1
|
Comparison of two cable configurations in 3D printed steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0275535. [PMID: 36194613 PMCID: PMC9531805 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
In laparoscopy, a small incision size improves the surgical outcome but increases at the same time the rigidity of the instrument, with consequent impairment of the surgeon’s maneuverability. Such reduction introduces new challenges, such as the loss of wrist articulation or the impossibility of overcoming obstacles. A possible approach is using multi-steerable cable-driven instruments fully mechanical actuated, which allow great maneuverability while keeping the wound small. In this work, we compared the usability of the two most promising cable configurations in 3D printed multi-steerable instruments: a parallel configuration with all cables running straight from the steerable shaft to the handle; and a multi configuration with straight cables in combination with helical cables. Twelve participants were divided into two groups and asked to orient the instrument shaft and randomly hit six targets following the instructions in a laparoscopic simulator. Each participant carried out four trials (two trials for each instrument) with 12 runs per trial. The average task performance time showed a significant decrease over the first trial for both configurations. The decrease was 48% for the parallel and 41% for the multi configuration. Improvement of task performance times reached a plateau in the second trial with both instruments. The participants filled out a TLX questionnaire after each trial. The questionnaire showed a lower burden score for the parallel compared to multi configuration (23% VS 30%). Even though the task performance time for both configurations was comparable, a final questionnaire showed that 10 out of 12 participants preferred the parallel configuration due to a more intuitive hand movement and the possibility of individually orienting the distal end of the steerable shaft.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Abstract
Because of the increasing use of laparoscopic surgeries, robotic technologies have been developed to overcome the challenges these surgeries impose on surgeons. This paper presents an overview of the current state of surgical robots used in laparoscopic surgeries. Four main categories were discussed: handheld laparoscopic devices, laparoscope positioning robots, master–slave teleoperated systems with dedicated consoles, and robotic training systems. A generalized control block diagram is developed to demonstrate the general control scheme for each category of surgical robots. In order to review these robotic technologies, related published works were investigated and discussed. Detailed discussions and comparison tables are presented to compare their effectiveness in laparoscopic surgeries. Each of these technologies has proved to be beneficial in laparoscopic surgeries.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hardon SF, Rahimi AM, Postema RR, Willuth E, Mintz Y, Arezzo A, Dankelman J, Nickel F, Horeman T. Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1749-1754. [PMID: 35416585 PMCID: PMC9481478 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Hardon
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-VU University Medical Center, Room ZH 7F005, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - A M Rahimi
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-VU University Medical Center, Room ZH 7F005, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R R Postema
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-VU University Medical Center, Room ZH 7F005, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - E Willuth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Y Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J Dankelman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - F Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - T Horeman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Motahariasl N, Farzaneh SB, Motahariasl S, Kokotkin I, Sousi S, Zargaran A, Zargaran D, Patel B. Assessment of an Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder (FlexDex™) Compared to a Conventional Rigid Needle Holder in 2-Dimension Vision Amongst Novices: A Randomised Controlled Study. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2022; 15:15-25. [PMID: 35153517 PMCID: PMC8824294 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s345140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aims to compare novice performance of advanced bimanual laparoscopic skills using an articulating laparoscopic device (FlexDex™) compared to a standard rigid needle holder amongst surgical novices in 2-dimension (2D) visualisation. Methods In this prospective randomised trial, novices (n = 40) without laparoscopic experience were recruited and randomised into two groups, which used either traditional rigid needle holders or the FlexDex™. Both groups performed 10 repetitions of a validated assessment task. Times taken and error rates were recorded, and results were evaluated based on completion times, error rates, and learning curves. Results The intervention group that used the FlexDex™ completed 10 attempts of the standardised laparoscopic task slower than the control group that used traditional rigid needle holder (415 s versus 267 s taken for the first three attempts and 283 s versus 187 s taken for the last three attempts, respectively). The difference in average time for the first three and last three attempts reached statistical significance (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group demonstrated a higher error rate when compared to the control group (9.3 versus 6.2 errors per individual). Conclusion When compared to the FlexDex™, the traditional rigid needle holder was observed to be superior in task performance speed, leading to shorter completion times and quicker learning effect, as well as fewer errors. Key Statement Traditional rigid needle holder leads to faster task completion times and lower error rates when compared with an articulating laparoscopic needle holder in 2D vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ilya Kokotkin
- St George’s University of London, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Sara Sousi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK
- King’s College London, London, SE1 1UL, Greater London, UK
- Correspondence: Sara Sousi, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK, Email
| | - Alexander Zargaran
- King’s College London, London, SE1 1UL, Greater London, UK
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, SW10 9NH, UK
| | | | - Bijendra Patel
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9123999. [PMID: 33321836 PMCID: PMC7764454 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
As many meta-analyses comparing pediatric minimally invasive to open surgery can be found in the literature, the aim of this review is to summarize the current state of minimally invasive pediatric surgery and specifically focus on the trends and developments which we expect in the upcoming years. Print and electronic databases were systematically searched for specific keywords, and cross-link searches with references found in the literature were added. Full-text articles were obtained, and eligibility criteria were applied independently. Pediatric minimally invasive surgery is a wide field, ranging from minimally invasive fetal surgery over microlaparoscopy in newborns to robotic surgery in adolescents. New techniques and devices, like natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), single-incision and endoscopic surgery, as well as the artificial uterus as a backup for surgery in preterm fetuses, all contribute to the development of less invasive procedures for children. In spite of all promising technical developments which will definitely change the way pediatric surgeons will perform minimally invasive procedures in the upcoming years, one must bear in mind that only hard data of prospective randomized controlled and double-blind trials can validate whether these techniques and devices really improve the surgical outcome of our patients.
Collapse
|