 vs 4.1 ± 1.8 cm, P = .04) compared to those undergoing MP.

Conclusions

SP adrenalectomy appears to be a feasible approach in select adrenal masses. Further studies are needed to establish its safety and cost effectiveness.

The association between the type of anesthesia and hemodynamic instability during pheochromocytoma surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytoma often carries a risk for perioperative hemodynamic instability (HDI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors of intraoperative HDI during minimally invasive posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (PRA) for pheochromocytoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the prospectively collected data of 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic PRA or robotic PRA for pheochromocytoma between January 2014 and December 2020 at a single tertiary center. The patients were divided into two groups according to the intraoperative hypertensive event of systolic blood pressure (> 160 mmHg). The clinical manifestations and perioperative hemodynamic conditions were analysed.

RESULTS

In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the tumor size (> 3.4 cm) [OR 3.14, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.48-6.64), p = 0.003], type of preoperative alpha-blocker (selective type) [OR 3.9, 95% CI (1.52-10.02), p = 0.005], preoperative use of beta-blockers [OR 3.94, 95% CI (1.07-14.49), p = 0.039] and type of anesthesia [total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) vs. balanced anesthesia (BA)] [OR 2.57, 95% CI (1.23-5.38), p = 0.012] were determined as independent risk factors of intraoperative hypertensive events during minimally invasive adrenalectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of anesthesia was independently associated with intraoperative HDI along with larger tumor size, type of preoperative alpha-blocker and the use of preoperative beta-blockers. TIVA increased the risk of intraoperative hypertensive events compared with BA. Thus, the consideration of the type of anesthesia prior to adrenal surgery for pheochromocytoma along with the use of preoperative non-selective alpha-blockers may be beneficial in minimizing the risk of intraoperative HDI.

Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy: Patient Selection and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recently, efficacy of laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (PRA) for pheochromocytoma and malignancy has been questioned. Although robotic technique using wristed instruments may improve limitations of laparoscopic PRA, the worldwide experience with robotic PRA is limited. This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, surgical technique, and long-term outcomes of robotic PRA from a 12-year single-center experience.

METHODS

This analysis was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. In this study, PRA was performed robotically, with intraoperative ultrasound and indocyanine green imaging guidance. Long-term outcomes and predictors of operative time (OT) were assessed using descriptive and regression analyses. Using OT as a surrogate for difficulty of procedure, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to quantify anthropometric thresholds that would predict a more challenging procedure.

RESULTS

Altogether, 112 robotic PRA procedures were performed. Three cases (3%) were converted to a lateral approach, and one case (1%) was converted to open surgery. The morbidity rate was 2%. Microscopic capsular disruption occurred for one patient. No patient experienced persistent disease or local recurrence from pheochromocytoma or malignant adrenal tumors during the follow-up period (median, 48 months). Operating time was independently predicted by perirenal fat thickness, with 18.5 mm as the critical threshold.

CONCLUSION

In this study, favorable PRA outcomes were achieved with careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique that used robotic articulation guided by intraoperative imaging.

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art

Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is worldwide considered the gold standard technique. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches have proved their efficacy with excellent outcomes. Since the introduction of da Vinci System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), robotic surgery has made many steps forward gaining progressively more diffusion in the field of general and endocrine surgery. The robotic technique offers advantages to overcome some laparoscopic shortcomings (rigid instruments, loss of 3D vision, unstable camera). Indeed, the robotic system is provided of stereoscopic 3D-magnified vision, additional degree of freedom, tremor-filtering technology and a stable camera. Recently, several case series have demonstrated the feasibility and the safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy in high-volume centers with outcomes comparable to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Notwithstanding, the technical advantages of the robotic system have not yet demonstrated significant improvements in terms of outcomes to undermine laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Moreover, robotic adrenalectomy harbor inherits drawbacks, such as longer operative time and elevated costs, that limit its use. In particular, the high cost associated with the use of the robotic system is primarily related to the purchase and the maintenance of the unit, the high instruments cost and the longer operative time. Notably, these aspects make robotic adrenalectomy up to 2.3 times more costly than laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This literature review summarizes the current available studies and provides an overview about the robotic scenario including applicability, technical details and surgical outcomes.