Novel universally applicable technique for performing bilateral transcervical mediastinoscopic-assisted transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy: a truly minimally invasive procedure

Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy with simultaneous transhiatal abdominal procedure for thoracic esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy has been sporadically reported as a novel thoracic esophagectomy technique for patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Most reports indicate that the abdominal component of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy is performed sequentially after the cervical phase. However, if the cervical and abdominal phases are performed simultaneously using a nerve integrity monitoring system with no administration of muscle relaxants, there are two major advantages: a reduced risk of recurrent nerve palsy and a shorter operative time. We herein report our experience performing novel robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a simultaneous transhiatal abdominal approach using a nerve integrity monitoring system.

METHODS

Thirty cases of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy performed from 2023 to April 2024 were reviewed. The operative and short-term surgical outcomes of this procedure were compared with those of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy using a sequential abdominal approach, and the feasibility and efficacy of the simultaneous procedure were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients successfully underwent robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy with no intraoperative adverse events. There were no differences in the patients' demographic or operative data between the two groups. There was no difference in the mean operation time for the cervical procedure (p = 0.23). However, there was a significant difference in the total time for the whole procedure (sequential group: 453.8 ± 26.8 min, simultaneous group: 291.2 ± 36.1 min; p < 0.01). There were no differences in postoperative surgical complications between the groups. There was also no difference in the total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy, a new technique for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible under intraoperative management using nerve integrity monitoring without muscle relaxants. This procedure facilitates intraoperative monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve activity, significantly shortening the total operative time.

Bilateral transcervical mediastinoscopic-assisted transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy compared with thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcervical mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer is indicated in select institutions because of the complex surgical technique required and the unfamiliar surgical view compared with the standard transthoracic esophagectomy approach. This study was performed to compare the feasibility and efficacy of bilateral transcervical mediastinoscopic-assisted transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy (BTC-MATLE) with thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This study involved 392 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative minimally invasive esophagectomy with R0 resection (excluding salvage, conversion, and two-stage operations and open thoracotomy) at the National Cancer Center Hospital from 2017 to 2022. The patients underwent either BTC-MATLE or TE (32 and 360 consecutive patients, respectively). Propensity score-matching analysis was used to balance the baseline differences by covariates of age, performance status, and clinical stage.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in age, performance status, cT factor, cN factor, cStage, preoperative treatment, and surgical history for respiratory disease. After propensity score-matching, these significant differences (excluding a surgical history of respiratory disease) were no longer statistically significant, and 27 patients were assigned to each group. The total operation time and the postoperative intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter in the BTC-MATLE than TLE group. There were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications or the three major postoperative complications of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, and pneumonia, even for patients whose preoperative pulmonary function indices (vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s) were significantly lower in the BTC-MATLE than TLE group. The numbers of total and thoracic harvested lymph nodes were significantly higher in the TLE than BTC-MATLE group; however, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

BTC-MATLE may provide the same feasibility and oncological outcomes as TLE even for patients with significantly lower pulmonary function.

Association between preoperative serum zinc level and prognosis in patients with advanced esophageal cancer in the neoadjuvant treatment era

Background

Zinc (Zn), an essential trace element, has an adverse influence on the prognosis of several cancers. However, the association between the preoperative serum Zn level and outcomes in patients with advanced esophageal cancer in the current neoadjuvant treatment era remains unclear.

Methods

This study involved 185 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent R0 surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from August 2017 to February 2021. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between the preoperative serum Zn level and the patients' outcomes.

Results

The patients were divided into a low Zn group (<64 μg/dL) and a high Zn group (≤64 μg/dL) according to the mean preoperative serum Zn level. Low Zn had significantly worse overall survival (OS) (2-year OS rate: 76.2% vs. 83.3% in low vs. high Zn; p = 0.044). A low Zn in pathological non-responders (Grade ≤ 1a) was significantly associated with a shorter 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (39.6% vs. 64.1% in low vs. high Zn; p = 0.032). The multivariate analysis identified low BMI and Zn level among preoperative nutritional status indices as an independent risk factor for worse RFS in non-responders. Compared with responders, pathological non-responders comprised significantly more males and a performance status of ≥1, and there was no difference in Zn level according to pathological response.

