Learning curve of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernias

Learning Curve for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With da Vinci Single-Port Robotic System

BackgroundTransabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair using the da Vinci Single-Port robot (SP-TAPP) is currently performed in few centers. We aimed to define the learning curve for SP-TAPP by analyzing operative times.MethodsThe operative times of 122 SP-TAPP performed between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The following phases were analyzed: docking time (DT); pre-robot time (PRT, from skin incision to side cart placement); flap closure time (FCT); console time (CT), and overall time (OT). Cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) was used to analyze learning curves. Surgical and 30-day outcome were analyzed.ResultsThe DT has remained constant over time (P > 0.9). PRT was divided into 3 phases with n1 = 5, n2 = 95 and n3 = 4, in which there was a progressive decrease in time (14.8 vs 11.9 vs 6.8 min; P = 0.08). In FCT and CT, 3 phases were identified in which times remained stable (P > 0.9 and P = 0.7). CUSUM analysis of OT identified 3 phases consisting of n1 = 13, n2 = 100 and n3 = 9 in which there was a progressive decrease in times (82 vs 72 vs 62 min; P = 0.3). Analysis of complications and early surgical outcomes did not differ except for estimated blood loss, although this was a clinically insignificant finding.ConclusionsThe learning curve for SP-TAPP is rapid and it shows how the technical skills are transferable between the multiport platform and the da Vinci Single Port robotic system for an experienced surgeon. An improvement is evident in PRT and OT, also compared to multiport systems, showing a potential for the platform to increase surgical activity.

Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society

AIM

This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.

CONCLUSION

Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.

Learning Curves for Robotic-Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair

Importance

Although the use of robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs has increased significantly over the last decade, the experience surgeons need to achieve comparable outcomes with more established laparoscopic and open approaches has not been well characterized.

Objective

To estimate the learning curves for robotic-assisted ventral (incisional and umbilical) hernia repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included Medicare fee-for-service patients (≥18 years) enrolled in Medicare Part A and Part B with no managed care undergoing ventral hernia repairs between 2010 and 2020. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate reoperation rates for hernia recurrence, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, mesh placement, and hospital characteristics. Analyses were conducted from October 2023 to July 2024.

Exposure

Incremental robotic-assisted hernia repair volume.

Main Outcome and Measure

Reoperation for hernia recurrence within 7 years of index hernia repair.

Results

This study comprised 160 379 Medicare patients (mean [SD] age, 69 [11] years), of whom 93 272 (58.2%) were female, 13 799 (8.6%) were Black, 3124 (2.0%) were Hispanic, and 138 311 (86.2%) were White. Among these patients, 12 609 (7.9%) underwent robotic-assisted hernia repairs, 32 337 (20.2%) laparoscopic repairs, and 115 433 (71.9%) open repairs. This study also included 23 580 surgeons, with 5074 performing robotic-assisted hernia repairs. The national reoperation rates for hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and open repairs were 12.5% (95% CI, 12.06%-12.94%) and 12.9% (95% CI, 12.70%-13.15%), respectively. Reoperation rates decreased as the number of robotic-assisted cases increased, from 14.2% (95% CI, 13.34%-14.97%) at 10 cases to 7.6% (95% CI, 6.75-8.37) at 50 cases. Surgeons needed at least 19 (95% CI, 16-22) robotic-assisted hernia repairs or 16 (95% CI, 13-19) repairs to achieve outcomes equivalent to those of laparoscopic and open procedures. Few surgeons (285 surgeons [5.7%]) performed enough robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs to achieve necessary volume nationally to overcome the learning curve.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 23 580 surgeons who performed ventral hernia repairs between 2010 and 2020, increasing experience with robotic-assisted hernia repairs was associated with improved long-term reoperation rates for hernia recurrence. However, the majority of surgeons did not perform enough cases to reach reoperation rates equivalent to more established laparoscopic and open approaches.

Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon's console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study aimed to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance of the Dexter system in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The primary objectives of this multicenter study conducted at three centers in France, Germany, and Switzerland were to document the successful completion of rTAPP procedures and the occurrence of serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grades III-V), device-related events up to 30 days post-surgery. The procedures were performed by three surgeons with varying levels of experience in robotic systems.

