Subxiphoid and subcostal thoracoscopic surgical approach for thymectomy

Same-day discharge for patients undergoing subxiphoid thoracoscopic thymectomy for small tumours without myasthenia gravis: a prospective, single-arm clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Subxiphoid thoracoscopic surgery is an effective method for treating thymic tumours. We performed the first evaluation of the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) in patients undergoing this procedure and summarized their associated clinical experience.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, single-centre prospective clinical trial. This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300077148). The subjects were patients with a preoperative clinical diagnosis of thymic tumour. All eligible patients underwent examinations and preparations at the preoperative preparation centre and subsequently underwent a subxiphoid thoracoscopic thymectomy. The evaluation indicators included R0 (complete resection without residual tumour) resection rate, SDD completion rate, 30-day postoperative readmission rate, number of emergency visits, perioperative complication rate, length of stay and total medical costs.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were enrolled between November 2023 and April 2024. All patients underwent subxiphoid thoracoscopic resection of the thymic tumours to achieve R0 resection. The completion rate of the SDD surgery was 92.3% (36/39). The perioperative complication rate was 5.6% (2/36 patients). Only 2.8% (1/36) of the patients were readmitted within 1 month of an emergency visit due to pneumothorax. The median length of stay was 11 h (interquartile range 10-14), and the median total medical cost was 19 400 renminbi (interquartile range 18 500-21 100).

CONCLUSIONS

The SDD procedure may be safe and feasible for selected patients undergoing subxiphoid thoracoscopic thymectomy, based on a small sample size. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block on Postoperative Recovery After Subxiphoid Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Severe postoperative pain can occur after subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy (SVATT), affecting the quality of postoperative recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal (EOI) block on recovery after SVATT.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients undergoing SVATT were randomly divided into the EOI group (group E, n = 30) and the control group (group C, n = 30). Group E underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral EOI block at the 6th rib level and was injected 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side. Group C was injected with 20 mL of 0.9% saline at the same site. After the operation, both groups received a patient-controlled intravenous analgesic (PCIA) pump. The 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores were recorded at 24 hours before surgery (T0), 24 hours after surgery (T3), and 48 hours after surgery (T4). The sufentanil usage in the first 24 hours postoperatively, the remifentanil dosage during surgery, the time of first pressing PCIA, and the cases of rescue analgesia were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores of patients at 6 (T1), 12 (T2), 24 (T3), and 48 hours (T4) after an operation during rest and coughing were recorded. The dermatomes of the sensory plane, block complications in group E, and the incidence of other postoperative adverse reactions in both groups were also recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with group C, the QoR-15 scores of patients were significantly higher at T3 and T4 in the group E. The VAS scores were significantly lower at T1, T2, and T3 during rest and coughing in the group E. The sufentanil usage in the first 24 hours postoperatively, the remifentanil dosage during surgery, and the cases of rescue analgesia were significantly lower in group E, and the time of first pressing PCIA was significantly increased in group E (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided EOI block can be safely used in patients undergoing SVATT, which can improve the quality of postoperative recovery and reduce postoperative pain.

Subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic extend thymectomy with sternal suspension for thymoma

BACKGROUND

Thymoma is a primary tumor of the thymus, commonly located in the anterior mediastinum. Most thymomas are benign or low-grade malignant, but they can invade surrounding organs or metastasize. The primary treatment for thymoma is surgical resection. Traditional methods involve open thoracotomy, but it is traumatic, with slow recovery and many complications. In recent years, with the development of thoracoscopic techniques, thoracoscopic total thymectomy has gradually become the preferred method for small size thymomas due to its minimally invasive, safe, and effective.

METHODS

This paper introduces a thoracoscopic extend thymectomy technique, the subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic extend thymectomy with sternal suspension. This method involves placing hooks at the upper and lower ends of the sternum to suspend the sternum upward, increasing the thoracic cavity space and facilitating thoracoscopic operations. This research reviews the clinical data of 59 patients with early-stage thymomas treated with this technique at our center since 2020 and analyzes the perioperative therapeutic efficacy and safety. It also compares the outcomes with those of 17 patients who underwent thoracoscopic approaches.

RESULTS

The results show that subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic total thymectomy with sternal suspension is an innovative and effective surgical method, achieving the same tumor eradication as other thoracic surgeries. The flexible switching of observation ports provides a more comprehensive surgical field, reduces surgical trauma and complications, and improves the surgical outcomes and quality of life for patients.

Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach

INTRODUCTION

The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group.

CONCLUSION

Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.

Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy and robotic surgery in the treatment of mediastinal tumors

OBJECTIVE

Comparing the clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy and robotic surgery in the treatment of mediastinal tumors using meta-analysis.