Conclusion

A preoperative low Zn level had a negative impact on early recurrence in esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This suggests the need to administer Zn supplementation to patients with esophageal cancer who have preoperative Zn deficiency.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE)

BACKGROUND

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for visualisation and en-bloc dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while retaining the benefits of THE. However, given its novel inception, there is a paucity of literature. This study aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of MATHE and clarify its role in the future of esophagectomy.

METHODS

Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MATHE. Meta-analyses of proportions and pooled means were performed for the outcomes of intraoperative blood loss, lymph node (LN) harvest, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean operative time, R0 resection, conversion rates, 30-day mortality rate, 5-year OS, and surgical complications (anastomotic leak, cardiovascular [CVS] and pulmonary complications, chyle leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [RLN]). Sensitivity analyses were performed for outcomes with substantial statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The search yielded 223 articles; 28 studies and 1128 patients were included in our analysis. Meta-analyses of proportions yielded proportion rates: 30-day mortality (0 %, 95 %CI 0-0), 5-year OS (60.5 %, 95 %CI 47.6-72.7), R0 resection (100 %, 95 %CI 99.3-100), conversion rate (0.1 %, 95 %CI 0-1.2). Among surgical complications, RLN palsy (14.6 %, 95 %CI 9.5-20.4) were most observed, followed by pulmonary complications (11.3 %, 95 %CI 7-16.2), anastomotic leak (9.7 %, 95 %CI 6.8-12.8), CVS complications (2.3 %, 95 %CI 0.9-4.1) and chyle leak (0.02 %, 95 %CI 0-0.8). Meta-analysis of pooled means yielded means: LN harvest (18.6, 95 %CI 14.3-22.9), intraoperative blood loss (247.1 ml, 95 %CI 173.6-320.6), hospital LOS (18.1 days, 95 %CI 14.4-21.8), and operative time (301.5 min, 95 %CI 238.4-364.6). There was moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

MATHE is associated with encouraging post-operative mortality and complication rates, while allowing for radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with reasonable lymph node harvest.

Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach for thoracic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Thoracic esophageal cancer resection through the neck approach has recently been reported as mediastinoscopic surgery. We present the first report of a new minimally invasive technique for thoracic esophageal cancer: robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach.

METHODS

Ten cases of robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy performed at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan, from February 2023 to August 2023 were reviewed. The short-term surgical outcomes were presented, and the feasibility and efficacy of this procedure were discussed.

RESULTS

The mean operation time for the cervical procedure was 184.2 ± 23.6 min. The total time for the whole procedure was 472.7 ± 28.4 min, and total intraoperative blood loss was 162.2 ± 40.0 ml. Among the 10 cases, one patient developed recurrent nerve paralysis, one patient developed pulmonary complications, and no patients developed postoperative pneumonia. The median postoperative hospital stay was 22 (range: 12-43) days. No patients developed severe postoperative surgical complications, which were graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ III. The total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes was 37.2 ± 11.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy, a novel procedure for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible. Using this procedure, the incidence of recurrent nerve palsy, which is a problem with transcervical esophagectomy and mediastinoscopic esophagectomy, is expected to decrease.

Tracheal injury diagnosed by a sudden increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide levels during mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Mediastinoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer facilitates early postoperative recovery. However, it can occasionally cause serious complications. Here, we present the case of a patient with a tracheal injury diagnosed by a sudden increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) during mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old man diagnosed with esophageal cancer was scheduled to undergo mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. During the mediastinoscopic procedure, the EtCO2 level suddenly increased above 200 mmHg, and the blood pressure dropped below 80 mmHg. We immediately asked the operator to stop insufflation and found a tracheal injury on the right side of the trachea near the carina by bronchoscopy. The endotracheal tube was replaced with a double-lumen tube, and the trachea was repaired via right thoracotomy. There were no further intraoperative complications. After surgery, the patient was extubated and admitted to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring EtCO2 levels and close communication with the operator is important for safely managing sudden tracheal injury during mediastinoscopic esophagectomy.

