A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A cable-driven highly compact single port laparoscopic surgical robot with sequentially inserted arms

BACKGROUND

The single port surgical robot causes only one incision and brings many benefits to patients. It is very challenging to design a single port surgical robot that causes a smaller incision than current products.

METHODS

This paper presents a highly compact single port laparoscopy surgical robot, which makes full use of the space of the port and only needs a 15 mm-diameter port. The robot is composed of a camera manipulator and two operating manipulators. The non-fully cylindrical manipulators enter the port sequentially, and the equivalent diameter of each operating manipulator is 12 mm. An additional 9 mm-diameter channel is left for other surgical tools to pass through after all manipulators entering the port.

RESULTS

The kinematics model of the robot is established, including detailed forward kinematics model and inverse kinematics solution based on geometric iteration method. The teleoperation experiment shows that the manipulator can complete the object-grasping, object-transfer and weight-lifting tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed single port surgical robot design concept can also be extended to the field of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgical robots.

Variation in Estimated Surgical Procedure Times Across Patient Characteristics and Surgeon Specialty

Importance

The time involved in performing a procedure is a key factor in determining physician payments by Medicare. However, there are long-standing concerns regarding the accuracy of the time estimates generated by the American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee surveys that are used in the valuation process, and there have been calls to use other data sources to estimate procedure times.

Objective

To compare estimated procedure times that come from claims with the times used in Medicare's valuation process.

Design and Setting

Building off prior work using Medicare fee-for-service claims, procedure times were estimated from linked anesthesia claims data for 1349 different Current Procedure Terminology codes that are typically performed with anesthesia. All procedures in the nation performed in 2018 for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were included in the analysis. These estimated times were compared with the times used in the valuation process. Analysis took place from February to November 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Estimated procedure times using anesthesia claims were compared with the procedure time used in valuation by calculating an estimated-to-valuation procedure time ratio for each code. The valuation procedure time is publicly reported by Medicare. The mean and median ratio are presented over all procedures and for select high-volume codes as well as by patient characteristics (age, sex, and risk score) and specialty of the physician performing the procedure.

Results

Across 4.9 million procedures in this analysis, the mean estimated procedure time was 27% lower than the time used in the valuation process. There were notable exceptions, for which the mean estimated procedure time equaled or exceeded the valuation time including total hip arthroplasty (5% longer) and total knee arthroplasty (equal duration). Within a given code, older patients and those with more illness had longer procedure times. There was substantial variation across specialties in the percent difference between mean estimated and valuation procedure times ranging from gastroenterology (36% shorter) and ophthalmology (35% shorter) to cardiac surgery (2% longer) and thoracic surgery (7% longer).

Conclusions and Relevance

Claims-based procedure times could be used to improve the accuracy of valuations for procedures.

Using Flow Disruptions to Examine System Safety in Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Crossover Design

BACKGROUND

The integration of high technology into health care systems is intended to provide new treatment options and improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of care. Robotic-assisted surgery is an example of high technology integration in health care, which has become ubiquitous in many surgical disciplines.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand and measure current robotic-assisted surgery processes in a systematic, quantitative, and replicable manner to identify latent systemic threats and opportunities for improvement based on our observations and to implement and evaluate interventions. This 5-year study will follow a human factors engineering approach to improve the safety and efficiency of robotic-assisted surgery across 4 US hospitals.

METHODS

The study uses a stepped wedge crossover design with 3 interventions, introduced in different sequences at each of the hospitals over four 8-month phases. Robotic-assisted surgery procedures will be observed in the following specialties: urogynecology, gynecology, urology, bariatrics, general, and colorectal. We will use the data collected from observations, surveys, and interviews to inform interventions focused on teamwork, task design, and workplace design. We intend to evaluate attitudes toward each intervention, safety culture, subjective workload for each case, effectiveness of each intervention (including through direct observation of a sample of surgeries in each observational phase), operating room duration, length of stay, and patient safety incident reports. Analytic methods will include statistical data analysis, point process analysis, and thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

The study was funded in September 2018 and approved by the institutional review board of each institution in May and June of 2019 (CSMC and MDRH: Pro00056245; VCMC: STUDY 270; MUSC: Pro00088741). After refining the 3 interventions in phase 1, data collection for phase 2 (baseline data) began in November 2019 and was scheduled to continue through June 2020. However, data collection was suspended in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected a total of 65 observations across the 4 sites before the pandemic. Data collection for phase 2 was resumed in October 2020 at 2 of the 4 sites.

