Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEA) technique for primary ventral hernia repair

Cranial approach for preperitoneal/pretransversalis enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (PeTEP) hernia repair: a novel technique description and early outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques are widely used to treat abdominal wall defects. This study describes a cranial approach for performing the total preperitoneal/pretransversalis enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (PeTEP) technique and presents early outcomes for treating primary ventral hernias (PVH), midline trocar site incisional hernias (IHs), both associated with rectus diastasis, as well as lateral IHs.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted from October 2023 to September 2024, identifying cases where the cranial PeTEP technique was employed, using data from a multicentric prospectively maintained database. The cranial approach involved dissection of the preperitoneal fatty rhomboid, extending the dissection across the preperitoneal and transversalis fascial plane to the semilunar lines laterally and the pubis caudally. For lateral defects, the dissection extended beyond the ipsilateral semilunar line, surpassing the lateral edge of the defect.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent elective endoscopic hernia repair: 62.5% PVH, 29.2% midline IH, and 8.3% lateral IH. The mean defect area was 6.32 ± 6.13 cm2, and the average mesh size was 497.21.41 ± 202.71 cm2. The surgical site occurrences rate was 8.3%, with no surgical site infections or recurrences at a mean follow-up of 5.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The cranial PeTEP technique was a safe, effective, and reproducible method for repairing PVH and small-medium IHs associated with rectus diastasis in a selected cohort of patients. It facilitated large preperitoneal mesh placement without entering the retromuscular plane and avoided posterior component separation in lateral defects. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm these promising results.

Mini-invasive surgery for diastasis recti: an overview on different approaches

Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is an acquired condition defined by a widening of the linea alba exceeding 2 cm and the subsequent separation between the two medial margins of the rectus muscles, accompanied by a laxity of the ventral abdominal muscles, and often by ventral midline hernias. It is a quite common problem in women after pregnancy. In addition to the aesthetic implications resulting from the swelling of the anterior abdominal wall in the case of increased pressure within the abdominal cavity, DRA leads to several physical functional disorders, including muscle weakness, prolapses of the pelvic organs, urinary and fecal incontinence, low back and pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction. The management of diastasis recti can be conservative, with physiotherapy and specific physical exercises, but, especially in case of concomitant hernia, surgery can be considered as the first choice of treatment in order to restore the midline and repair the hernia. Through recent years, a large amount of mini-invasive surgical techniques has been proposed, approaching the abdominal differently, and to date there is still lack of evidence on the optimal choice for surgeons and patients. So, the present review aims to give the reader an overview on the different techniques proposed, focusing on the three main categories of approaches (pre-aponeurotic, retro-muscular and pre-peritoneal), their specific features and results, with a view on the newly proposed robotic approaches that can theoretically reproduce each single technique.

Laparoendoscopic extraperitoneal surgical techniques for ventral hernias and diastasis recti repair: a systematic review

PURPOSE

this systematic review aims to classify and summarize the characteristics and outcomes of the different laparoendoscopic extraperitoneal approaches for the repair of ventral hernias and diastasis recti described in the last 10 years.

METHODS

a literature search was performed by two reviewers in December 2023 including articles from January 2013, 01 to December 2023, 15. The techniques were selected according to the surgical access site (anterior or posterior to the rectus sheath), the access type (laparoendoscopic, single incision laparoscopic, mini or less open), the main space used to repair the defect (subcutaneous or retromuscular) and the mesh place (onlay, sublay-retromuscular or sublay-preperitoneal) and classified as anterior or posterior approaches.

RESULTS

the literature search retrieved 1755 results and 27 articles were included in the study. The studies included 1874 patients, the mean age ranged from 37.8 to 60.2 years. The access site was anterior in 16 cases and posterior in 11 cases. The mesh was positioned onlay in 13 cases and sublay in 13 cases, with only one study using no mesh. Complications were: seroma, ranging from 0.8 to 81%, followed by skin complications (leak, ischemia, necrosis) from 0.8 to 6.4%, surgical site infections and bleeding. Recurrences ranged from 0% to 12,5%, with a mean follow-up from 1 to 24 months.