METHODS

Computer retrieval of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for literature comparing the clinical effects of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in treating mediastinal tumors, with the retrieval time limit from the establishment of the database to September 2023. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 19 articles were included, with a total of 3517 patients. The results of the Meta-analysis showed that the RATS group had less intraoperative bleeding [MD =  - 5.20, 95%CI (- 9.28, - 1.12), P = 0.01], lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy [OR = 0.41, 95%CI (0.23, 0.72), P = 0.002], lower rate of total postoperative complications [OR = 0.57, 95%CI (0.34, 0.95), P = 0.03], shorter postoperative drainage time [MD =  - 0.72, 95%CI (- 1.13, - 0.32), P = 0.0004], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [MD =  - 0.90, 95%CI (- 1.16, - 0.65), P < 0.001], in comparison with the VATS group. There was an insignificant difference between the two groups in terms of tumor size [MD =  - 0.02, 95%CI (- 0.33, 0.30), P = 0.91] and operation time [MD = 0.17, 95%CI (- 7.61, 7.94), P = 0.97]. However, in regards to hospitalization costs [MD = 2634.75, 95%CI (991.62, 4277.88), P = 0.002], the RATS group was more expensive than the VATS group.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted mediastinal tumor resection surgery has more advantages in terms of intraoperative bleeding, conversion to thoracotomy rate, total postoperative complication rate, postoperative drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay, in comparison with thoracoscopic-assisted mediastinal tumor resection surgery. There is an insignificant difference in tumor size and operation time between the two surgeries. However, robot-assisted mediastinal tumor resection surgery increases hospitalization costs.

Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of subcostal thoracoscopy and median sternotomy in treating thymoma: a propensity score-matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of subcostal thoracoscopy and median sternotomy as surgical approaches for thymoma resection and lymph node dissection. The feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of subcostal thoracoscopy were compared with those of median sternotomy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 335 patients with thymoma were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the subcostal thoracoscopy group and the median sternotomy group. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain comparable subsets of 50 patients in each group. A comparative analysis was conducted on various parameters.

RESULTS

All surgeries were successful, and no conversions to open thoracotomy were required in the subcostal thoracoscopy group. Significant differences in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, patient satisfaction scores, pain assessment, and postoperative complications were observed between the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes or lymph node stations dissected intraoperatively between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Subcostal thoracoscopy is not inferior to median sternotomy as a surgical approach for thymoma resection and lymph node dissection. Our research provides important new comparative data on minimally invasive thymoma resection.

Robot versus video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for large thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Both video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) thymectomy and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) thymectomy have been suggested as technically sound approaches for early-stage thymic epithelial tumors. However, the choice of VATS or RATS thymectomy for large and advanced thymic epithelial tumors remains controversial. In this study, the perioperative outcomes of VATS and RATS thymectomy were compared in patients with large thymic epithelial tumors (size ≥5.0 cm).

METHODS

A total of 113 patients with large thymic epithelial tumors who underwent minimally invasive surgery were included. Sixty-three patients underwent RATS, and 50 patients underwent VATS. Patient characteristics and perioperative variables were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group experienced a shorter operation time (median: 110 min vs.130 min; P < 0.001) and less blood loss (30.00 ml vs. 100.00 ml, P < 0.001). No patients in the RATS group needed conversion to open surgery, but in the VATS series, five patients required conversion to open procedures (0% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.054). The rate of concomitant resection in the RATS group was similar to that in the VATS group (11.43% vs. 5.71%; P = 0.673). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the duration of chest tube (P = 0.587), postoperative complications (P = 1.000), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.141).

CONCLUSION

For large thymic epithelial tumors, RATS thymectomy can be performed safely and effectively in a radical fashion. Due to the advanced optics and precise instrument control, concomitant resections can be easily achieved in larger thymic epithelial tumors using the robotic approach.

A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis: Robotic Thymectomy Through the Subxiphoid Has Advantages Over Video-Assisted Thymectomy Surgery

Objective: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the security and effectiveness of subxiphoid and subcostal robot-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy (S-RATT) and compare it with subxiphoid and subcostal video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy (S-VATT) in terms of short-term perioperative results and costs. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 62 individuals who had undergone successful complete thymectomy for anterior mediastinal disease using subxiphoid and subcostal arch approaches. Propensity score-matching analysis was utilized between the two groups, and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Results: The S-RATT group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss (20 ± 15.35 versus 69.55 ± 69.54, P < .001), lower levels of C-reactive protein (112.38 ± 68.08 versus 72.58 ± 42.62, P = .027), and lower postoperative pain scores (2.09 ± 1.54 versus 4.27 ± 1.28, P < .001). However, the hospitalization costs of patients in the S-VATT group were found to be lower than those in the S-RATT group (33,802.41 ± 8785.05 versus 49,977.53 ± 20,221.79, P < .001). Conclusions: S-RATT appears to be a viable and secure method for managing anterior mediastinal tumors.

