Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience

Concurrent robotic colorectal surgical oncology training within a structured mentored international fellowship program

Robotic colorectal surgery is increasingly adopted worldwide, with mentored programs for established surgeons becoming more common. However, there is a paucity of dedicated robotic training programs for colorectal fellows. This study aims to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a structured, apprentice-based robotic colorectal training program delivered to multiple fellows concurrently. The fellowship program incorporates simulation training, dry/wet laboratory work, dedicated robotic console time in the operating room (OR) and individualised mentorship. Overall robotic proficiency was assessed using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and procedure-specific proficiency was assessed using a modified European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery (EARCS) Global Assessment Score (GAS) throughout the fellowship. A total of 59 cases (29 right hemicolectomies, 30 anterior resections) were evaluated between August 2023 and July 2024. Significant improvements were observed in GEARS scores (p = 0.0065) and modified GAS for both right hemicolectomies (p = 0.0052) and anterior resections (p = 0.0005), demonstrating a high level of competence and independence. Mean operative times were 213 min (right hemicolectomy) and 328 min (anterior resection). Median length of stay in the hospital was 2 days (right hemicolectomy) and 4 days (anterior resection). Median lymph node yield was 29 (right hemicolectomy) and 26 (anterior resection). There was 0% involved margins for both procedures. Robotic colorectal surgical oncology training delivered to multiple fellows concurrently in an apprenticeship model with dedicated console time is achievable and successful, leading to high levels of robotic competency and independence, whilst maintaining a high standard of clinical care and oncological outcome.

Robotic CME in 110 consecutive cases: feasibility and short-term technical and oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been introduced from open surgery, to compare right colon cancer surgery to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer and it is currently being applied by robotic approach. CME concept is based on the complete removal of right mesocolon and the dissection deep at the level of the central feeding vessels. Aside the CME, intracorporeal anastomosis completes a total minimally invasive approach to the treatment of right colon cancer. This study retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and efficacy of robotic CME and intracorporeal anastomosis in a cohort of consecutive patients affected with right colon cancer.

METHODS

The data of 110 patients undergone a robotic CME with IA anastomosis for right colon cancer from 2018 to 2023 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative, postoperative, and short-middle term outcomes were considered for analysis, as well as pathologic and oncologic outcomes. A time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for OS and DFS.

RESULTS

All patients underwent a robotic right colectomy. Median operative time was 184 min, blood loss was negligible, no intraoperative complications occurred. Three conversions (2.7%) were experienced due to bulky lymph nodes and severe local advanced tumor. Mean postoperative stay was 6 days. Six postoperative complications occurred, 4 postoperative ileus, 1 late dehiscence of the colonic stump and an iatrogenic colonic perforation. The latter needed reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic CME with central vessels ligation seems feasible and safe, with acceptable morbidity and adequate short-middle term outcomes.

European multicentre analysis of the implementation of robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon tumours

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is an oncologically driven technique for treating right colon cancer. While laparoscopic CME is technically demanding and has been associated with more complications, the robotic approach might reduce morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of stepwise implementation of robotic CME.

METHOD

A multicentre retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on robotic right colectomy was performed at five European tertiary centres. Patients were classified for type of surgery: R-RHC (standard right colectomy), R-impCME (learning cases towards robotic CME defined as R-RHC with one but not all the hallmarks of CME) or R-CME (robotic CME). Primary outcomes were overall and severe 30-day complication rates before and after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing robotic surgery for (pre)malignant lesions of the right colon between 2010 and 2020 were included: R-RHC (n = 101), R-impCME (n = 135) and R-CME (n = 315). Baseline characteristics differed for American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.0012) and preoperative diagnosis of adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001). Procedure time increased by surgical complexity (p < 0.001). Vascular event rates did not differ, with no superior mesenteric vein injuries. Conversion, complication and anastomotic leak rates, time to flatus/soft diet and length of stay (LOS) did not differ. While R-RHC was performed for a lower rate of malignancies (p < 0.001), lymph node yield was significantly higher in R-CME (p < 0.001). After PSM, analyses on 186 patients documented no differences in overall and severe 30-day complication rate, conversion rate, LOS or 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

R-CME can be implemented without increasing the overall or 30-day severe complication rate.

Oncological surgical outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery with loco-regional anesthesia: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pathological outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who were unsuitable for general anesthesia and underwent regional anesthesia in terms of their suitability for oncological surgery.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients who underwent mesocolicormesorectal surgery under regional anesthesia at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between May 2019 and May 2023 were retrospectively examined. The negative margins of the proximal, distal, and circumferential margins of specimens, as well as the number of lymph nodes removed, were analyzed.

RESULTS

All the patients had clear proximal, distal, and circumferential surgical margins. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 23.45 (min-max: 3-97). When patients (n=24) who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded, an insufficient number (<12) of lymph nodes were removed in 3 (7.69%) patients. A total of 3 patients died postsurgery, resulting in a 30-day mortality rate of 5.6%.

