Long-term results of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the curative treatment of low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei and multicystic mesothelioma

A systematic review of minimally invasive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal malignancy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is traditionally a maximally invasive operation with a large abdominal incision and multi-visceral resections. However, to minimize abdominal wall morbidity and improve functional recovery, some centres have adopted a minimally invasive (MI) approach in select cases. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the evidence for safety and patient selection for minimally invasive approaches to CRS and HIPEC with curative intent.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed using three electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. Data regarding postoperative morbidity was meta-analysed.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria (N = 462 MI patients), all of which were retrospective in design. Six studies included an open comparison group. Pseudomyxoma peritonei, mesothelioma and ovarian carcinoma made up the majority of cases (>90%), with a PCI < 10 listed as a prerequisite to selection across all studies. On pooled analysis there was no difference in major morbidity between MI and open groups (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.18-1.46, P = 0.33). There was one perioperative death reported in the MI group. Length of stay appeared shorter in the MI group (median range MI: 4-11 v Open: 7-13 days). Short-term recurrence and overall survival between both groups also appeared no different.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive CRS and HIPEC appears feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients. Clear histological stratification and longer term follow up is required to determine oncological safety, particularly in more aggressive tumours such as colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Outcomes of minimal access cytoreductive surgery (M-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC vs. open cytoreductive surgery (O-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) has shown better peri-operative outcomes with equivalent oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal and thoracic oncology. Open CRS (O-CRS) procedure accompanies inevitable and significant surgical morbidity in patients. The aim of the review article is to compare outcomes of M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC with open procedure in peritoneal surface malignancies.

Content

Comprehensive search of databases was done and total 2,807 articles were found (2793-PubMed and 14-Cochrane review). PRISMA flow chart was prepared and 14 articles were selected. Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using random-effects model (DerSimonian Laird) and fixed effect model. Publication bias was tested with Funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Quality of studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Summary and Outlook

Patients in both groups [total (732), M-CRS(319), O-CRS(413)] were similar in demographic characteristics. Peri-operative outcomes were significantly better in M-CRS group in terms of blood loss SMD=-2.379, p<0.001 (95 % CI -2.952 to -1.805), blood transfusion RR=0.598, p=0.011 (95 % CI 0.402 to 0.889), bowel recovery SMD=-0.843, p=0.01 (95 % CI -1.487 to -0.2), hospital stay SMD=-2.348, p<0.001 (95 % CI -3.178 to -1.519) and total morbidity RR=0.538, p<0.001 (95 % CI 0.395 to 0.731). Duration of surgery SMD=-0.0643 (95 % CI -0.993 to 0.865, p=0.892) and CC0 score RR=1.064 (95 % CI 0.992 to 1.140, p=0.083) had no significant difference. Limited studies which evaluated survival showed similar outcomes. This meta-analysis shows that M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC is feasible and has better peri-operative outcomes compared to open procedure in patients with limited peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) peritoneal surface malignancies. Survival outcomes were not calculated. Further studies are warranted in this regard.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Long term oncologic outcomes from the international PSOGI registry

The laparoscopic approach for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (L-CRS + HIPEC) in highly selected patients was previously reported from the PSOGI registry with a demonstrable reduction in length of stay and post-operative morbidity. This study aims to update this international PSOGI registry with a larger cohort of patients and a longer follow-up period.

METHODS

An international registry was designed through a networking database (REDCAP®). All centers performing L-CRS + HIPEC were invited through PSOGI to submit data on their cases. Variables such as demographics, clinical outcomes, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 315 L-CRS + HIPEC cases were provided by 14 worldwide centers. A total of 215 patients were included in the L-CRS + HIPEC group. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 3 (3-5). The median length of stay was 7 days (5-10) and the major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) was 6.1% after 30 days. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) per tumor origin was: 94% for PMP-LG, 85% for PMP-HG, 100% for benign multicyst peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM), 37.4% for colonic origin, and 54%(at 3 years) for ovarian origin. The 5 years overall survival (OS) per tumor origin was: 100% for PMP-LG, PMP-HG and MPM; 61% for colonic origin, and 74% (at 3 years) for ovarian origin. In addition, a total of 85 patients were analyzed in the laparoscopic risk-reducing HIPEC (L-RR + HIPEC). The median length of stay was 5 days (4-6) and the major morbidity was 6% after 30 days. The 5-year DFS per tumor origin was: 96% for perforated low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN II) and 68.1% for colon origin. The 5 years OS per tumor origin was: 98% for LAMN II and 83.5% for colonic origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive CRS + HIPEC is a safe procedure for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in specialized centers. It improves perioperative results while providing satisfactory oncologic outcomes. L-RR + HIPEC represents a promising strategy that could be evaluated in patients with high risk of developing peritoneal carcinomatosis into prospective randomized trials.

