Minimally invasive treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 15-year single referral center's experience on 215 patients

What Will We Learn if We Start Listening to Women with Menses-Related Chest Pain?

Background. Thoracic endometriosis is thought to be the most common form of endometriosis occurring outside of the pelvis. We aimed to characterize thoracic symptoms of endometriosis in a population of patients not necessarily suffering from catamenial pneumothorax, which is most commonly identified as a symptom of thoracic endometriosis. Material and methods. We used a web-based survey addressed to users of two Polish endometriosis patient advocate organizations. The factor that qualified patients for the study was the presence of symptoms in the chest related to the menstrual cycle. Results. A total of 92 respondents were questioned. In this group, 96% (88/92) of patients were previously diagnosed with pelvic endometriosis, 20% (18/92) with thoracic endometriosis, and 18% (17/92) with diaphragmatic endometriosis. The percentage of patients diagnosed with both thoracic and diaphragmatic endometriosis was 15% (14/92). Ninety-eight percent of patients suffered from pain. The four most common symptoms reported by patients were chest pain, dyspnea, cough, and stunned limb, occurring in 96%, 67%, 52%, and 33%, respectively. The feeling of a stunned, weakened limb occurs in older women at 38.4 vs. 35.5 years of age (p = 0.021). There is a trend that women who suffer pain (36.7 vs. 31.3 years of age p = 0.053) and hemoptysis (41.0 vs. 36.2 years of age p = 0.059) are older than women without these symptoms. We identified two unique symptoms of thoracic endometriosis-pouring liquid sensation (13%) and popping sensation (12%)-which can be related to a small amount of gas and fluid in the pleural cavity. Conclusions. Patients who have endometriosis suffer from a constellation of thoracic symptoms related to menses.

Thoracic Endometriosis Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review and Multidisciplinary Approach to Management

Background: Endometriosis is a systemic, inflammatory, estrogen-dependent condition characterized by endometrial stroma and gland-like lesions outside of the uterus. It causes a range of symptoms, notably chronic pelvic pain, infertility and organ dysfunction. Thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES) has been described as endometriosis that is found in the lung parenchyma, pleura and diaphragm. It may be asymptomatic or present with symptoms of catamenial pneumothorax, hemothorax, hemoptysis, isolated chest pain, shoulder pain or findings of lung nodules. Aim: The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES), including its clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and current management strategies. This review aims to highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of TES, emphasizing conservative management and the role of minimally invasive surgical techniques for refractory cases. Conclusions: Thoracic endometriosis syndrome appears to be a marker of severe endometriosis. As much as possible, the patient with TES is managed conservatively, with surgery reserved for refractory cases. When surgery is recommended, the procedure is conducted through a multidisciplinary minimally invasive approach, with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and video-assisted laparoscopy. Meticulous intraoperative survey, the removal of endometriosis implants with and without robotic assistance and post-operative hormonal therapy may be recommended to prevent recurrence.

A bird-eye view of diaphragmatic endometriosis: current practices and future perspectives

Diaphragmatic endometriosis is one of the most common localization of extra-pelvic endometriosis and may cause debilitating symptoms such as cyclic shoulder pain, right upper abdominal pain, and right-sided chest pain. Diaphragmatic endometriosis may also be asymptomatic. The exact mechanisms by which diaphragmatic endometriosis originates are unknown. The high correlation between severe pelvic endometriosis and diaphragmatic endometriosis suggests that the latter originates from endometriotic cells that reach the upper abdomen by circulating with the peritoneal fluid current. Robust evidence regarding the preoperative diagnosis and optimal management of diaphragmatic endometriosis is lacking. Most reports rely on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the radiologic diagnosis of diaphragmatic endometriosis. Although its sensitivity ranged between 78% and 83%, MRI was found to underestimate the extent of diaphragmatic endometriosis in comparison with the surgical findings. Accumulating evidence indicates that asymptomatic diaphragmatic endometriosis is very unlikely to progress, and therefore, could be left in situ when incidentally found. The efficiency of ablative and excisional approaches for symptomatic endometriosis has not been assessed thoroughly to date. In addition, it is unclear whether combining the laparoscopic approach with video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) may result in an optimized result. This gap exists due to the lack of data about the association between diaphragmatic and thoracic endometriosis. In this review, we aimed to provide a state of the art description of the current knowledge and gaps about the pathogenesis, diagnostics, and treatment modalities of diaphragmatic endometriosis.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy Excision of a Severe Form of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study of 60 Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of the robotic surgical approach in the treatment of severe diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE).