CONCLUSIONS

This will be the largest direct observational study of surgery ever conducted with data collected on 680 robotic surgery procedures at 4 different institutions. The proposed interventions will be evaluated using individual-level (workload and attitude), process-level (perioperative duration and flow disruption), and organizational-level (safety culture and complications) measures. An implementation science framework is also used to investigate the causes of success or failure of each intervention at each site and understand the potential spread of the interventions.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/25284.

A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery

Process mapping has been identified as a strategy to improve surgical efficiency but has been inconsistently applied in the literature and underutilised in surgical practice. In this journal, we recently described our utilisation of these approaches when applied to breast reconstruction. We showed that in surgery as complex as autologous breast reconstruction, process mapping can improve efficiency, and may improve surgical teaching, education and audit. The intraoperative period specifically is an area that can be applied not only to breast reconstruction, but to a much broader range of surgical procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase and PsychINFO. Manual searching of the references from articles identified was also conducted. Data items relating to the review aims were extracted from articles' methods, applications, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was carried out to synthesise the information on the current usage of process mapping in the intraoperative period. Seventeen of 1,488 studies were eligible for review, with all of non-randomised study design. Studies had overlap in components of the intraoperative period to which process mapping was applied. Common areas of improvement were identified. Outcome measures were assessed in ten studies that implemented interventions based on the improvement areas to increase surgical efficiency. As such, process mapping has been used as part of larger quality improvement methods, albeit with inconsistent nomenclature, to improve surgical efficiency. While it has been applied to a range of surgical specialties, there is a lack of application to the surgical component of the intraoperative period. Greater consistency in the reporting and description of process mapping will enable further research for evidence of its benefits.

[Not Available]

OBJECTIVES

Database review to analyse age and sex differences in complication and conversion rates and influence on return to normal daily activities and work after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

658 patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for proven gallstones between 9/4/2001 and 15/2/2006 under the care of one surgeon (F. H.) at Benenden hospital, Kent, UK.

RESULTS

We had a 65.5% response rate with 431 replies at a mean follow up of 22.4 months (2.3-52.8). There was a male to female ratio of 5:23 with a mean age of 54.2 years (22-83). Using linear regression we found no significant correlation with operative time and variables of age and sex (df = 2, 251, R (2) = 0.03, F = 0.574, p < 0.564). No significant correlation with number of complications and age or sex (df = 2, 334, R (2) = 0.004, F = 1.615, p < 0.200). Age (Exp(B) = 1.040, p < 0.51) and sex (Exp(B) = 0.863, p < 0.855) had no effect on conversion. No difference was found in relation to age and sex with return to normal daily activities (df = 2, 307, F = 0.904, p < 0.406). Age was a non-significant predictor of return to work (Beta = 0.040, p < 0.572) however men return to work significantly sooner (Beta = 0.191, p < 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative time, number of complications, conversion to open and return to normal daily activities may not be affected by age or sex of patients. Hospital stay may be longer in older patients. Men appear to return to work sooner. Further analysis with validated questionnaires are required.