[Surgical treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei-Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy]

BACKGROUND

Pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome (PMP) is an orphan disease. Surgery is the fundament of treatment.

METHOD

Short review summarizing the state of the art treatment.

RESULTS

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) form the foundations of treatment for PMP. The peritoneal cancer index should be preoperatively determined based on imaging and/or laparoscopy, intraoperatively validated and both should be documented. An extraperitoneal surgical preparation technique leads to effective en bloc resection of the peritoneum and the affected abdominal area. The HIPEC technique should be performed with mitomycin C for 60-90 min. Complete CRS (CC = 0, CC = 1) and the histological subtype are relevant for the prognosis. Structured educational programs and mentoring can optimize the learning curve. The aftercare should be performed at the surgical center. After follow-up imaging at 3 months after CRS, in the first 2 years a control should be carried out every 6 months. Thereafter, the intervals can be extended to 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Standardized surgical treatment and HIPEC, optimized specific surgical training and structured follow-up at the center lead to an excellent long-term prognosis for patients with PMP.

An Asian Tertiary Centre's Early Experience with Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

The use of open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown improved oncological survival in terms of treating peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). However, this procedure often comes with associated morbidity. The move towards use of laparoscopic surgery in this field is postulated to lead to a reduction in morbidity and earlier return to function, but literature on its use for CRS and HIPEC has been scarce. We performed a retrospective review of 6 patients with PSM who underwent laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC in our institution and analysed the patient characteristics, oncological history, perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was 0 (IQR 0-1.25). All 6 patients had appendiceal primaries. Median operative time was 285 min (IQR 228.8-300); median length of stay was 7.5 days (IQR 5-8.8). All patients achieved complete cytoreduction, and there was no conversion to open surgery. One patient developed port site infection and another 2 patients subsequently developed adhesions. Median follow-up time was 35 (IQR 17.5-41) months. No patients had developed recurrence at the time of data collection. We conclude that in patients with limited PCI sore (< 2), laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC are safe and feasible. With increasing experience, a select group of patients with limited PSM may be treated via minimally invasive surgery, minimising the morbidity of a traditional laparotomy.

Learning curve for minimal invasive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures

PURPOSE

The benefits of the minimally invasive approach for performing cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (L-CRS + HIPEC) have been described previously, associating an early recovery with similar oncologic outcomes in patients with limited peritoneal carcinomatosis. Currently, no studies are focusing on the learning curve for this emerging procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the L-CRS + HIPEC learning curve and its knock-on effect on the perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

We identified all consecutive unselected patients who underwent L-CRS + HIPEC by a single surgeon between April 2016 and January 2022 (n = 51). Patients who underwent risk-reducing CRS + HIPEC (PCI = 0) or initial conversion due to an intraoperative PCI > 10 were excluded from the final analysis. To evaluate the learning curve, perioperative data were analysed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Major morbidity occurred in one patient (3.8%). The difficulty of the L-CRS + HIPEC procedures was categorised as low in 23.1% (n = 6), intermediate in 19.2% (n = 5), and advanced in 57.7% (n = 15). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.4 ± 1.5 days. No patient had a conversion to open surgery. The learning curve was divided into two distinct phases: the learning phase (1-14) and the consolidation phase (15-26). A significant decrease in the operative time (375 ± 103.1 vs 239.2 ± 63.6 min) was observed with no differences in complexity, the number of peritonectomy procedures, or morbidity.