CONCLUSION

this systematic review confirms the presence of several new minimally invasive extraperitoneal techniques for the repair of abdominal wall defects, with different advantages and disadvantages. Further studies, with more extensive follow-up data and wider patient groups, are necessary to define specific indications for each technique.

Rives-Stoppa Repair Versus Bilateral Inguinal Hernioplasty: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques and Patient Outcomes

Hernia repair surgery is a common procedure to address the protrusion of organs or tissues through weakened muscles or connective tissue. This review compares two prominent surgical techniques for hernia repair: the Rives-Stoppa repair and bilateral inguinal hernioplasty. The Rives-Stoppa repair involves a posterior approach with extensive mesh placement suitable for complex and recurrent hernias. In contrast, bilateral inguinal hernioplasty focuses on simultaneously repairing bilateral hernias, potentially reducing operative time and enhancing recovery. This review examines each approach's technical aspects, including incision methods, mesh placement, and closure techniques. Patient outcomes, such as postoperative pain, recovery time, recurrence rates, and quality of life, are critically analyzed based on current research and clinical data. Economic considerations are also evaluated, encompassing each technique's cost-effectiveness and economic impact. By synthesizing these findings, this review aims to provide valuable insights for surgeons, healthcare providers, and policymakers in optimizing hernia repair strategies. The evolving landscape of surgical techniques and materials underscores the importance of ongoing research to refine practices and improve outcomes for patients undergoing hernia repair surgery.

An improved approach of totally visceral sac separation (TVS) for incisional hernia compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus repair (IPOM plus)

Endoscopic techniques have been widely used in ventral hernia surgery. Totally visceral sac separation (TVS) is a new concept proposed for hernia repair in recent years. The aim of this study was to contrast the postoperative results of TVS with the widely used method of Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus repair (IPOM plus) for incisional hernias. The retrospective comparison analysis of 38 IPOM plus and 34 TVS was conducted during the time period between December 2019 and June 2022. For both two groups, baseline characteristics, surgical records, postoperative information, and quality of life outcomes utilizing the Carolina's Comfort Scale were collected and analyzed. There were no differences between the methods of TVS and IPOM plus among the baseline characteristics. It showed the operative time in TVS group with the mean time of 213.4 min was significantly longer than that in IPOM plus group with the mean time of 182.9 min (P = 0.010). The postoperative length of stay in TVS group was 6.2 days, which was significantly shorter than IPOM plus group with the mean time of 4.8 days (P = 0.011). The medical expenses was significantly smaller in TVS group than that in IPOM plus group (P < 0.001). The quality of life scores of TVS were significant better than IPOM plus at one week, one month and six months. Besides, both TVS and IPOM plus have very few complications. TVS approach for incisional hernias is secure, effective, and valuable. It has shorter postoperative length of stay, higher quality of life, longer operative time, smaller medical expenses, and approximate complications compared with IPOM plus procedure. Our results have a greater contribution to the application and popularization of TVS technique.

A visual method of establishing preperitoneal space for totally visceral sac separation in ventral hernia repair

OBJECTIVE

To explore a method of visually establishing preperitoneal space. In this paper, the procedure is described in detail and its safety and efficacy evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective style was adopted. The clinical data of 33 patients who accepted the total visceral sac separation (TVS) procedure from December 2019 to November 2021 were collected. Observation indices included location and area of abdominal defect; surgical method and duration of operation to establish preperitoneal space and any postoperative complications; developments during follow-up. Follow-up was performed up to December 2021 using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect any complications of incision or recurrence of ventral hernia.

RESULTS

For operative indices, all patients underwent the TVS procedure successfully except for one who had to be converted to laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) due to failure to establish preperitoneal space. The time required to establish preperitoneal space was 185.75 ± 44.37 s and the duration of hospital stay was 8.27 ± 1.42 days. No complications, such as abdominal bleeding or digestive tract injury, occurred during hospitalization. No complications of incision were observed during follow up, which lasted 2-24 months with an average of 7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results of the novel attempt to establish the preperitoneal space visually confirmed this to be a safe and feasible method. However, the sample size used here was small, with a short follow up. The details and notes need to be further discussed.

