Laparoscopic adrenalectomy vs. radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of primary aldosteronism. A single center retrospective cohort analysis adjusted with propensity score

Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for aldosterone-producing adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency ablation (Ablation) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for treating patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases from inception to April 2024. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies comparing Ablation and LA for APA were included. Data on efficacy, safety, and other relevant outcomes were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 887 patients (414 in the Ablation group, 473 in the LA group) were included. Pooled analysis showed comparable clinical success rates (74.2% in Ablation vs. 82% in LA, p = 0.52) but a significantly higher rate of hypertension crises in the Ablation group (16.4 vs. 3%, p < 0.0001). Resolution of hypertension was more frequent in the LA group (44 vs. 27.2%, p = 0.003). Ablation was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Still, no significant differences were found in the resolution of primary aldosteronism, complication rates, blood pressure reduction, or medication usage.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Ablation and LA demonstrate comparable efficacy in treating APA, with Ablation offering advantages in terms of lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay. However, Ablation may be associated with a higher rate of hypertension crises during the procedure. The results suggest that Ablation is not yet a substitute for LA. A personalized approach considering patient-specific factors and institutional expertise is warranted when selecting the appropriate treatment.

Bilateral adrenal artery embolization for the treatment of idiopathic hyperaldosteronism: A proof-of-principle single center study

Unilateral adrenal artery embolization (AAE) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with primary aldosteronism due to aldosterone-producing adenomas or idiopathic hyperaldosteronism with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of bilateral AAE in idiopathic hyperaldosteronism. We enrolled a total of 58 patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism who underwent successful bilateral AAE, and 55 of them completed 6-month follow-up. Bilateral AAE significantly lowered blood pressure of patients with IHA at 1, 3, and 6 months (all P < 0.01). Six months after the procedure, office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure decreased by 20.3/13.5, 18.4/12.6, and 13.7/9.9 mmHg, respectively. Among them, 92.7%, 90.9%, and 89.1% had significant or moderate improvement in blood pressure control at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. Bilateral AAE substantially decreased plasma aldosterone levels, reversed plasma renin suppression, decreased aldosterone-to-renin ratio, and corrected hypokalemia. Importantly, the procedure did not significantly change serum cortisol and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels, and the cortisol and ACTH circadian rhythms remained intact three months after the procedure. Additionally, 16 patients underwent ACTH stimulation tests three months post-procedure and all of them had normal results except for one with a decreased response due to exogenous steroid therapy. Flank pain was the most common side effect which happened in 96.4% of the patients and resolved within 48 h. There were no long-term side effects in the 6 months. The present study provides evidence that bilateral AAE is an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with IHA. Changes in office and 24h ambulatory blood pressure at 1, 3, and 6 months after bilateral adrenal artery embolization in patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism.

Ablation and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Balancing efficacy and safety in the treatment of benign adrenal gland tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Aldosterone-producing adenomas cause hypertension in 5-10 % of cases. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard treatment for early-stage adrenal gland tumors, but minimally invasive procedures, such as ablative techniques can also be applied. Therefore, we aimed to compare laparoscopic adrenalectomy and ablation techniques in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of benign adrenal gland tumors.

Materials and methods

We conducted a systematic search in five databases and included studies comparing the efficacy and safety of ablation techniques and laparoscopic adrenalectomy. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for eligible studies with binary outcomes, and mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes.

Results

Five studies focusing on aldosterone-producing adenomas were included in our review. A total of 119 patients at 14 centers underwent ablation, and 161 patients had laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The complication rates (OR: 0.98, CI: 0.35-2.69) were similar in both groups, but among complications, hypertensive crisis (OR: 8.13; CI: 1.14-58.11) was more frequent in the ablative group, and even the success rate of interventions - the resolution of hypertension (OR: 0.30, CI: 0.16-0.56) - was lower in this group. On the other hand, the advantage of ablation was shorter intervention time (MD: 75.64 min; CI: 6.33-144.95), shorter hospital stay (MD: 1.6 days; CI: 0.88-2.31), and less perioperative blood loss (MD: 43.55 ml; CI: 12.07-75.04) compared to laparoscopy.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is still the best therapeutic approach, but ablation can be an appropriate alternative option for the treatment of aldosterone-producing adrenal gland tumors.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism: a meta‑analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy (including blood pressure, medication reduction, serum potassium, and clinical success) and safety parameters (including operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, hypertension crisis rate, and complication rate) of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the treatment of primary aldosteronism (PA).

