Length of Barrett's esophagus in the presence of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma

High Risk of Persistence and Risk of Dysplasia After Diagnosis of Ultrashort Barrett's Esophagus

INTRODUCTION

The management of ultrashort (<1 cm) Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of ultrashort BE (USBE) at index diagnosis, identify factors associated with persistent BE after USBE diagnosis, and identify risk of dysplasia after initial USBE in a population of US veterans.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study at the Veterans Affairs hospital in Houston, TX, of consecutive patients with new BE diagnosis from November 1990 to June 2022 with follow-up through April 2023. Using a pathology database, we identified patients with a new USBE diagnosis and any subsequent follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). We examined the association of sociodemographic and clinical risk factors of persistent USBE cohort compared with longer-length segment BE and those with a negative follow-up EGD after index USBE with χ 2 tests and logistic regression models. Last, we calculated the prevalence and incidence of any dysplasia in persistent BE after USBE at index diagnosis compared with BE ≥1 cm. We excluded patients without at least 1 follow-up endoscopy.

RESULTS

Of 739 patients with BE, 167 (22.6%) had USBE on index EGD. Of those with index USBE, 86 (51.5%) had persistent BE and 67 (40.1%) had negative intestinal metaplasia on follow-up EGD. There was a greater proportion of non-Hispanic White and Hispanic than non-Hispanic Black patients with persistent BE after index USBE and the negative follow-up of EGD cohorts ( P = 0.012), but no significant difference in age, sex, smoking status, alcohol status, and body mass index between the 2 groups. White race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-10.7) and Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 4.85; 95% CI 1.19-19.7; ref: non-Hispanic Black) were associated with an increased likelihood of persistent BE. During 3,880.7 person-years of follow-up, 112 patients (10 persistent BE after index USBE) developed definite dysplasia/neoplasia. The incidence rate of definite dysplasia/neoplasia was 19.5 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 10.5-36.3 per 1,000 person-years) in those with persistent BE after USBE and 33.8 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 27.9-41.1 per 1,000 person-years) in those with longer segment BE ( P value by log-rank test = 0.23; hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.35-1.29). We did not identify any significant predictors of dysplasia in persistent BE after index endoscopy with USBE.

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of persistent BE after index USBE is high, and there is a risk of developing dysplasia/neoplasia in persistent BE after USBE. We were unable to detect a difference in the risk of dysplasia/neoplasia between persistent BE after index USBE and BE ≥1 cm on index endoscopy in a cohort of US veterans. White race and Hispanic ethnicity are associated with persistent BE after index USBE and may be target demographics for surveillance.

Computer-assisted classification of the squamocolumnar junction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An irregular Z-line is characterized by a squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) that extends proximally above the gastroesophageal junction by <1 cm, whereas Barrett's esophagus is defined as a columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) that extends proximally by ≥1 cm with the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia on biopsy sampling. Measurement of the CLE is most accurate for lengths ≥1 cm, and, as such, guidelines do not recommend biopsy sampling of an irregular Z-line when seen on endoscopy. However, a CLE is often estimated by visual inspection rather than direct measurement, making this characterization imprecise. In this study, we present methodology to standardize the characterization of the SCJ, hypothesizing that the shape of the Z-line can be used as a surrogate classifier. We present a computer-generated algorithm capable of automated segmentation and shape complexity quantification of the Z-line.

METHODS

We selected and manually segmented 849 images of the Z-line. We used the nnUNet framework (Nature Methods, Heidelberg, Germany) to train a model to segment the Z-line. An additional dataset of 58 videos containing the Z-line were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Endoscopy video library. A high-quality image containing the Z-line was selected from each video. Ten gastroenterologists (5 esophageal experts) rated each of the 58 video-image pairs containing the Z-line as "regular" or "irregular," including their degree of confidence. Fleiss κ statistics were used to determine interobserver variability. The "ground truth" classification was determined by the esophageal expert majority vote. A wavelet decomposition model was then used to determine the threshold of irregularity based on the ground truth. Heat maps were generated for each Z-line to determine localized areas of complexity.