Can ventral TAPP achieve favorable outcomes in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The concept of the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) was transferred from the inguinal hernia repair to be adopted in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (VHR) and since then it has been gaining popularity. However, there are minimal data supporting the ventral TAPP (vTAPP) technique which may lead to reticence in the adoption of this approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who received minimally invasive vTAPP for VHR.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library until July 2022. We selected studies that compared the vTAPP technique with any of other minimally invasive techniques. A meta-analysis was done for the outcomes of perioperative characteristics and postoperative parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies (1429 patients) were identified. vTAPP was associated with considerable benefit when compared to IPOM. vTAPP was less painful (MD = - 1.01; 95% CI [- 1.39, - 0.64], p < 0.00001), of reduced average cost (MD = - 457.10; 95% CI [- 457.27, - 456.92], p < 0.00001) and decreased SSI (OR = 0.29; 95% [0.09, 0.96], p = 0.04). On the other hand, the vTAPP approach consumed less operative time (MD: - 31.01, 95% CI [- 33.50, - 28.51]), p < 0.00001) and shorter hospital stay than the e-TEP approach.

CONCLUSION

vTAPP appears to be safe and effective procedure for VHR, superior or similar to other minimally invasive techniques for perioperative characteristics and short-term outcomes.

Postoperative Pain After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Background: Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair, when performed correctly, may reduce the risk for pain and discomfort in the postoperative period thus enabling shorter hospital stay. The aim of the present study was to evaluate postoperative pain following robot-assisted laparoscopic repair. The approach was selected after an intraoperative decision to complete the repair as: (1). Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP); (2). Trans-Abdominal RetroMuscular (TARM) repair; or (3). Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) repair depending on anatomical conditions. Methods: Twenty ventral hernia repairs, 8 primary and 12 incisional, were included between 18th Dec 2017 and 11th Nov 2019. There were 8 women, mean age was 60.3 years, and mean diameter of the defect was 3.8 cm. The repairs were performed at Södersjukhuset (Southern General Hospital, Stockholm) using the Da Vinci Si Surgical System®. Sixteen repairs were completed with the TAPP technique, 2 with the TARM technique, and 2 as IPOM repair. Results: Mean hospital stay was 1.05 days. No postoperative infection was seen, and no recurrence was seen at 1 year. At the 30-day follow-up, fifteen patients (75%) rated their pain as zero or pain that was easily ignored, according to the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire. After 1 year no one had pain that was not easily ignored. Conclusion: The present study shows that robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral hernia is feasible and safe. More randomized controlled trials are needed to show that the potential benefits in terms of shorter operation times, earlier discharge, and less postoperative pain motivate the extra costs associated with the robot technique.

Subxiphoid top-down endoscopic totally preperitoneal approach (eTPA) for midline ventral hernia repair

PURPOSE

Midline abdominal wall hernia repair is among the most common surgical interventions performed worldwide. However, the optimal surgical technique remains controversial. To overcome the disadvantages of both open and transabdominal procedures, we developed a totally endoscopic preperitoneal approach (eTPA) with placement of a large mesh.

METHODS

From December 2019 to October 2020, 20 consecutive patients with small to medium-sized midline ventral hernias underwent repair using a completely preperitoneal subxiphoid top-down approach. The preperitoneal space was entered directly below the xiphoid, and careful endoscopic development of the plane between the peritoneum and posterior sheath of the rectus fascia was then performed behind the linea alba. The hernia sac and its contents were identified and reduced. The hernia defect was closed with sutures, and a mesh with an adequate high defect: mesh ratio was placed in the newly created preperitoneal space.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled in this study, including 14 with primary umbilical hernias, 4 with primary epigastric hernias, and 2 with recurrent umbilical hernias. 15 patients suffered from a mild concomitant diastasis recti. All operations were successfully completed without conversion to open repair. The mean operative time was 105.3 min (range, 60-220 min). Postoperative pain was mild, and the mean visual analog scale score for pain was 1.8 on the first postoperative day. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 days (range, 1-4 days). One patient developed a minor postoperative seroma, but it had no adverse impact on the final outcome. No patients developed recurrence during the 3- to 10-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The subxiphoid top-down totally endoscopic preperitoneal approach (eTPA) technique is feasible and effective. It may become a valuable alternative for the treatment of primary small- (defect size < 2 cm) and medium-sized (2-4 cm) midline ventral hernias, particularly in presence of a concomitant diastasis recti.