A Step-Wise Approach to Total Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction: How and Why We Do It

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is a safe alternative compared to open gastrectomy for cancer. To increase the uptake of minimally invasive approaches and facilitate their analysis and improvement a stepwise approach is warranted. This study describes our technique and experiences total laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG) with jejunal pouch reconstruction for gastric cancer. Technical modifications throughout the years were described. In patients with anastomotic leakage, the CT-scan and reoperation report were reviewed to identify the location and cause of the leak. A total of 47 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with extracorporeal jejunal pouch reconstruction and stapled circular esophagojejunostomy from May 2007 to August 2015 were prospectively analyzed. A stepwise approach of 10 steps was designed based on video and case analysis. Median operation time was 301 (148-454) minutes and median blood loss was 300 (30-900) milliliters. Anastomotic leakage occurred in six (12.8 %) patients; additionally, one (2.12 %) jejunal-pouch staple line leak was identified. An important modification in our technique was a purse-string suture around the anvil of the circular stapler to prevent esophageal mucosa to slip away. After this modification, the leakage rate was reduced to 7 % in the last 15 procedures. In conclusion, TLG with jejunal pouch reconstruction is a feasible procedure in a selected group of patients. Our stepwise approach and technique may help surgeons to introduce jejunal pouch reconstruction during laparoscopic gastrectomy in their center.

Detecting performance variance in complex surgical procedures: analysis of a step-wise technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) is a technically challenging operation. Our aim is to evaluate a standardized technique of LRH and determine variances in performance.

METHODS

The procedure was deconstructed into 7 major step-wise components. All LRH followed the same surgical sequence, and used the same devices and operating room set-up. Thirty randomly selected video recordings of the procedure underwent intraoperative time analysis. The variances measured by standard deviation of each step were calculated (mean in minutes ± standard deviation).

RESULTS

Mean total operative time was 114 ± 25 min. The steps with the least variance were inferior vena cava dissection (8 ± 3) and right hepatic vein ligation (9 ± 5). The longest and also the step with the greatest variance was parenchymal transection (35 ± 12).

CONCLUSIONS

LRH can be performed consistently using a standardized step-wise technique. Parenchymal transection had most variation, and this could be explained by intrinsic liver factors. Surgical performance improvement should begin with deconstructing the operation into definable steps to identify areas for change.

Configuration comparison among kinematically optimized continuum manipulators for robotic surgeries through a single access port

Many recent developments of surgical robots focus on less invasive paradigms, such as laparoscopic SPA (Single Port Access) surgery, NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), laryngoscopic MIS (Minimally Invasive Surgery), etc. A configuration similarity shared by these surgical robots is that two or more manipulators are inserted through one access port (a laparoscope, an endoscope, or a laryngoscope) for surgical interventions. However, upon designing such a surgical robot, the structure of the inserted manipulators has not been thoroughly explored based on evaluation of their performances. This paper presents a comparison for kinematic performances among three different continuum manipulators. They all could be applied in the aforementioned surgical robots. The structural parameters of these continuum manipulators are firstly optimized to assure a more fair and consistent comparison. This study is conducted in a dimensionless manner and provides scalable results for a wide spectrum of continuum manipulator designs as long as their segments have a constant curvature. The results could serve as a design reference for future developments of surgical robots which use one access port and continuum mechanisms.

Selection algorithm for posterior versus lateral approach in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

There are no objective selection criteria described in the literature for the laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal (PR) versus lateral transabdominal (LT) approach in a given patient. The aim of this study is to quantify the algorithm we have been using in our practice.

METHODS

Within 11 years, 219 patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy at one institution. The laparoscopic LT technique was used in patients with unilateral tumors >6 cm. In those patients with unilateral tumors <6 cm, anthropometric parameters were used to select between laparoscopic PR and LT approaches. These parameters were quantified for 82 patients from computed tomography scans and their effects on operative time were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed by use of the t test and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent laparoscopic LT and 30 patients underwent PR adrenalectomy. Patients were selected for the PR approach if the distance from Gerota's fascia to the skin was less than 5 cm and the 12th rib was at or rostral to the level of renal hilum. On multivariate analysis, total operative time correlated with body mass index in the LT approach and thickness of the perinephric fat and the distance between the adrenal tumor and the upper pole of kidney in the PR approach.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we have described an objective algorithm that can be used to select patients with unilateral adrenal tumors <6 cm for a laparoscopic PR or LT approach with favorable perioperative outcomes.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients

BACKGROUND

Findings have shown that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is feasible and reproducible. The authors have pioneered a two-trocar SILC technique at the University of Texas Southwestern. Their results for 100 patients are presented.