RESULTS

50 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (IQR 51.0-72.0) and BMI of 25.1 kg/cm2 (IQR 23.5-28.7), respectively, underwent inguinal hernia repair (33 unilateral, 17 bilateral). All surgeries were successfully completed using three standard laparoscopy trocars. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. The median skin-to-skin operative time was 50 min (IQR 45-60) for unilateral hernias and 96 min (IQR 84-105) for bilateral hernias. The median console time was 30 min (IQR 26-41) for unilateral and 66 min (IQR 60-77) for bilateral hernias. Twenty-six patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and 22 on postoperative day 1.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the use of the Dexter system in rTAPP was feasible and safe in multicenter cohorts, with operative times consistent with the literature on other robotic platforms. Our data demonstrated the accessibility of this new robotic approach, even when adopted by surgeons new to robotics. The Dexter system emerged as a valuable device in the hernia repair toolkit for both experienced robotic surgeons and those new to the field.

Learning Curve of Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective 2-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) technique is a novel, useful, and minimally invasive therapeutic strategy for lumbar degenerative diseases, which has advantages over other surgical techniques. However, the degree of technical difficulty in learning BESS is controversial and not well established. This study aims to determine the learning curve of BESS technique through cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

METHODS

A total of 144 consecutive patients who underwent BESS with lumbar decompressive discectomy between 2017 and 2023 were included. A retrospective bicenter study was performed.

RESULTS

Three doctors with endoscopy experience employed the BESS technique for 51, 42, and 46 procedures, respectively. The CUSUM test of the 3 doctors showed adequate technical ability at the 45th, 41st, and 44th operations respectively. Two doctors without endoscopy experience gave up further use of BESS technique due to technical difficulties after initial attempt. The overall complication rates of the 3 surgeons using the BESS technique were 3.92% (n = 2), 6.82% (n = 3), and 2.17% (n = 1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that BESS is an effective treatment, and the learning curves of BESS for lumbar discectomy using CUSUM analysis were 41 ∼ 45 cases in trainees with endoscopic experience. Endoscopic experience contributes to the learning curve of the BESS technique.

Robotic-assisted treatment of paraesophageal hernias in the emergency setting: a retrospective study

Emergency treatment of paraesophageal hernias can be carried out through laparotomy or minimally invasive approaches, however, evidence in this regard is weak. The aim of our study was to assess safety and feasibility of the robotic-assisted treatment of paraesophageal hernias in the emergency setting. At the Bellinzona e Valli Regional Hospital, Switzerland, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients operated on from January 2020 to January 2024 with robotic surgery for emergency presentation of paraesophageal hernias. Demographic and clinical details, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Out of 82 patients who underwent robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair, 17 were treated in the emergency setting. Median age was 79 years (IQR 77-85), 3 (17.6%) patients were male, and median BMI was 23.9 kg/m2 (IQR 21.0-26.0). Most frequent presentation symptoms were pain (100%), regurgitation (88.2%), and dyspnea (17.6%). No intraoperative complication, conversion to open surgery or stomach resections were recorded. Two complications of grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and one of grade 2 occurred; all were successfully treated until resolution. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 5-16). After a mean follow-up of 15.9 months (IQR 6.5-25.6) only two small axial asymptomatic recurrences that required no treatment. Despite limitations, our study demonstrated a very low rate of intra- and postoperative complications, likely supporting the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted treatment for paraesophageal hernias in emergency settings. Larger studies with a control arm are needed to validate our initial findings.

Gasless robot-assisted transaxillary hemithyroidectomy (RATH): learning curve and complications

PURPOSE

Gasless robot-assisted transaxillary hemithyroidectomy (RATH) is regarded as an alternative surgical option for thyroid operations. However, the associated steep learning curve is a clinical concern. This study evaluated the learning curve of RATH for surgeons without experience of endoscopic surgery and the early surgical outcomes of RATH.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent gasless RATH and conventional hemithyroidectomy (CH) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, from June 2021 to August 2022. The learning curve and early surgical outcomes of gasless RATH were evaluated. And the early surgical outcomes of gasless RATH were compared to CH.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients who underwent gasless RATH and 104 patients who underwent CH were matched and assessed. The cumulative sum techniques (CUSUM) analysis showed that the peak point of gasless RATH operative time occurred at the 31st case. No clear single peak was identified in the CUSUM plot for drainage amount and blood loss. No significant difference in perioperative complications was observed between these two groups. Moreover, the number of postoperative patients who got sense of thyroid area traction were fewer in the gasless RATH group (n = 11, 10.5%) than in the CH group (n = 32, 30.8%).

