Endoscopic thyroidectomy via the combined trans-oral and chest approach for cT1-2N1bM0 papillary thyroid carcinoma

Prophylactic central lymph node dissection in cN0 papillary thyroid cancer: a comparative study of via breast and transoral approach versus via breast approach alone

Background

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) progresses slowly and has a good prognosis, while the prognosis is worse if combined with central neck lymph node metastasis at an early stage. The different endoscope approaches may affect the thoroughness of lymph node dissection. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of prophylactic central lymph node dissection(CLND) for cN0 PTC performed via breast and transoral approach versus via breast approach alone.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of the surgical data of 136 patients with stage cN0 PTC was performed from August 2020 to December 2022. Among them, 64 underwent the breast and transoral approach (combined approach group), and 72 underwent the breast approach alone (breast approach group). The relevant indexes of surgery, the number of lymph nodes dissected, the occurrence of postoperative complications, and the cosmetic satisfaction of incision were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time of the combined approach group was 156.4 ± 29.8 min, significantly longer than that of the breast approach group, 119.6 ± 55.9 min, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The two groups of patients were compared in terms of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time, incision cosmetic satisfaction, and the occurrence of postoperative complications, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The total number of lymph nodes retrieved in the central area (10.6 ± 7.1) and the number of positive lymph nodes (4.6 ± 4.9) in the combined approach group were significantly more than those in the breast approach group (7.4 ± 4.8, 1.6 ± 2.7), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference between the two groups in terms of the number of negative lymph nodes was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The study demonstrated that choosing the breast combined transoral approach for prophylactic CLND of cN0 PTC could more thoroughly clear the central area lymph nodes, especially the positive lymph nodes, which could help in the evaluation of the disease and the guidance of the treatment, while not increasing the postoperative complications. It provides a reference for clinicians to choose the appropriate surgical approach and also provides new ideas and methods for prophylactic CLND in patients with cN0 PTC.

Re-interpreting mesenteric vascular anatomy on 3D virtual and/or physical models, part II: anatomy of relevance to surgeons operating splenic flexure cancer

BACKGROUND

The splenic flexure is irrigated from two vascular areas, both from the middle colic and the left colic artery. The challenge for the surgeon is to connect these two vascular areas in an oncological safe procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The vascular anatomy, manually 3D reconstructed from 32 preoperative high-resolution CT datasets using Osirix MD, Mimics Medical and 3-matic Medical Datasets, were exported as STL-files, video clips, stills and supplemented with 3D printed models.

RESULTS

Our first major finding was the difference in level between the middle colic and the inferior mesenteric artery origins. We have named this relationship a mesenteric inter-arterial stair. The middle colic artery origin could be found cranial (median 3.38 cm) or caudal (median 0.58 cm) to the inferior mesenteric artery. The lateral distance between the two origins was 2.63 cm (median), and the straight distance 4.23 cm (median). The second finding was the different trajectories and confluence pattern of the inferior mesenteric vein. This vein ended in the superior mesenteric/jejunal vein (21 patients) or in the splenic vein (11 patients). The inferior mesenteric vein confluence could be infrapancreatic (17 patients), infrapancreatic with retropancreatic arch (7 patients) or retropancreatic (8 patients). Lastly, the accessory middle colic artery was present in ten patients presenting another pathway for lymphatic dissemination.

CONCLUSION

The IMV trajectory when accessible, is the solution to the mesenteric inter-arterial stair. The surgeon could safely follow the IMV to its confluence. When the IMV trajectory is not accessible, the surgeon could follow the caudal border of the pancreas.