CONCLUSION

For elderly and comorbid individuals with CRC, regional anesthesia can be used to carry out surgery with oncological principles.

Robotic approach to colonic resection: For some or for all patients?

The robotic approach is rapidly gaining momentum in colorectal surgery. Its benefits in pelvic surgery have been extensively discussed and are well established amongst those who perform minimally invasive surgery. However, the same cannot be said for the robotic approach for colonic resection, where its role is still debated. Here we aim to provide an extensive debate between selective and absolute use of the robotic approach for colonic resection by combining the thoughts of experts in the field of robotic and minimally invasive colorectal surgery, dissecting all key aspects for a critical view on this exciting new paradigm in colorectal surgery.

Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review

AIM

There is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendicectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.

METHOD

A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendicectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendicectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.

Developing a phantom for simulating robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision using 3D printing and medical imaging

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision is an advanced procedure mainly because of the great variability in anatomy. Phantoms can be used for simulation-based training and assessment of competency when learning new surgical procedures. However, no phantoms for robotic complete mesocolic excision have previously been described. This study aimed to develop an anatomically true-to-life phantom, which can be used for training with a robotic system situated in the clinical setting and can be used for the assessment of surgical competency.

METHODS

Established pathology and surgical assessment tools for complete mesocolic excision and specimens were used for the phantom development. Each assessment item was translated into an engineering development task and evaluated for relevance. Anatomical realism was obtained by extracting relevant organs from preoperative patient scans and 3D printing casting moulds for each organ. Each element of the phantom was evaluated by two experienced complete mesocolic excision surgeons without influencing each other's answers and their feedback was used in an iterative process of prototype development and testing.

RESULTS

It was possible to integrate 35 out of 48 procedure-specific items from the surgical assessment tool and all elements from the pathological evaluation tool. By adding fluorophores to the mesocolic tissue, we developed an easy way to assess the integrity of the mesocolon using ultraviolet light. The phantom was built using silicone, is easy to store, and can be used in robotic systems designated for patient procedures as it does not contain animal-derived parts.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly developed phantom could be used for training and competency assessment for robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision surgery in a simulated setting.

The rise of robotic colorectal surgery: better for patients and better for surgeons

Robotic colorectal surgery represents a major technological advancement in the treatment of patients with colorectal disease. Several recent randomized controlled trials comparing robotic colorectal surgery with laparoscopic surgery have demonstrated improved short-term patient outcomes in the robotic group. Whilst the primary focus of research in robotic surgery has been on patient outcomes, the robotic platform also provides unparalleled benefits for the surgeon, including improved ergonomics and surgeon comfort, with the potential to reduce occupational injuries and prolong career longevity. It is becoming clear that robotic surgical systems improve patient outcomes and may provide significant benefits to the surgical workforce.

Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for colon cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score-matching analysis

Robotic surgery is widely used in gastrointestinal surgery. While the application of robotic surgery for colon cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS) remains controversial for the fear of intra-abdominal adhesions. This study was aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic colectomy for patients with PAS. The medical records of colon cancer patients who underwent robotic surgery at our hospital from June 2015 to August 2020 were extracted and analyzed. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to minimize selection bias. We compared perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications between the patients with PAS or with no PAS (NPAS). A total of 79 patients (PAS group) and 348 patients (NPAS group) were included in our study. After PSM, 79 patients of PAS group and 79 patients of NPAS group were selected for further analysis. We did not find statistical difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph nodes retrieved, length of hospital stay and hospital costs between the two groups. No difference was noted in the incidence of postoperative complications, conversion to open surgery and mortality between the two groups. According to the results of multivariate analysis, PAS was not identified as risk factor for postoperative complications. Left hemicolectomy and perioperative transfusion were associated with postoperative complications. PAS did not negatively affect the outcomes of robotic colectomy. After individually preoperative assessment, robotic surgery could be performed feasibly and safely for colon cancer patients with PAS.

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery is increasingly implemented for the resection of right-sided colonic cancer, possibly resulting in improved 5-year overall and disease-free survival compared to non-CME surgery. However, it is not clear what surgical platform should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the following outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic CME-surgery for right-sided colonic cancer: (i) short-term clinical outcomes, (ii) pathological specimen quality, and (iii) long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception until August 2021. Pooled proportions were calculated by applying the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was explored by I-square and supplemented by sensitivity- and meta-regression analyses. The risk of bias was evaluated by either MINORS or Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies with 5.357 patients (740 robot-assisted and 4617 laparoscopic) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall postoperative morbidity was 17% [95% CI (14-20%)] in the robot-assisted group and 13% [95%CI (12-13%)] in the laparoscopic group. Robot-assisted CME was associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower intraoperative blood loss, a higher amount of harvested lymph nodes, and better 3-year oerall and disease-free survival. MINORS and RoB2 indicated a serious risk of bias across studies included.