CONCLUSION

Gasless RATH can be considered as an alternative approach to the conventional open procedure, as it is an easy remote access technique, with shorter learning curves and certain advantage such as less sense of thyroid area traction.

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia is a common global disease. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (RTAPP) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (LTAPP) for inguinal hernia.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search in Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed for relevant clinical studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality of selected studies was assessed using the Jadad scale for randomized controlled studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of ten studies were included, comprising two randomized controlled studies and eight non-randomized controlled studies. Meta-analysis results revealed no statistically significant differences between the RTAPP group and the LTAPP group regarding hospital stay [MD = 0.21 days, 95% CI (-0.09, 0.51), P = 0.17], incidence of seroma [OR = 0.85, 95% CI(0.45, 1.59), P = 0.61], overall complication rate [OR = 1.22, 95% CI(0.68, 2.18), P = 0.51], readmission rate [OR = 1.31, 95% CI(0.23, 7.47), P = 0.76], and recurrence rate [OR = 0.82, 95% CI(0.22, 3.07), P = 0.77]. However, the RTAPP group had longer operation time compared to the LTAPP group [MD = 14.02 minutes, 95% CI (6.65, 21.39), P = 0.0002], and the cost of the RTAPP procedure was higher than that of the LTAPP procedure [MD = $4.17 thousand, 95% CI (2.59, 5.76), P<0.00001].

CONCLUSION

RTAPP for inguinal hernia is a safe and feasible approach, however, it is associated with increased operation time and treatment costs.

Switching from robotic-assisted extended transabdominal preperitoneal (eTAPP) to totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias

Our study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the robotic-assisted extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair compared to transabdominal preperitoneal (eTAPP) repair with a suprapubic trocar insertion to treat umbilical and epigastric hernias. On a prospectively maintained database, we identified patients who underwent either eTEP or eTAPP for treating umbilical and epigastric hernias. During the study period, 53 patients were included, 32 in the eTEP group and 21 in the eTAPP group. The mean age was 59.0 ± 13.9 years, 45 patients (84.9%) were male, and the mean BMI was 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Most hernias were umbilical (81.1%) and primary (83.0%). The operative time for eTEP was slightly shorter than for eTAPP (106 ± 43 min vs. 126 ± 74 min, p = 0.232). Postoperatively, only one case of bleeding and one seroma were recorded. No complication occurred during a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 6.4 months in the eTEP group and 20.5 ± 9.7 months in the eTAPP group. In conclusion, our study showed that the eTEP with suprapubic approach was safe and feasible in the treatment of epigastric and umbilical hernias. According to our experience, shorter operative time, integrity of the posterior layers and increased overlap size are the main surgical reasons of switching from eTAPP to eTEP.

Safety and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia in pioneering hospitals in Japan: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia in 12 pioneering hospitals in Japan.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021 were collected. Primary outcome measures were intra-operative adverse events and post-operative complications, whereas secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes, including chronic pain, recurrence, and learning curve.

RESULTS

In total, 307 patients were included. One case of inferior epigastric arterial injury was reported; no cases of bowel or bladder injury were reported. Thirty-five seromas were observed, including four (1.3%) cases that required aspiration. The median operative time of a unilateral case was 108 minutes (interquartile range: 89.8-125.5), and post-operative pain was rated 1 (interquartile range: 0-2) on the numerical rating scale. In complicated cases, such as recurrent inguinal hernias and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy-associated hernias, dissection and suture were safely achieved, and no complications were observed, except for non-symptomatic seroma. All patients underwent robotic procedures, and there was no chronic post-operative inguinal pain, although one case of hernia recurrence was reported. Regarding the learning curve, plateau performance was achieved after 7-10 cases in terms of operative time (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair can be safely introduced in Japan. Regardless of the involvement of many surgeons, the mastery of robotic techniques was achieved relatively quickly. The advantage of robotic technology such as wristed instruments may expand the application of minimally invasive hernia repair for complicated cases.

