The learning curve for the second generation of laparoscopic surgeons: lesson learned from a large series of laparoscopic adrenalectomies

The mentoring effects of learning curve of total extraperitoneal hernioplasty: the CUSUM analysis of the pioneer and second-generation surgeon

BACKGROUND

Most studies demonstrated that the learning curve of total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) is around 30-80 cases. All these studies were performed by a single surgeon who had little or no experience of TEP repair before. However, with mentoring by experienced surgeon, the second-generation surgeon may get more familiar with the anatomy and procedures of TEP than the pioneer surgeon. Besides, the surgical caveats would be further understood and pitfalls avoided by mentoring with the pioneer surgeon. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of mentoring by pioneer surgeon to the second-generation surgeon in the TEP operation by comparing the learning curve and complications of pioneer and second-generation surgeon.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our TEP cases performed by the two surgeons, the pioneer surgeon and the second-generation surgeon, in general surgery department in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung division. The reviewed period was between January 2016 and December 2021. The pioneer surgeon performed the TEP surgery by himself. The second-generation surgeon attended 20-30 cases of TEP done by pioneer surgeon. Then, the pioneer surgeon mentored the second-generation surgeon's first 10 TEP cases. By comparing the operation time, the intraoperative and post-operative complications, cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curve was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The CUSUM analysis reveals that the learning curve of TEP is around 45 procedures in the pioneer surgeon and 30 procedures in the second-generation surgeon. The median operation time in pioneer surgeon and second-generation surgeon is 103.5 vs 90 min (p = 0.03). The overall intraoperative and post-operative complications between pioneer and second-generation surgeon reveal no significant difference. After crossing the learning curve, the operation time of pioneer surgeon and the second-generation surgeon decreased significantly, from 114 to 93 min (p = 0.008) and from 103 to 87.2min (p = 0.032), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the overall post-operative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

By mentoring with the pioneer surgeon, the second-generation surgeon may achieve the learning curve quicker than the pioneer surgeon in terms of operation time. After reaching the learning curve, the operation time before and after learning curve reveal significant different in both surgeons while the overall post-operative complications reveal no significant different.

Implementation of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: learning curve of a single high-volume center

Open esophagectomy is considered to be the main surgical procedure in the world for esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing a new surgical technique is associated with learning curve morbidity. The objective of this study is to determine the learning curve based on anastomotic leakage (AL) after implementing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MI-ILE) in January 2015. All 257 patients who underwent MI-ILE in a single high-volume center between January 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. The learning curve was evaluated using the standard CUSUM analysis with an expected AL rate of 11%. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative complications, textbook outcome, and lymph node yield divided by the year of operation. Hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis was used to check for potential confounding variables. The CUSUM analysis showed a learning curve of 179 cases. The mean AL rate decreased from 33.3% in 2015 to 9.5% in 2020 (P = 0.007). There was an increase in the mean lymph node yield from 21 in 2018 to 28 in 2019 (P < 0.001) and textbook outcome from 37.3% in 2015 to 66.7% in 2020 (P = 0.005). A newly implemented MI-ILE has a learning curve of 179 patients based on a reference AL rate of 11% using the CUSUM method. Whether future generation surgeons will show similar learning curve numbers, implicating continuous development of different introduction programs of new techniques, will have to be the focus of future research.

Development and validation of a preoperative "difficulty score" for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

A difficulty score for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is lacking in the literature. A retrospective cohort study was designed to develop a preoperative "difficulty score" for LA.

METHODS

A multicenter study was conducted involving four Italian tertiary centers for adrenal disease. The population was randomly divided into two subsets: training group and validation one. A multicenter study was undertaken, including 964 patients. Patient, adrenal lesion, surgeon's characteristics, and the type of procedure were studied as potential predictors of target events. The operative time (pOT), conversion rate (cLA), or both were used as indicators of the difficulty in three multivariate models. All models were developed in a training cohort (70% of the sample) and validated using 30% of patients. For all models, the ability to predict complicated postoperative course was reported describing the area under the curve (AUCs). Logistic regression, reporting odds ratio (OR) with p-value, was used.