METHODS

Literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2023), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang from inception to August 2023. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The Stata 12.0 software was used for statistical analyses. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for categorical outcomes, while mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% CI were calculated for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies involving 204 patients (LA, n = 127; and RAF, n = 77) were included. LA had better diastolic blood pressure control than RFA (WMD = 5.19; 95% CI 0.96-9.43); however, the RFA demonstrated better shorter operative time (WMD = - 57.99; 95% CI - 116.54 to 0.57), and shorter length of hospital stay (OR - 1.6; 95% CI - 2.37 to - 0.83) compared to LA. All remaining parameters were comparable between the interventions.

CONCLUSION

While grossly comparable in efficacy as treatment options for PA, RFA may allow for shorter operative time and hospital stay, less intraoperative blood loss, and lower hospitalization costs. However, LA has better diastolic blood pressure control. Even so, we still need larger prospective studies, specifically with comparative hypertension response (short and long term) and number of post-procedural antihypertensive medication requirement.

Practical consensus for the treatment and follow-up of primary aldosteronism: a multidisciplinary consensus document

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk than essential hypertension. The aim of this consensus is to provide practical clinical recommendations for its surgical and medical treatment, pathology study and biochemical and clinical follow-up, as well as for the approach in special situations like advanced age, pregnancy and chronic kidney disease, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in a nominal group consensus approach of experts from the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN), Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), Spanish Radiology Society (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC(ML)), Spanish Society of Anatomic-Pathology and Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC).

Treating Primary Aldosteronism-Induced Hypertension: Novel Approaches and Future Outlooks

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared with blood pressure-matched cases of primary hypertension. Current limitations in patient care stem from delayed recognition of the condition, limited access to key diagnostic procedures, and lack of a definitive therapy option for nonsurgical candidates. However, several recent advances have the potential to address these barriers to optimal care. From a diagnostic perspective, machine-learning algorithms have shown promise in the prediction of PA subtypes, while the development of noninvasive alternatives to adrenal vein sampling (including molecular positron emission tomography imaging) has made accurate localization of functioning adrenal nodules possible. In parallel, more selective approaches to targeting the causative aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma/nodule (APA/APN) have emerged with the advent of partial adrenalectomy or precision ablation. Additionally, the development of novel pharmacological agents may help to mitigate off-target effects of aldosterone and improve clinical efficacy and outcomes. Here, we consider how each of these innovations might change our approach to the patient with PA, to allow more tailored investigation and treatment plans, with corresponding improvement in clinical outcomes and resource utilization, for this highly prevalent disorder.

Radiofrequency Ablation in Primary Aldosteronism

The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) technique has been extensively used in the treatment of primary malignancies and metastases and has been recently deployed for the treatment of unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) as an alternative to whole unilateral adrenalectomy.Current evidence comparing RFA with unilateral adrenalectomy in the treatment of PA so far has been variable, with studies being retrospective and small-scale, but it remains a very attractive option as a potentially less invasive treatment option compared to adrenalectomy.This review article describes the procedure, and provides evidence and the possible future direction of RFA in the treatment of unilateral PA.