RESULTS

Fair agreement, with a Fleiss κ of .39, was observed among the 10 endoscopists when rating the Z-line as regular versus irregular using this dataset. Moderate agreement was observed among the 5 esophageal experts with a Fleiss κ statistic of .42, and fair agreement was observed among the 5 nonesophageal experts with a Fleiss κ statistic of .31. The wavelet energy coefficient optimal threshold to classify an SCJ as irregular was determined to be 1.53 × 107 with an accuracy of 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our computer-generated model was capable of automatic segmentation and classification of the Z-line. We established a threshold of complexity using the wavelet energy coefficient to standardize the classification of the SCJ.

Irregular Z-Line: To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy?

The z-line refers to the squamocolumnar junction which marks the transition between the normal stratified squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus and the columnar epithelium of the gastric cardia. An "irregular" z-line refers to an irregular appearing squamocolumnar junction characterized by the presence of columnar mucosa less than 1 cm in length that extends above the gastroesophageal junction. In contrast, Barrett's esophagus is diagnosed when columnar mucosa of at least 1 cm is seen in the distal esophagus extending above the gastroesophageal junction with biopsies demonstrating specialized intestinal metaplasia. Current guidelines recommend against taking routine biopsies from a normal or irregular z-line in the absence of visible abnormalities and advise against endoscopic surveillance in this patient population, in large part due to multiple studies demonstrating lack of progression to advanced neoplasia such as high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with an irregular z-line. Despite these recommendations, a sizable number of patients without Barrett's esophagus undergo biopsies from the z-line and are subsequently recommended to have surveillance endoscopies. Furthermore, patients with an irregular z-line are often mislabelled as Barrett's esophagus resulting in significant downstream consequences including higher healthcare costs and reduced health-related quality of life. In this review, we highlight the importance of landmark identification of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction at the time of endoscopy, share recommendations from current guidelines related to the z-line, examine rates of neoplastic progression in those with an irregular z-line, discuss consequences of routinely biopsying an irregular z-line, and highlight strategies on how to approach an irregular z-line if seen on endoscopy. A careful, high-quality endoscopic examination can help to identify visible abnormalities at the z-line, which, if present, should be targeted for biopsies to rule out dysplasia and neoplasia.

Incidence of Barrett's Esophagus Following Sleeve Gastrectomy in Southeast Asian Population

Background: Variable incidences (up to 18.8%) of Barrett's esophagus (BE) have been reported following sleeve gastrectomy (SG), however, there is no published data from the Southeast Asian population. Objective: To determine the incidence of BE following SG in Southeast Asians. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study from a tertiary-care center, all patients who had undergone SG from 2008 to 2021 and completed a minimum of 1-year follow-up were contacted to participate. Preoperative data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. On recruitment, all patients underwent barium swallow and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and weight parameters and reflux symptoms were recorded. Results: One hundred fourteen patients with no preoperative evidence of BE were included. The mean follow-up duration was 5.4 ± 3.1 years. On follow-up endoscopy, Barrett's was suspected in 4 patients. However, 3 patients had columnar-lined epithelium and only 1 patient (0.87%) had evidence of intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia on histology. Reflux esophagitis (grade LA-A) resolved in 9 out of 11 patients, while the rate of de novo esophagitis was reported in 22.3%. The mean reflux Symptom Severity score increased from 0.6 ± 1.8 to 2.6 ± 5.4 (P = .002). The mean body mass index reduced from 44.1 ± 7.1 to 33.6 ± 6.9 kg/m2 (P < .0001), however, 23.7% of the patients experienced significant weight recidivism. Conclusions: Southeast Asians might have a low incidence of BE following SG. Hence, endoscopic surveillance for the sole purpose of diagnosing BE may not be advisable for these patients.

Quantitative p53 immunostaining aids in the detection of prevalent dysplasia

AIMS

The lack of accepted scoring criteria has precluded the use of p53 in routine practice. We evaluate the utility of automated quantitative p53 analysis in risk stratifying Barrett's oesophagus (BE) patients using non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) biopsies in a multicentric cohort of BE progressor (P) and non-progressor (NP) patients.