METHODS

From January 2008 to March 2009, 100 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease underwent SILC through a 1.5- to 2-cm umbilical incision using a two-port (5-mm) technique. For nearly all the patients, a 30 degrees angled scope was used. The gallbladder was retracted, with two or three sutures placed along the gallbladder. These sutures were either fixated internally or placed through the abdominal wall to obtain a critical view of Calot's triangle. The SILC procedure was performed using standard technique with 5-mm reticulating or conventional laparoscopic instruments. The cystic duct and artery were well visualized, clipped, and divided. Cholecystectomy was completed with electrocautery, and the specimen was retrieved through the umbilical incision.

RESULTS

In this series, 80 women (85%) and 15 men (15%) with an average age of 33.8 years (range, 17-66 years) underwent SILC. Their mean BMI was 29.8 kg/m(2) (range, 17-42.5 kg/m(2)), and 39% of these patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 50.8 min (range, 23-120 min). The mean estimated blood loss was 22.3 ml (range, 5-125 ml), and 5% of the patients had an intraoperative cholangiogram. There were no conversions of the SILC technique. A two-trocar technique was feasible for 87% of the patients. For the remaining patients, either a three-channel port or three individual trocars were required. A SILC technique was used for 5% of the patients to manage acute cholecystitis or gallstone pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

The SILC technique with a two-trocar technique is safe, feasible, and reproducible. The operating times are reasonable and can be lessened with experience. Even complex cases can be managed with this technique. Excellent exposure of the critical view was obtained in all cases. The SILC procedure is becoming the standard of care for most of the authors' elective patients with gallbladder disease. Clinical trials are warranted before the SILC technique is adopted universally.

Laparoscopic ultrasound as the primary method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluorocholangiography (IOC) has been the standard method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) has been evaluated as a possible alternative, but has been used less frequently. The authors examined the evolving use of these two methods to assess the relative utility of LUS as the primary method for routine bile duct imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

This study analyzed a prospective database containing 423 consecutive cholecystectomies performed by one attending surgeon in an academic medical center between 1995 and 2005.

RESULTS

Intraoperative bile duct imaging was performed in 371 (94%) of 396 LCs performed for cholelithiasis. As recorded, IOC was performed in 239 cases, LUS in 236 cases, and both in 104 cases. Choledocholithiasis was present in 50 patients (13%). Common bile duct stones (CBDS) were identified by LUS in 3% of the patients without preoperative indicators of CBDS, and in 10% of the patients with one or more indicators. As shown by the findings, LUS had a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 99.6%, a sensitivity of 92.3%, and a specificity of 100% for detecting CBDS. Also, LUS identified clinically significant bile duct anatomy in 6% of the patients. In 1995, LUS was used for 20% of cases, whereas by 2005, it was used for 97% of cases. Conversely, the use of IOC decreased from 93% to 23%.

CONCLUSIONS

With moderate experience, LUS can become the primary routine imaging method for evaluating the bile duct during LC. It is as reliable as IOC for detecting choledocholithiasis. In addition, LUS can locate the common bile duct during difficult dissections. On the basis of this experience, LUS is used currently in nearly all LCs and is the sole method for bile duct imaging in 75% of these cases. IOC is used as an adjunct to LUS when LUS imaging is inadequate, when stronger clinical indicators of choledocholithiasis are present, or when biliary anatomy remains uncertain.

Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Technical modifications and methods for gallbladder dissection to minimize the risk of gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are described. The authors aimed to investigate the effects of gallbladder aspiration during LC on the operative and postoperative course of patients.

METHODS

For this study, 200 patients undergoing LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomly divided into two groups. Gallbladders were aspirated before dissection in group A (n = 100), and they were not aspirated in group B (n = 100). Operative and postoperative data on the patients were collected.

