Clinical evaluation of the Prismaflex™ HF 20 set and Prismaflex™ system 7.10 for acute continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) in children

Recent Advances in Kidney Replacement Therapy in Infants: A Review

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is used to treat children and adults with acute kidney injury (AKI), fluid overload, kidney failure, inborn errors of metabolism, and severe electrolyte abnormalities. Peritoneal dialysis and extracorporeal hemodialysis/filtration can be performed for different durations (intermittent, prolonged intermittent, and continuous) through either adaptation of adult devices or use of infant-specific devices. Each of these modalities have advantages and disadvantages, and often multiple modalities are used depending on the scenario and patient-specific needs. Traditionally, these therapies have been challenging to deliver in infants due the lack of infant-specific devices, small patient size, required extracorporeal volumes, and the risk of hemodynamic stability during the initiation of KRT. In this review, we discuss challenges, recent advancements, and optimal approaches to provide KRT in hospitalized infants, including a discussion of peritoneal dialysis and extracorporeal therapies. We discuss each specific KRT modality, review newer infant-specific devices, and highlight the benefits and limitations of each modality. We also discuss the ethical implications for the care of infants who need KRT and areas for future research.

Delivering optimal renal replacement therapy to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

Critical illness is often complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI). In patients with severe AKI, renal replacement therapy (RRT) is deployed to address metabolic dysfunction and volume excess until kidney function recovers. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive update on key aspects of RRT prescription and delivery to critically ill patients. Recently completed trials have enhanced the evidence base regarding several RRT practices, most notably the timing of RRT initiation and anticoagulation for continuous therapies. Better evidence is still needed to clarify several aspects of care including optimal targets for ultrafiltration and effective strategies for RRT weaning and discontinuation.

Survival of infants treated with CKRT: comparing adapted adult platforms with the Carpediem™

BACKGROUND

The most severely ill neonates and infants with AKI who need kidney replacement therapy have had to rely upon peritoneal dialysis, or adaptations of veno-venous continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) devices for adults. Data from the Prospective Pediatric CRRT (ppCRRT) registry observed children < 10 kg had a lower survival rate than children > 10 kg (44% vs. 64%, p < 0.001). A CKRT device designed specifically for small children could improve outcomes. The Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine (CARPEDIEM™) is specifically dedicated to providing CKRT for newborns and small infants.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing patient severity of illness and outcomes between the ppCRRT and CARPEDIEM registries, involving 6 Italian pediatric intensive care units. Thirty-eight subjects from the CARPEDIEM registry and 84 subjects from the ppCRRT registry < 10 kg were screened for comparison. We compared patient outcomes with a weight-matched cohort (< 5 kg) of 34 patients from the CARPEDIEM registry and 48 patients from the ppCRRT registry.

RESULTS

The ppCRRT subjects had higher rates of vasoactive medication at CKRT initiation. Survival to CKRT termination was higher for CARPEDIEM subjects (33/34 vs. 21/48, p < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that CARPEDIEM registry cohort was the only variable to retain an association with survival to CKRT discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest children receiving CKRT using CARPEDIEM have excellent survival. Our data should be interpreted with caution given the retrospective comparison across two eras more than a decade apart.

Controversies in paediatric acute kidney injury and continuous renal replacement therapy: can paediatric care lead the way to precision acute kidney injury medicine?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Paediatric patients represent a unique challenge for providers managing acute kidney injury (AKI). Critical care for these children requires a precise approach to assessment, diagnostics and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Primarily based on observational data, large epidemiologic datasets have demonstrated a strong association between AKI prevalence (one in four critically ill children) and poor patient outcome. Drivers of AKI itself are multifactorial and the causal links between AKI and host injury remain incompletely defined, creating a management paradigm primarily supportive in nature. The previous decades of research have focused primarily on elucidating the population-level epidemiologic signal of AKI and use of renal replacement therapy (RRT), but in order to reverse the course of the AKI 'epidemic', future decades will require more attention to the individual patient. A patient-level approach to AKI in children will require sophisticated approaches to risk stratification, diagnostics and targeted utilization of therapies (both supportive and targeted towards drivers of injury).