Comparison of short-term results of subxiphoid and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in diagnostic wedge resections

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare early results in patients who underwent subxiphoid wedge resection with those operated on using a multiportal approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 151 patients who underwent diagnostic wedge resection for suspected interstitial lung disease. Patients who underwent wedge resection via subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared.

RESULTS

The study included 90 men (59.6%) and 61 women (40.4%) with a mean age of 54.8 ± 12 years. Of these, 127 patients underwent conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 24 patients underwent subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (8.6%), with no significant difference according to surgical technique. Sex was a significant factor in the rate of complications (12.2% in men vs. 3.2% in women). There was no intraoperative mortality; the 30-day mortality rate was 4% (n = 6). Five nonsurviving patients were in the conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group and 1 was in the subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (p = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the subxiphoid approach reduced procedure time and length of hospital stay in the early period, while there was no significant difference between the techniques in terms of complications or mortality. Based on these findings, we conclude that surgical outcomes were as successful with the subxiphoid approach as with conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Safety and feasibility of a modularized procedure for trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to introduce an "eight-step modularized procedure (M-RET)" for trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Its safety and feasibility were further verified in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 consecutive MG patients who underwent trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy at our institution between September 2016 and August 2021. According to different resection models, patients were divided into two groups: traditional trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy group (T-RET group) and eight-step modularized technique group (M-RET group). Baseline demographic characteristics and operation-related parameters were collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 41 (47.1%) patients in the M-RET group and 46 (52.9%) patients in the T-RET group. The M-RET group resected a greater amount of mediastinal adipose tissues and required more dissection time (median and interquartile range: 135.0, 125.0 to 164.0 v. 120.0, 105.0 to 153.8, P = 0.006) compared with the T-RET group. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest drainage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the two groups. There was no mortality or conversion in each of the two groups and all patients recovered well upon discharge.

CONCLUSION

The eight-step modularized technique of trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy was verified to be a safe, effective, radical procedure, which offers unique superiority over ectopic thymic tissue resection.

Subxiphoid-subcostal versus transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy: A safe and feasible approach

Objective

Subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy (ST) is an emerging alternative to transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy. Potential advantages of ST are the avoidance of intercostal incisions and visualization of both phrenic nerves in their entirety. We describe our experience with ST and compare our results to our previous experience with transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy.

Methods

We conducted an institutional review board-exempt retrospective review of all patients who had a minimally invasive thymectomy from August 2008 to October 2021. We excluded patients with a previous sternotomy or radiological evidence of invasion into major vasculature. The ST approach involved 1 subxiphoid port for initial access, 2 subcostal ports on each side, and carbon dioxide insufflation. We used descriptive and comparative statistics on demographic, operative, and postoperative data.

Results

We performed ST in 40 patients and transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy in 16 patients. The median age was higher in the ST group (58 years vs 34 years; P = .02). Operative data showed no significant differences in operative times, blood loss, or tumor characteristics. In the ST group, we had 2 emergency conversions for bleeding; 1 ministernotomy, and 1 sternotomy. Postoperative data showed that the ST group had fewer days with a chest tube (1 day vs 2.5 days; P = .02). There were no differences in median length of stay, tumor characteristics, final margins, major complication rate, and opioid requirements between the groups. There has been no incidence of diaphragmatic hernia and no phrenic nerve injuries or mortality in either group.

Conclusions

ST is safe and has similar outcomes compared with transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy.

Clinical analysis of subxiphoid vs. lateral approaches for treating early anterior mediastinal thymoma

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of the subxiphoid approach for early anterior mediastinal thymoma and evaluate its advantages over the lateral intercostal approach.

Methods

A total of 345 patients with early anterior mediastinal thymoma were retrospectively analyzed from January 2016 to December 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Out of these, 99 patients underwent subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy and 246 patients underwent transthoracic video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy. We compared the intraoperative conditions (such as operation time and intraoperative blood loss), postoperative conditions [such as postoperative pleural drainage volume, extubation time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score], and postoperative complications (such as death, pneumonia, delayed wound healing, cardiac arrhythmia, and phrenic nerve injury) of the two groups and analyzed the clinical advantages of the subxiphoid approach for treating early anterior mediastinal thymoma.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general clinical features, operation time, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05).However, there was a significant difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pleural drainage volume, tube extubation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative VAS pain score, and postoperative analgesics (a significantly decreased flurbiprofen axetil amount) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the lateral intercostal thoracic approach, the subxiphoid approach had advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, tube extubation time, postoperative pleural drainage volume, postoperative VAS pain score, and analgesics dosage. It could provide a better view of the bilateral pleural cavities and more thorough thymectomy and superior cosmesis, and it proved to be a safe and feasible minimally invasive surgical method.