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study using data prospectively recorded in the Franco-European Multidisciplinary Institute of Endometriosis database and the National Observatory for Endometriosis database.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center. Endometriosis care center.

PATIENTS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing robotic excision of severe DE from January 2020 to July 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

Robotic excision of severe DE.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated and compared using descriptive statistics. A p value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Full-thickness diaphragmatic resection was performed in 76.7% of patients (46 of 60) and partial diaphragmatic muscle resection in 10% of cases (6 of 60). Peritoneal stripping technique was performed in 60% of patients (36 of 60), divided as follows: as the only technique in the case of extensive superficial diaphragmatic involvement in 13.3% of cases (8 of 60), in addition to full-thickness or partial diaphragmatic resection in the case of concomitant multiple foci in 46.7% of patients (28 of 60). Median operative time was 79.6 minutes with no statistically significative difference related to the surgeon performing surgery (p >.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 1.7% (1 of 60) and 6.6% of cases (4 of 60), respectively. Diaphragmatic hernia (Clavien-Dindo 3b) was the most common postoperative complication and required surgical repair in all cases. Median hospital stay was 24 hours. The rate of patients with complete recovery from DE symptoms has gradually increased during follow-up, reaching 89% after 12 months from surgery.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, robotic treatment of severe DE in expert hands was feasible, effective, and safe.

Tailoring radicality in diaphragmatic surgery for deep endometriosis: A matter of choice

Diaphragmatic endometriosis (DpE) is a rare disease localization which represents an important clinical challenge. The main criticisms toward the proper DpE management consist of poor consensus on both surgical indications and the choice between different surgical techniques available to treat the disease. Furthermore, only weak recommendations are provided by current guidelines and surgical management is mostly based on surgeon's experience. As consequence, the lack of standardization about the surgical treatment led to the risk of under- or over-treatments in patients suffering from this form of endometriosis. The latest evidence-based data suggest to adopt a lesion-oriented surgical approach serving as a guide in daily surgical activities, in order to ensure a tailored radicality and reduce the rate of surgery-related complications. Diaphragmatic endometriosis surgery should be performed only by expert surgeons with an extensive oncogynecologic expertise since it represents a technically demanding procedure. A multidisciplinary approach is also mandatory in order to adequately select and treat these patients by minimizing the risk of additional morbidity.

Robotic surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis: is it time to take a step forward?

Endometriosis is a chronic debilitating disease that affects nearly 10% of women of the reproductive age. Although the treatment modalities of endometriosis are numerous, surgical excision of the endometriotic implants and nodules remains the sole cytoreductive approach. Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis was proven to be beneficial in improving the postoperative pain and fertility. Moreover, it was also proved to be safe and efficient in treating the visceral localization of deep endometriosis, such as urinary and colorectal endometriosis. More recently, robotic-assisted surgery gained attention in the field of endometriosis surgery. Although the robotic technology provides a 3D vision of the surgical field and 7-degree of freedom motion, the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of this approach are yet to be determined. With this paper, we aim to review the available evidence regarding the role of robotic surgery in the management of endometriosis along with the current practices in the field.

Diaphragmatic Endometriosis-A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of the Patients' Demographics, Symptomatology, and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes

Diaphragmatic endometriosis is rare and forms 0.67-4.7% of all endometriosis cases. Evidence regarding its optimal management is lacking. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the patient characteristics and long-term treatment outcomes of diaphragmatic endometriosis patients. Over a 4-year period, 23 patients were diagnosed with diaphragmatic endometriosis. The majority of patients had coexisting deep pelvic endometriosis. Cyclic upper abdominal pain was reported by 60.9% of patients, while cyclic chest and shoulder pain were reported by 43.5% and 34.8% of patients, respectively. Most patients were treated with laparoscopic lesion ablation, while 21.1% were treated with minimally invasive excision. The mean follow-up time was 23.7 months. Long-lasting resolution of the chest, abdominal, and shoulder pain occurred in 50%, 35.7%, and 25% of patients, respectively. Nonetheless, 78.9% of patients reported major improvement in their symptoms postoperatively. Significantly higher rates of postoperative shoulder, abdominal, and chest pain were observed in patients who received postoperative hormonal therapy compared with those who did not. All patients treated expectantly remained stable. Therefore, we recommend treating diaphragmatic endometriosis only in symptomatic patients. The risk of incomplete surgery should be minimized by a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach with a careful assessment of the diaphragm and the thoracic cavity.

