1
|
Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Endoscopic full thickness resection: techniques, applications, outcomes. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38779710 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2357611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) represents a pivotal advancement in the minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal lesions, offering a novel approach for the management of lesions previously deemed challenging or unreachable through conventional endoscopic techniques. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the development, methodologies, applications, and clinical outcomes associated with EFTR, including exposed and device-assisted EFTR (DA-EFTR), the integration of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with EFTR in hybrid techniques, and the collaborative approach between laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery (LECS). It encapsulates a comprehensive analysis of the various EFTR techniques tailored to specific lesion characteristics and anatomical locations, underscoring the significance of technique selection based on the lesion's nature and situational context. EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY The review underscores EFTR's transformative role in expanding therapeutic horizons for gastrointestinal tumors, emphasizing the importance of technique selection tailored to the unique attributes of each lesion. It highlights EFTR's capacity to facilitate organ-preserving interventions, thereby significantly enhancing patient outcomes and reducing procedural complications. EFTR is a cornerstone in the evolution of gastrointestinal surgery, marking a significant leap forward in the pursuit of precision, safety, and efficacy in tumor management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nabi Z, Samanta J, Dhar J, Mohan BP, Facciorusso A, Reddy DN. Device-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection in colorectum: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:116-128. [PMID: 37422920 DOI: 10.1111/den.14631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is emerging as an effective modality for mucosal and submucosal lesions in the colorectum. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the success and safety of device-assisted EFTR in the colon and rectum. METHODS A literature search was performed in the Embase, PubMed, and Medline databases for studies evaluating device-assisted EFTR between inception to October 2022. The primary outcome of the study was clinical success (R0 resection) with EFTR. Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure duration, and adverse events. RESULTS In all, 29 studies with 3467 patients (59% male patients, 3492 lesions) were included in the analysis. The lesions were located in right colon (47.5%), left colon (28.6%), and rectum (24.3%). EFTR was performed for subepithelial lesions in 7.2% patients. The pooled mean size of the lesions was 16.6 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.9-18.2, I2 98%). Technical success was achieved in 87.1% (95% CI 85.1-88.9%, I2 39%) procedures. The pooled rate of en bloc resection was 88.1% (95% CI 86-90%, I2 47%) and R0 resection was 81.8% (95% CI 79-84.3%, I2 56%). In subepithelial lesions, the pooled rate of R0 resection was 94.3% (95% CI 89.7-96.9%, I2 0%). The pooled rate of adverse events was 11.9% (95% CI 10.2-13.9%, I2 43%) and major adverse events requiring surgery was 2.5% (95% CI 2.0-3.1%, I2 0%). CONCLUSION Device-assisted EFTR is a safe and effective treatment modality in cases with adenomatous and subepithelial colorectal lesions. Comparative studies are required with conventional resection techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - D Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barbaro F, Papparella LG, Chiappetta MF, Ciuffini C, Fukuchi T, Hamanaka J, Quero G, Pecere S, Gibiino G, Petruzziello L, Maeda S, Hirasawa K, Costamagna G. Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection of residual/recurrent colonic lesions on scars: a retrospective Italian and Japanese comparative study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 36:162-167. [PMID: 38131424 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic treatment of recurrent/residual colonic lesions on scars is a challenging procedure. In this setting, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the first choice, despite a significant rate of complications. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) has been shown to be well-tolerated and effective for these lesions. The aim of this study is to conduct a comparison of outcomes for resection of such lesions between ESD and eFTR in an Italian and a Japanese referral center. METHODS From January 2018 to July 2020, we retrospectively enrolled patients with residual/recurrent colonic lesions, 20 treated by eFTR in Italy and 43 treated by ESD in Japan. The primary outcome was to compare the two techniques in terms of en-bloc and R0-resection rates, whereas complications, time of procedure, and outcomes at 3-month follow-up were evaluated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS R0 resection rate was not significantly different between the two groups [18/20 (90%) and 41/43 (95%); P= 0.66]. En-bloc resection was 100% in both groups. No significant difference was found in the procedure time (54 min vs. 61 min; P= 0.9). There was a higher perforation rate in the ESD group [11/43 (26%) vs. 0/20 (0%); P= 0.01]. At the 3-month follow-up, two lesions relapsed in the eFTR cohort and none in the ESD cohort (P= 0.1). CONCLUSION eFTR is a safer, as effective and equally time-consuming technique compared with ESD for the treatment of residual/recurrent colonic lesions on scars and could become an alternative therapeutic option for such lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Barbaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Luigi Giovanni Papparella
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Michele Francesco Chiappetta
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Promise, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Cristina Ciuffini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Takehide Fukuchi
- Division of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jun Hamanaka