Emerging Potential of Microwave Ablation for Primary Aldosteronism Resulting From Unilateral Aldosterone-producing Adenoma

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most prevalent form of secondary hypertension and is most commonly caused by an adrenal adenoma or bilateral adrenal hyperplasia. Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice for unilateral disease. Here, we report the case of a 57-year-old man with previous bladder cancer who was referred for evaluation of resistant hypertension and hypokalemia. Diagnostic workup indicated PA with computed tomography imaging revealing a left adrenal adenoma and adrenal venous sampling lateralizing to the left adrenal. He was therefore referred for a left adrenalectomy using a retroperitoneoscopic approach. However, surgery was complicated by significant perinephritis related to previous bladder cancer immunotherapy and, in view of an identifiable adrenal adenoma, a partial adrenalectomy was performed. Despite histology confirming removal of an adrenal adenoma, he remained hypertensive and hypokalemic with persistent PA. He underwent a computed tomography-guided percutaneous thermal (microwave) ablation of the residual adrenal nodule with immediate biochemical reversal of PA. Six years postprocedure, he remains biochemically and clinically cured from PA. This article presents the details of the case and reviews the literature on long-term outcomes for patients undergoing thermal ablation and adrenalectomy, suggesting that thermal ablation may be a viable alternative for selected patients.

Node-by-node diagnosis for multiple ipsilateral nodules by segmental adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVES

In patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), multiple adrenocortical nodules may be present on the surgical side. The aim of this study was to clarify the pathological diagnosis and the node-by-node diagnostic capability of segmental adrenal venous sampling (sAVS).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS

A total of 162 patients who underwent adrenalectomy following sAVS were studied.

MEASUREMENTS

Multiple nodules on the surgical side were extracted while referring to contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. We also performed a detailed histopathological analysis of the resected specimens from patients undergoing sAVS, which included immunohistochemistry for CYP11B2.

RESULTS

In 11 (6.8%) patients, two to three nodules were detected on the surgical side. All patients were diagnosed by sAVS with at least one aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) for localized aldosterone elevation in tributaries. Seven patients showed a lateralization index value of ≥4 after ACTH stimulation. Histopathologically and clinically, two patients had two or three CYP11B2-positive APAs, and the other nine patients both APAs and non-APAs. The positive predictive value of the most suspected APA, that is, the drainer that showed the highest aldosterone level by sAVS, was 11/11 (100%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.5%-100%), while that for the second and third suspected APA was 3/7 (42.9%, 95% CI: 9.9%-81.6%), and they were significantly different (p = .01). Further, the positive predictive value of non-APA was 4/4 (100%, 95% CI: 39.8%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The sAVS could correctly diagnose the aldosterone production in multiple ipsilateral adrenal nodules.

Adrenal Ablation Versus Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism for the Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Superselective adrenal arterial embolization (SAAE) is an alternative treatment for patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). This single-center prospective cohort study aimed to compare the efficacy of SAAE with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in treating patients with PA who refused unilateral adrenalectomy.

METHODS

Of the 140 PA patients who were enrolled in the study and completed 12-month follow-up, 74 patients underwent SAAE and 66 received MRA treatment. The clinical and biochemical outcome was compared at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of the patients were similar between groups. Office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure reduction at 1 month after discharge was more pronounced in the SAAE group than MRA group (all P < 0.05) while the blood pressure reduction was comparable between the 2 groups at 6 and 12 months. Patients who underwent SAAE took less antihypertensive medications than the MRA group during 12-month follow-up (P < 0.01). Both SAAE and MRA treatment improved renin suppression, aldosterone-to-renin ratio elevation, and hypokalemia at 6 and 12 months, whereas only SAAE but not MRA reduced plasma aldosterone levels. Moreover, SAAE achieved higher rates of complete clinical and biochemical success than MRA (both P < 0.01). Logistic regression found that complete clinical and biochemical success was only directly associated with diagnosis of unilateral PA in contrast to bilateral PA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides evidence that SAAE is a reasonable choice of treatment in patients with either unilateral or bilateral PA in terms of clinical and biochemical outcomes. This study was registered at Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100045896).

Update on Hypertension Research in 2021

In 2021, 217 excellent manuscripts were published in Hypertension Research. Editorial teams greatly appreciate the authors' contribution to hypertension research progress. Here, our editorial members have summarized twelve topics from published work and discussed current topics in depth. We hope you enjoy our special feature, "Update on Hypertension Research in 2021".