Phrenic nerve paralysis after bipolar electrocoagulation of endometriosis of the diaphragm: case report and mini review

Objective

To present a case of persistent postoperative elevation of the right hemidiaphragm after bipolar electrocoagulation of diaphragmatic endometriosis, highly likely because of collateral thermal damage to key branches of the phrenic nerve, and review the literature on diaphragmatic endometriosis, focusing on operative treatment.

Design

Case report and mini review.

Setting

Single university-based interdisciplinary endometriosis center.

Patient(s)

A 33-year-old nulliparous patient, initially presenting with right-sided shoulder and back pain accompanied by severe dysmenorrhea and diarrhea. Written consent for the use of anonymized data and images for research purposes was obtained.

Intervention(s)

Laparoscopic surgery with bipolar electrocoagulation of multiple superficial endometriotic lesions on the right hemidiaphragm and excision of bilateral deep infiltrating endometriosis on the sacrouterine ligaments.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Outcome and complication of surgical treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis.

Result(s)

Three weeks after surgical treatment, the patient complained of exertional dyspnea and pain in the right flank. Imaging showed a postoperative elevation of the right hemidiaphragm, which did not resolve over the following 6 months. We suspect collateral thermal damage to key branches of the phrenic nerve after bipolar electrocoagulation of extensive superficial diaphragmatic lesions.

Conclusion(s)

During laparoscopic treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis, bipolar electrocoagulation should be used sparingly and with caution to avoid potentially damaging the phrenic nerve.

Robotic management of diaphragmatic endometriosis in 10 steps: Robotic surgery of the diaphragm

OBJECTIVE

To present 10 standardized steps of the surgical management of diaphragmatic endometriosis using Da Vinci robotic assistance.

DESIGN

Surgical education video. The local IRB confirmed that the video met ethical criteria required for publication. Patient consent was obtained.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center INTERVENTION: : The film presents a standardized way of performing excision of diaphragmatic endometriosis using the 10 following steps: 1) The patient is placed in left lateral decubitus and 10° proclivity (1,2); 2) Three 8mm-wide incisions are performed, including on the right medio-clavicular line for the endoscope, on the medio-axilar line for the bipolar forceps, and 2 cm below the xiphoid appendix for the scissors. A 10mm incision is performed 3 cm above the umbilicus for the assistant trocar; 3) The procedure starts by an inspection of the right diaphragmatic surface, the falciform ligament is sectioned to allow exploration of the left diaphragm and supplementary mobilization of the liver; 4) Adhesions are completely sectioned, down to the hepato-phrenic cul de sac, tangentially to the liver surface; 5) Small lesions, which do not require full thickness excision, are first removed, before creating a pneumothorax, using a low monopolar setting at 20 watts (3). 6) Full thickness excision of transfixing lesions or holes is carried out using monopolar scissors and results in an immediate complete right pneumothorax (2,4); 7) The pleural cavity is inspected to identify disseminated lesions in the chest, located far from the diaphragm. 8) Repairing of the diaphragm is carried out by performing an unidirectional barbed suture. 9) Before performing the final knot, the laparoscopic suction irrigation canula is introduced into the chest cavity and the CO2 used for inflation is fully aspirated, leading to the creation of the diaphragm concavity; the use of a chest drain is therefore not necessary; 10) Despite the lack of high-level of evidence data, we routinely use an antiadhesion agent, with an aim to reduce postoperative adhesions. Operative time varies from 30 min to 1 hour. Chest X ray is routinely performed at postoperative day 1. To date, in 76 patients, X ray did not reveal postoperative relevant pleurisy requiring chest drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

The robotic assisted-laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis involving the diaphragm is a standardized 10-step procedure which allows a complete removal of diaphragmatic lesions with good clinical outcomes.