Risk factors for reoperation following inguinal hernia repair: results from a cohort of patients from an integrated healthcare system

PURPOSE

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed globally. Identification of risk factors that contribute to hernia recurrence following an index inguinal hernia repair, especially those that are modifiable, is of paramount importance. Therefore, we sought to investigate risk factors for reoperation following index inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

125,133 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent their first inguinal hernia repair with mesh within a large US integrated healthcare system were identified for a cohort study (2010-2020). Laparoscopic, robotic, and open procedures were included. The system's integrated electronic health record was used to obtain data on demographics, patient characteristics, surgical characteristics, and reoperations. The association of these characteristics with ipsilateral reoperation during follow-up was modeled using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Risk factors were selected into the final model by stepwise regression with Akaike Information Criteria, which quantifies the amount of information lost if a factor is left out of the model. Factors associated with reoperation with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of reoperation at 5-year follow-up was 2.4% (95% CI 2.3-2.5). Increasing age, female gender, increasing body mass index, White race, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, drug abuse, peripheral vascular disease, and bilateral procedures all associated with a higher risk for reoperation during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies several risk factors associated with reoperation following inguinal hernia repair. These risk factors may serve as targets for optimization protocols prior to elective inguinal hernia repair, with the goal of reducing reoperation risk.

Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Unilateral Repair of Non-recurrent Inguinal Hernia

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data comparing open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches on unilateral, non-recurrent inguinal hernias. Our study presents a large, retrospective triple-arm outcome analysis between robotic, laparoscopic, and open unilateral, non-recurrent inguinal hernia repairs at a single institution.

METHODS

706 patients who underwent elective, non-recurrent inguinal hernia repair performed by 8 general surgeons at a single institution from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient baseline characteristics, operative times, resident involvement, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed for all repair types. A cost analysis of the different procedures was performed.

RESULTS

There were 305 laparoscopic repairs, 207 robotic repairs, and 194 open repairs. Open and laparoscopic repairs were performed on patients who were older (p =< .001) and with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p =< .001). Patient BMI was higher in minimally invasive repair than open repair (P = .021). There were no significant differences in complication rates on pairwise analysis. Robotic and open repairs had significantly longer operative times than laparoscopic repairs (P < .001). There was less resident involvement in robotic repair than with the other approaches (P < .001). Resident involvement was associated with shorter OR times (P = .001) and no significant difference in postoperative complications. There was a trend over the study period toward faster operative times and more robotic repair. Robotic repair is the most expensive repair, followed by laparoscopic and open repairs.

CONCLUSION

All 3 repair techniques can be performed without significant differences in outcomes. The technique utilized should be based on surgeon preference and patient characteristics.

CUSUM learning curves: what they can and can't tell us

INTRODUCTION

There has been increased interest in assessing the surgeon learning curve for new skill acquisition. While there is no consensus around the best methodology, one of the most frequently used learning curve assessments in the surgical literature is the cumulative sum curve (CUSUM) of operative time. To demonstrate the limitations of this methodology, we assessed the CUSUM of console time across cohorts of surgeons with differing case acquisition rates while varying the total number of cases used to calculate the CUSUM.

METHODS

We compared the CUSUM curves of the average console times of surgeons who completed their first 20 robotic-assisted (RAS) cases in 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks, respectively, for their first 50 and 100 cases, respectively. This analysis was performed for prostatectomy (1094 surgeons), malignant hysterectomy (737 surgeons), and inguinal hernia (1486 surgeons).

RESULTS

In all procedures, the CUSUM curve of the cohort of surgeons who completed their first 20 procedures in 13 weeks demonstrated a lower slope than cohorts of surgeons with slower case acquisition rates. The case number at which the peak of the CUSUM curve occurs uniformly increases when the total number of cases used in generation of the CUSUM chart changes from 50 to 100 cases.

CONCLUSION

The CUSUM analyses of these three procedures suggests that surgeons with fast initial case acquisition rates have less variability in their operative times over the course of their learning curve. The peak of the CUSUM curve, which is often used in surgical learning curve literature to denote "proficiency" is predictably influenced by the total number of procedures evaluated, suggesting that defining the peak as the point at which a surgeon has overcome the learning curve is subject to routine bias. The CUSUM peak, by itself, is an insufficient measure of "conquering the learning curve."