Successful Robot-Assisted Surgery for Advanced Metachronous Cancer in a Gastric Conduit after Esophagectomy: A Case Report

The incidence of gastric tube cancers has increased due to improved survival rates in patients after esophagectomy. However, the optimal surgical approach for gastric tube cancer remains controversial. Here, we report the case of a 70-year-old man with advanced gastric cancer arising from a retrosternally placed gastric conduit, 12 years after thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Total resection of the gastric conduit was performed with robotic assistance. Although the working space was limited, secure resection was possible. Continuous en bloc mobilization was achieved with neck dissection, and reconstruction was performed via the same retrosternal route using the ileocolon. The patient was discharged on the 14th postoperative day without any adverse events. Robot-assisted surgery can overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopic mediastinal surgery and has advantages such as improved ergonomics, comfort, and elimination of hand tremors, and therefore may be an option for future minimally invasive surgeries.

Application of Inflatable Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy in Individualized Treatment of Esophageal Cancer

Surgery is a crucial treatment option for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The emergence of minimally invasive esophageal techniques has led to the popularity of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy, which has proven to be more advantageous than traditional thoracotomy. However, some patients with esophageal cancer may not benefit from this procedure. Individualized treatment plans may be necessary for patients with varying conditions and tolerances to anesthesia, making conventional surgical methods unsuitable. Inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (IVMTE) has emerged as a promising treatment option for esophageal cancer because it does not require one-lung ventilation, reduces postoperative complications, and expands surgical indications. This technique also provides surgical opportunities for patients with impaired pulmonary function or thoracic lesions. It is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the advancements and limitations of IVMTE to tailor treatment plans and improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Understanding the advantages and limitations of this surgical method will help specific patients with esophageal cancer. We conducted a thorough review of the relevant literature to examine the importance of IVMTE for individualized treatment of this disease.

Left-primary & right-auxiliary operation mode in mediastinoscope-assisted radical esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) is the most minimally invasive esophagectomy procedure. It is a more challenging procedure and more difficult to be popularized than thoracoscopic surgery. We developed a new MATHE operation mode that provides a clearer visual field and makes the procedures simpler.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with esophageal cancer were divided into a control group (n = 29) and a study group (n = 51). The control group underwent classic MATHE, while the study group received modified MATHE. We compared the two groups on operation time; intraoperative blood loss; blood transfusion amount; incidence rate of lung infection, recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) injury, chylothorax, and anastomotic leakage; and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

The study group was significantly better than the control group in operation time (271.78 min vs. 322.90 min, p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (48.63 mL vs. 68.97 mL, p < 0.05), and left paratracheal lymph node (No. 4L) dissection rate (88.24% vs. 24.14%, p < 0.01). No significant differences were identified in the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage, lung complications, or RLNs injury between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The modified MATHE is easier to perform. Modified MATHE is significantly superior to classic MATHE in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection rate.

Novel Mediastinoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery is an expanding field of surgery that has replaced many open surgical techniques. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of esophageal cancer, yet it is still associated with significant morbidity and technical difficulties. Mediastinoscope-assisted esophagectomy is a promising technique that aims to decrease the surgical burden and enhance recovery.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched for publications on mediastinoscope-assisted esophagectomies for esophageal cancer. The primary endpoint was a postoperative anastomotic leak, while secondary endpoints were assessment of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), blood loss, chyle leak, hospital length of stay (LOS), operative (OR) time, pneumonia, wound infection, mortality, and microscopic positive margin (R1). The pooled event rate (PER) and pooled mean were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six out of the 2274 searched studies were included. The pooled event rate (PER) for anastomotic leak was 0.145 (0.1144; 0.1828). The PERs for chyle leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury/hoarseness, postoperative pneumonia, wound infection, early mortality, postoperative morbidity, and microscopically positive (R1) resection margins were 0.027, 0.185, 0.09, 0.083, 0.020, 0.378, and 0.037 respectively. The pooled means for blood loss, hospital stay, operative time, number of total harvested LNs, and number of harvested thoracic LNs were 159.209, 15.187, 311.116, 23.379, and 15.458 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is a promising minimally invasive technique, avoiding thoracotomy, patient repositioning, and lung manipulation; thus allowing for shorter surgery, decreased blood loss, and decreased postoperative morbidity. It can also be reliable in terms of oncological safety and LN dissection.