METHODS

NDBE biopsies prior to the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia from 75 BE-P, and index and last surveillance biopsies from 148 BE-NP were stained for p53, and scored digitally as 1+, 2+ and 3+. A secondary cohort of 30 BE-P was evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with BE-NP, BE-P was predominantly men (p=0.001), ≥55 years of age (p=0.008), with longer BE segments (71% vs 33%; p<0.001). The mean number of 3+p53 positive cells and 3+ positive glands were significantly more in BE-P versus BE-NP NDBE biopsies (175 vs 9.7, p<0.001; 9.8 vs 0.1; p<0.001, respectively). At a cut-off of ≥10 p53 (3+) positive cells, the sensitivity and specificity of the assay to identify BE-P were 39% and 93%. On multivariate analysis, scoring p53 in NDBE biopsies, age, gender and length of BE were significantly associated with neoplastic progression. 54% of patients classified as prevalent dysplasia showed an abnormal p53 immunohistochemical stain. These findings were validated in the secondary cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated p53 analysis in NDBE biopsies serves as a promising tool for assessing BE neoplastic progression and risk stratification. Our study highlights the practical applicability of p53 assay to routine surveillance practice and its ability to detect prevalent dysplasia.

Mechanisms and pathophysiology of Barrett oesophagus

Barrett oesophagus, in which a metaplastic columnar mucosa that can predispose individuals to cancer development lines a portion of the distal oesophagus, is the only known precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, the incidence of which has increased profoundly over the past several decades. Most evidence suggests that Barrett oesophagus develops from progenitor cells at the oesophagogastric junction that proliferate and undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition as part of a wound-healing process that replaces oesophageal squamous epithelium damaged by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD also seems to induce reprogramming of key transcription factors in the progenitor cells, resulting in the development of the specialized intestinal metaplasia that is characteristic of Barrett oesophagus, probably through an intermediate step of metaplasia to cardiac mucosa. Genome-wide association studies suggest that patients with GERD who develop Barrett oesophagus might have an inherited predisposition to oesophageal metaplasia and that there is a shared genetic susceptibility to Barrett oesophagus and to several of its risk factors (such as GERD, obesity and cigarette smoking). In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms, pathophysiology, genetic predisposition and cells of origin of Barrett oesophagus, and opine on the clinical implications and future research directions.

Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing forceps biopsy sampling with wide-area transepithelial sampling brush for detecting intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia during routine upper endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Intestinal metaplasia (IM) in the esophagus is a potentially premalignant mucosal change. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of IM detection during upper endoscopy by forceps biopsy sampling (FB) versus wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS) brush.

METHODS

Patients presenting for upper endoscopy for foregut symptoms or surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) at 9 centers in the United States were randomized to either FB or WATS.

RESULTS

Of 1002 patients, FB was done in 505 and WATS in 497. The overall frequency of finding IM was 21% and was similar with FB (19.6%) and WATS (22.7%, P = .2). Low-grade dysplasia was found in 8 patients. No patient had high-grade dysplasia. There was no difference in detection of dysplasia between FB and WATS. In patients with no history of IM, WATS found significantly more IM compared with FB when a columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) was present (32.4% with WATS vs 15.2% with FB, P = .004). In 184 patients with known BE, FB and WATS found IM with similar frequency (38.5% FB vs 41.9% WATS, P = .6) with no difference in short- or long-segment BE.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, FB and WATS detected a similar frequency of IM and dysplasia. WATS was twice as likely as FB to find IM in patients without a history of BE who had CLE on endoscopy. In patients with known BE, WATS and FB showed IM and dysplasia with similar frequency. These findings suggest that WATS can be used instead of FB with similar or improved efficacy at detecting IM and dysplasia. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03859557.).

Endoscopic diagnosis and screening of Barrett's esophagus: Inconsistency of diagnostic criteria between Japan and Western countries

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an endoscopically identifiable premalignant condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To diagnose BE precisely, careful inspection of the anatomic landmarks, including the esophagogastric junction and the squamocolumnar junction is important. The distal end of the palisade vessels and the proximal end of the gastric folds are used as the landmark of the esophagogastric junction in endoscopic diagnosis, with the latter solely used internationally, except in some Asian countries, including Japan. In addition, the diagnostic criteria adopted internationally for BE are inconsistent, particularly between Japan and Western countries. Recently updated guidelines in Western countries have included length criteria, with a 1‐cm threshold of columnar epithelium by endoscopic observation and/or histologic confirmation of the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia. Since BE is endoscopically diagnosed at any length without histologic assessment in Japan, the reported prevalence of short‐segment BE is very high in Japan compared with that in Western countries. Although guidelines on screening exist for BE, the current strategies based on the presence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with multiple risk factors may miss the opportunity for early detection of EAC. Indeed, up to 40% of patients with EAC have no history of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. To discuss BE on the same footing worldwide, standardization of diagnostic criteria, screening indication, and establishment of effective techniques for detecting dysplastic lesions are eagerly awaited. Japanese guidelines for BE should be revised regarding the length criteria, including the minimum length and long‐segment BE, in line with the recently updated Western guidelines.