Differences in the learning curve of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair according to surgeon's robotic experience

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to analyze the learning curve of each step of robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) in two surgeons with varying degrees of expertise with the robotic platform but no experience with laparoscopic hernia repair.

METHODS

Data on 124 rTAPP cases performed by two surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was applied to visualize the learning curve of rTAPP on operation time of each step of the procedure [the peritoneal flap creation (T1), the completion of the critical view of the myopectineal orifice (T2), the mesh application (T3) and the peritoneal flap closure (T4)]. Each intraoperative and postoperative outcome was compared according to surgeon's experience with the robotic platform and learning phase. The robotic surgeon mentored the surgeon-in-training and was present during all surgeries in his learning period.

RESULTS

The surgeon in training with the robotic platform showed a learning phase till the 20th procedure followed by a gradual improvement in performances. The expert surgeon showed a learning phase till the 35th procedure after which a constant decrease of operative time was recorded till the last procedure included. The operative times of each step of the procedures of both surgeons were significantly improved after the learning phase. In the late phase, the surgeon in training could achieve operative times in T2 and T3, which are similar to those of an experienced robotic surgeon with no experience with TAPP before the completion of the learning phase.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the learning phase of rTAPP surgery may vary between 20 and 35 cases, depending on the surgeon's experience in robotic surgery.

Impact of Umbilicus-Symphysis Pubis Distance on Technical Difficulties in Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair (TAPP)

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has gained popularity due to its advantages over open procedures. However, technical challenges and anatomical variations can affect surgical outcomes. The umbilicus-symphysis pubis (USP) distance has been identified as a potential factor impacting laparoscopic operations. This study aims to investigate the association between USP distance, technical difficulties, and operative time in the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 122 patients who underwent elective TAPP surgery. USP distance was measured, and surgical data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between USP distance and operative time.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 80 underwent unilateral hernia repair, and 42 underwent bilateral hernia repair. In unilateral repair, USP distance did not significantly affect operative time. However, in bilateral repair, there was a significant association between USP distance and operation time prolongation ( P =0.039).

DISCUSSION

TAPP surgery presents challenges due to limited visualization and anatomical variations. Factors like USP distance can impact surgical outcomes. A shorter distance increases complexity, while a longer distance facilitates smoother procedures. Surgeons should consider USP distance during surgical planning to optimize outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The study findings indicate that USP distance is associated with prolonged operative time in TAPP bilateral hernia repair. Surgeons, especially those in the learning phase, can benefit from considering this relationship to optimize surgical outcomes and resource allocation. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore additional factors influencing operative time in hernia repair surgeries.

Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic transabdominal peritoneal repair for unilateral inguinal hernia: a propensity-score matched analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic transabdominal peritoneal repair (TAPP) for unilateral inguinal hernia.

METHODS

This single institutional retrospective cohort study used de-identified data of patients who underwent robotic TAPP (R-TAPP) or laparoscopic TAPP (L-TAPP) for unilateral inguinal hernia between January 1, 2016 and October 31, 2021. Two cohorts were propensity matched, and data were analyzed. The learning curve was evaluated in the R-TAPP group.

RESULTS

Among 938 patients analyzed, 704 were included. After propensity-score matching, 80 patients were included in each group. The difference in operative time between R-TAPP and L-TAPP groups was 10 min (99.5 and 89.5 min, p = 0.087); however, console/laparoscopic time was similar (67 and 66 min, p = 0.71). The dissection time for medial-type hernia in the R-TAPP group was marginally shorter than that in the L-TAPP group (17 and 27 min, p = 0.056); however, there was no difference for lateral-type hernia (38.5 and 40 min p = 0.37). Perioperative variables, including estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain, had no significant difference, and chronic pain, which needed medication or intervention, was not observed in each group. The number of cases needed to achieve plateau performance was 7-10 in the R-TAPP group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that R-TAPP was safely introduced, and its perioperative outcomes were not inferior to those of L-TAPP. A shorter dissection time for medial-type hernia might be due to the robot's advantages, and a fast-learning curve could help with the early standardization of the procedure.

The adoption of oncoplastic surgery: Is there a learning curve?

INTRODUCTION

Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) is a form of breast conservation surgery involving partial mastectomy followed by volume displacement or replacement surgery. As the field of OPS is growing, we sought to determine if there was a learning curve to this surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent OPS over a 6-year period with a single surgeon formally trained in both Plastic Surgery and Breast Oncology. Cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM) was performed on mean operative time to generate the learning curve and learning curve phases. Outcomes were compared between phases to determine significance.