RESULTS

The rate of gallbladder perforation was significantly lower in group A than in group B (p = 0.0003). The operative time was significantly shorter in group A (46.70 +/- 15.93 min) than in group B (60.75 +/- 22.09 min) (p = 0.047). Postoperative complications were more numerous in group B. The hospital stay was significantly longer in group B (1.55 +/- 0.81 days) than in group A (1.3 +/- 0.5 days; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrate the advantages of gallbladder aspiration in elective cases.

Acute cholecystitis

Only 20-30% of patients with gallstones have symptoms and the probability of a patient with silent gallstones developing biliary-related pain is 1-2%, while the risk of developing a serious complication (e.g. empyema, perforation, peritonitis etc.) is less than 0.1% per year. Imaging techniques are important in establishing the diagnosis and evaluating the patient. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the golden standard for the management of symptomatic gallstones and there are two surgical treatment options: early cholecystectomy (same hospital admission) and interval (delayed) cholecystectomy (6-8 weeks after resolution of acute attack). Early LC has medical and socioeconomic advantages over interval LC. LC can be undertaken for the majority of patients with AC and in some high risk groups the postoperative mortality can even be reduced. LC in AC is associated with longer operating time, a higher rate of conversion and bile damage. Early diagnosis and early operation can prevent the development of complications associated with AC.

Laparoscopic ultrasound

Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a relative latecomer to the area of surgical sonography whose arrival can be attributed to the need for development of specialized transducers that could fit through conventional laparoscopic trocars. The quality, reliability, and ease of use of such units has evolved rapidly, so that laparoscopic ultrasonography may now be performed on a routine basis. Laparoscopic ultrasonography allows the surgeon to look into the tissues being operated upon, thereby compensating for the inability to physically palpate such tissues. Thus, it has not only helped to mimic open surgery, but has also refined the current techniques of laparoscopic operations. With the increasing availability of equipment, as well as the training of surgeons in this modality, laparoscopic ultrasound is quickly becoming an essential tool for the surgeon aiming to take laparoscopic surgery to new frontiers.

Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery systems have been introduced to deal with the basic disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. However, working with these systems may lead to time loss due to additional robot-specific tasks, such as set-up of equipment and sterile draping of the system. To evaluate loss of time in robot-assisted surgery, we compared 10 robot-assisted cholecystectomies to 10 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The robot-assisted procedures were performed with the da Vinci telemanipulation system. The total time in the operating room (OR) was scored and divided into preoperative, operative, and postoperative phases. These phases were further divided into smaller time-frames to precisely define moments of time loss.

RESULTS

The most significant difference between the two groups was found in the preoperative phase. Robot-related tasks led to time loss in all time-frames of this phase. In the operative phase, the trocar entry time-frame was longer in robot-assisted cases than in standard procedures. Additionally, postoperative OR clearing was longer in the robot-assisted cases. Total operating time did not differ significantly between the two procedures.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted surgery leads to time loss during preparation of routine laparoscopic procedures.

Robotics and general surgery

Robotics are now being used in all surgical fields, including general surgery. By increasing intra-abdominal articulations while operating through small incisions, robotics are increasingly being used for a large number of visceral and solid organ operations, including those for the gallbladder, esophagus, stomach, intestines, colon, and rectum, as well as for the endocrine organs. Robotics and general surgery are blending for the first time in history and as a specialty field should continue to grow for many years to come. We continuously demand solutions to questions and limitations that are experienced in our daily work. Laparoscopy is laden with limitations such as fixed axis points at the trocar insertion sites, two-dimensional video monitors, limited dexterity at the instrument tips, lack of haptic sensation, and in some cases poor ergonomics. The creation of a surgical robot system with 3D visual capacity seems to deal with most of these limitations. Although some in the surgical community continue to test the feasibility of these surgical robots and to question the necessity of such an expensive venture, others are already postulating how to improve the next generation of telemanipulators, and in so doing are looking beyond today's horizon to find simpler solutions. As the robotic era enters the world of the general surgeon, more and more complex procedures will be able to be approached through small incisions. As technology catches up with our imaginations, robotic instruments (as opposed to robots) and 3D monitoring will become routine and continue to improve patient care by providing surgeons with the most precise, least traumatic ways of treating surgical disease.