- Division of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Silvia Pecere
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Giulia Gibiino
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Lucio Petruzziello
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Shin Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kingo Hirasawa
- Division of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moura DB, Nunes N, Chálim Rebelo C, Côrte-Real F, Rego AC, Duarte MA. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Subepithelial Lesion in the Cecum: Granular Cell Tumor. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 30:461-463. [PMID: 38476149 PMCID: PMC10928858 DOI: 10.1159/000527586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Bernardo Moura
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada EPER, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aganja RP, Sivasankar C, Lee JH. AI-2 quorum sensing controlled delivery of cytolysin-A by tryptophan auxotrophic low-endotoxic Salmonella and its anticancer effects in CT26 mice with colon cancer. J Adv Res 2023:S2090-1232(23)00238-2. [PMID: 37689243 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The limitations of conventional cancer therapies necessitate target-oriented, highly invasive, and safe treatment approaches. Hence, the intrinsic anti-tumor activity of Salmonella can offer better options to combat cancers. OBJECTIVES This study aims to utilize attenuated Salmonella and deliver cytolytic protein cytolysin A (ClyA) under quorum sensing (QS) signaling for precise localized expression in tumors but not in healthy organs. METHODS The therapeutic delivery strain was imposed with tryptophan auxotroph for selective colonization in tumors by trpA and trpE deletion, and lipid-A and O-antigen were altered by pagL and rfaL deletions using lambda red recombination method. The strain was transformed with the designed QS-controlled ClyA expression vector which was validated by western blot. The in vivo passaged therapeutic strain was used for treatment four times at a weekly interval, with a dose of 5 × 106 CFU/mouse for cancer therapy. RESULTS The attenuated strain induced minimal endotoxicity-related cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ and exhibited adequate colonization despite earlier exposure in mice. The QS-controlled ClyA expression was confirmed by western blot from bacterial cultures grown at different cell densities. The results demonstrated that the in vivo passaged strain preferentially colonized the tumor after vacating the spleen, liver, and lung, leaving no outward histological scars. The anti-cancer effect of the designed construct was evaluated in the murine CT26 colon cancer model. The expression of ClyA increased tumoricidal activity by 67 % compared to vector control. CONCLUSION Hence, the anti-tumor effect of the engineered Salmonella strain was improved by ClyA expression via QS activation after achieving the threshold bacterial cell density. Further, immunohistochemical staining of the tumor and other organs corroborated the QS-controlled tumor-specific expression of ClyA. Overall, the results imply that the developed anti-cancer Salmonella has low endotoxicity and QS-controlled expression of ClyA as beneficial safety elements and supports recurrent Salmonella inoculation by O-antigen deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ram Prasad Aganja
- Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, South Korea
| | - Chandran Sivasankar
- Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, South Korea
| | - John Hwa Lee
- Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Obri M, Ichkhanian Y, Brown P, Almajed MR, Nimri F, Taha A, Agha Y, Jesse M, Singla S, Piraka C, Zuchelli TE. Full-thickness resection device for management of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E899-E907. [PMID: 37810898 PMCID: PMC10558260 DOI: 10.1055/a-2131-4891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice is technically challenging and is commonly referred for surgical resection. However, post-resection appendicitis is a concern. Many studies have varying rates of post-procedure appendicitis. We aim to report the rate of post-resection appendicitis by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Studies that involved the use of a full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for management of appendiceal polyps were included. The primary outcome was appendicitis after FTRD and a subgroup analysis was performed on studies that only included FTRD performed at the appendiceal orifice. Results Appendicitis was encountered in 15% (95%CI: [11-21]) of the patients with 61% (95% CI: [44-76]) requiring surgical management. Pooled rates of technical success, histologic FTR, and histologic R0 resection in this sub-group (n=123) were 92% (95% CI: [85-96]), 98% (95% CI: [93-100]), and 72% (95% CI: [64-84%]), respectively. Post-resection histopathological evaluation revealed a mean resected specimen size of 16.8 ± 5.4 mm, with non-neoplastic pathology in 9 (7%), adenomas in 103 (84%), adenomas + high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in nine (7%), and adenocarcinoma in two (2%). The pooled rate for non-appendicitis-related surgical management (technical failure and/or high-risk lesions) was 11 % (CI: 7-17). Conclusions FTRD appears to be an effective method for managing appendiceal lesions. However, appendicitis post-resection occurs in a non-trivial number of patients and the R0 resection rate in appendiceal lesions is only 72%. Therefore, caution should be employed in the use of this technique, considering the relative risks of surgical intervention in each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Obri
- Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | | | - Patrick Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | | | - Faisal Nimri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Ashraf Taha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Yasmine Agha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Michelle Jesse
- Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Sumit Singla
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
| | - Cyrus Piraka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
