An in vitro model fails to demonstrate aerosolization of tumor cells

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review

Radical hysterectomy is a standard surgery to treat early-stage uterine cervical cancer. The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial has shown that patients receiving minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have a poorer prognosis than those receiving open radical hysterectomy; however, the reason for this remains unclear. The LACC trial had 2 concerns: the learning curve and the procedural effects. Appropriate management of the learning curve effect, including surgeons' skills, is required to correctly interpret the result of surgical randomized controlled trials. Whether the LACC trial managed the learning curve effect remains controversial, based on the surgeons' inclusion criteria and the distribution of institutions with recurrent cases. An appropriate surgical procedure is also needed, and avoiding intraoperative cancer cell spillage plays an important role during cancer surgery. Cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive surgery to treat cervical cancer is caused by several factors, including 1) exposure of tumor, 2) the use of a uterine manipulator, and 3) direct handling of the uterine cervix. Unfortunately, these issues were not addressed by the LACC trial. We evaluated the results of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy while avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer. Our findings show that avoiding cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy may ensure an equivalent oncologic outcome, comparable to that of open radical hysterectomy. Therefore, evaluating the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive surgery with a better control of the learning curve and procedural effects is needed.

Transpyloric optic navigation of tumor using a laparoscope during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The Pathogenesis and Prevention of Port-Site Metastasis in Gynecologic Oncology

Port-site metastasis (PSM) is a specific and challenging complication of laparoscopic gynecologic oncologic procedures. Research has demonstrated that PSM is associated with significant morbidity and poor outcome. The exact pathogenesis of PSM in gynecologic patients is not clear. Several preventive measures of PSM have been addressed in the relevant literature, and novel approaches to prevent this uncommon complication keep emerging. In this review, we summarized the potential mechanisms of PSM and discuss the controversies and merits of proposed preventive measures of PSM in gynecologic oncology. We undertook a literature search using the Medline database to identify studies on the pathogenesis and prevention of laparoscopic PSM. Hypotheses of PSM pathogeneses center on the immune response, pneumoperitoneum, wound contamination, and surgical method. Cogent evidence of effective prevention of PSM after laparoscopic surgery is lacking. Traditional preventive actions such as irrigation and tumor manipulation should be taken individually. Insufflation of hyperthermic CO₂ and humidified CO₂ leads to a better outcome in patients with a malignant tumor who undergo a laparoscopic procedure compared with normal CO₂ pneumoperitoneum. Port-site resection shows no advantage in survival and results in more wound events. PSM prevention plays a crucial part in the overall care of patients with gynecologic malignancies who undergo laparoscopic procedures.

Port site metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the incidence, pathophysiology, risk factors and possible methods of reducing the risk of port site metastases following uro-oncological procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

To our knowledge, 28 cases of port site metastasis have been reported in the urologic literature. There has been an increased interest in the use of intraperitoneal instillation of various tumoricidals in order to reduce the risk of port site seeding.

SUMMARY

The risk of port site metastases remains low, provided that surgeons rigorously adhere to the principles of oncological surgery.

Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to summarize current hypotheses for the possible sources of laparoscopic port-site metastasis, to review the results of experimental models that support such hypotheses, and to discuss the potential options for preventing these metastases.

METHODS

We performed a Medline search to identify in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials that analyzed port-site metastases associated with laparoscopic surgery. We report the incidence of port-site metastases and causative factors associated with this condition.

RESULTS

The estimated incidence of port-site metastases in all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for malignant disease is approximately 1-2%. Multiple factors are associated with this complication. Among the most common proposed etiologies are the wound implantations caused by the surgical technique and instrumentation; the leakage of insufflation gas through the ports, known as the "chimney effect"; and the impact of pneumoperitoneum on local immune reactions. Several preventive measures, have been suggested, including careful patient selection, lavage of the peritoneal cavity as well as of the port wounds with cytotoxic agents, and modifications of surgical technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Only through the results of well-conducted large multi-institutional prospective randomized trials will we learn not only the true incidence of port-site metastases, but also the potential factors that lead to the occurrence of this complication.

Port site metastases in urological laparoscopic surgery

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly gaining widespread acceptance among urologists, including extensive application in malignant conditions. However, untoward occurrences of port site metastases have not eluded to urological applications. This up-to-date review on port site metastases in urology delineates possible contributing factors and describes techniques to prevent it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We comprehensively reviewed published experimental and clinical studies with special emphasis on the incidence, pathophysiology and prevention of port site metastases.

RESULTS

Nine cases of port site metastases after urological laparoscopy have been described in clinical and experimental studies. Etiological factors include natural malignant disease behavior, host immune status, local wound factors, laparoscopy related factors such as aerosolization of tumor cells (the use of gas, type of gas, insufflation and desufflation, and pneumoperitoneum) and sufficient technical experience of the surgeons and operating team (adequate laparoscopic equipment, skill, minimal handling of the tumor, surgical manipulation and wound contamination during instruments change, organ morcellation and specimen removal).

CONCLUSIONS

Port site metastases is a multifactorial phenomenon with an as yet undetermined incidence. The problem is influenced to some extent by surgeon and operating team experience and, therefore, it could be partially prevented. The suggested preventive steps are avoiding laparoscopic surgery when there are ascites, trocar fixation to prevent dislodgment, avoiding gas leakage along and around the trocar, sufficient technical readiness of the operating team (adequate laparoscopic equipment and technique, minimal handling and avoiding tumor boundary violation of the tumor), using a bag for specimen removal, placing drainage when needed before desufflation, povidone-iodine irrigation of instruments, trocars and port site wounds, and suturing 10 mm. and larger trocar wounds.

[Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic resction of a duodenal stromal tumor]

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumors are rare and their evolution is dubious. This observation of port site metastasis after laparoscopic resection of a small duodenal stromal tumor would be, to our knowledge, the first case reported in the literature. Several direct and indirect mechanisms were supposed to be involved in the appearance of metastases after laparoscopic surgery, but the risk of dissemination remains badly evaluated on its frequency as well as on its mechanisms.

Cancer and laparoscopy, experimental studies: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review the experimental studies on laparoscopy and cancer and to propose guidelines for the clinical management of gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

The literature in MEDLINE was searched from January 1992 to December 1998 using the terms 'cancer', 'laparoscopy' and 'experimental or animal study'. Cross-referencing identified additional publications. Abstracts and letters to the editor were excluded. All the relevant papers were reviewed.

RESULTS

Depending on the model used, controversial results have been reported on the incidence of trocar site metastasis when comparing CO(2) laparoscopy and laparotomy. In contrast, the following conclusions can be proposed: (i) tumour growth after laparotomy is greater than after endoscopy; (ii) tumour dissemination is worse after CO(2) laparoscopy than after laparotomy; (iii) some of the disadvantages of CO(2) laparoscopy may be treated using local or intravenous treatments or avoided using other endoscopic exposure methods, such as gasless laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic treatment of gynecologic cancer has potential advantages and disadvantages, and may only be performed in prospective clinical trials. The risk of dissemination appears high when a large number of malignant cells are present. Adnexal tumours with external vegetations, and bulky lymph nodes should be considered as contra-indications to CO(2) laparoscopy.