SUMMARY

In this review, we will summarize the past, present and future of AKI care in children, discussing the ongoing work and future goals of a personalized approach to AKI medicine.

Advances in Neonatal Acute Kidney Injury

In this state-of-the-art review, we highlight the major advances over the last 5 years in neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI). Large multicenter studies reveal that neonatal AKI is common and independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The natural course of neonatal AKI, along with the risk factors, mitigation strategies, and the role of AKI on short- and long-term outcomes, is becoming clearer. Specific progress has been made in identifying potential preventive strategies for AKI, such as the use of caffeine in premature neonates, theophylline in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, and nephrotoxic medication monitoring programs. New evidence highlights the importance of the kidney in "crosstalk" between other organs and how AKI likely plays a critical role in other organ development and injury, such as intraventricular hemorrhage and lung disease. New technology has resulted in advancement in prevention and improvements in the current management in neonates with severe AKI. With specific continuous renal replacement therapy machines designed for neonates, this therapy is now available and is being used with increasing frequency in NICUs. Moving forward, biomarkers, such as urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and other new technologies, such as monitoring of renal tissue oxygenation and nephron counting, will likely play an increased role in identification of AKI and those most vulnerable for chronic kidney disease. Future research needs to be focused on determining the optimal follow-up strategy for neonates with a history of AKI to detect chronic kidney disease.

Neonatal acute kidney injury: a case-based approach

Neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI) is increasingly recognized as a common complication in critically ill neonates. Over the last 5-10 years, there have been significant advancements which have improved our understanding and ability to care for neonates with kidney disease. A variety of factors contribute to an increased risk of AKI in neonates, including decreased nephron mass and immature tubular function. Multiple factors complicate the diagnosis of AKI including low glomerular filtration rate at birth and challenges with serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function in newborns. AKI in neonates is often multifactorial, but the cause can be identified with careful diagnostic evaluation. The best approach to treatment in such patients may include diuretic therapies or kidney support therapy. Data for long-term outcomes are limited but suggest an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension in these infants. We use a case-based approach throughout this review to illustrate these concepts and highlight important evidence gaps in the diagnosis and management of neonatal AKI.

Use of the Selective Cytopheretic Device in Critically Ill Children

Introduction

Critically ill children with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) are at increased risk of death. The selective cytopheretic device (SCD) promotes an immunomodulatory effect when circuit ionized calcium (iCa²⁺) is maintained at <0.40 mmol/l with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). In a randomized trial of adult patients on CRRT, those treated with the SCD maintaining an iCa²⁺ <0.40 mmol/l had improved survival/dialysis independence. We conducted a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–sponsored study to evaluate safety and feasibility of the SCD in 16 critically ill children.

Methods

Four pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) enrolled children with AKI and multiorgan dysfunction receiving CKRT to receive the SCD integrated post-CKRT membrane. RCA was used to achieve a circuit iCa²⁺ level <0.40 mmol/l. Subjects received SCD treatment for 7 days or CKRT discontinuation, whichever came first.

Results

The FDA target enrollment of 16 subjects completed the study from December 2016 to February 2020. Mean age was 12.3 ± 5.1 years, weight was 53.8 ± 28.9 kg, and median Pediatric Risk of Mortality II was 7 (range 2–19). Circuit iCa²⁺ levels were maintained at <0.40 mmol/l for 90.2% of the SCD therapy time. Median SCD duration was 6 days. Fifteen subjects survived SCD therapy; 12 survived to ICU discharge. All ICU survivors were dialysis independent at 60 days. No SCD-related adverse events (AEs) were reported.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that SCD therapy is feasible and safe in children who require CKRT. Although we cannot make efficacy claims, the 75% survival rate and 100% renal recovery rate observed suggest a possible favorable benefit-to-risk ratio.