RESULTS

Mean operative time decreased significantly across the 6-year period, generating three distinct learning curve phases: Learner phase (cases 1-23), Competence phase (24-73), and Mastery phase (74 and greater). The overall positive margin rate was 10.9% and there was no significant difference in rates between phases (p = 0.49). Overall complication rates, reoperation rates, and locoregional recurrence remained the same across all phases (p = 0.16; p = 0.65; p = 0.41). The rate of partial nipple loss decreased between phases (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

As with many complex operations, there does appear to be a learning curve with OPS, as the operative time and the rates of partial nipple loss decreased over time.

Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review

Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.

Comparison of perioperative and mid-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Although the advantages of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) have been described, guidelines regarding robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) have yet to be established, despite its increased adoption as a minimally invasive alternative. This study compares the largest single-center cohorts of LIHR and RIHR and aims to shed light on the differences in outcomes between these two techniques.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LIHR or RIHR over an 8-year period were included as part of a retrospective analysis. Variables were stratified by preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes. Complications were listed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system and comprehensive complication index (CCI®). Study groups were compared using univariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier's time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1153 patients were included: 606 patients underwent LIHR, while 547 underwent RIHR. Although demographics and comorbidities were mostly similar between the groups, the RIHR group included a higher proportion of complex hernias. Operative times were in favor of LIHR (42 vs. 53 min, p < 0.001), while RIHR had a smaller number of peritoneal breaches (0.4 vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) as well as conversions (0.2 vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). The number of patients lost-to-follow-up and the average follow-up times were similar (p = 0.821 and p = 0.304, respectively). Postoperatively, CCI® scores did not differ between the two groups (median = 0, p = 0.380), but Grade IIIB complications (1.2 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.025) and recurrences (0.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.013) were in favor of RIHR. Furthermore, estimated recurrence-free time was higher in the RIHR group [p = 0.032; 99.7 months (95% CI 98.8-100.5) vs. 97.6 months (95% CI 95.9-99.3).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that RIHR may confer advantages over LIHR in terms of addressing more complex repairs while simultaneously reducing conversion and recurrence rates, at the expense of prolonged operation times. Further large-scale prospective studies and trials are needed to validate these findings and better understand whether RIHR offers substantial clinical benefit compared with LIHR.

Description of the Current Da Vinci® Training Pathway for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery by the European Hernia Society

Background: Robot assisted laparoscopic abdominal wall surgery (RAWS) has seen a rapid adoption in recent years. The safe introduction of the robot platform in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias is important to safeguard the patient from harm during the learning curve. The scope of this paper is to describe the current European training curriculum in RAWS. Methods and Analysis: The pathway to competence in RAWS will depend on the robot platform, experience in other abdominal procedures (novice to expert) and experience in the abdominal wall repair techniques. An overview of the learning curve effect in the initial case series of several early adopters in RAWS was reviewed. In European centres, current training for surgeons wanting to adopt RAWS is managed by the specific technology-based training organized by the company providing the robot. It consists of four phases where phases I and II are preclinical, while phases III and IV focus on the introduction of the robotic platform into surgical practice. Conclusion: On behalf of the Robotic Surgery Task Force of the European Hernia Society (EHS) we believe that the EHS should play an important role in the clinical phases III and IV training. Courses organized in collaboration with the robot provider on relevant surgical anatomy of the abdominal wall and procedural steps in complex abdominal wall reconstruction like transversus abdominis release are essential. Whereas the robot provider should be responsible for the preclinical phases I and II to gain familiarity in the specific robot platform.

Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a long learning curve. It can be a technically challenging procedure and initially presents an unfamiliar view of inguinal anatomy. The aim of this review was to evaluate published literature relating to the learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and identify the number of cases required for proficiency. The secondary aim was to compare outcomes between surgeons before and after this learning curve threshold had been attained.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies that evaluated the learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A meta-regression analysis was undertaken to identify the number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency, and a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between cases that were undertaken during a surgeon's learning phase and experienced phase of the curve.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included in this review, with 19 studies included in the meta-regression analysis, and 11 studies included in the meta-analysis. Mixed-effects Poisson regression demonstrated that there was a non-linear trend in the number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency, with a 2.7% year-on-year decrease. The predicted number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency in 2020 was 32.5 (p < 0.01). The meta-analysis determined that surgeons in their learning phase may experience a higher rate of conversions to open (OR 4.43, 95% CI 1.65, 11.88), postoperative complications (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07, 2.42), and recurrences (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.40, 4.30).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a well-defined learning curve. While learning surgeons demonstrated reasonable outcomes, supervision during this period may be appropriate given the increased risk of conversion to open surgery. These data may benefit learning surgeons in the skill development of minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs.

A retrospective review of a large series of groin hernia patients operated with robotically assisted laparoscopic technique (R-TAPP)

We have reviewed the patient outcome and the feasibility of robotically assisted inguinal hernia repair (R-TAPP) from the first 4-years period after its introduction in our department in a Scandinavian Public Health hospital. A total of 226 hernia repairs were performed in 195 patients (31 bilateral hernias). 160 patients had primary hernias, whereas 35 had recurrent hernias. Of the recurrent hernias, three had recurred twice. The majority of the hernias were in the right groin (53.3%) and the lateral location was the most common (65.0%). The hernia was scrotal in 29 cases. The mean operation time was significantly reduced throughout the observation period for our cohort, i.e. from 81 to 57 min (p < 0.001). The operation time was 27 min faster (mean value) in unilateral vs bilateral hernias and 19 min faster (mean value) in primary vs residual hernias. There were no statistically significant differences in operation time between lateral and medial hernias, and no differences in operation time between the obese and normal-weight cases. We experienced four severe per-operative complications (4/226; 1.8%): two cases of abdominal wall bleeding subsequently undergoing intravascular coiling, one perforation of the urinary bladder and one perforation of small bowel that were both closed by direct suture intraoperatively. There were no conversions to laparoscopy or open procedure. One hernia recurred during the observation period. Our findings suggest that the R-TAPP procedure in a Scandinavian Public Health hospital’s surgical department is both safe and feasible.

Results of single-incision distal biceps tendon repair for early-career upper-extremity surgeons

Background

The purpose of this investigation was to assess surgical outcomes after distal biceps tendon (DBT) repair for upper-extremity surgeons at the beginning of their careers, immediately following fellowship training. We aimed to determine if procedure times, complication rates, and clinical outcomes differed during the learning curve period for these early-career surgeons.

Methods

All cases of DBT repairs performed by 2 fellowship-trained surgeons from the start of their careers were included. Demographic data as well as operative times, complication rates, and patient reported outcomes were retrospectively collected. A cumulative sum chart (CUSUM) analysis was performed for the learning curve for both operative times and complication rate. This analysis continuously compares performance of an outcome to a predefined target level.

Results

A total of 78 DBT repairs performed by the two surgeons were included. In the CUSUM analysis of operative time for surgeon 1 and 2, both demonstrated a learning curve until case 4. In CUSUM analysis for complication rates, neither surgeon 1 nor surgeon 2 performed significantly worse than the target value and learning curve ranged from 14 to 21 cases. Mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (QuickDASH) (10.65 ± 5.81) and the pain visual analog scale scores (1.13 ± 2.04) were comparable to previously reported literature.

Conclusions

These data suggest that a learning curve between 4 and 20 cases exists with respect to operative times and complication rates for DBT repairs for fellowship-trained upper-extremity surgeons at the start of clinical practice. Early-career surgeons appear to have acceptable clinical results and complications relative to previously published series irrespective of their learning stage.

Three-point mesh fixation in robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) repair of 208 inguinal hernias: preliminary results of a single-center consecutive series

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of our mesh fixation technique in robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (R-TAPP). The primary outcome was the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, chronic pain, and return to normal activities.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and December 2019, we performed 208 consecutive R-TAPP in 161 patients and the mesh was fixed by three intracorporeal stiches using a Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) 3-0 suture. Patients were followed up at 10 and 30 days after surgery with a clinical evaluation for detection of early complications, postoperative pain, need for analgesics, return to normal activities, and satisfaction rate. Patients were further followed up at study conclusion in February 2021 for recurrence and chronic pain detection.