Employing a Xiphoid-umbilicus Approach in an Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Procedure for the Preperitoneal Repair of Midline Ventral Hernias

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) repair seems to be a promising procedure for treating ventral hernias because repairing at the preperitoneal layer reduces damage to the natural musculoaponeurotic structures of the abdominal wall. This article reports the preliminary surgical results after such a procedure with a xiphoid-umbilicus approach for a midline ventral hernia of the middle-upper abdomen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen cases with a small midline ventral hernia scheduled for preperitoneal repair with a TES procedure with a xiphoid-umbilicus approach were included. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients' average age was 55.80±15.33 years, body mass index was 26.49±2.98, defect size was 4.59±2.28 cm2, and the most frequent region was M3. Five of 15 procedures were conducted in a bottom-up direction, and 10 of 15 with single-port surgery. Only 1 repair failed due to severe peritoneal damage. The operation duration was 120.4±47.7 minutes. All patients recovered quickly and uneventfully, and no case needed readmission. No severe intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred. Only 1 case developed seroma, and there was no surgical site infection, pain, trocar site hernia, and recurrence observed during short-term follow-up (3 to 12 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic preperitoneal repair helps reduce damage to the abdominal wall during a TES procedure. Compared with a suprapubic approach, employing a xiphoid-umbilicus approach facilitates preperitoneal repair for small ventral hernias of the middle-upper abdomen. This will be a future option for minimally invasive surgical repair of such ventral hernias (Supplemental Digital Content 1, Video, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A287).

Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair of Parastomal Hernia: A Case Report

A parastomal hernia is a type of incisional hernia that occurs in abdominal integuments in the proximity of a stoma. It is a frequent late complication following colostomy. Surgical repair is currently the only treatment option for parastomal hernia. Here we present the case of a 74-year-old patient with parastomal hernia and a history of open surgery treated with a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic approach. There was no recurrence of the hernia at the 3-month follow-up. We discuss the feasibility and possible operative approaches for endoscopic repair of parastomal hernia with the TEP technique.

Learning Curve of Robotic Rives-Stoppa Ventral Hernia Repair: A Cumulative Sum Analysis

Background: Robotic Rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair (rRS-VHR) is a minimally invasive technique that incorporates extraperitoneal mesh placement, using either transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal access. An understanding of its learning curve and technical challenges may guide and encourage its adoption. We aim at evaluating the rRS-VHR learning curve based on operative times while accounting for adverse outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rRS repair for centrally located ventral and incisional hernias. A single surgeon operative time-based cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis learning curve was created, and a composite outcome was used for risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM). Results: Eighty-one patients undergoing rRS-VHR were included. A learning curve was created by using skin-to-skin times. Accordingly, patients were grouped into three phases. The mean skin-to-skin time was 72.2 minutes, and there was a significant decrease in skin-to-skin times throughout the learning curve (Phase-I: 86.4 minutes versus Phase-III: 63.8 minutes; P = .001), with a gradual decrease after 29 cases. Eleven patients experienced adverse composite outcomes, which were used to create a RA-CUSUM graph. Results showed the highest adverse outcome rates in Phase-II, with a gradual decrease in risk-adjusted operative times after 51 cases. Conclusions: Consistently decreasing operative times and adverse outcome rates in rRS-VHR was observed after the completion of 29 and 51 cases, respectively. Future studies that provide group learning curves for this procedure can deliver more generalizable results in terms of its performance rates.