Essential updates 2020/2021: Recent topics in surgery and perioperative therapy for esophageal cancer

In this review, we focused on four topics, namely, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), conversion and salvage surgery, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, based on notable reports published in the years 2020 and 2021. It seems that while the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL) were better than those of open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (OE-IL), there were no significant differences in the long-term outcomes between MIE-IL and OE-IL. Similarly, the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-MK) were better than those of open McKeown esophagectomy (OE-MK), while there were no significant differences in the long-term outcomes between MIE-MK and OE-MK. Furthermore, the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (RAMIE-IL) were superior to those of completely minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (CMIE-IL). On the other hand, there were advantages and disadvantages in relation to the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (RAMIE-MK) as compared with completely minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (CMIE-MK). However, there were no significant differences in the long-term outcomes between RAMIE-MK and CMIE-MK. Further research is needed to evaluate of short-term and long-term outcomes of transmediastinal esophagectomy with and without robotic assistance. Both induction chemotherapy and induction chemoradiotherapy appear to be promising to secure a higher rate of conversion surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemoimmunoradiotherapy have shown promising results and are expected as new powerful therapies.

Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy

Background

At present, minimally invasive radical esophagectomy is the main surgical method for esophageal cancer treatment, but it has inherent limitations. We have developed a novel method of radical esophagectomy without thoracotomy to improve this situation, namely, by using EMLE. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy (EMLE) through a retrospective analysis.

Methods

From January 2019 to June 2022, we successfully performed 106 cases of radical resection of esophageal cancer with this new surgical technique, gradually improved the surgical path, and recorded the perioperative data and postoperative complications of all patients.

Results

The operation was successfully performed in all patients except for two patients who required a switch to open surgery. The mean operation time was 171.11 ± 33.29 min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 93.53 ± 56.32 ml. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 23.59 ± 5.42. The postoperative complications included pneumonia (3.77%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (1.89%), anastomotic leak (14.15%), pleural effusion (5.66%), chylothorax (2.83%), and reoperation (4.72%). All complications were graded I-III per the Clavien-Dindo classification. No perioperative death was recorded.

Conclusion

Expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy is feasible for radical resection of esophageal cancer, with good therapeutic effect and safety. Because of its minimal impact on patients and convenient operation, it is a novel surgical option for patients with esophageal cancer and is expected to become a standard surgical method for radical esophagectomy in the future.

A descriptive comparison of postoperative outcomes between hybrid mediastino-thoracoscopic approach and conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the hybrid mediastino-thoracoscopic approach with that of the conventional thoracoscopic approach and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the hybrid approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 172 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from July 2009 to June 2021, excluding salvage surgery. In the mediastinoscopic approach, the lymph nodes were dissected from a small incision in the left aspect of the neck to the aortic arch with supine double-lung ventilation. Thereafter, the middle-to-lower mediastinum and right superior mediastinum were dissected thoracoscopically in the prone position. The patients' demographics, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and postoperative recurrence patterns were compared between 51 patients in the hybrid approach and 121 patients in the conventional approach.

RESULTS

The hybrid group had more elderly patients (71 years vs. 67 years; P = 0.010), more cardiovascular disease (33.3% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.021), lower rates of preoperative chemotherapy (49.0% vs. 69.4%; P = 0.015), and shorter right lung collapse time (196 min vs. 264 min; P < 0.001). Postoperative hoarseness was not different between the two groups (31.4% vs. 27.3%; P = 0.584), and there was a significant difference in the sternal-vertebral distance at the level of the sternal notch (41 mm in the hybrid group vs. 48 mm in the conventional group; P = 0.029). The sternal-vertebral distance of less than 45 mm was an independent risk factor for postoperative hoarseness in the logistic analysis (odds ratio 3.636, 95% confidence interval 1.054-12.546; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

The hybrid mediastino-thoracoscopic approach could be safely adapted to elderly or cardiopulmonary diseased patients; however, short sternal-vertebral distance might be a risk factor of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

A comparison of the surgical invasiveness and short-term outcomes between thoracoscopic and pneumatic mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been widely accepted as a treatment for esophageal cancer. This retrospective study compared the short-term outcomes and surgical invasiveness between thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) and mediastinoscopic esophagectomy with pneumomediastinum (pneumatic mediastinoscopic esophagectomy [PME]).

METHODS

A total of 72 patients who underwent TE or PME were included and assessed for their surgical findings, postoperative complications, and inflammatory responses on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7.

RESULTS

The PME group exhibited a significantly shorter operative time and fewer lymph nodes retrieved than the TE group. Furthermore, the PME group tended to have greater incidences of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and lower incidences of atelectasis than the TE group. The PME group had significantly lower white blood cell counts on POD 5, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on POD 3 than the TE group.