RESULTS

Painkillers were stopped by 57% of the patients after the first postoperative day and by 96% after 1 week. Chronic pain (> 3 months after surgery) was observed in three patients (1.8%) and only one of them was treated with percutaneous ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve infiltration. After a mean follow-up of 24.0 ± 6.7 months, only 1 recurrence (0.48%) was clinically detected and confirmed by a CT-scan.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-point mesh fixation technique is feasible during robot-assisted TAPP repair for inguinal hernia and seems to be a viable alternative to other fixation methods. Further long-term controlled investigations are needed to understand if this technique is effective in influencing recurrence and chronic pain rates.

Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair

With more than 5500 da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) installed worldwide, the robotic approach for general surgery, including for inguinal hernia repair, is gaining popularity in the USA. However, in many countries outside the USA, robotic surgery is performed at only a few advanced institutions; therefore, its advantages over the open or laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia repair are unclear. Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, but there is still no firm evidence to support the superiority of robotic surgery for this procedure or its long-term clinical outcomes. Robotic surgery has the potential to overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery through appropriate utilization of technological advantages, such as wristed instruments, tremor filtering, and high-resolution 3D images. The potential benefits of robotic inguinal hernia repair are lower rates of complications or recurrence than open and laparoscopic surgery, with less postoperative pain, and a rapid learning curve for surgeons. In this review, we summarize the current status and future prospects of robotic inguinal hernia repair and discuss the issues associated with this procedure.

Robotic hernia surgery I. English version : Robotic inguinal hernia repair (r‑TAPP). Video report and results of a series of 302 hernia operations

The treatment of inguinal hernias with open and minimally invasive procedures has reached a high standard in terms of outcome over the past 30 years. However, there is still need for further improvement, mainly in terms of reduction of postoperative seroma, chronic pain, and recurrence. This video article presents the endoscopic anatomy of the groin with regard to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (r‑TAPP) and illustrates the surgical steps of r‑TAPP with respective video sequences. The results of a cohort study of 302 consecutive hernias operated by r‑TAPP are presented and discussed in light of the added value of the robotic technique, including advantages for surgical training. r‑TAPP is the natural evolution of conventional TAPP and has the potential to become a new standard as equipment availability increases and material costs decrease. Future studies will also have to refine the multifaceted added value of r‑TAPP with new parameters.

[Robotic hernia surgery : Part I: Robotic inguinal hernia repair (r‑TAPP). Video report and results of a series of 302 hernia operations]

The treatment of inguinal hernias with open and minimally invasive procedures has reached a high standard in terms of outcome over the past 30 years. However, there is still need for further improvement, mainly in terms of reduction of postoperative seroma, chronic pain, and recurrence. This video article presents the endoscopic anatomy of the groin with regard to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (r‑TAPP) and illustrates the surgical steps of r‑TAPP with respective video sequences. The results of a cohort study of 302 consecutive hernias operated by r‑TAPP are presented and discussed in light of the added value of the robotic technique, including advantages for surgical training. r‑TAPP is the natural evolution of conventional TAPP and has the potential to become a new standard as equipment availability increases and material costs decrease. Future studies will also have to refine the multifaceted added value of r‑TAPP with new parameters.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Despite the limited research in support of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR), it is an increasingly adopted technique in surgical practice. While a major risk factor for the development of ventral hernias and subsequent complications, obesity in RIHR has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RIHR between obese and non-obese patients.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data surrounding RIHRs performed at a single center between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into non-obese (< 30 kg/m²) and obese (≥ 30 kg/m²) groups, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared in unmatched and matched groups, derived using a 1:2 propensity score match (PSM).

RESULTS

From a total of 547 patients, 414 were non-obese and 133 were obese. A PSM analysis, accounting for confounding preoperative variables and risk factors, stratified these into 262 patients for the non-obese group and 131 patients for the obese group. Although the obese group's operative times were longer on average (57 min vs. 51 min; p = 0.007), this difference did not persist after matching. The only significant difference in operative variables was a higher rate of cord lipomas in the obese group. Postoperative variables, including wound complications, readmissions, and recurrence, were similar across unmatched and matched groups.

CONCLUSION

In the first study to investigate the influence of obesity in RIHR, no differences in outcomes were found between obese and non-obese patients. This procedure can be safely performed in obese individuals, however, more studies comparing body mass index (BMI) classes are needed to establish whether a prohibitive BMI threshold exists for RIHR.