Operative approach and case volume are associated with negative resection margins for adrenocortical carcinoma

Laparoscopic surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma: Estimating the risk of margin-positive resection

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, there has been increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, MIS has been associated with noncurative resection and locoregional recurrence. We aimed to identify risk factors for margin-positivity among patients who undergo MIS resection for ACC. We hypothesized that a simple nomogram can accurately identify patients most suitable for curative MIS resection.

METHODS

Curative-intent resections for ACC were identified through the National Cancer Database spanning 2010-2018. Trends in MIS utilization were reported using Pearson correlation coefficients. Factors associated with margin-positive resection were identified among preoperatively available variables using multivariable logistic regression, then incorporated into a predictive model. Model quality was cross validated using an 80% training data set and 20% test data set.

RESULTS

Among 1260 ACC cases, 38.6% (486) underwent MIS resection. MIS utilization increased over time at nonacademic centers (R = 0.818, p = 0.007), but not at academic centers (R = 0.009, p = 0.982). Factors associated with margin-positive MIS resection were increasing age, nonacademic center (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, p = 0.006), cT3 (OR: 4.7, p < 0.001) or cT4 tumors (OR: 14.6, p < 0.001), and right-sided tumors (OR: 2.0, p = 0.006). A predictive model incorporating these four factors produced favorable c-statistics of 0.75 in the training data set and 0.72 in the test data set. A pragmatic nomogram was created to enable bedside risk stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing proportion of ACC are resected via minimally invasive operations, particularly at nonacademic centers. Patient selection based on a few key factors can minimize the risk of noncurative surgery.

Disparities in Access to High-Volume Surgeons and Specialized Care

The significant volume-outcome relationship has triggered interest in improving quality of care by directing patients to high-volume centers and surgeons. However, significant disparities exist for different racial/ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic groups for thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal, and pancreatic neuroendocrine surgical diseases disease.

Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery is considered a standard treatment for benign adrenal tumors; however, no consensus has been reached on the optimal resection technique for adrenocortical carcinomas. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the management of adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS

The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles from inception to May 2022, by two independent reviewers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022316050).

RESULTS

From 183 studies screened, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1617 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic surgery (n = 472) or open surgery (n = 1145). Open surgery demonstrated a lower rate of positive resection margin compared with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.10; I² = 0%). Additionally, open surgery had more favorable overall survival (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72; I² = 0%) and recurrence-free rates (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; I² = 38%) than laparoscopic surgery at 3 years. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery than open surgery (mean difference - 2.49 days, 95% CI - 2.95 to - 2.04; I² = 45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgery should still be considered the standard operative approach; however, laparoscopic surgery could be regarded as an effective and safe operation for selected adrenocortical carcinoma cases with appropriate laparoscopic expertise. Further randomized controlled studies with tumor stage- and resection margin-dependent survival analysis are necessary to ascertain the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy in pheochromocytoma patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pheochromocytoma is a challenging tumor type requiring resection with a clear margin and an intact capsule to prevent recurrences. Our aim was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) versus robotic adrenalectomy (RA) for pheochromocytoma.

METHODS

In an institutional review board-approved retrospective study, clinical parameters of patients who underwent LA versus RA at a single center were compared using Mann-Whitney U, χ² , and survival analyses. Continuous data are expressed as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

There was a total of 157 patients (RA: n = 87, LA: n = 70) analyzed. Estimated blood loss (36.3 [35.0] vs. 99.9 [65.0] cc, p = 0.020) and hospital stay (1.3 [0.0] vs. 2.2 [1.0] days, p = 0.010) were lower in robotic versus laparoscopic group, respectively. Disease-free and overall survival was similar between groups. The rate of conversion to open for tumors ≥5 cm was less in the robotic group (0% vs. 14%, respectively, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

In this study, long-term outcomes of LA and RA were similar, although adrenalectomies performed robotically were associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and a lower chance of conversion to open in the case of large tumors.