A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing THUNDERBEAT to the Maryland LigaSure energy device in laparoscopic left colon surgery

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between bipolar sealing, ultrasonic shears and a hybrid device during laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a prospective, multicenter, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Although EBDs are essential for minimally invasive surgery, well-established prospective randomized studies comparing EBDs are scarce. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative inflammatory response and short-term surgical outcomes among different energy-based devices (EBDs) in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG).

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer scheduled for LDG at two different medical centers were prospectively randomized into three groups: ultrasonic shears (US), advanced bipolar (BP) and ultrasonic-bipolar hybrid (HB). The C-reactive protein (CRP) level, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), laboratory tests, cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), hospital stay, and complication rate were analyzed. A novel semiquantitative measurement method using indocyanine green (ICG) and a near-infrared camera measured the amount of lymphatic leakage.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, the CRP level, was significantly lower in the BP (n = 60) group than in the US (n = 57) or HB (n = 57) group [9.03 ± 5.55 vs. 11.12 ± 5.02 vs. 12.67 ± 6.14, p = 0.001, on postoperative day (POD) 2 and 7.48 vs. 9.62 vs. 9.48, p = 0.026, on POD 4]. IBL was significantly lower in BP than in US or HB (26.3 ± 25.3 vs. 43.7 ± 42.0 vs. 34.9 ± 37.0, p = 0.032). Jackson-Pratt drainage triglycerides were significantly lower in BP than in US (53.6 ± 33.7 vs. 84.2 ± 59.0, p = 0.11; HB: 71.3 ± 51.4). ICG fluorescence intensity, operation time, laboratory results, cytokines, hospital stay, and complication rate were not significantly different among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

BP showed a lower postoperative CRP level and less IBL than US and HB, suggesting less collateral thermal damage and better sealing function. Surgeons may consider this when selecting EBDs for laparoscopic surgery.

Single-incision clipless laparoscopic total colectomy for intractable slow transit constipation: a single surgeon's experience

PURPOSE

In our institution, patients with intractable slow transit constipation (STC) have undergone single-incision clipless laparoscopic total colectomy (SCLTC) with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) since 2011. We aimed to examine the feasibility and usefulness of SCLTC with IRA for patients with intractable STC.

METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2018, twenty-two patients with intractable STC underwent SCLTC with IRA at Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University, by a single surgeon, were retrospectively registered in this study. They consisted of the first 12 consecutive patients undergoing the double stapling technique (DST) with IRA (DST group) and the last 10 consecutive patients undergoing functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) with IRA (FEEA group).

RESULTS

The median surgical time was 185 (150-249) min for the FEEA group and 230 (180-266) min for the DST group. A significant difference was identified between the two groups (0.035). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the median age, sex, body mass index, constipation type, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or no use of laxatives daily stool frequency 1 month after surgery. No postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, bowel obstruction, or bleeding related to vessel sealing device, were encountered in either group more than 3 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that SCLTC with IRA is feasible and safe for patients with intractable STC. SCLTC with IRA using FEEA is especially preferred to that using DST for patients with intestinal contents in the rectum that cannot be completely removed by pre- and intraoperative preparation.