Treating the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: are steroids the answer?

A Clinical Response-Adjusted Steroid Treatment Protocol for Children With Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Prednisone protocols for children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) are generally similar in dose and duration, despite wide variations in time to response. We assessed the feasibility of a novel clinical treatment protocol characterized by a shorter duration and lower cumulative dose for children with early clinical response.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonrandomized pilot clinical trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

The study population included 59 children with newly diagnosed INS treated between 2014 and 2019 who responded to treatment within 8 days.

INTERVENTION

The intervention group (n = 27) was treated with a response-adjusted protocol during which responders received an 8-week course of tapering doses of prednisone. The usual care group (n =32) was treated with the standard protocol (prednisone, 60 mg/m²/24 hours for 6 weeks, followed by 40 mg/m²/48 hours for 4 weeks, followed by a slow taper for a total of 24 weeks).

OUTCOME

Consent rate, cumulative prednisone dose, the development of frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS or SDNS, respectively), relapses per year, treatment with steroid-sparing therapies, and adverse effects of steroid therapy over 3 years of follow-up observation.

RESULTS

The consent rate was 88%. The mean cumulative steroid dose for the initial treatment was 70 mg/kg and 141 mg/kg (P < 0.001) in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively. None of the patients in the intervention group relapsed while on faster steroid taper down. The occurrence of FRNS and SDNS in the intervention group was not statistically different than in the usual care group, hazard ratios were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.37-1.73) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.30-1.27), respectively. The proportions of relapse-free patients were similar (P = 0.5), and adverse steroid events did not differ between the groups.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of randomization and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a shortened duration of steroid dosing for INS when patients demonstrate an initial clinical response to treatment. A larger study is needed to characterize the relative efficacy and toxicity of this novel treatment regimen.

FUNDING

This study received no funding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCTO2649413.

Long-term obesity prevalence and linear growth in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: is normal growth and weight control possible with steroid-sparing drugs and low-dose steroids for relapses?

BACKGROUND

Long-term steroid treatment in children is known to cause obesity and negatively affect growth. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of obesity and overweight and analyze linear growth in children with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

The study involved 265 children treated with glucocorticoids for nephrotic syndrome for a mean duration of 43 months (range: 6-167, IQR: 17, 63.3). Height, weight, and BMI SDS were recorded at each visit. Rate of change between the final and initial height, weight, and BMI was calculated (Δ score). The cumulative steroid dose (mg/kg/day) during follow-up was calculated. Relapses without significant edema were treated with low-dose steroids and steroid-sparing drugs were used in children with steroid dependency/frequent relapses.

RESULTS

Mean first BMI SDS was + 1.40 ± 1.30 and final + 0.79 ± 1.30. At initial assessment, 41.4% of the patients were obese (BMI ≥ 95^th percentile) and 19.5% were overweight (BMI 85^th-95^th percentile). At the last clinical visit, 24% were obese and 17% overweight. The children had lower BMI SDS at last clinical visit compared to initial assessment. Mean first height SDS of the cohort was - 0.11 ± 1.22 and final score 0.078 ± 1.14 (p < 0.0001). Almost 85% of patients were treated with steroid-sparing drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that children with nephrotic syndrome, despite a need for steroid treatment for active disease, can improve their obesity and overweight and also improve their linear growth from their first to last visit with us.

Optimizing the corticosteroid dose in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic (SSNS) syndrome in children has evolved surprisingly slowly since the ISKDC consensus over 50 years ago. From a move towards longer courses of corticosteroid to treat the first episode in the 1990s and 2000s, more recent large, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have unequivocally shown no benefit from an extended course, although doubt remains whether this applies across all age groups. With regard to prevention of relapses, daily ultra-low-dose prednisolone has recently been shown to be more effective than low-dose alternate-day prednisolone. Daily low-dose prednisolone for a week at the time of acute viral infection seems to be effective in the prevention of relapses but the results of a larger RCT are awaited. Recently, corticosteroid dosing to treat relapses has been questioned, with data suggesting lower doses may be as effective. The need for large RCTs to address the question of whether corticosteroid doses can be reduced was the conclusion of the authors of the recent corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children Cochrane update. This review summarizes development in thinking on corticosteroid use in SSNS and makes suggestions for areas that merit further scrutiny.

Proteinuria in Children

Although the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) removed the screening urinalysis from its health supervision guidelines in 2007, the use of the urinalysis remains an important part of pediatric care. Thus, the incidental finding of proteinuria is still commonplace when a urine sample is collected for various complaints, such as fever and abdominal pain. Knowing when to reassure a patient with proteinuria versus when to perform additional testing is a situation that general practitioners face regularly, but also one that not all may be comfortable dealing with due to the possibility of missing a diagnosis. In addition, proteinuria in certain conditions can signify renal disease and worse outcomes, so general practitioners should know how to screen and interpret the results. Understanding the common benign and pathological causes of proteinuria helps medical providers to better inform and treat their patients, and possibly avoid unnecessary additional testing or subspecialty referrals. [Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(6):e268-e272.].

Treatment of nephrotic syndrome: going beyond immunosuppressive therapy

It is indisputable that immunosuppressive therapy and pathological diagnosis of renal biopsy have greatly improved the prognosis of childhood nephrotic syndrome. Unfortunately, there is no "one-size-fits-all" approach for precise patient stratification and treatment when facing the huge challenges posed by steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). But genomic medicine has brought a glimmer of light, and the cognition of SRNS has entered a new stage. Based on this, identification of single genetic variants of SRNS has recognized the key role of podocyte injury in its pathogenesis. Targeted treatment of podocyte injury is paramount, and immunosuppressant with podocyte-targeted therapy seems to be more suitable as the first choice for SRNS, that is, we need to pay attention to their additional non-immunosuppressive effects. In the same way, other effect factors of nephrotic syndrome and the related causes of immunosuppressive therapy resistance require us to select reasonable and targeted non-immunosuppressive therapies, instead of only blindly using steroids and immunosuppressants, which may be ineffective and bring significant side effects. This article provides a summary of the clinical value of identification of genetic variants in podocytes and non-immunosuppressive therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children.