Are drains useful in eTEP ventral hernia repairs? An AWR surgical collaborative (AWRSC) retrospective study

To drain or not to drain in minimal invasive ventral hernia surgery

PURPOSE

Despite the high prevalence of ventral hernias worldwide, intraoperative drain placement remains a controversial topic. The benefit in reducing postoperative complications has not yet been clearly demonstrated. This study investigates whether a drain prevents postoperative complications after minimally invasive ventral hernia repair using the extended-totally-extraperitoneal-(eTEP)-technique.

METHODS

This monocentric, retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent eTEP between 2019 and 2024. Two comparison groups were formed (54 patients with drain,106 patients without) and analysed for potential differences.

RESULTS

There were no significant sociodemographic or clinical differences between the study groups. The defect size was larger in the drain group (drain: 13 cm2 (64,5) †, no-drain: 6,5 cm2 (21) †, p = 0,025). There were no significant differences regarding frequency of postoperative complications (drain: 13%, no-drain: 8,5%, p = 0,373), surgical site infections (SSI) (drain: 0%, no-Drain: 1,9%, p = 0,550), and surgical site occurrences (SSO) (drain: 13%, no-Drain: 4,7%, p = 0,108). A subgroup analysis showed that robotically operated patients were more frequently provided with drains (rob: 30 (47,6%), lap: 24 (24,7%), p = 0,003), had larger defect sizes (rob: 28 cm2 (72)†, lap: 6 cm2 (9,87)†, p < 0,001), and received Transversus-abdominis-releases (TAR) more often (rob: 14 (22,2%), lap: 5 (5,2%), p = 0,001).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences between patients with and without drains after eTEP regarding the frequency of postoperative complications, SSOs and SSIs. Our findings do not suggest nor refute that wound drains prevent postoperative complications.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery for ventral hernia repair (VHR) is gaining attention for its potential advantages over laparoscopic and open techniques. This approach combines the advantages of minimally invasive surgery with the ability to perform technically challenging procedures, often required in open surgery but difficult with conventional laparoscopy. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic VHR compared to other surgical approaches, focusing on postoperative complications, operative time, and costs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis were conducted, including 67 studies from January 2010 to May 2023 on Robotic VHR compared with other techniques. Primary outcome was 30-days postoperative complications; SSI, SSO, seroma, mortality, recurrence, length of hospital stay, operative time and costs were analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Robotic surgery was associated with longer operative times compared to both laparoscopic (MD 64.67 min; p < 0.001) and open repairs (MD 69.69 min; p < 0.001). However, it resulted, compared to open surgery, in fewer SSIs (OR 0.62; p 0.05), mortality (OR 0.44; p 0.04) and shorter hospital stay (MD -3.77 days; p < 0.001). No differences were found in overall complications or length of stay between robotic and laparoscopic approaches but higher costs and longer operative times were reported in robotic VHR.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available low-quality evidence, robotic VHR appears to offer limited advantages compared to laparoscopic techniques. However, when compared to open approaches, robotic VHR may demonstrate reduced postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays even if an higher rate of seroma formation was retrieved probably related to technical details. Nevertheless, longer operative times and higher costs remain significant limitations. Further high-quality comparative studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Drain vs no drain placement after retromuscular ventral hernia repair with mesh: an ACHQC analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most common procedures in the United States, and drains are used in over 50% of mesh repairs. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of drains on surgical site occurrences (SSO) and infection (SSI) after open and minimally invasive retromuscular VHR with mesh.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the ACHQC was performed to include adult patients who underwent elective VHR with retromuscular mesh placement. Univariate analysis was performed comparing drain and no-drain groups. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with increased SSO, SSI, readmission, and length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

6945 patients underwent elective VHR with sublay mesh. Most patients had M2 and M3 hernias in both groups (with Drain and no-drain). The median LOS was 4.7 (SD 8.3) in the drain group and 1.6 (SD 8.4) in the no-drain group (p < 0.001). 30-day SSI was higher in the drain group (176; 3.8% vs 25; 1.1%; p < 0.001). Despite lower SSO overall in the drain group (470; 10.0% vs 286; 12.7%; p < 0.001), SSO or SSI requiring intervention (SSOPI) was higher in the drain group (240; 5.1% vs 44; 1.9%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified diabetes (OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.6; p < 0.001) and BMI (OR 1.04, CI 1.03-1.05; p < 0.001) as predictors of SSO, while the use of a drain was protective (OR 0.61; CI 0.5-0.8; p < 0.001). For SSI, logistic regression showed diabetes (OR 1.6, CI 1.2-2.3; p = 0.004) and open approach (OR 3.5, CI 2.1-5.9; p < 0.001) as predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Drain placement during retromuscular VHR with mesh was predictive of decreased postoperative SSO occurrence but associated with increased LOS. Diabetes and open approach, but not drain use, were predictors of SSI.