CONCLUSION

L-CRS + HIPEC is a complex procedure that must be performed in a high-volume and experienced oncologic unit, requiring a learning curve to achieve the consolidation condition, which could be established after 14 procedures.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Optimal Interval Cytoreduction Surgery (LOICS) in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancers Having Low Burden Disease

Laparoscopy has been increasingly utilised for cytoreduction surgery in patients with early ovarian cancers. The present study tries to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic interval cytoreduction surgery (LOICS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) having low burden residual disease. A retrospective study of was done of AOC's who underwent LOICS between 2010 and 2014. Epithelial ovarian cancer patients who underwent interval cytoreduction surgery were included and analysed for short-term and long-term outcomes. In all, 36 patients with stage III ovarian cancers were included in the analysis. Twenty-two (61.1%) were grade 3 and 14 (38.8%) were grade 2, and no patient had grade 1 tumour. Stage wise majority were stage IIIC (94.4%) followed by 2 (5.5%) in stage IIIA. There was 1 postoperative complication (2.5%) and no intraoperative complications. Median time to discharge and to start chemotherapy was 5 days and 23 days respectively. After a median follow-up of 60 months, 3 patients (8.3%) were lost to follow-up and the remaining 33 patients were analysed for survival outcomes. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 58.3% and 36.1% respectively. The median RFS and OS were 24 months and 51 months, respectively. Most recurrences involved the peritoneum (82.6%), and 5 patients (21.7%) had nodal recurrence alone. Laparoscopic optimal interval cytoreduction is feasible in patients with advanced ovarian cancers provided the disease burden permits optimal surgery, especially in centres with expertise in complex laparoscopic procedures.

Laparoscopic Cytoreduction Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM): Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Literature Review

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has gained increasing acceptance in clinical practice. Performing CRS and HIPEC laparoscopically represents a challenging and intriguing technical evolution. However, the experiences are limited, and the evidence is low. This retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC within the Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam. Clinical, perioperative, and follow-up data were extracted and collected on prospectively maintained databases. We added a systematic review according to the PRISMA method for English-language articles through April 2022 using the keywords laparoscopic, hyperthermic, HIPEC, and chemotherapy. From 2016 to 2022, fourteen patients were treated with Lap-CRS-HIPEC with curative intent within the Italian centers. No conversion to open was observed. The median duration of surgery was 487.5 min. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 3, and complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. Two patients (14.3%) had major postoperative complications, one requiring reintervention. After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, eleven patients were alive without disease (78.6%), two patients developed recurrence (14.3%), and one patient died for unrelated causes (7.1%). The literature review confirmed these results. In conclusion, current evidence shows that Lap-CRS-HIPEC is feasible, safe, and associated with a favorable outcome in selected patients. An accurate patient selection will continue to be paramount in choosing this treatment.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis

Background

Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC.

Methods

This was a single institution prospective clinical trial and comparative study using historical controls. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or primary peritoneal origin, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) $$\le$$ ≤ 10 were eligible.

Results

Clinical trial: 18 patients (median age 57 years, 39% female) with appendiceal (15) or colorectal (3) primary PSM underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. Median and range outcomes were: operative time 219 min (134–378), EBL 10 mL (0–100), time to return to bowel function 3 days (1–7), duration IV narcotic use 3 days (1–8), length of stay 6 days (3–11). All patients had a complete cytoreduction (CC-score 0). Three (17%) experienced minor morbidity, with no major morbidity or mortality. Median DFS and OS were not reached with median follow-up of 48 months. Comparative analysis: Laparoscopic approach associated with reduced time to return of bowel function (3 versus 4 days, p = 0.001), length of stay (8 versus 5 days, p < 0.001), and morbidity (16% versus 42%, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of DFS included prior chemotherapy (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.85, 13.89; p = 0.002), and CC-score > 0 (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19, 9.41; p = 0.025), but not surgical approach. CC-score > 0 was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 10.12, 95% CI 2.16, 47.30, p = 0.003).

Conclusions and relevance

Laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC should be considered for patients with PSM with low-volume disease, including those with adenocarcinoma histology.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02463877.

Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a poor prognostic factor for all malignancies. This extent of metastatic disease progression remains difficult to treat with systemic therapies due to poor peritoneal vascularization resulting in limited drug delivery and penetration into tissues. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are surgical interventions that directly target peritoneal tumors and have improved outcomes for PC resulting from appendiceal and colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite these radical therapies, long-term survival remains infrequent, and recurrence is common. The reasons for these outcomes are multifactorial and signal the need for the continued development of novel therapeutics, techniques, and approaches to improve outcomes for these patients. Here, we review landmark historical studies that serve as the foundation for current recommendations, recent discoveries, clinical trials, active research, and areas of future interest in CRS/HIPEC to treat PC originating from appendiceal and colorectal malignancies.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes: a single-center early experience propensity-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of laparoscopy in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is not well established. Herein, we describe our early experience of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC in patients with low-volume peritoneal disease compared to patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC during the same time period.

METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained database, patients who underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC were compared to a control cohort of patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC, matched for peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction, and tumor histology.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC and were compared to a matched control cohort of 32 patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC. Clinical and demographic data were similar between the groups. PCI, number of resected organs, and optimal cytoreduction rates were comparable. Patients who underwent laparoscopic experienced a lower estimated blood loss, (median, [IQR 1-3]); 150 mL, [50-300] vs. 100 mL, [50-125], p = 0.04, shorter length of stay (median [IQR 1-3]; 4 days [3-6] vs. 6 days [5-8], p < 0.01, and a lower 30-day complication rate (6.3% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.577) and overall survival (p = 0.472) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study demonstrates that laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment in selected patients with low tumor volume. Minimally invasive CRS/HIPEC is associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter length of stay. There was no difference in long-term oncological outcomes between the groups.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in LAMN with small volume of peritoneal disease: a valuable option of treatment for good patient-related experience measures (PREMs)

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the best effective treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). In the last years, the advances in histopathology have stratified PMP lesions in different degrees of aggressivity suggesting the possibility of a tailored treatment. In a subset of patients with small volume peritoneal disease, laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC is feasible. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of laparoscopic CRS + HIPEC in a monocentric series of patients under patient-related experience measures (PREMs).

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC with curative intent at Cancer Institute of Montpellier were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database and analyzed. Selection criteria for laparoscopic approach were low-grade PMP with pathological confirmation prior to CRS-HIPEC, age < 75 years, no extra-peritoneal disease, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) < 10, and a limited history of abdominal surgery. A PREMS interview was conducted before analysis with all the included patients. Outcomes of interest included postoperative morbidity, medium-term survival, and PREMs.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were operated on for low-grade PMP with a laparoscopic approach at our institution. Conversions to laparotomy were necessary in three patients, and postoperative complications were observed in three patients (Clavien 3b in one patient). In-hospital postoperative median stay was 9.5 days. No death or recurrence was observed during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC for LAMN in presence of small peritoneal disease is feasible in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. According to our PREMs questionnaire, patients' expectations were satisfied.

Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery followed or not by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: results from a large multicentric cohort

BACKGROUND

Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM) is a rare, slowly growing, condition prone to recur after surgery. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) added to complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) remains controversial and difficult to assess. As patients are mostly reproductive age women, surgical approach, and fertility considerations are important aspects of the management. This observational retrospective review aimed to accurate treatment strategy reflections.

METHODS

The RENAPE database (French expert centers network) was analyzed over a 1999-2019 period. MCPM patients treated with CRS were included. A special focus on HIPEC, mini-invasive approach, and fertility considerations was performed.

RESULTS

Overall 60 patients (50 women) were included with a median PCI of 10 (4-14) allowing 97% of complete surgery, followed by HIPEC in 82% of patients. A quarter of patients had a laparoscopic approach. Twelve patients (20%) recurred with a 3-year recurrence free survival of 84.2% (95% confidence interval 74.7-95.0). The hazard of recurrence was numerically reduced among patients receiving HIPEC, however, not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.41, 0.12-1.42, p = 0.200). A severe post-operative adverse event occurred in 22% of patients with five patients submitted to a subsequent reoperation. Among four patients with a childbearing desire, three were successful (two had a laparoscopic-CRS-HIPEC and one a conventional CRS without HIPEC).

CONCLUSION

MCPM patients treatment should aim at a complete CRS. The intraoperative treatment options as laparoscopic approach, fertility function sparing and HIPEC should be discussed in expert centers to propose the most appropriate strategy.