1
|
Al-Tai S, Axer S, Szabo E, Ottosson J, Stenberg E. Impact of surgical technique on gastroesophageal reflux disease after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide observational study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2025; 21:465-470. [PMID: 39592296 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/21/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained increasing popularity worldwide, yet concerns persist regarding the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) postoperatively. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the influence of technical aspects of LSG, specifically bougie size and distance from the pylorus to resection line edge, on the risk of developing symptomatic GERD within 2years following surgery. SETTING Data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) and the National Prescribed Drug Register were utilized for this analysis. METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted encompassing all LSG patients in Sweden between 2012 and 2020 who did not receive preoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions. Patients were categorized based on bougie size and pyloric distance. Regular PPI use, defined as a dispensed prescription of more than 300 tablets per year, was employed as a proxy measure of symptomatic GERD and was compared between the groups. RESULTS The study included 7,435 patients with complete data on dispensed PPI prescription both preoperatively and throughout the 2-year follow-up period. Information on bougie size and pyloric distance was available for 97.4% and 84.9%, respectively. Narrower bougie size and greater pyloric distance were associated with increased risk of regular PPI use postsurgery. Advanced age and female sex were independent risk factors for post-LSG regular PPI use, while initial body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (%TWL), and comorbidities showed no significant associations. CONCLUSIONS Using a narrow bougie and initiating resection at a greater distance from the pylorus were associated with higher risk of symptomatic de novo GERD following LSG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Al-Tai
- Department of Surgery, Torsby hospital, Torsby, Sweden; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
| | - Stephan Axer
- Department of Surgery, Torsby hospital, Torsby, Sweden; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Eva Szabo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Johan Ottosson
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tolone S, Conzo G, Flagiello L, Gambardella C, Lucido FS, Brusciano L, Parisi S, De Bortoli N, Savarino EV, Del Genio G, Docimo L. De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Are Infrequent after Sleeve Gastrectomy at 2-Year Follow-Up Using a Comprehensive Preoperative Esophageal Assessment. J Clin Med 2024; 13:545. [PMID: 38256679 PMCID: PMC10816106 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Pathological obesity is a growing public health concern, and its association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) poses challenges in selecting the appropriate bariatric procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a popular choice due to its simplicity and effectiveness in weight loss. However, concerns regarding postoperative GERD have been raised. This study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative assessment of esophageal function and the risk of developing postoperative GERD in patients undergoing SG. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted, including symptom assessment, upper endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), and 24 h esophageal pH impedance monitoring (MII-pH). A total of 500 obese patients were included, and their data were compared with 25 healthy volunteers. This study revealed that patients without GERD symptoms, normal endoscopy, HRM, and MII-pH were suitable candidates for SG, with low risk of developing postoperative GERD. The addition of fundoplication techniques to SG may be considered in patients with mild reflux or those at risk of developing it. This study emphasizes the importance of preoperative evaluation in selecting the appropriate bariatric procedure to minimize the risk of postoperative GERD and expand the indications for SG in obese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Tolone
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Giovanni Conzo
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Luigi Flagiello
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Claudio Gambardella
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Francesco Saverio Lucido
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Luigi Brusciano
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Simona Parisi
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Gianmattia Del Genio
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| | - Ludovico Docimo
- Division of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy (L.F.); (L.B.); (S.P.); (G.D.G.); (L.D.)
| |
Collapse
|