| | - Tobias E. Zuchelli
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Srirajaskanthan R, Clement D, Brown S, Howard MR, Ramage JK. Optimising Outcomes and Surveillance Strategies of Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2766. [PMID: 37345103 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms are increasing in incidence, in part due to increased endoscopic procedures being performed for bowel cancer screening. Whilst most of these lesions are low-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, they can have a varied clinical behaviour. Frequently, these lesions are incorrectly characterised at endoscopy and, therefore, incompletely excised using standard polypectomy techniques. Furthermore, some cases are not fully staged prior to or post resection. In this article we discuss the endoscopic and surgical options available to improve the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and the staging procedures that should be used in these NETs. We also review factors that may suggest a higher risk of nodal involvement or recurrence. This information may help determine whether endoscopic or surgical resection techniques should be considered. In cases of R1 resection we discuss the management options available and the long-term surveillance options and when these should be offered to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Dominique Clement
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Sarah Brown
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Mark R Howard
- Department of Histopathology, Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - John K Ramage
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mueller J, Kuellmer A, Schiemer M, Thimme R, Schmidt A. Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:232-242. [PMID: 35997598 DOI: 10.1111/den.14425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is an integral part of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Since its market launch in Europe in 2014, its safety and effectiveness have been proven in numerous studies. Adaptations in design as well as new techniques, such as hybrid EFTR, expand the spectrum of the FTRD system. The following review is intended to provide an overview of the clinical application and current evidence of EFTR with the FTRD system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Mueller
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Armin Kuellmer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Schiemer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Robert Thimme
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nomura T, Sugimoto S, Nakamura H, Oyamada J, Ito K, Kamei A. Closure of full-thickness perforations in porcine stomach using 20-mm reopenable clips. Endoscopy 2022; 55:E86-E87. [PMID: 36216259 PMCID: PMC9829780 DOI: 10.1055/a-1944-9175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuma Nomura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan,Department of Gastroenterology, Mie Prefectural Shima Hospital, Shima, Mie, Japan
| | - Shinya Sugimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan
| | - Haruka Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan,Department of Gastroenterology, Mie Prefectural Shima Hospital, Shima, Mie, Japan
| | - Jun Oyamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan
| | - Keiichi Ito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mie Prefectural Shima Hospital, Shima, Mie, Japan
| | - Akira Kamei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McKechnie T, Govind S, Lee J, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C. Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Surg Res 2022; 280:440-449. [PMID: 36054955 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with an over-the-scope full-thickness resection device is a relatively new technique for the resection of colorectal lesions. Multiple centers have published the results of case series and observational cohorts regarding the use of this technique for managing difficult polyps. This study aims to aggregate the results of these studies to determine the effectiveness and safety of this technique in the resection of these technically challenging colonic lesions. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were included if they reported technical success rate for EFTR of colonic lesions. The primary outcome was technical success rate and secondary outcomes included rate of R0 resection and overall 30-d morbidity. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to generate effect sizes for pooled outcomes. RESULTS From 2211 citations, 21 studies with 1539 patients (mean age 67.2 y, 39.5% female) undergoing 1551 procedures were included. Difficult to resect benign lesions were the most commonly excised lesions (hyperplastic: 35.9%; adenomas: 30.2%), followed by T1 adenocarcinomas (25.6%) and neuroendocrine tumors (6.1%). Technical success rate was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87-92), and R0 resection rate was 79% (95% CI 76-82). Mean procedure time was 53.5 min and mean specimen size was 17.5 mm. Overall 30-d morbidity was 11% (95% CI 7-13), and incidences of perforation and postpolypectomy bleeding were 2% (95% CI 1-2) and 5% (95% CI 3-7), respectively. Lesion recurrence at 3-mo follow-up was 8%. CONCLUSIONS EFTR requires further large sample size, comparative studies with reporting of long-term oncologic data. However, preliminary findings indicate that it is a safe and effective technique with high rates of technical success and acceptable rates of R0 resection when employed by experienced endoscopists for high-risk colonic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaylan Govind
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Lee