Clinical Application of Thoracoscopic Resection of Anterior Mediastinal Tumors under the Xiphoid Process

Objective

To explore the feasibility and advantages of thoracoscopic resection of anterior mediastinal tumors through subxiphoid and lateral thoracic approaches.

Method

74 patients with anterior mediastinal tumors hospitalized in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the lateral chest group (31 cases) and the infraxiphoid group (43 cases) according to different operation methods. The tumor size, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain score, postoperative complications, postoperative drainage tube removal time, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.

Result

The intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain scores in the subxiphoid group were better than those in the lateral chest group. There was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with the lateral thoracic approach, the thoracoscopic subxiphoid approach can be more safe and effective in resectioning anterior mediastinal tumors.

[Single-versus Two-port Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery in Thymoma: A Propensity-matched Study]

BACKGROUND

In recent years, with the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, thoracoscopic thymoma resection has experienced a development process from three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to two-port (TP) and single-port (SP) variants. However, the feasibility and safety of SP-VATS have not been generally recognized. This study intends to explore the safety and feasibility of SP-VATS in thymoma resection, in order to provide a reference for clinical surgicalselection.

METHODS

The clinical data of 197 patients who underwent thoracoscopic thymoma resection in Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 2018 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into SP-VATS group (n=42) and TP-VATS group (n=155). After matching propensity scores, there is no statistically significant difference in preoperative baseline data between SP-VATS group and TP-VATS group. Among them, there were 17 males and 25 females with an average age of 28-72 (48.00±9.43) years in the SP-VATS group, and 20 males and 22 females with an average age of 30-75 (50.38±9.83) years in TP-VATS group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The operation was successfully completed in both groups, and there was no conversion to thoracotomy or increased surgical incisions. Compared with the TP-VATS group, the chest drainage time and hospital stay in the SP-VATS group were shorter [(2.95±0.76) d vs (3.33±0.85) d; (4.57±0.83) d vs (5.07±1.13) d], and the visual pain score at 24 h and 72 h after surgery were lower [(3.64±0.85) points vs (4.05±0.66) points; (2.33±0.75) points vs (3.07±0.68) points] (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time [(130.00±26.23) min vs (135.24±27.03) min], intraoperative blood loss [(69.52±22.73) mL vs (82.38±49.23) mL] (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SP-VATS in thymoma is a safe, feasible, and less invasive procedure, with less postoperative pain and faster recovery than multi-port VATS.

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Surgical resection of the thymus is indicated in the presence of primary thymic diseases such as thymoma. Video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robot‐assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offer a minimally invasive approach to thymectomy. However, there is no clear conclusion whether RATS can achieve an equal or even better surgical effect when compared with VATS in treatment of thymoma. We performed this meta‐analysis to explore and compare the outcomes of RATS versus VATS for thymectomy in patients with thymoma.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched for full‐text literature citations. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the data analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted.

Results

A total of 11 studies with 1418 patients, of whom 688 patients were in the RATS group and 730 in the VATS group, were involved in the analysis. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss in operation, lower volume of drainage, fewer postoperative pleural drainage days, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in operative time and patients with or without myasthenia gravis between the two groups.

Conclusions

RATS has more advantages over VATS, indicating that RATS is better than VATS in terms of postoperative recovery. We look forward to more large‐sample, high‐quality randomized controlled studies published in the future.

The Early Perioperative Outcomes of Subxiphoid Approach Versus Lateral Intercostal Approach Thoracoscopic Thymectomy for Thymic Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the early perioperative outcomes regarding the safety and efficacy of subxiphoid thoracoscopic thymectomy (STT) versus lateral intercostal thoracoscopic thymectomy (LITT) for patients with thymic tumors. Methods: A thorough literature search of the following online databases was performed: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Original research articles published before December 30, 2020, that compared STT with LITT were included. Meta-analysis was performed for early perioperative outcomes, including blood loss, pain score, duration of hospital stay, operative time, chest tube drainage time, and incidence of postoperative complications. Results: Six studies that included 604 patients were finally selected for our analysis, with 296 cases of STT and 308 cases of LITT. Our results showed that compared with LITT, STT was associated with less blood loss (standardized mean difference = -0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.49 to -0.14, P = .02), a lower pain score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -2.55, 95% CI = -3.52 to -1.59; P < .00001), and a shorter hospital stay (WMD = -1.37, 95% CI = -2.37 to -0.36; P = .008), whereas there were no significant differences with regard to the operative time (WMD = -10.04, 95% CI = -22.29 to 2.21, P = .11), chest tube drainage time (WMD = -0.58, 95% CI = -1.17 to 0.02, P = .06), and the incidence of postoperative complications (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.39 to 1.44, P = .38). Conclusions: The current analysis suggests that STT is superior to LITT with respect to the early perioperative outcomes, and STT is a safe and effective surgical method for patients with thymic tumors.