Abdominal distention and continuous feeding intolerance after intraperitoneal kidney transplant: Answers

Prevalence and risk factors of enteral nutrition intolerance in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Feeding intolerance (FI) among intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing early continuous enteral nutrition (EN) is related to poor outcomes. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and risk factors of FI in ICU patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 1057 patients who received early continuous EN via a nasogastric tube between January 2014 and August 2019. The prevalence of FI during the first 7 days of ICU stay was calculated, and the risk factors were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of FI during the first 7 days of ICU stay was 10.95%. FI occurred in 159 of 1057 (15.04%) patients on ICU day 2, 114 of 977 (11.67%) patients on ICU day 3, and 86 of 715 (12.03%) patients on ICU day 7. Mechanical ventilation (MV) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.928, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.064-3.493, P  = 0.03) was an independent risk factor for FI defined by a gastric residual volume (GRV) of 200 mL and/or vomiting, and acute renal failure (OR: 3.445, 95% CI: 1.115-10.707, P  = 0.032) was an independent risk factor of FI defined by a GRV of 500 mL and/or vomiting. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was an independent predictor regardless of the FI defined by a GRV of 200 mL (OR: 2.064, 95% CI: 1.233-3.456, P  = 0.006) or 500 mL (OR: 6.199, 95% CI: 2.108-18.228, P  = 0.001) in the ICU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FI occurs frequently in early ICU days, especially in patients receiving MV and CRRT. However, further investigation of a consensus definition of FI and risk factors is still warranted in future studies.

Risk factors for intolerance to enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

AIM

To identify the risk factors for intolerance to enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and provide clinical data for the early clinical application of enteral nutrition in these patients.

METHODS

The clinical data of 243 patients who underwent enteral nutrition treatment for SAP at Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January 2012 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the presence of intolerance to enteral nutrition or not, the patients were divided into a tolerance group and an intolerance group. The risk factors for intolerance to enteral nutrition were determined by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eight-four (34.57%) of the 243 SAP patients had intolerance to enteral nutrition. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age > 60 years (OR = 5.212, 95%CI: 1.462-18.587, P = 0.011), fasting time > 72 h (OR = 3.683, 95%CI: 1.322-11.612, P = 0.012), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) > 20 cmH₂O (OR = 6.034, 95%CI: 2.431-20.114, P = 0.001), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ) score > 20 (OR = 6.411, 95%CI: 2.512-22.239, P = 0.001), and serum albumin < 25 g/L (OR = 5.961, 95%CI: 2.318-20.001, P = 0.001) were risk factors for intolerance to enteral nutrition in SAP patients. Adding soluble fiber (OR = 0.221, P = 0.002, 95%CI: 0.067-0.693) was identified to be a protective factor for intolerance to enteral nutrition in SAP patients.

CONCLUSION

The main risk factors for intolerance to enteral nutrition in SAP patients are age > 60 years, fasting time > 72 h, IAP > 20 cmH₂O, APACHE Ⅱ score > 20, and serum albumin < 25 g/L. Soluble fiber diet is able to prevent the development of intolerance to enteral nutrition in SAP patients.