Barrett's esophagus: results from an Italian cohort with tight endoscopic surveillance

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Barrett's Esophagus represents a condition that predisposes to the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The aim of the present study was to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with BE, to establish the presence of risk factors for this condition, and to determine the frequency of dysplastic lesions as well as the evolution towards adenocarcinoma under tight endoscopic control.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively collected and analyzed data from a cohort of patients with Barrett's Esophagus identified through endoscopic records of ULSS7 in Northern Italy, who underwent upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy over a 10-year period from July 2008 to December 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients were identified as having BE and included in the study. Mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 3 months-13 years). Demographic characteristics of the study population included mean age of 62.7 years (range 33-90 years), with 62.5% of the study population being aged 60 or older, and a male predominance. Females were significantly older than males (65.7 years, range 37-90 vs 61.9 years, range 33-87, p=0.043, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirms the importance of tight endoscopic control in the management of BE, favoring early detection of BE degeneration towards high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. In a subset of patients with high-risk factors including male sex, cigarette smoking and heavy alcohol intake, it may be worthwhile to consider endoscopic control over time in order to detect the development of BE.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Esophagitis, and Barrett's Esophagus 3 to 4 Years Post Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most popular bariatric procedure worldwide. However, SG is associated with de novo gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) and esophagitis, with concerns for progression into Barrett's esophagus (BE). The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and endoscopic progression of GERD, esophagitis, and BE 3 to 4 years after SG.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients (pts) were assessed with endoscopy preoperative and at 3 to 4 years post SG, representing 44.9% follow-up. Endoscopy was offered to all SG pts regardless of symptoms. Outcomes including percent total weight loss (%TWL), PPI use, esophagitis progression, de novo reflux, and BE formation.

RESULTS

At post-op follow-up, the %TWL was 23%. The average BMI dropped from 49.07 to 37.5. De novo reflux developed in 13 pts (30.9%). Of the 16 pts with GERD pre-op, 37.5% improved, 25% had stable disease, and 37.5% had worsening symptoms. The rate of esophagitis nearly doubled from 37.9% pre-op to 70.6% post-op. A majority of post-op pts had mild esophagitis (87.8%), with 12.1% with LA classes C and D. Asymptomatic esophagitis was found in 68.2% of post-op pts. The incidence of BE was 12.7% post-op, with de novo BE developing in 4 pts, representing 7.2%.

CONCLUSION

SG is associated with increased rates of asymptomatic esophagitis and de novo reflux at 3 to 4 years post-op. De novo BE was detected as well, highlighting the importance of post-op screening. The majority of pts with GERD pre-op have stable disease or improve.

How extent of Barrett's metaplasia influences the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will focus on how the extent of Barrett's metaplasia influences the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). More specifically, this review will discuss the concepts of long and short-segment Barrett's metaplasia and irregular Z line as they relate to EAC risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Prague classification can standardize reporting of Barrett's metaplasia. Recent literature has found significant associations between the length of Barrett's metaplasia and increased progression risk to EAC in multiple geographically distinct populations. Length of Barrett's metaplasia has been incorporated into the Progression of Barrett's esophagus (PIB) model that can predict individualized life-time risks of progression. The risk of malignant transformation appears to be very low in patients with irregular Z line.

SUMMARY

Length of Barrett's metaplasia has emerged as an important predictor that can influence the risk of EAC and should be reported using the Prague classification. The PIB model, if further validated, could help a practicing gastroenterologist to inform patients with Barrett's metaplasia about their personal risk of progression to tailor surveillance intervals. Current guidelines do not recommend surveillance in patients with irregular Z line, but careful examination is recommended.