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ichkhanian Y, Barawi M, Seoud T, Thakkar S, Kothari TH, Halabi ME, Ullah A, Edris W, Aepli P, Kowalski T, Shinn B, Shariaha RZ, Mahadev S, Mosko JD, Andrisani G, Di Matteo FM, Albrecht H, Giap AQ, Tang SJ, Naga YM, van Geenen E, Friedland S, Tharian B, Irani S, Ross AS, Jamil LH, Lew D, Nett AS, Farha J, Runge TM, Jovani M, Khashab MA. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice: a multicenter international experience. Endoscopy 2022; 54:16-24. [PMID: 33395714 DOI: 10.1055/a-1345-0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice remains a challenge. We aimed to report outcomes with the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for the resection of appendiceal lesions and identify factors associated with the occurrence of appendicitis. METHODS This was a retrospective study at 18 tertiary-care centers (USA 12, Canada 1, Europe 5) between November 2016 and August 2020. Consecutive patients who underwent resection of an appendiceal orifice lesion using the FTRD were included. The primary outcome was the rate of R0 resection in neoplastic lesions, defined as negative lateral and deep margins on post-resection histologic evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the rates of: technical success (en bloc resection), clinical success (technical success without need for further surgical intervention), post-resection appendicitis, and polyp recurrence. RESULTS 66 patients (32 women; mean age 64) underwent resection of colonic lesions involving the appendiceal orifice (mean [standard deviation] size, 14.5 (6.2) mm), with 40 (61 %) being deep, extending into the appendiceal lumen. Technical success was achieved in 59/66 patients (89 %), of which, 56 were found to be neoplastic lesions on post-resection pathology. Clinical success was achieved in 53/66 (80 %). R0 resection was achieved in 52/56 (93 %). Of the 58 patients in whom EFTR was completed who had no prior history of appendectomy, appendicitis was reported in 10 (17 %), with six (60 %) requiring surgical appendectomy. Follow-up colonoscopy was completed in 41 patients, with evidence of recurrence in five (12 %). CONCLUSIONS The FTRD is a promising non-surgical alternative for resecting appendiceal lesions, but appendicitis occurs in 1/6 cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yervant Ichkhanian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mohammed Barawi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Talal Seoud
- Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shyam Thakkar
- Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Truptesh H Kothari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Maan El Halabi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai West, New York, New York, USA
| | - Asad Ullah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wedi Edris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Patrick Aepli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzerne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Kowalski
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brianna Shinn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Reem Z Shariaha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Srihari Mahadev
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Mosko
- The Center for Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gianluca Andrisani
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Heinz Albrecht
- Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andrew Q Giap
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente, Anaheim, California, USA
| | - Shou-Jiang Tang
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Yehia M Naga
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | | | - Shai Friedland
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Shayan Irani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew S Ross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Health-Royal Oak, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.,Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel Lew
- Pancreatic and Biliary Diseases Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, USA
| | - Andrew S Nett
- Division of Gastroenterology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Jad Farha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas M Runge
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Manol Jovani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Keane MG, Mony S, Wood LD, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. Prophylactic appendiceal retrograde intraluminal stent placement (PARIS). VideoGIE 2021; 6:552-554. [PMID: 34917867 PMCID: PMC8646081 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret G Keane
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shruti Mony
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laura D Wood
- Sol Goldamn Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bauermeister M, Mende M, Hornoff S, Faiss S. Hybrid resection of large colorectal adenomas combining EMR and FTRD. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:978-983. [PMID: 34078211 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1933583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) allowed resection of difficult adenomas in the duodenum and colorectum with non-lifting. The main limitation of this endoscopic technique is the lesion size. We describe a hybrid approach combining endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and FTRD in a cohort of 17 patients to reduce tumor size and enable full-thickness resection. METHODS Retrospective analysis from data of 17 patients who underwent hybrid EMR-FTRD for large adenomas in the colorectum at our institution. Technical success, histological confirmation of margin-free resection and adverse advents were studied. RESULTS 16 of 17 (94.1%) lesions could be resected macroscopically complete with confirmed full-thickness resection. Histological work-up of the full-thickness specimens showed free lateral margins in 13 patients (76.4%), unclear margins in two patients (11.8%) and positive margins in two patients (11.8%). There were no immediate perforation or major bleeding, however one patient showed a stenosis after resection in the follow-up endoscopy. Follow-up endoscopy was available in 12 patients. In two of 12 patients a recurrent adenoma was detected. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid EMR-EFTR in the colorectum seems to be a safe and effective technique for large non-lifting lesions with positive lifting signs in the margins. Further prospective evaluation of efficacy, safety and long-term outcome of this hybrid technique is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthias Mende
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Hornoff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|