RESULTS

In model A, gender (OR 2.04, p = 0.001), BMI (OR 1.07, p = 0.002), previous surgery (OR 1.29, p = 0.048), site (OR 21.8, p < 0.001) and size of the lesion (OR 1.16, p = 0.002), cumulative sum of procedures (OR 0.99, p < 0.001), extended (OR 26.72, p < 0.001) or associated procedures (OR 4.32, p = 0.015) increased the pOT. In model B, ASA (OR 2.86, p = 0.001), lesion size (OR 1.20, p = 0.005), and extended resection (OR 8.85, p = 0.007) increased the cLA risk. Model C had similar results to model A. All scores obtained predicted the target events in validation cohort (OR 1.99, p < 0.001; OR 1.37, p = 0.007; OR 1.70, p < 0.001, score A, B, and C, respectively). The AUCs in predicting complications were 0.740, 0.686, and 0.763 for model A, B, and C, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A difficulty score based on both pOT and cLA (Model C) was developed using 70% of the sample. The score was validated using a second cohort. Finally, the score was tested, and its results are able to predict a complicated postoperative course.

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase II/III randomized clinical controlled trials

PURPOSE

The best approach for minimally invasive adrenalectomy is still under debate.

METHODS

A systematic search of randomized clinical trials was carried out. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was made reporting the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). The primary endpoint regarded both in-hospital mortality and morbidity. The secondary endpoints were operative time (OP), blood loss (BL), length of stay (LOS), conversion, incisional hernia, and disease recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included, involving 359 patients clustered as follows: 175 (48.7%) in the TPLA arm; 55 (15.3%) in the RPLA arm; 10 (2.8%) in the Ro-TPLA arm; 25 (7%) in the TPAA arm; 20 (5.6%) in the SILS-LA arm; and 74 (20.6%) in the RPA arm. The RPLA had the highest probability of being the safest approach (SUCRA 69.6%), followed by RPA (SUCRA 63.0%). TPAA, Ro-TPLA, SILS-LA, and TPLA have similar probability of being safe (SUCRA values 45.2%, 43.4%, 43.0%, and 38.5%, respectively). Analysis of the secondary endpoints confirmed the superiority of RPA regarding OP, BL, LOS, and incisional hernia rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The best choice for patients with adrenal masses candidate for minimally invasive surgery seems to be RPA. An alternative could be RPLA. The remaining approaches could have some specific advantages but do not represent the first minimally invasive choice.

Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is Associated with the Operative Time in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

Background: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the standard treatment for adrenal benign tumors, including primary aldosteronism (PA) or Cushing's syndrome (CS). Several obesity-related factors were associated with prolonged total operative time (OT), but perinephric fat characteristics were not assessed. We investigated whether the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, which evaluates perinephric fat characteristics, was associated with OT for LA. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study examined 141 consecutive patients who underwent LA for PA or CS. We reviewed patients' characteristics and OT. MAP scores were recorded using preoperative imaging. The correlation among characteristics data, MAP score, and OT was evaluated. Results: Overall, we assessed 82 women and 59 men. Adrenal tumors were found in 80 PA and 61 CS patients. There were 74 left-sided and 67 right-sided tumors. For all patients, the median age, body mass index, and tumor size were 56 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46-65), 24.1 kg/m² (IQR 21.7-26.8), and 19 mm (IQR 13-26), respectively. A total of 91 patients had MAP scores of 0, and 50 had MAP >0. The median OT was 183.5 minutes (IQR: 156-224 minutes) in the MAP >0 group and 162 minutes (IQR: 135-194 minutes) in the MAP = 0 group. In single variable analysis (unadjusted), MAP scores >0 and left-sided tumors were correlated with longer OT. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that this correlation was only significant for MAP scores >0. Conclusions: MAP score may be useful in preoperative planning for PA or CS patients undergoing LA.