Analysis of retromuscular drain output and postoperative outcomes for heavyweight versus mediumweight polypropylene mesh following open ventral hernia repair

PURPOSE

Heavyweight polypropylene (HWPP) mesh is thought to increase inflammatory response and delay tissue integration compared to mediumweight (MWPP). Reactive fluid volume (i.e., drain output) may be a reasonable surrogate for integration. We hypothesized that daily drain output is higher with HWPP compared to MWPP in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair (VHR).

METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted March 2017-April 2019 comparing MWPP and HWPP for VHR. Retromuscular drain output in milliliters was measured at 24-h intervals up to postoperative day seven. Univariate analyses compared differences in daily drain output and time to drain removal. Multivariable analyses compared total drain output and wound morbidity within 30 days and hernia recurrence at 1 year.

RESULTS

288 patients were included; 140 (48.6%) HWPP and 148 (51.4%) MWPP. Daily drain output for days 1-3 was higher for HWPP vs. MWPP (total volume: 837.8 mL vs. 656.5 mL) (p < 0.001), but similar on days 4-7 (p > 0.05). Median drain removal time was 5 days for both groups. Total drain output was not predictive of 30-day wound morbidity (p > 0.05) or hernia recurrence at 1 year (OR 1, p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

While HWPP mesh initially had higher drain outputs, it rapidly returned to levels similar to MWPP by postoperative day three and there was no difference in clinical outcomes. We believe that drains placed around HWPP mesh can be managed similarly to MWPP mesh.

Outcomes after ventral hernia repair using the extended totally extraperitoneal approach: Initial experience from the Philippines

INTRODUCTION

Newer extraperitoneal techniques of laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) have been continually introduced since the popularity of the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique began in 1993. One of which is the extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach allowing wide mesh augmentation, concurrent repair of diastasis recti, and performance of transversus abdominis release (TAR) for large/complex hernias. However, minimally invasive/laparoendoscopic ventral hernia repair is not yet widely adopted in the Philippines. We aim to share our preliminary experience with LVIHR using the eTEP approach.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all consecutive eTEP repairs for ventral hernia between January 2019 and September 2023. The clinical profiles of all patients were gathered. Hernia characteristics, operative profile, and postoperative outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the study with a mean age of 54.7; 60% were incisional hernias, and the most common hernia location was the umbilical area. A defect size between 4 and 10 cm was reported in 54.3%. eTEP-TAR was necessary in 12 patients. At a median follow-up of 16 months, two patients developed seroma, one hematoma, and two surgical site infections. All were successfully managed conservatively. Only one patient developed recurrence.

CONCLUSION

eTEP approach is safe and feasible for repairing ventral hernias. Our preliminary experience showed acceptable outcomes similar to the published literature. Surgeons interested in this technique should be familiar with the abdominal wall anatomy, carefully select patients during preoperative planning, and undergo mentorship with hernia surgeons experienced with the technique to shorten the learning curve.

Patient-performed at-home surgical drain removal is safe and feasible following hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, surgical drains are considered a relative contraindication to telemedicine-based postoperative care. We sought to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of an at-home patient-performed surgical drain removal pilot program.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study among patients who were discharged with surgical drains was performed. Patients discharged with drains were given the option for in-clinic, provider-performed removal, or at-home, patient-performed drain removal. Patient demographics, health characteristics, perioperative metrics, and operative outcomes were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 68 encounters with drain removal were included (at-home: 28%, n = 19; in-clinic: 72%, n = 49), with both groups having similar demographics, except for age (median age of telemedicine-based at-home: 50 vs in-clinic: 62 years, p = 0.03). Patients who opted into at-home, patient-performed drain removal were more likely to have drain removal occur earlier (9 vs 13 days for in-clinic, p < 0.001). In-clinic removal resulted in increased encounters with surgical nursing staff and increased travel time, with no significant difference in complication burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-performed at-home drain removal is safe and allows for more timely drain removal.

Pitfalls and complications of enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach to abdominal wall reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal access technique (eTEP) to minimally invasive retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction is a relatively novel technique that has continued to gain popularity. There is a paucity of information regarding the prevention and management of eTEP complications. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the complications reported with eTEP ventral hernia repair and discuss the main complications associated with this technique.

METHODS

A literature search via PubMed was performed focusing on eTEP ventral hernia repair. Based on the available literature and own practice experience, the authors discuss key strategies for preventing and managing complications associated with the eTEP approach.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty studies were identified. Forty-seven studies were fully reviewed and twenty-four were included in this review. The technical details of the technique were described as performed by the authors. Postoperative complications were classified into different categories and discussed separately.

CONCLUSION

As the eTEP approach continues to gain popularity, it is essential to consider its unique complications. A focus on prevention with anatomical bearings and sound surgical technique is paramount.