CONCLUSION

PME seems to be less invasive than TE and can be considered the preferred option for patients with lower-stage esophageal cancer expected to have severe pleural adhesion or who cannot tolerate TE.

Handgrip strength predicts early postoperative dysphagia after thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy in male patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia after esophagectomy, especially in the early postoperative period, remains a severe complication. The association between sarcopenia and dysphagia has received attention in geriatric non-cancer populations. This study aimed to determine the associations between sarcopenia parameters and early postoperative dysphagia after esophagectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 201 consecutive male patients undergoing thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for esophageal cancer between October 2018 and December 2020. We used three sarcopenia parameters: handgrip strength (HGS), skeletal muscle index, and gait speed. Postoperative swallowing function was assessed by videofluoroscopy using the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS; range 1-8). Logistic regression analyses were used to predict factors associated with postoperative aspiration (PAS 6-8). Furthermore, we compared values in patients with symptomatic aspiration (PAS 6-7) and with silent aspiration (PAS 8).

RESULTS

Aspiration occurred in 38 of 201 patients (18.9%). On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of aspiration included age [odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.17; p < 0.001], low HGS (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.06-8.78; p = 0.039), upper third esophageal cancer (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.03-7.54; p = 0.044) and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.26-7.06; p = 0.013). Furthermore, among patients with aspiration (PAS 6-8), low HGS was significantly associated with silent aspiration (OR 6.43; 95% CI 1.06-39.00; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Low HGS was significantly associated with early postoperative aspiration and impairment of airway protective reflexes after TLE.

Surgical Therapy of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Current Standards and Future Perspectives

Transthoracic esophagectomy is currently the predominant curative treatment option for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. The majority of carcinomas present as locally advanced tumors requiring multimodal strategies with either neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy alone. Minimally invasive, including robotic, techniques are increasingly applied with a broad spectrum of technical variations existing for the oncological resection as well as gastric reconstruction. At the present, intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy is the preferred technique of reconstruction (Ivor Lewis esophagectomy). With standardized surgical procedures, a complete resection of the primary tumor can be achieved in almost 95% of patients. Even in expert centers, postoperative morbidity remains high, with an overall complication rate of 50-60%, whereas 30- and 90-day mortality are reported to be <2% and <6%, respectively. Due to the complexity of transthoracic esophagetomy and its associated morbidity, esophageal surgery is recommended to be performed in specialized centers with an appropriate caseload yet to be defined. In order to reduce postoperative morbidity, the selection of patients, preoperative rehabilitation and postoperative fast-track concepts are feasible strategies of perioperative management. Future directives aim to further centralize esophageal services, to individualize surgical treatment for high-risk patients and to implement intraoperative imaging modalities modifying the oncological extent of resection and facilitating surgical reconstruction.

A novel laparoscopic assisted mediastinal dissection with gastric tube inversion technique for gastric tube cancer reconstructed through a retrosternal route

A median sternotomy is often performed in patients with gastric tube cancer reconstructed through the retrosternal route; however, this procedure is invasive and has the risk of severe infectious complications. To overcome these problems, we created a novel method to perform the reconstructed gastric tube resection using a gastric tube inversion technique combined with a laparoscopic mediastinal approach. After the duodenum was divided, the oral side of the cut end was sutured with silken threads for traction. The gastric tube was dissected from the caudal side under a laparoscopic mediastinal approach, whereas the cervical esophagus was taped. After the adhesion between the middle side of the posterior sternum and the reconstructed gastric tube was dissected to the cervix, the gastric tube was inverted by guiding and pulling the thread toward the cervical side. Sharp dissection was facilitated between the inverted gastric tube and the surrounding organs under moderate traction and a favorable surgical view. We have performed this procedure and evaluated the short-term outcomes in six cases. The laparoscopic mediastinal approach was completed without a median sternotomy in all six cases. Restorable intraoperative lung injury was observed in one case and no major vessel injuries were observed. The postoperative course was satisfactory with a 29.5-day median length of hospital stay (range, 16-60 days). The gastric tube inversion technique combined with the laparoscopic mediastinal approach for patients with retrosternal-reconstructed gastric tube cancer was shown to be safe and less invasive and should be considered in resection of the reconstructed gastric tube.