CONCLUSIONS

This review which includes predominantly non-randomized studies suggests a possible advantage of the robot-assisted CME compared with a laparoscopic technique for several short-term outcomes.

Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

Safe implementation of robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis

The robotic platform can overcome technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic colon surgery. Transitioning from laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) to robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) is associated with a learning phase. This study aimed at determining the length of this learning phase and its associated morbidity. We retrospectively analyzed all laparoscopic right colectomies with ECA (n = 38) and robotic right colectomies with ICA (n = 67) for (pre)malignant lesions performed by a single surgeon between January 2014 and December 2020. CUSUM-plot analysis of total procedure time was used for learning curve determination of robotic colectomies. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Compared to laparoscopy, the learning phase robotic right colectomies (n = 35) had longer procedure times (p < 0.001) but no differences in anastomotic leakage rate, length of stay or 30-day morbidity. Conversion rate was reduced from 16 to 3 percent in the robotic group. This study provides evidence that robotic right colectomy with ICA can be safely implemented without increasing morbidity.

Robotic complete mesocolic excision of right-sided colon cancer with bulky lymph node metastases using the da Vinci® Si™ system: A case report

Reports on robotic surgery in the treatment of right-sided colorectal cancer most commonly use the da Vinci® Xi™ system; however, with the increasing popularity of robotic surgery for the treatment of colon cancer, it is likely to be performed using the da Vinci Si™ and X™ systems. The present study reported the case of a 63-year-old woman who underwent complete mesocolic excision (CME) with the da Vinci Si system involving a rotation technique for ascending colon cancer with bulky lymph node metastasis to the anterior pancreas. Robot-assisted right hemicolectomy was planned for this patient with T4aN2bM0, stage IIIc cancer. A lap protector and EZ access (Hakko Co. Ltd.) were fixed in the umbilical incision, and the da Vinci camera port was placed just off-center at the EZ access to allow the camera port to be repositioned by rotating it. The medial approach was used. The bulky metastatic lymph nodes at the head of the pancreas were dissected after ligating the right colic artery and vein. During CME, rotation of the EZ access was used to avoid interference between the robotic arms. The right colon was released from the retroperitoneum and resected. A functional end-to-end anastomosis was created, and right colectomy was successfully completed. The total operation time was 271 min and the console time with the da Vinci Si system was 140 min. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8 without complications. In conclusion, robotic right colectomy was successfully performed and rotation of the EZ access facilitated robotic surgery using the da Vinci Si system.

Robotic-assisted Surgery: Expanding Indication to Colon Cancer in Japan

In recent years, robotic-assisted surgery has demonstrated remarkable progress as a minimally invasive procedure for colorectal cancer. While there have been fewer studies investigating robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of colon cancer than rectal cancer, evidence regarding robotic-assisted colectomy has been accumulating due to increasing use of the procedure. Robotic-assisted colectomy generally requires a long operative time and involves high costs. However, as evidence is increasingly supportive of its higher accuracy and less invasive nature compared to laparoscopic colectomy, the procedure is anticipated to improve the ratio of conversion to laparotomy and accelerate postoperative recovery. Robotic-assisted surgery has also been suggested for a specific level of effectiveness in manipulative procedures, such as intracorporeal anastomosis, and is increasingly indicated as a less problematic procedure compared to conventional laparoscopy and open surgery in terms of long-term oncological outcomes. Although robotic-assisted colectomy has been widely adopted abroad, only a limited number of institutions have been using this procedure in Japan. Further accumulation of experience and studies investigating surgical outcomes using this approach are required in Japan.

Updates on Robotic CME for Right Colon Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Background. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is a surgical technique introduced with the aim of ameliorating the oncologic results of colectomy. Various experiences have demonstrated favorable oncologic results of CME in comparison with standard colectomy, in which the principles of CME are not respected. The majority of the literature refers to open or laparoscopic CME. This review analyses current evidence regarding robotic CME for right colectomy. Methods. An extensive Medline (Pub Med) search for relevant case series, restricted to papers published in English, was performed, censoring video vignettes and case reports. Results. Fourteen studies (ten retrospective, four comparative series of robotic versus laparoscopic CME) were included, with patient numbers ranging from 20 to 202. Four different approaches to CME are described, which also depend on the robotic platform utilized. Intraoperative and early clinical results were good, with a low conversion and anastomotic leak rate and a majority of Clavien–Dindo complications being Grades I and II. Oncologic adequacy of the surgical specimens was found to be good, although a homogeneous histopathologic evaluation was not provided. Conclusions. Further large studies are warranted to define long-term oncologic results of robotic right colectomy with CME and its eventual benefits in comparison to laparoscopy.